The critical dialogue between Ángel Rama and Antonio Candido in the perspective of Gadamer’s hermeneutics
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Scripta |
Texto Completo: | http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/scripta/article/view/22153 |
Resumo: | The temporal distance that separates us from the work of Candido and Rama allow us to situate these authors within a historical period – marked by the consolidation of the national state and the belief in modernization as a homogenizing force in society – which has already been ended and can thus be seen as a unity in itself. In Gadamer terms, one can say that this tradition is sufficiently dead so that we can comprehend it as a whole. On the other hand, the problems that affect Latin American criticism today are not so different from the ones tackled by those authors. Because the effects of the tradition of Candido and Rama can still be felt today, there is interest in keeping alive a dialogue with them. In this process, we are invited to rethink our place in the tradition which was handed down to us and reconcile aesthetics with cultural criticism. |
id |
PUC_MINS-6_a92e8a9c6e2f2930b93736f12ce84c73 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22153 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_MINS-6 |
network_name_str |
Revista Scripta |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The critical dialogue between Ángel Rama and Antonio Candido in the perspective of Gadamer’s hermeneuticsO diálogo crítico de Ángel Rama e Antonio Candido na perspectiva da hermenêutica de GadamerHermeneuticsLiterary CriticismCultural CriticismAntonio CandidoÁngel RamaHermenêuticaCrítica LiteráriaCrítica CulturalAntonio CandidoÁngel RamaThe temporal distance that separates us from the work of Candido and Rama allow us to situate these authors within a historical period – marked by the consolidation of the national state and the belief in modernization as a homogenizing force in society – which has already been ended and can thus be seen as a unity in itself. In Gadamer terms, one can say that this tradition is sufficiently dead so that we can comprehend it as a whole. On the other hand, the problems that affect Latin American criticism today are not so different from the ones tackled by those authors. Because the effects of the tradition of Candido and Rama can still be felt today, there is interest in keeping alive a dialogue with them. In this process, we are invited to rethink our place in the tradition which was handed down to us and reconcile aesthetics with cultural criticism. A distância temporal que nos separa da obra de Candido e Rama permite que os situemos em um período histórico – marcado pela consolidação do estado nacional e a crença na modernização como uma força homogeneizadora na sociedade – que já foi concluído e, portanto, pode ser visto como uma unidade. Nos termos de Gadamer, pode-se dizer que essa tradição está suficientemente morta para que possa ser compreendida por inteiro. Por outro lado, os problemas que afetam a crítica literária latino-americana hoje não são tão diferentes daqueles enfrentados por esses autores. Porque os efeitos da tradição de Candido e Rama ainda se fazem sentir, existe interesse em manter vivo um diálogo com eles. Nesse processo, somos convidados a repensar nosso lugar na tradição que nos foi transmitida e reconciliar a estética com a crítica cultural. PUC Minas2019-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/scripta/article/view/2215310.5752/P.2358-3428.2019v23n49p167-199Scripta; Vol 23 No 49 (2019): Antonio Candido: teacher, critic, politician; 167-199Scripta; v. 23 n. 49 (2019): Antonio Candido: professor, crítico, político; 167-1992358-34281516-4039reponame:Revista Scriptainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)instacron:PUC_MINSporhttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/scripta/article/view/22153/16265http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCanani, Ney A. G. 2022-02-17T06:34:43Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22153Revistahttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/scripta/userhttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/scripta/oai||cespuc@pucminas.br2358-34281516-4039opendoar:2022-02-17T06:34:43Revista Scripta - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The critical dialogue between Ángel Rama and Antonio Candido in the perspective of Gadamer’s hermeneutics O diálogo crítico de Ángel Rama e Antonio Candido na perspectiva da hermenêutica de Gadamer |
title |
The critical dialogue between Ángel Rama and Antonio Candido in the perspective of Gadamer’s hermeneutics |
spellingShingle |
The critical dialogue between Ángel Rama and Antonio Candido in the perspective of Gadamer’s hermeneutics Canani, Ney A. G. Hermeneutics Literary Criticism Cultural Criticism Antonio Candido Ángel Rama Hermenêutica Crítica Literária Crítica Cultural Antonio Candido Ángel Rama |
title_short |
The critical dialogue between Ángel Rama and Antonio Candido in the perspective of Gadamer’s hermeneutics |
title_full |
The critical dialogue between Ángel Rama and Antonio Candido in the perspective of Gadamer’s hermeneutics |
title_fullStr |
The critical dialogue between Ángel Rama and Antonio Candido in the perspective of Gadamer’s hermeneutics |
title_full_unstemmed |
The critical dialogue between Ángel Rama and Antonio Candido in the perspective of Gadamer’s hermeneutics |
title_sort |
The critical dialogue between Ángel Rama and Antonio Candido in the perspective of Gadamer’s hermeneutics |
author |
Canani, Ney A. G. |
author_facet |
Canani, Ney A. G. |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Canani, Ney A. G. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Hermeneutics Literary Criticism Cultural Criticism Antonio Candido Ángel Rama Hermenêutica Crítica Literária Crítica Cultural Antonio Candido Ángel Rama |
topic |
Hermeneutics Literary Criticism Cultural Criticism Antonio Candido Ángel Rama Hermenêutica Crítica Literária Crítica Cultural Antonio Candido Ángel Rama |
description |
The temporal distance that separates us from the work of Candido and Rama allow us to situate these authors within a historical period – marked by the consolidation of the national state and the belief in modernization as a homogenizing force in society – which has already been ended and can thus be seen as a unity in itself. In Gadamer terms, one can say that this tradition is sufficiently dead so that we can comprehend it as a whole. On the other hand, the problems that affect Latin American criticism today are not so different from the ones tackled by those authors. Because the effects of the tradition of Candido and Rama can still be felt today, there is interest in keeping alive a dialogue with them. In this process, we are invited to rethink our place in the tradition which was handed down to us and reconcile aesthetics with cultural criticism. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/scripta/article/view/22153 10.5752/P.2358-3428.2019v23n49p167-199 |
url |
http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/scripta/article/view/22153 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5752/P.2358-3428.2019v23n49p167-199 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/scripta/article/view/22153/16265 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
PUC Minas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
PUC Minas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scripta; Vol 23 No 49 (2019): Antonio Candido: teacher, critic, politician; 167-199 Scripta; v. 23 n. 49 (2019): Antonio Candido: professor, crítico, político; 167-199 2358-3428 1516-4039 reponame:Revista Scripta instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas) instacron:PUC_MINS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas) |
instacron_str |
PUC_MINS |
institution |
PUC_MINS |
reponame_str |
Revista Scripta |
collection |
Revista Scripta |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Scripta - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||cespuc@pucminas.br |
_version_ |
1798329531381055488 |