Risk perception and social media engagement: The public debate on vaccination during the second year of the Covid-19 pandemic
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia |
DOI: | 10.15448/1980-3729.2024.1.44004 |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/44004 |
Resumo: | : In this article, we start from the hypothesis that the COVID-19 pandemic has transformed the public debate on vaccination on social media. In the current configuration of the "Risk Society" (Beck, 1992), risk management becomes a central component of everyday life, influencing how the public accesses and interacts with health-related information in media spaces. Given this scenario, we aim to verify whether the advance of coronavirus vaccination coverage and the positive results obtained in confronting the pandemic throughout the second year of the crisis have been reflected in the nature of information circulating about vaccines. Against this background, our goal was to identify changes and continuities of the contents that guide this debate in the Brazilian context. To this end, we analyzed the 100 links with the most engagement during the second year of the pandemic (2021), comparing them quantitatively with the first year (2020) and with the period preceding the health crisis (2018-2019). Our methodology is inspired by Content Analysis and structured from five categories: engagement, theme, accuracy, positioning, and risk calculation. Among the main results achieved, we observed in the corpus a reduction of disinformation content, possibly associated with the fact that, in the face of the effectiveness of immunizers, vaccines have ceased to be a priority theme in the disputes of meaning present in the public debate. Moreover, we identified a sharp drop in the total engagement on the subject in 2021. |
id |
PUC_RS-12_5c6930bb57bd10bd1a3cb22206e85f14 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/44004 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-12 |
network_name_str |
Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia |
spelling |
Risk perception and social media engagement: The public debate on vaccination during the second year of the Covid-19 pandemicPercepción de riesgo y participación activa en las redes sociales: El debate publico sobre la vacunación durante el segundo año de la pandemia de Covid-19Percepção de risco e engajamento nas redes sociais: O debate público sobre vacinação durante o segundo ano da pandemia de Covid-19Social MediaEngagementRisk PerceptionCovid-19VaccineRedes SocialesParticipación ActivaPercepción del RiesgoCovid-19VacunaRedes SociaisEngajamentoPercepção de RiscoCovid-19Vacina: In this article, we start from the hypothesis that the COVID-19 pandemic has transformed the public debate on vaccination on social media. In the current configuration of the "Risk Society" (Beck, 1992), risk management becomes a central component of everyday life, influencing how the public accesses and interacts with health-related information in media spaces. Given this scenario, we aim to verify whether the advance of coronavirus vaccination coverage and the positive results obtained in confronting the pandemic throughout the second year of the crisis have been reflected in the nature of information circulating about vaccines. Against this background, our goal was to identify changes and continuities of the contents that guide this debate in the Brazilian context. To this end, we analyzed the 100 links with the most engagement during the second year of the pandemic (2021), comparing them quantitatively with the first year (2020) and with the period preceding the health crisis (2018-2019). Our methodology is inspired by Content Analysis and structured from five categories: engagement, theme, accuracy, positioning, and risk calculation. Among the main results achieved, we observed in the corpus a reduction of disinformation content, possibly associated with the fact that, in the face of the effectiveness of immunizers, vaccines have ceased to be a priority theme in the disputes of meaning present in the public debate. Moreover, we identified a sharp drop in the total engagement on the subject in 2021.En este artículo, partimos de la hipótesis de que la pandemia de COVID-19 ha transformado el debate público sobre la vacunación en las redes sociales. En la configuración actual de la "Sociedad del Riesgo" (BeckK, 1992), la gestión de riesgos se convierte en un componente central de la vida cotidiana, influyendo en cómo el público accede e interactúa con información relacionada con la salud en los espacios mediáticos. Ante este escenario, buscamos verificar si el avance en la cobertura de vacunación contra el coronavirus y los resultados positivos obtenidos en el enfrentamiento a la pandemia a lo largo del segundo año de la crisis influyen en la naturaleza de la información que circula sobre las vacunas. En este contexto, nuestro objetivo fue identificar cambios y continuidades de los contenidos que orientan el debate en el escenario brasileño. Para ello, analizamos los 100 enlaces con más participación activa durante el segundo año de la pandemia (2021), comparándolos cuantitativamente con el primer año (2020) y con el periodo anterior a la crisis sanitaria (2018-2019). Nuestra metodología está inspirada en el análisis de contenido y estructurada a partir de cinco categorías: participación activa, tema, precisión, posicionamiento y cálculo de riesgo. Entre los principales resultados alcanzados, observamos en el corpus una reducción del contenido de desinformación, posiblemente asociado al hecho de que, frente a la efectividad de los inmunizadores, las vacunas han dejado de ser un tema prioritario en las disputas de sentido presentes en el debate publico. Además, identificamos una marcada reducción en la participación activa total sobre el tema en 2021.Neste artigo, partimos da hipótese de que a pandemia da COVID-19 tem transformado o debate público sobre a vacinação nas mídias sociais. Na atual configuração da “Sociedade de Risco” (Beck, 1992), a gestão dos riscos se torna um componente central da vida cotidiana, influenciando os modos como o público acessa e interage com informações relacionadas à saúde em espaços midiáticos. Diante desse cenário, buscamos verificar se o avanço da cobertura vacinal contra o coronavírus e os resultados positivos obtidos no enfrentamento da pandemia ao longo do segundo ano da crise refletiram na natureza das informações circulantes sobre vacinas. Sob esse pano de fundo, nosso objetivo foi identificar mudanças e continuidades dos conteúdos que pautam esse debate no contexto brasileiro. Com este fim, analisamos os 100 links com mais engajamento durante o segundo ano da pandemia (2021), comparando-os quantitativamente com o primeiro ano (2020) e com o período que antecedeu a crise sanitária (2018-2019). Nossa metodologia é inspirada na Análise de Conteúdo e estruturada a partir de cinco categorias: engajamento, tema, acurácia, posicionamento e cálculo de risco. Dentre os principais resultados alcançados, observamos no corpus uma redução de conteúdos desinformativos, que pode estar diretamente ligada ao fato de que, diante da eficácia dos imunizantes, as vacinas terem deixado de ser tema prioritário nas disputas de sentido presentes no debate público. Além disso, identificamos uma queda acentuada no engajamento total acerca do assunto em 2021.