Planning and Governance for Resilient Metropolises in Brazil and Germany – Arrangements for Institutional Collective Action
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Urbe. Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.pucpr.br/Urbe/article/view/29992 |
Resumo: | Metropolises are a fundamental characteristic of the 21st century due to the unprecedented urbanization that has seen cities transcend their traditional boundaries. At the heart of the metropolitan question, there is the need for collective decisions and coordinated joint action in a territory characterized by the existence of multiple governments and social actors with different interests, preferences, and resources. Consequently, new institutional arrangements for metropolitan management have continued to evolve aiming to overcome the dilemma of collective action. In this article, we present some principal findings of a study that examines the institutional arrangements of metropolitan governance in the metropolises of Sao Paulo and Belo Horizonte (Brazil), as well as Stuttgart and Hannover (Germany), based on the institutional collective action framework. The research is based on the analysis of the relevant literature, reports, secondary studies, and the conduction of a semi-structured panel of expert researchers, revealing varied vertical and horizontal cooperation arrangements, the strengths and weaknesses of their institutional design, and contextual factors that have shaped the governance and planning structures and the possibilities of resilient metropolitan development. The article concludes with some recommendations for the implementation of institutional arrangements at the metropolitan scale for emerging metropolises, particularly in the Global South. |
id |
PUC_PR-27_1cca809c4fbbfc397f84ead0d1b8107b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/29992 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_PR-27 |
network_name_str |
Urbe. Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Planning and Governance for Resilient Metropolises in Brazil and Germany – Arrangements for Institutional Collective ActionPlanning and Governance for Resilient Metropolises in Brazil and Germany – Arrangements for Institutional Collective ActionMetropolises are a fundamental characteristic of the 21st century due to the unprecedented urbanization that has seen cities transcend their traditional boundaries. At the heart of the metropolitan question, there is the need for collective decisions and coordinated joint action in a territory characterized by the existence of multiple governments and social actors with different interests, preferences, and resources. Consequently, new institutional arrangements for metropolitan management have continued to evolve aiming to overcome the dilemma of collective action. In this article, we present some principal findings of a study that examines the institutional arrangements of metropolitan governance in the metropolises of Sao Paulo and Belo Horizonte (Brazil), as well as Stuttgart and Hannover (Germany), based on the institutional collective action framework. The research is based on the analysis of the relevant literature, reports, secondary studies, and the conduction of a semi-structured panel of expert researchers, revealing varied vertical and horizontal cooperation arrangements, the strengths and weaknesses of their institutional design, and contextual factors that have shaped the governance and planning structures and the possibilities of resilient metropolitan development. The article concludes with some recommendations for the implementation of institutional arrangements at the metropolitan scale for emerging metropolises, particularly in the Global South.Metropolises are a fundamental characteristic of the 21st century due to the unprecedented urbanization that has seen cities transcend their traditional boundaries. At the heart of the metropolitan question, there is the need for collective decisions and coordinated joint action in a territory characterized by the existence of multiple governments and social actors with different interests, preferences, and resources. Conse-quently, new institutional arrangements for metropolitan management have continued to evolve aiming to overcome the dilemma of collective action. In this article, we present some principal findings of a study that examines the institutional arrangements of metropolitan governance in the metropolises of Sao Paulo and Belo Horizonte (Brazil), as well as Stuttgart and Hannover (Germany), based on the institutional collective action framework. The research is based on the analysis of the relevant literature, reports, secondary stud-ies, and the conduction of a semi-structured panel interview researchers, revealing varied vertical and hor-izontal cooperation arrangements, the strengths and weaknesses of their institutional design, and contex-tual factors that have shaped the governance and planning structures and the possibilities of resilient met-ropolitan development. The article concludes with some recommendations for the implementation of insti-tutional arrangements at the metropolitan scale for emerging metropolises, particularly in the Global South.Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná - PUCPR2023-05-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/Urbe/article/view/29992Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana; Vol. 15 (2023)Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana; Vol. 15 (2023)Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana; v. 15 (2023)2175-3369reponame:Urbe. Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbanainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)instacron:PUC_PRporhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/Urbe/article/view/29992/26080Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbanahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessThuranira, BessyFrey, Klaus 2023-05-03T14:28:34Zoai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/29992Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=2175-3369&lng=pt&nrm=isONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpurbe@pucpr.br2175-33692175-3369opendoar:2023-05-03T14:28:34Urbe. Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Planning and Governance for Resilient Metropolises in Brazil and Germany – Arrangements for Institutional Collective Action Planning and Governance for Resilient Metropolises in Brazil and Germany – Arrangements for Institutional Collective Action |
title |
Planning and Governance for Resilient Metropolises in Brazil and Germany – Arrangements for Institutional Collective Action |
spellingShingle |
Planning and Governance for Resilient Metropolises in Brazil and Germany – Arrangements for Institutional Collective Action Thuranira, Bessy |
title_short |
Planning and Governance for Resilient Metropolises in Brazil and Germany – Arrangements for Institutional Collective Action |
title_full |
Planning and Governance for Resilient Metropolises in Brazil and Germany – Arrangements for Institutional Collective Action |
title_fullStr |
Planning and Governance for Resilient Metropolises in Brazil and Germany – Arrangements for Institutional Collective Action |
title_full_unstemmed |
Planning and Governance for Resilient Metropolises in Brazil and Germany – Arrangements for Institutional Collective Action |
title_sort |
Planning and Governance for Resilient Metropolises in Brazil and Germany – Arrangements for Institutional Collective Action |
author |
Thuranira, Bessy |
author_facet |
Thuranira, Bessy Frey, Klaus |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Frey, Klaus |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Thuranira, Bessy Frey, Klaus |
description |
Metropolises are a fundamental characteristic of the 21st century due to the unprecedented urbanization that has seen cities transcend their traditional boundaries. At the heart of the metropolitan question, there is the need for collective decisions and coordinated joint action in a territory characterized by the existence of multiple governments and social actors with different interests, preferences, and resources. Consequently, new institutional arrangements for metropolitan management have continued to evolve aiming to overcome the dilemma of collective action. In this article, we present some principal findings of a study that examines the institutional arrangements of metropolitan governance in the metropolises of Sao Paulo and Belo Horizonte (Brazil), as well as Stuttgart and Hannover (Germany), based on the institutional collective action framework. The research is based on the analysis of the relevant literature, reports, secondary studies, and the conduction of a semi-structured panel of expert researchers, revealing varied vertical and horizontal cooperation arrangements, the strengths and weaknesses of their institutional design, and contextual factors that have shaped the governance and planning structures and the possibilities of resilient metropolitan development. The article concludes with some recommendations for the implementation of institutional arrangements at the metropolitan scale for emerging metropolises, particularly in the Global South. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-05-03 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/Urbe/article/view/29992 |
url |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/Urbe/article/view/29992 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/Urbe/article/view/29992/26080 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná - PUCPR |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná - PUCPR |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana; Vol. 15 (2023) Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana; Vol. 15 (2023) Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana; v. 15 (2023) 2175-3369 reponame:Urbe. Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) instacron:PUC_PR |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) |
instacron_str |
PUC_PR |
institution |
PUC_PR |
reponame_str |
Urbe. Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana |
collection |
Urbe. Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Urbe. Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
urbe@pucpr.br |
_version_ |
1799125956291461120 |