CRYPT, MAUSOLEUM, CENOTAPH; SEPULCHRE
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/Direito/article/view/23654 |
Resumo: | Sanin-Restrepo’s theory of encryption is taken here as an instance of a practice of critique by allegory; thus the productivity of the theory can be developed and demonstrated by working through the allegorical meanings of encryption, one interpretation of which can choose to focus on the crypt. This allegorical meaning is distinct from symbolic meaning, using Benjamin’s distinction. We focus on the body and the structure, working through the instances of the visibility of the site and the presence or absence of the body. The question of visibility is significant since encryption deals with the hidden: is a crypt, then, a hiding place? We find four combinations: the concealed presence of a body, in a crypt; the publicised presence of a body, in a mausoleum; the publicised absence of a body, in a cenotaph; the concealed absence of a body, in a sepulchre. This four-way combination allows consideration of Agamben, Deleuze, Negri, and a critical Hegelianism that revisits Feuerbach, Stirner and Marx on alienatio, mapping the four metaphors in turn onto these four theoretical positions. This study of the theoretical implications of studying different modes of commemorating the corpse thus exemplifies the re-thinking possible by way of critique by allegory. |
id |
PUC_MINS-4_c23219542df8bf174fe15c53138859a1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23654 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_MINS-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
CRYPT, MAUSOLEUM, CENOTAPH; SEPULCHRECRIPTA, MAUSOLEO, CENOTAFIO; SEPULCROCryptMausoleumCenotaphSepulchreAllegoryCritiqueCriptaMausoleoCenotafioSepulcroAlegoríaCríticaSanin-Restrepo’s theory of encryption is taken here as an instance of a practice of critique by allegory; thus the productivity of the theory can be developed and demonstrated by working through the allegorical meanings of encryption, one interpretation of which can choose to focus on the crypt. This allegorical meaning is distinct from symbolic meaning, using Benjamin’s distinction. We focus on the body and the structure, working through the instances of the visibility of the site and the presence or absence of the body. The question of visibility is significant since encryption deals with the hidden: is a crypt, then, a hiding place? We find four combinations: the concealed presence of a body, in a crypt; the publicised presence of a body, in a mausoleum; the publicised absence of a body, in a cenotaph; the concealed absence of a body, in a sepulchre. This four-way combination allows consideration of Agamben, Deleuze, Negri, and a critical Hegelianism that revisits Feuerbach, Stirner and Marx on alienatio, mapping the four metaphors in turn onto these four theoretical positions. This study of the theoretical implications of studying different modes of commemorating the corpse thus exemplifies the re-thinking possible by way of critique by allegory.La teoría de la encriptación de Sanin-Restrepo se toma aquí como una instancia de una práctica de crítica por alegoría; así, la productividad de la teoría puede desarrollarse y demostrarse trabajando a través de los significados alegóricos de la encriptación, una interpretación que puede centrarse en la cripta. Utilizando la distinción de Benjamin entendemos que este significado alegórico es distinto del significado simbólico. Nos centramos en el cuerpo y la estructura, trabajando a través de las instancias de la visibilidad del sitio y la presencia o ausencia del cuerpo. La cuestión de la visibilidad es importante, ya que la encriptación se ocupa de lo oculto: ¿es una cripta, entonces, un escondite? Encontramos cuatro combinaciones: la presencia oculta de un cuerpo, en una cripta; la presencia pública y publicitada de un cuerpo, en un mausoleo; la ausencia publicitada de un cuerpo, en un cenotafio; La ausencia oculta de un cuerpo, en un sepulcro. Esta combinación de cuatro vías permite considerar a Agamben, Deleuze, Negri y un hegelianismo crítico que revisita Feuerbach, Stirner y Marx sobre la alienación, mapeando las cuatro metáforas en estas cuatro posiciones teóricas. Este estudio de las implicaciones teóricas de estudiar diferentes modos de conmemorar el cadáver ejemplifica así el replanteamiento posible a modo de crítica por