CRYPT, MAUSOLEUM, CENOTAPH; SEPULCHRE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: McDonald, Angus
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito (Online)
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/Direito/article/view/23654
Resumo: Sanin-Restrepo’s theory of encryption is taken here as an instance of a practice of critique by allegory; thus the productivity of the theory can be developed and demonstrated by working through the allegorical meanings of encryption, one interpretation of which can choose to focus on the crypt. This allegorical meaning is distinct from symbolic meaning, using Benjamin’s distinction. We focus on the body and the structure, working through the instances of the visibility of the site and the presence or absence of the body. The question of visibility is significant since encryption deals with the hidden: is a crypt, then, a hiding place? We find four combinations: the concealed presence of a body, in a crypt; the publicised presence of a body, in a mausoleum; the publicised absence of a body, in a cenotaph; the concealed absence of a body, in a sepulchre. This four-way combination allows consideration of Agamben, Deleuze, Negri, and a critical Hegelianism that revisits Feuerbach, Stirner and Marx on alienatio, mapping the four metaphors in turn onto these four theoretical positions. This study of the theoretical implications of studying different modes of commemorating the corpse thus exemplifies the re-thinking possible by way of critique by allegory.
id PUC_MINS-4_c23219542df8bf174fe15c53138859a1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23654
network_acronym_str PUC_MINS-4
network_name_str Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling CRYPT, MAUSOLEUM, CENOTAPH; SEPULCHRECRIPTA, MAUSOLEO, CENOTAFIO; SEPULCROCryptMausoleumCenotaphSepulchreAllegoryCritiqueCriptaMausoleoCenotafioSepulcroAlegoríaCríticaSanin-Restrepo’s theory of encryption is taken here as an instance of a practice of critique by allegory; thus the productivity of the theory can be developed and demonstrated by working through the allegorical meanings of encryption, one interpretation of which can choose to focus on the crypt. This allegorical meaning is distinct from symbolic meaning, using Benjamin’s distinction. We focus on the body and the structure, working through the instances of the visibility of the site and the presence or absence of the body. The question of visibility is significant since encryption deals with the hidden: is a crypt, then, a hiding place? We find four combinations: the concealed presence of a body, in a crypt; the publicised presence of a body, in a mausoleum; the publicised absence of a body, in a cenotaph; the concealed absence of a body, in a sepulchre. This four-way combination allows consideration of Agamben, Deleuze, Negri, and a critical Hegelianism that revisits Feuerbach, Stirner and Marx on alienatio, mapping the four metaphors in turn onto these four theoretical positions. This study of the theoretical implications of studying different modes of commemorating the corpse thus exemplifies the re-thinking possible by way of critique by allegory.La teoría de la encriptación de Sanin-Restrepo se toma aquí como una instancia de una práctica de crítica por alegoría; así, la productividad de la teoría puede desarrollarse y demostrarse trabajando a través de los significados alegóricos de la encriptación, una interpretación que puede centrarse en la cripta. Utilizando la distinción de Benjamin entendemos que este significado alegórico es distinto del significado simbólico. Nos centramos en el cuerpo y la estructura, trabajando a través de las instancias de la visibilidad del sitio y la presencia o ausencia del cuerpo. La cuestión de la visibilidad es importante, ya que la encriptación se ocupa de lo oculto: ¿es una cripta, entonces, un escondite? Encontramos cuatro combinaciones: la presencia oculta de un cuerpo, en una cripta; la presencia pública y publicitada de un cuerpo, en un mausoleo; la ausencia publicitada de un cuerpo, en un cenotafio; La ausencia oculta de un cuerpo, en un sepulcro. Esta combinación de cuatro vías permite considerar a Agamben, Deleuze, Negri y un hegelianismo crítico que revisita Feuerbach, Stirner y Marx sobre la alienación, mapeando las cuatro metáforas en estas cuatro posiciones teóricas. Este estudio de las implicaciones