The Friendship Paradox in the formation of academic committees
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Transinformação (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/6717 |
Resumo: | The Friendship Paradox is a phenomenon which states that most people have fewer friends than their own friends, and its generalization has been proposed in the last three decades by several scientific papers. Our study is focused on the academic environment, and seeks to determine whether or not the impression that individuals may have concerning invitations to take part in oral defenses is justifiable. This involved testing two hypotheses with regard to academic committee members: “The Invitee Paradox” (in terms of the person who is invited); and “The Inviter Paradox” (in terms of the person who extends the invitation). The paradoxes were assessed by designing invitation networks, both weighted and unweighted, which represent a dual relationship in which an invitation originates from an “inviter” and is extended to an “invitee”. We then tested the hypotheses with the aid of two real-world open access datasets from online academic repositories: (1) American (Brazilian Capes Catalog); and (2) European (French STAR Deposit). Our results showed that only “The Invitee Paradox” was true. We also explored possible relations between our proposed measurement of the invitation paradoxes and the PageRank metric, as to evaluate the relative importance of members in the invitation networks. |
id |
PUC_CAMP-4_d26910f422744e9b5678bc1084bd466c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/6717 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_CAMP-4 |
network_name_str |
Transinformação (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Friendship Paradox in the formation of academic committeesO Paradoxo da Amizade na formação de bancas acadêmicasAcademic Committees Friendship ParadoxOral DefensesScientific CollaborationBancas Acadêmicas Paradoxo da AmizadeDefesas OraisColaboração CientíficaThe Friendship Paradox is a phenomenon which states that most people have fewer friends than their own friends, and its generalization has been proposed in the last three decades by several scientific papers. Our study is focused on the academic environment, and seeks to determine whether or not the impression that individuals may have concerning invitations to take part in oral defenses is justifiable. This involved testing two hypotheses with regard to academic committee members: “The Invitee Paradox” (in terms of the person who is invited); and “The Inviter Paradox” (in terms of the person who extends the invitation). The paradoxes were assessed by designing invitation networks, both weighted and unweighted, which represent a dual relationship in which an invitation originates from an “inviter” and is extended to an “invitee”. We then tested the hypotheses with the aid of two real-world open access datasets from online academic repositories: (1) American (Brazilian Capes Catalog); and (2) European (French STAR Deposit). Our results showed that only “The Invitee Paradox” was true. We also explored possible relations between our proposed measurement of the invitation paradoxes and the PageRank metric, as to evaluate the relative importance of members in the invitation networks.O Paradoxo da Amizade é um fenômeno que afirma que a maioria das pessoas tem menos amigos que os seus próprios amigos, e sua generalização tem sido proposta nas últimas três décadas por vários artigos científicos. Nosso estudo é focado no ambiente acadêmico, e buscadeterminar se a impressão que indivíduos podem ter referente a convites para participar de defesasorais é justificável. Isso envolveu o teste de duas hipóteses em relação aos membros de bancasacadêmicas: “O Paradoxo do Convidado” (em termos da pessoa que é convidada); e o “O Paradoxo do Convidador” (em termos da pessoa que oferece o convite). Os paradoxos foram avaliadosprojetando redes de convites, tanto ponderadas quanto não ponderadas, que representam relacionamentos duais nos quais um convite se origina de um “convidador” e é oferecido a um “convidado”. Testamos, então, as hipóteses com o auxílio de dois conjuntos de dados reais de acesso livre de repositórios acadêmicos online: (1) americano (Catálogo Brasileiro da Capes); e (2) europeu (Depósito STAR Francês). Nossos resultados mostraram que somente o “O Paradoxo do Convidado” foi verdadeiro. Também exploramos possíveis relações entre a medição proposta dos paradoxos de convites e a métrica PageRank, a fim de avaliar a importância relativa dos membros nas redes de convites.Núcleo de Editoração - PUC-Campinas2023-07-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed ArticleArtículo revisado por paresAvaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/6717Transinformação; Vol. 35 (2023); 1-14Transinformação; Vol. 35 (2023); 1-14Transinformação; v. 35 (2023); 1-142318-08890103-3786reponame:Transinformação (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)instacron:PUC_CAMPenghttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/6717/6399Copyright (c) 2023 Transinformaçãohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPloeger Mansueli, Victor AlexandreFornaziero Segura Ramos, DiogoPascual Mena-Chalco, Jesús2024-04-02T12:31:59Zoai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/6717Revistahttp://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/seer/index.php/transinfo/indexPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpsbi.nucleodeeditoracao@puc-campinas.edu.br2318-08890103-3786opendoar:2024-04-02T12:31:59Transinformação (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Friendship Paradox in the formation of academic committees O Paradoxo da Amizade na formação de bancas acadêmicas |
title |
The Friendship Paradox in the formation of academic committees |
spellingShingle |
The Friendship Paradox in the formation of academic committees Ploeger Mansueli, Victor Alexandre Academic Committees Friendship Paradox Oral Defenses Scientific Collaboration Bancas Acadêmicas Paradoxo da Amizade Defesas Orais Colaboração Científica |
title_short |
The Friendship Paradox in the formation of academic committees |
title_full |
The Friendship Paradox in the formation of academic committees |
title_fullStr |
The Friendship Paradox in the formation of academic committees |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Friendship Paradox in the formation of academic committees |
title_sort |
The Friendship Paradox in the formation of academic committees |
author |
Ploeger Mansueli, Victor Alexandre |
author_facet |
Ploeger Mansueli, Victor Alexandre Fornaziero Segura Ramos, Diogo Pascual Mena-Chalco, Jesús |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fornaziero Segura Ramos, Diogo Pascual Mena-Chalco, Jesús |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ploeger Mansueli, Victor Alexandre Fornaziero Segura Ramos, Diogo Pascual Mena-Chalco, Jesús |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Academic Committees Friendship Paradox Oral Defenses Scientific Collaboration Bancas Acadêmicas Paradoxo da Amizade Defesas Orais Colaboração Científica |
topic |
Academic Committees Friendship Paradox Oral Defenses Scientific Collaboration Bancas Acadêmicas Paradoxo da Amizade Defesas Orais Colaboração Científica |
description |
The Friendship Paradox is a phenomenon which states that most people have fewer friends than their own friends, and its generalization has been proposed in the last three decades by several scientific papers. Our study is focused on the academic environment, and seeks to determine whether or not the impression that individuals may have concerning invitations to take part in oral defenses is justifiable. This involved testing two hypotheses with regard to academic committee members: “The Invitee Paradox” (in terms of the person who is invited); and “The Inviter Paradox” (in terms of the person who extends the invitation). The paradoxes were assessed by designing invitation networks, both weighted and unweighted, which represent a dual relationship in which an invitation originates from an “inviter” and is extended to an “invitee”. We then tested the hypotheses with the aid of two real-world open access datasets from online academic repositories: (1) American (Brazilian Capes Catalog); and (2) European (French STAR Deposit). Our results showed that only “The Invitee Paradox” was true. We also explored possible relations between our proposed measurement of the invitation paradoxes and the PageRank metric, as to evaluate the relative importance of members in the invitation networks. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-07-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article Artículo revisado por pares Avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/6717 |
url |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/6717 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/6717/6399 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Transinformação https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Transinformação https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Editoração - PUC-Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Editoração - PUC-Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Transinformação; Vol. 35 (2023); 1-14 Transinformação; Vol. 35 (2023); 1-14 Transinformação; v. 35 (2023); 1-14 2318-0889 0103-3786 reponame:Transinformação (Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) instacron:PUC_CAMP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_CAMP |
institution |
PUC_CAMP |
reponame_str |
Transinformação (Online) |
collection |
Transinformação (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Transinformação (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
sbi.nucleodeeditoracao@puc-campinas.edu.br |
_version_ |
1799125986808168448 |