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2024-01-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/4400410.15448/1980-3729.2024.1.44004Revista FAMECOS; Vol. 31 No. 1 (2024): Single Volume - Continuous flow; e44004Revista FAMECOS; Vol. 31 Núm. 1 (2024): Volumen Único - Flujo continuo; e44004Revista FAMECOS; v. 31 n. 1 (2024): Volume único - Fluxo contínuo; e440041980-37291415-0549reponame:Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologiainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/44004/28446Copyright (c) 2024 Revista FAMECOShttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMassarani, LuisaWaltz, IgorMedeiros, Amanda2024-04-09T14:35:35Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/44004Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecosPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/oai||revistafamecos@gmail.com1980-37291980-3729opendoar:2024-04-09T14:35:35Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Risk perception and social media engagement: The public debate on vaccination during the second year of the Covid-19 pandemic Percepción de riesgo y participación activa en las redes sociales: El debate publico sobre la vacunación durante el segundo año de la pandemia de Covid-19 Percepção de risco e engajamento nas redes sociais: O debate público sobre vacinação durante o segundo ano da pandemia de Covid-19 |
title |
Risk perception and social media engagement: The public debate on vaccination during the second year of the Covid-19 pandemic |
spellingShingle |
Risk perception and social media engagement: The public debate on vaccination during the second year of the Covid-19 pandemic Risk perception and social media engagement: The public debate on vaccination during the second year of the Covid-19 pandemic Massarani, Luisa Social Media Engagement Risk Perception Covid-19 Vaccine Redes Sociales Participación Activa Percepción del Riesgo Covid-19 Vacuna Redes Sociais Engajamento Percepção de Risco Covid-19 Vacina Massarani, Luisa Social Media Engagement Risk Perception Covid-19 Vaccine Redes Sociales Participación Activa Percepción del Riesgo Covid-19 Vacuna Redes Sociais Engajamento Percepção de Risco Covid-19 Vacina |
title_short |
Risk perception and social media engagement: The public debate on vaccination during the second year of the Covid-19 pandemic |
title_full |
Risk perception and social media engagement: The public debate on vaccination during the second year of the Covid-19 pandemic |
title_fullStr |
Risk perception and social media engagement: The public debate on vaccination during the second year of the Covid-19 pandemic Risk perception and social media engagement: The public debate on vaccination during the second year of the Covid-19 pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed |
Risk perception and social media engagement: The public debate on vaccination during the second year of the Covid-19 pandemic Risk perception and social media engagement: The public debate on vaccination during the second year of the Covid-19 pandemic |
title_sort |
Risk perception and social media engagement: The public debate on vaccination during the second year of the Covid-19 pandemic |
author |
Massarani, Luisa |
author_facet |
Massarani, Luisa Massarani, Luisa Waltz, Igor Medeiros, Amanda Waltz, Igor Medeiros, Amanda |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Waltz, Igor Medeiros, Amanda |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Massarani, Luisa Waltz, Igor Medeiros, Amanda |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Social Media Engagement Risk Perception Covid-19 Vaccine Redes Sociales Participación Activa Percepción del Riesgo Covid-19 Vacuna Redes Sociais Engajamento Percepção de Risco Covid-19 Vacina |
topic |
Social Media Engagement Risk Perception Covid-19 Vaccine Redes Sociales Participación Activa Percepción del Riesgo Covid-19 Vacuna Redes Sociais Engajamento Percepção de Risco Covid-19 Vacina |
description |
: In this article, we start from the hypothesis that the COVID-19 pandemic has transformed the public debate on vaccination on social media. In the current configuration of the "Risk Society" (Beck, 1992), risk management becomes a central component of everyday life, influencing how the public accesses and interacts with health-related information in media spaces. Given this scenario, we aim to verify whether the advance of coronavirus vaccination coverage and the positive results obtained in confronting the pandemic throughout the second year of the crisis have been reflected in the nature of information circulating about vaccines. Against this background, our goal was to identify changes and continuities of the contents that guide this debate in the Brazilian context. To this end, we analyzed the 100 links with the most engagement during the second year of the pandemic (2021), comparing them quantitatively with the first year (2020) and with the period preceding the health crisis (2018-2019). Our methodology is inspired by Content Analysis and structured from five categories: engagement, theme, accuracy, positioning, and risk calculation. Among the main results achieved, we observed in the corpus a reduction of disinformation content, possibly associated with the fact that, in the face of the effectiveness of immunizers, vaccines have ceased to be a priority theme in the disputes of meaning present in the public debate. Moreover, we identified a sharp drop in the total engagement on the subject in 2021. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-01-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/44004 10.15448/1980-3729.2024.1.44004 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/44004 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/1980-3729.2024.1.44004 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/44004/28446 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista FAMECOS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista FAMECOS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista FAMECOS; Vol. 31 No. 1 (2024): Single Volume - Continuous flow; e44004 Revista FAMECOS; Vol. 31 Núm. 1 (2024): Volumen Único - Flujo continuo; e44004 Revista FAMECOS; v. 31 n. 1 (2024): Volume único - Fluxo contínuo; e44004 1980-3729 1415-0549 reponame:Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia |
collection |
Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistafamecos@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1822181321277964288 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.15448/1980-3729.2024.1.44004 |