Machado de Assis and the chronicle: “Martinha’s Dagger” - the dialogical debate of memory
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos CESPUC de Pesquisa |
Texto Completo: | http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/cadernoscespuc/article/view/24696 |
Resumo: | This paper contemplates the social orientation of memory as a space of dialogical debates over the facts that constitutes themselves, by contraposition and confrontation, as recollections or memories forgotten. From the centripetal forces perspective, there are the facts that ought to be remembered but also those that must be forgotten and left as residues. Paradoxically, when the centrifugal forces approach forgetfulness in such manner they appropriate this semiotic matter reconnecting the recollection as a festival of resurrection of its social sense. Considering this ideological division scenery and acknowledging a certain exceedance and exteriority on our approach of Machado de Assis’ story, “O Punhal de Martinha” (Martinha’s dagger), this text analyzes the refractions suggested by the author-creator whilst he axiologically claims forgetfulness as the social place of action of the centrifugal forces. “The dagger” as a sign or a social response derived from the contraposition or confrontation of the social voices starts to be considered as a metonymy of the responses of social rating/evaluation that the centripetal and the centrifugal forces attach to the ideologized position of women in social interactions as they place men as the dominant beings. In the author-creator’s refractions it is highlighted the recollection of what was supposed to be forgotten, therefore, women’s social independence and assertiveness. Hence, it is impossible to forget Martinha as it was aimed by centrifugal forces though it is possible to remember Lucrécia as it was intended by the centripetal forces when they favour subordination and non-assertiveness while regarding women’s social position. |
id |
PUC_MINS-7_63e74b986b255959e7bd3e5fc760d829 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24696 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_MINS-7 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos CESPUC de Pesquisa |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Machado de Assis and the chronicle: “Martinha’s Dagger” - the dialogical debate of memoryMachado de Assis e a crônica: “O punhal de Martinha” – o debate dialógico da memóriaAuthor-creatorCentripetal forcesCentrifugal forcesRecollectionAutor-criadorForças centrípetasForças centrífugasLembrançaThis paper contemplates the social orientation of memory as a space of dialogical debates over the facts that constitutes themselves, by contraposition and confrontation, as recollections or memories forgotten. From the centripetal forces perspective, there are the facts that ought to be remembered but also those that must be forgotten and left as residues. Paradoxically, when the centrifugal forces approach forgetfulness in such manner they appropriate this semiotic matter reconnecting the recollection as a festival of resurrection of its social sense. Considering this ideological division scenery and acknowledging a certain exceedance and exteriority on our approach of Machado de Assis’ story, “O Punhal de Martinha” (Martinha’s dagger), this text analyzes the refractions suggested by the author-creator whilst he axiologically claims forgetfulness as the social place of action of the centrifugal forces. “The dagger” as a sign or a social response derived from the contraposition or confrontation of the social voices starts to be considered as a metonymy of the responses of social rating/evaluation that the centripetal and the centrifugal forces attach to the ideologized position of women in social interactions as they place men as the dominant beings. In the author-creator’s refractions it is highlighted the recollection of what was supposed to be forgotten, therefore, women’s social independence and assertiveness. Hence, it is impossible to forget Martinha as it was aimed by centrifugal forces though it is possible to remember Lucrécia as it was intended by the centripetal forces when they favour subordination and non-assertiveness while regarding women’s social position.A publicação propõe-se a refletir sobre a orientação social da memória como espaço de debate dialógico entre os fatos que se constituem, na contraposição e no confronto, como material de lembrança ou de esquecimento. Do ponto de vista das forças centrípetas há, axiologicamente, fatos que devem ser lembrados, mas há fatos que devem ser esquecidos como restos. Contraditoriamente, as forças centrífugas, ao tomarem, desse modo, o esquecimento, apropriam-se, axiologicamente, de tal material semiótico, rearticulando a sua lembrança como festa de ressurreição de seu sentido social. Em face desse quadro de divisão ideológica, assumindo uma certa exterioridade e uma certa excedência em relação à crônica, “O Punhal de Martinha”, do autor-criador de Machado de Assis, o texto desta publicação analisa as refrações que esse autor propõe ao tomar a defesa axiológica do esquecimento como lugar social de ação das forças centrífugas. Nisso o punhal, como signo, ou resposta social que ocorre na contraposição e no confronto das vozes sociais, passa a ser considerado como metonímia das respostas da valoração/avaliação social que as forças centrípetas e centrífugas atribuem à posição ideologizada para a mulher nas relações que axiologicamente situam o homem como figura dominante. Nas refrações do autor-criador, torna-se importante a lembrança do que seria esquecido, ou seja, a posição social de independência e assertividade da mulher. Por isso é impossível esquecer Martinha como desejam as forças centrífugas, ainda que se possa lembrar de Lucrécia como pretendem as forças centrípetas ao privilegiarem, para a mulher, a posição social de dependência e não-assertividade.Editora PUC