Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfort
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Fisioterapia em Movimento |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/12725 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Functional resistance training (FRT) is becoming increasingly popular to improve physical fitness of practitioners, however, yet there are gaps in knowledge about effectiveness of FRT in relation conventional resistance training (CRT) in several ambits, as musculoskeletal complaints. Objective: Compare the effect of FRT and CRT in the musculoskeletal discomfort and magnitude of gain in muscle strength in healthy women. Methods: 52 women was divided into three groups, FRT (n = 15; 22 ± 2.35 years): functional resistance training; CRT (n = 14; 22.5 ± 1.78 years): conventional resistance training and CG (n = 13; 20.6 ± 1.10 years): no type of intervention. The training was periodized in 30 sessions over 12 weeks with 3 sessions per week. For the muscle strength variable used the 1RM test and for the musculoskeletal discomfort variable, the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ). Regarding the statistical analysis, all results took into consideration a 5% level of significance. Results: Considerable gain in muscle strength was observed for all exercises in both training groups. In addition, there was a tendency in CRT to relate a more musculoskeletal discomfort; presented 27.3% more complaints compared FRT in the MNQ. Conclusion: The FRT was as effective as the CRT for improving muscle strength, furthermore, there was a tendency for FRT to cause less musculoskeletal discomfort. |
id |
PUC_PR-26_049071a841fce85d13ab37303bd7af45 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/12725 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_PR-26 |
network_name_str |
Fisioterapia em Movimento |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfortIntroduction: Functional resistance training (FRT) is becoming increasingly popular to improve physical fitness of practitioners, however, yet there are gaps in knowledge about effectiveness of FRT in relation conventional resistance training (CRT) in several ambits, as musculoskeletal complaints. Objective: Compare the effect of FRT and CRT in the musculoskeletal discomfort and magnitude of gain in muscle strength in healthy women. Methods: 52 women was divided into three groups, FRT (n = 15; 22 ± 2.35 years): functional resistance training; CRT (n = 14; 22.5 ± 1.78 years): conventional resistance training and CG (n = 13; 20.6 ± 1.10 years): no type of intervention. The training was periodized in 30 sessions over 12 weeks with 3 sessions per week. For the muscle strength variable used the 1RM test and for the musculoskeletal discomfort variable, the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ). Regarding the statistical analysis, all results took into consideration a 5% level of significance. Results: Considerable gain in muscle strength was observed for all exercises in both training groups. In addition, there was a tendency in CRT to relate a more musculoskeletal discomfort; presented 27.3% more complaints compared FRT in the MNQ. Conclusion: The FRT was as effective as the CRT for improving muscle strength, furthermore, there was a tendency for FRT to cause less musculoskeletal discomfort.Editora PUCPRESS2017-09-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/1272510.1590/1980-5918.030.002.AO15Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 30 No. 2 (2017)Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 30 n. 2 (2017)1980-5918reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimentoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)instacron:PUC_PRenghttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/12725/12059Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESSinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMontechieze Cassemiro, BrunaRibeiro Lemes, ÍtaloFerreira de Figueiredo, Maria PaulaMarques Vanderlei, FrancielePastre, Carlos MarceloNetto Júnior, Jayme2022-03-07T18:58:53Zoai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/12725Revistahttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisioPRIhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/oairubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br1980-59180103-5150opendoar:2022-03-07T18:58:53Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfort |
title |
Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfort |
spellingShingle |
Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfort Montechieze Cassemiro, Bruna |
title_short |
Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfort |
title_full |
Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfort |
title_fullStr |
Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfort |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfort |
title_sort |
Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfort |
author |
Montechieze Cassemiro, Bruna |
author_facet |
Montechieze Cassemiro, Bruna Ribeiro Lemes, Ítalo Ferreira de Figueiredo, Maria Paula Marques Vanderlei, Franciele Pastre, Carlos Marcelo Netto Júnior, Jayme |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ribeiro Lemes, Ítalo Ferreira de Figueiredo, Maria Paula Marques Vanderlei, Franciele Pastre, Carlos Marcelo Netto Júnior, Jayme |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Montechieze Cassemiro, Bruna Ribeiro Lemes, Ítalo Ferreira de Figueiredo, Maria Paula Marques Vanderlei, Franciele Pastre, Carlos Marcelo Netto Júnior, Jayme |
description |
Introduction: Functional resistance training (FRT) is becoming increasingly popular to improve physical fitness of practitioners, however, yet there are gaps in knowledge about effectiveness of FRT in relation conventional resistance training (CRT) in several ambits, as musculoskeletal complaints. Objective: Compare the effect of FRT and CRT in the musculoskeletal discomfort and magnitude of gain in muscle strength in healthy women. Methods: 52 women was divided into three groups, FRT (n = 15; 22 ± 2.35 years): functional resistance training; CRT (n = 14; 22.5 ± 1.78 years): conventional resistance training and CG (n = 13; 20.6 ± 1.10 years): no type of intervention. The training was periodized in 30 sessions over 12 weeks with 3 sessions per week. For the muscle strength variable used the 1RM test and for the musculoskeletal discomfort variable, the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ). Regarding the statistical analysis, all results took into consideration a 5% level of significance. Results: Considerable gain in muscle strength was observed for all exercises in both training groups. In addition, there was a tendency in CRT to relate a more musculoskeletal discomfort; presented 27.3% more complaints compared FRT in the MNQ. Conclusion: The FRT was as effective as the CRT for improving muscle strength, furthermore, there was a tendency for FRT to cause less musculoskeletal discomfort. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-09-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/12725 10.1590/1980-5918.030.002.AO15 |
url |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/12725 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1980-5918.030.002.AO15 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/12725/12059 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESS info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESS |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora PUCPRESS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora PUCPRESS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 30 No. 2 (2017) Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 30 n. 2 (2017) 1980-5918 reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimento instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) instacron:PUC_PR |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) |
instacron_str |
PUC_PR |
institution |
PUC_PR |
reponame_str |
Fisioterapia em Movimento |
collection |
Fisioterapia em Movimento |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br |
_version_ |
1799138744399298560 |