The critical dialogue between Ángel Rama and Antonio Candido in the perspective of Gadamer’s hermeneutics

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Canani, Ney A. G.
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Scripta
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/scripta/article/view/22153
Resumo: The temporal distance that separates us from the work of Candido and Rama allow us to situate these authors within a historical period – marked by the consolidation of the national state and the belief in modernization as a homogenizing force in society – which has already been ended and can thus be seen as a unity in itself. In Gadamer terms, one can say that this tradition is sufficiently dead so that we can comprehend it as a whole. On the other hand, the problems that affect Latin American criticism today are not so different from the ones tackled by those authors. Because the effects of the tradition of Candido and Rama can still be felt today, there is interest in keeping alive a dialogue with them. In this process, we are invited to rethink our place in the tradition which was handed down to us and reconcile aesthetics with cultural criticism.
id PUC_MINS-6_a92e8a9c6e2f2930b93736f12ce84c73
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22153
network_acronym_str PUC_MINS-6
network_name_str Revista Scripta
repository_id_str
spelling The critical dialogue between Ángel Rama and Antonio Candido in the perspective of Gadamer’s hermeneuticsO diálogo crítico de Ángel Rama e Antonio Candido na perspectiva da hermenêutica de GadamerHermeneuticsLiterary CriticismCultural CriticismAntonio CandidoÁngel RamaHermenêuticaCrítica LiteráriaCrítica CulturalAntonio CandidoÁngel RamaThe temporal distance that separates us from the work of Candido and Rama allow us to situate these authors within a historical period – marked by the consolidation of the national state and the belief in modernization as a homogenizing force in society – which has already been ended and can thus be seen as a unity in itself. In Gadamer terms, one can say that this tradition is sufficiently dead so that we can comprehend it as a whole. On the other hand, the problems that affect Latin American criticism today are not so different from the ones tackled by those authors. Because the effects of the tradition of Candido and Rama can still be felt today, there is interest in keeping alive a dialogue with them. In this process, we are invited to rethink our place in the tradition which was handed down to us and reconcile aesthetics with cultural criticism. A distância temporal que nos separa da obra de Candido e Rama permite que os situemos em um período histórico – marcado pela consolidação do estado nacional e a crença na modernização como uma força homogeneizadora na sociedade – que já foi concluído e, portanto, pode ser visto como uma unidade. Nos termos de Gadamer, pode-se dizer que essa tradição está suficientemente morta para que possa ser compreendida por inteiro. Por outro lado, os problemas que afetam a crítica literária latino-americana hoje não são tão diferentes daqueles enfrentados por esses autores. Porque os efeitos da tradição de Candido e Rama ainda se fazem sentir, existe interesse em manter vivo um diálogo com eles. Nesse processo, somos convidados a repensar nosso lugar na tradição que nos foi transmitida e reconciliar a estética com a crítica cultural. PUC Minas2019-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/scripta/article/view/2215310.5752/P.2358-3428.2019v23n49p167-199Scripta; Vol 23 No 49 (2019): Antonio Candido: teacher, critic, politician; 167-199Scripta; v. 23 n. 49 (2019): Antonio Candido: professor, crítico, político; 167-1992358-34281516-4039reponame:Revista Scriptainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)instacron:PUC_MINSporhttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/scripta/article/view/22153/16265http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCanani, Ney A. G. 2022-02-17T06:34:43Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22153Revistahttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/scripta/userhttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/scripta/oai||cespuc@pucminas.br2358-34281516-4039opendoar:2022-02-17T06:34:43Revista Scripta - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The critical dialogue between Ángel Rama and Antonio Candido in the perspective of Gadamer’s hermeneutics
O diálogo crítico de Ángel Rama e Antonio Candido na perspectiva da hermenêutica de Gadamer
title The critical dialogue between Ángel Rama and Antonio Candido in the perspective of Gadamer’s hermeneutics
spellingShingle The critical dialogue between Ángel Rama and Antonio Candido in the perspective of Gadamer’s hermeneutics
Canani, Ney A. G.
Hermeneutics
Literary Criticism
Cultural Criticism
Antonio Candido
Ángel Rama
Hermenêutica
Crítica Literária
Crítica Cultural
Antonio Candido
Ángel Rama
title_short The critical dialogue between Ángel Rama and Antonio Candido in the perspective of Gadamer’s hermeneutics
title_full The critical dialogue between Ángel Rama and Antonio Candido in the perspective of Gadamer’s hermeneutics
title_fullStr The critical dialogue between Ángel Rama and Antonio Candido in the perspective of Gadamer’s hermeneutics
title_full_unstemmed The critical dialogue between Ángel Rama and Antonio Candido in the perspective of Gadamer’s hermeneutics
title_sort The critical dialogue between Ángel Rama and Antonio Candido in the perspective of Gadamer’s hermeneutics
author Canani, Ney A. G.
author_facet Canani, Ney A. G.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Canani, Ney A. G.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hermeneutics
Literary Criticism
Cultural Criticism
Antonio Candido
Ángel Rama
Hermenêutica
Crítica Literária
Crítica Cultural
Antonio Candido
Ángel Rama
topic Hermeneutics
Literary Criticism
Cultural Criticism
Antonio Candido
Ángel Rama
Hermenêutica
Crítica Literária
Crítica Cultural
Antonio Candido
Ángel Rama
description The temporal distance that separates us from the work of Candido and Rama allow us to situate these authors within a historical period – marked by the consolidation of the national state and the belief in modernization as a homogenizing force in society – which has already been ended and can thus be seen as a unity in itself. In Gadamer terms, one can say that this tradition is sufficiently dead so that we can comprehend it as a whole. On the other hand, the problems that affect Latin American criticism today are not so different from the ones tackled by those authors. Because the effects of the tradition of Candido and Rama can still be felt today, there is interest in keeping alive a dialogue with them. In this process, we are invited to rethink our place in the tradition which was handed down to us and reconcile aesthetics with cultural criticism.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/scripta/article/view/22153
10.5752/P.2358-3428.2019v23n49p167-199
url http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/scripta/article/view/22153
identifier_str_mv 10.5752/P.2358-3428.2019v23n49p167-199
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/scripta/article/view/22153/16265
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv PUC Minas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv PUC Minas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scripta; Vol 23 No 49 (2019): Antonio Candido: teacher, critic, politician; 167-199
Scripta; v. 23 n. 49 (2019): Antonio Candido: professor, crítico, político; 167-199
2358-3428
1516-4039
reponame:Revista Scripta
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)
instacron:PUC_MINS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)
instacron_str PUC_MINS
institution PUC_MINS
reponame_str Revista Scripta
collection Revista Scripta
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Scripta - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||cespuc@pucminas.br
_version_ 1798329531381055488