Minas2020-12-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/cadernoscespuc/article/view/2469610.5752/P.2358-3231.2020n37p217-235Cadernos CESPUC de Pesquisa Série Ensaios; n. 37 (2020): Dialogicidade e heterogeneidade das e nas práticas da linguagem; 217-2352358-3231reponame:Cadernos CESPUC de Pesquisainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)instacron:PUC_MINSporhttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/cadernoscespuc/article/view/24696/17557Copyright (c) 2020 Cadernos CESPUC de Pesquisa Série Ensaioshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCampos, Edson NascimentoTimóteo, Herbert de OliveiraDiniz Filho, Mariano Alves 2021-01-08T10:49:31Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24696Revistahttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/cadernoscespuc/indexhttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/cadernoscespuc/oaicespuc@pucminas.br||cespuc@pucminas.br2358-32311516-4020opendoar:2021-01-08T10:49:31Cadernos CESPUC de Pesquisa - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Machado de Assis and the chronicle: “Martinha’s Dagger” - the dialogical debate of memory Machado de Assis e a crônica: “O punhal de Martinha” – o debate dialógico da memória |
title |
Machado de Assis and the chronicle: “Martinha’s Dagger” - the dialogical debate of memory |
spellingShingle |
Machado de Assis and the chronicle: “Martinha’s Dagger” - the dialogical debate of memory Campos, Edson Nascimento Author-creator Centripetal forces Centrifugal forces Recollection Autor-criador Forças centrípetas Forças centrífugas Lembrança |
title_short |
Machado de Assis and the chronicle: “Martinha’s Dagger” - the dialogical debate of memory |
title_full |
Machado de Assis and the chronicle: “Martinha’s Dagger” - the dialogical debate of memory |
title_fullStr |
Machado de Assis and the chronicle: “Martinha’s Dagger” - the dialogical debate of memory |
title_full_unstemmed |
Machado de Assis and the chronicle: “Martinha’s Dagger” - the dialogical debate of memory |
title_sort |
Machado de Assis and the chronicle: “Martinha’s Dagger” - the dialogical debate of memory |
author |
Campos, Edson Nascimento |
author_facet |
Campos, Edson Nascimento Timóteo, Herbert de Oliveira Diniz Filho, Mariano Alves |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Timóteo, Herbert de Oliveira Diniz Filho, Mariano Alves |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Campos, Edson Nascimento Timóteo, Herbert de Oliveira Diniz Filho, Mariano Alves |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Author-creator Centripetal forces Centrifugal forces Recollection Autor-criador Forças centrípetas Forças centrífugas Lembrança |
topic |
Author-creator Centripetal forces Centrifugal forces Recollection Autor-criador Forças centrípetas Forças centrífugas Lembrança |
description |
This paper contemplates the social orientation of memory as a space of dialogical debates over the facts that constitutes themselves, by contraposition and confrontation, as recollections or memories forgotten. From the centripetal forces perspective, there are the facts that ought to be remembered but also those that must be forgotten and left as residues. Paradoxically, when the centrifugal forces approach forgetfulness in such manner they appropriate this semiotic matter reconnecting the recollection as a festival of resurrection of its social sense. Considering this ideological division scenery and acknowledging a certain exceedance and exteriority on our approach of Machado de Assis’ story, “O Punhal de Martinha” (Martinha’s dagger), this text analyzes the refractions suggested by the author-creator whilst he axiologically claims forgetfulness as the social place of action of the centrifugal forces. “The dagger” as a sign or a social response derived from the contraposition or confrontation of the social voices starts to be considered as a metonymy of the responses of social rating/evaluation that the centripetal and the centrifugal forces attach to the ideologized position of women in social interactions as they place men as the dominant beings. In the author-creator’s refractions it is highlighted the recollection of what was supposed to be forgotten, therefore, women’s social independence and assertiveness. Hence, it is impossible to forget Martinha as it was aimed by centrifugal forces though it is possible to remember Lucrécia as it was intended by the centripetal forces when they favour subordination and non-assertiveness while regarding women’s social position. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-02 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/cadernoscespuc/article/view/24696 10.5752/P.2358-3231.2020n37p217-235 |
url |
http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/cadernoscespuc/article/view/24696 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5752/P.2358-3231.2020n37p217-235 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/cadernoscespuc/article/view/24696/17557 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Cadernos CESPUC de Pesquisa Série Ensaios https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Cadernos CESPUC de Pesquisa Série Ensaios https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora PUC Minas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora PUC Minas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos CESPUC de Pesquisa Série Ensaios; n. 37 (2020): Dialogicidade e heterogeneidade das e nas práticas da linguagem; 217-235 2358-3231 reponame:Cadernos CESPUC de Pesquisa instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas) instacron:PUC_MINS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas) |
instacron_str |
PUC_MINS |
institution |
PUC_MINS |
reponame_str |
Cadernos CESPUC de Pesquisa |
collection |
Cadernos CESPUC de Pesquisa |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos CESPUC de Pesquisa - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cespuc@pucminas.br||cespuc@pucminas.br |
_version_ |
1798329684622049280 |