GENDER EQUITY IN BUSINESS SCHOOLS: What Has Been Promoted?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Galatoli, Caroline Rocha da Silva
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Irigaray, Hélio Arthur Reis
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Economia & Gestão
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/economiaegestao/article/view/15622
Resumo: The object of this research was to assess how gender discrimination is perceived by women students in Brazilian universities. It is expected that this paper can improve the gender equity discussion, specifically the glass ceiling phenomenon, exploring the gap between the women in university and those in job market. We have interviewed 33 female students of four universities in Rio de Janeiro. The interviews were transcribed and submitted to discourse analysis. We found out that discrimination occurs both by male professors and students, in classrooms, informal groups and university sports games. The reference model cited by interviewees from both universities have neutral characteristics in relation to gender typology academic described. This implies the beginning of a positive change of mindset, since previously jobs favored selection of male gender traits such as instrumentality. Instead, the interviewees value justice and ethics, for example. Considering that the educational environment reproduces society, managers should start concerning about what has been really promoted in business schools and why there is a gap between discourse and practices in those environments.
id PUC_MG-1_4530a1c49dc3ed2b572a6492e304b72e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15622
network_acronym_str PUC_MG-1
network_name_str Revista Economia & Gestão
repository_id_str
spelling GENDER EQUITY IN BUSINESS SCHOOLS: What Has Been Promoted?Gender EquityDiscriminationFeminismSexism.The object of this research was to assess how gender discrimination is perceived by women students in Brazilian universities. It is expected that this paper can improve the gender equity discussion, specifically the glass ceiling phenomenon, exploring the gap between the women in university and those in job market. We have interviewed 33 female students of four universities in Rio de Janeiro. The interviews were transcribed and submitted to discourse analysis. We found out that discrimination occurs both by male professors and students, in classrooms, informal groups and university sports games. The reference model cited by interviewees from both universities have neutral characteristics in relation to gender typology academic described. This implies the beginning of a positive change of mindset, since previously jobs favored selection of male gender traits such as instrumentality. Instead, the interviewees value justice and ethics, for example. Considering that the educational environment reproduces society, managers should start concerning about what has been really promoted in business schools and why there is a gap between discourse and practices in those environments.Editora PUC Minas2018-03-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/economiaegestao/article/view/1562210.5752/P.1984-6606.2017v17n48p62-81Revista Economia & Gestão; v. 17 n. 48 (2017): E&G - SET/DEZ; 62-811984-66061678-8982reponame:Revista Economia & Gestãoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)instacron:PUC_MINSporhttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/economiaegestao/article/view/15622/13063Copyright (c) 2018 Economia & Gestãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGalatoli, Caroline Rocha da SilvaIrigaray, Hélio Arthur Reis2019-09-16T02:52:04Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15622Revistahttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/economiaegestao/ONGhttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/economiaegestao/oai||economiaegestao@pucminas.br|| marcrez@hotmail.com|| marcrez@hotmail.com1984-66061984-6606opendoar:2019-09-16T02:52:04Revista Economia & Gestão - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv GENDER EQUITY IN BUSINESS SCHOOLS: What Has Been Promoted?
title GENDER EQUITY IN BUSINESS SCHOOLS: What Has Been Promoted?
spellingShingle GENDER EQUITY IN BUSINESS SCHOOLS: What Has Been Promoted?
Galatoli, Caroline Rocha da Silva
Gender Equity
Discrimination
Feminism
Sexism.
title_short GENDER EQUITY IN BUSINESS SCHOOLS: What Has Been Promoted?
title_full GENDER EQUITY IN BUSINESS SCHOOLS: What Has Been Promoted?
title_fullStr GENDER EQUITY IN BUSINESS SCHOOLS: What Has Been Promoted?
title_full_unstemmed GENDER EQUITY IN BUSINESS SCHOOLS: What Has Been Promoted?
title_sort GENDER EQUITY IN BUSINESS SCHOOLS: What Has Been Promoted?
author Galatoli, Caroline Rocha da Silva
author_facet Galatoli, Caroline Rocha da Silva
Irigaray, Hélio Arthur Reis
author_role author
author2 Irigaray, Hélio Arthur Reis
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Galatoli, Caroline Rocha da Silva
Irigaray, Hélio Arthur Reis
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Gender Equity
Discrimination
Feminism
Sexism.
topic Gender Equity
Discrimination
Feminism
Sexism.
description The object of this research was to assess how gender discrimination is perceived by women students in Brazilian universities. It is expected that this paper can improve the gender equity discussion, specifically the glass ceiling phenomenon, exploring the gap between the women in university and those in job market. We have interviewed 33 female students of four universities in Rio de Janeiro. The interviews were transcribed and submitted to discourse analysis. We found out that discrimination occurs both by male professors and students, in classrooms, informal groups and university sports games. The reference model cited by interviewees from both universities have neutral characteristics in relation to gender typology academic described. This implies the beginning of a positive change of mindset, since previously jobs favored selection of male gender traits such as instrumentality. Instead, the interviewees value justice and ethics, for example. Considering that the educational environment reproduces society, managers should start concerning about what has been really promoted in business schools and why there is a gap between discourse and practices in those environments.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-03-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/economiaegestao/article/view/15622
10.5752/P.1984-6606.2017v17n48p62-81
url http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/economiaegestao/article/view/15622
identifier_str_mv 10.5752/P.1984-6606.2017v17n48p62-81
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/economiaegestao/article/view/15622/13063
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Economia & Gestão
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Economia & Gestão
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora PUC Minas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora PUC Minas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Economia & Gestão; v. 17 n. 48 (2017): E&G - SET/DEZ; 62-81
1984-6606
1678-8982
reponame:Revista Economia & Gestão
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)
instacron:PUC_MINS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)
instacron_str PUC_MINS
institution PUC_MINS
reponame_str Revista Economia & Gestão
collection Revista Economia & Gestão
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Economia & Gestão - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||economiaegestao@pucminas.br|| marcrez@hotmail.com|| marcrez@hotmail.com
_version_ 1799124679759233024