alegoría.Editora PUC Minas2020-06-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/Direito/article/view/2365410.5752/P.2318-7999.2020v23n45p49-60Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito; v. 23 n. 45 (2020): REVISTA DA FACULDADE MINEIRA DE DIREITO - PUC MINAS; 49-602318-79991808-9429reponame:Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)instacron:PUC_MINSenghttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/Direito/article/view/23654/16906Copyright (c) 2020 Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direitoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMcDonald, Angus2022-03-10T14:15:00Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23654Revistahttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/Direito/indexPRIhttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/Direito/oai||revistafmd@pucminas.br2318-79991808-9429opendoar:2022-03-10T14:15Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
CRYPT, MAUSOLEUM, CENOTAPH; SEPULCHRE CRIPTA, MAUSOLEO, CENOTAFIO; SEPULCRO |
title |
CRYPT, MAUSOLEUM, CENOTAPH; SEPULCHRE |
spellingShingle |
CRYPT, MAUSOLEUM, CENOTAPH; SEPULCHRE McDonald, Angus Crypt Mausoleum Cenotaph Sepulchre Allegory Critique Cripta Mausoleo Cenotafio Sepulcro Alegoría Crítica |
title_short |
CRYPT, MAUSOLEUM, CENOTAPH; SEPULCHRE |
title_full |
CRYPT, MAUSOLEUM, CENOTAPH; SEPULCHRE |
title_fullStr |
CRYPT, MAUSOLEUM, CENOTAPH; SEPULCHRE |
title_full_unstemmed |
CRYPT, MAUSOLEUM, CENOTAPH; SEPULCHRE |
title_sort |
CRYPT, MAUSOLEUM, CENOTAPH; SEPULCHRE |
author |
McDonald, Angus |
author_facet |
McDonald, Angus |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
McDonald, Angus |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Crypt Mausoleum Cenotaph Sepulchre Allegory Critique Cripta Mausoleo Cenotafio Sepulcro Alegoría Crítica |
topic |
Crypt Mausoleum Cenotaph Sepulchre Allegory Critique Cripta Mausoleo Cenotafio Sepulcro Alegoría Crítica |
description |
Sanin-Restrepo’s theory of encryption is taken here as an instance of a practice of critique by allegory; thus the productivity of the theory can be developed and demonstrated by working through the allegorical meanings of encryption, one interpretation of which can choose to focus on the crypt. This allegorical meaning is distinct from symbolic meaning, using Benjamin’s distinction. We focus on the body and the structure, working through the instances of the visibility of the site and the presence or absence of the body. The question of visibility is significant since encryption deals with the hidden: is a crypt, then, a hiding place? We find four combinations: the concealed presence of a body, in a crypt; the publicised presence of a body, in a mausoleum; the publicised absence of a body, in a cenotaph; the concealed absence of a body, in a sepulchre. This four-way combination allows consideration of Agamben, Deleuze, Negri, and a critical Hegelianism that revisits Feuerbach, Stirner and Marx on alienatio, mapping the four metaphors in turn onto these four theoretical positions. This study of the theoretical implications of studying different modes of commemorating the corpse thus exemplifies the re-thinking possible by way of critique by allegory. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-06-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/Direito/article/view/23654 10.5752/P.2318-7999.2020v23n45p49-60 |
url |
http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/Direito/article/view/23654 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5752/P.2318-7999.2020v23n45p49-60 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/Direito/article/view/23654/16906 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora PUC Minas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora PUC Minas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito; v. 23 n. 45 (2020): REVISTA DA FACULDADE MINEIRA DE DIREITO - PUC MINAS; 49-60 2318-7999 1808-9429 reponame:Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito (Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas) instacron:PUC_MINS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas) |
instacron_str |
PUC_MINS |
institution |
PUC_MINS |
reponame_str |
Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito (Online) |
collection |
Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistafmd@pucminas.br |
_version_ |
1799124789236858880 |