teóricas de estudiar diferentes modos de conmemorar el cadáver ejemplifica así el replanteamiento posible a modo de crítica por alegoría.Editora PUC Minas2020-06-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/Direito/article/view/2365410.5752/P.2318-7999.2020v23n45p49-60Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito; v. 23 n. 45 (2020): REVISTA DA FACULDADE MINEIRA DE DIREITO - PUC MINAS; 49-602318-79991808-9429reponame:Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)instacron:PUC_MINSenghttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/Direito/article/view/23654/16906Copyright (c) 2020 Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direitoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMcDonald, Angus2022-03-10T14:15:00Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23654Revistahttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/Direito/indexPRIhttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/Direito/oai||revistafmd@pucminas.br2318-79991808-9429opendoar:2022-03-10T14:15Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv CRYPT, MAUSOLEUM, CENOTAPH; SEPULCHRE
CRIPTA, MAUSOLEO, CENOTAFIO; SEPULCRO
title CRYPT, MAUSOLEUM, CENOTAPH; SEPULCHRE
spellingShingle CRYPT, MAUSOLEUM, CENOTAPH; SEPULCHRE
McDonald, Angus
Crypt
Mausoleum
Cenotaph
Sepulchre
Allegory
Critique
Cripta
Mausoleo
Cenotafio
Sepulcro
Alegoría
Crítica
title_short CRYPT, MAUSOLEUM, CENOTAPH; SEPULCHRE
title_full CRYPT, MAUSOLEUM, CENOTAPH; SEPULCHRE
title_fullStr CRYPT, MAUSOLEUM, CENOTAPH; SEPULCHRE
title_full_unstemmed CRYPT, MAUSOLEUM, CENOTAPH; SEPULCHRE
title_sort CRYPT, MAUSOLEUM, CENOTAPH; SEPULCHRE
author McDonald, Angus
author_facet McDonald, Angus
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv McDonald, Angus
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Crypt
Mausoleum
Cenotaph
Sepulchre
Allegory
Critique
Cripta
Mausoleo
Cenotafio
Sepulcro
Alegoría
Crítica
topic Crypt
Mausoleum
Cenotaph
Sepulchre
Allegory
Critique
Cripta
Mausoleo
Cenotafio
Sepulcro
Alegoría
Crítica
description Sanin-Restrepo’s theory of encryption is taken here as an instance of a practice of critique by allegory; thus the productivity of the theory can be developed and demonstrated by working through the allegorical meanings of encryption, one interpretation of which can choose to focus on the crypt. This allegorical meaning is distinct from symbolic meaning, using Benjamin’s distinction. We focus on the body and the structure, working through the instances of the visibility of the site and the presence or absence of the body. The question of visibility is significant since encryption deals with the hidden: is a crypt, then, a hiding place? We find four combinations: the concealed presence of a body, in a crypt; the publicised presence of a body, in a mausoleum; the publicised absence of a body, in a cenotaph; the concealed absence of a body, in a sepulchre. This four-way combination allows consideration of Agamben, Deleuze, Negri, and a critical Hegelianism that revisits Feuerbach, Stirner and Marx on alienatio, mapping the four metaphors in turn onto these four theoretical positions. This study of the theoretical implications of studying different modes of commemorating the corpse thus exemplifies the re-thinking possible by way of critique by allegory.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/Direito/article/view/23654
10.5752/P.2318-7999.2020v23n45p49-60
url http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/Direito/article/view/23654
identifier_str_mv 10.5752/P.2318-7999.2020v23n45p49-60
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/Direito/article/view/23654/16906
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora PUC Minas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora PUC Minas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito; v. 23 n. 45 (2020): REVISTA DA FACULDADE MINEIRA DE DIREITO - PUC MINAS; 49-60
2318-7999
1808-9429
reponame:Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito (Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)
instacron:PUC_MINS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)
instacron_str PUC_MINS
institution PUC_MINS
reponame_str Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito (Online)
collection Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistafmd@pucminas.br
_version_ 1799124789236858880