Risk perception and social media engagement: The public debate on vaccination during the second year of the Covid-19 pandemic

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Massarani, Luisa
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Waltz, Igor, Medeiros, Amanda
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia
DOI: 10.15448/1980-3729.2024.1.44004
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/44004
Resumo: : In this article, we start from the hypothesis that the COVID-19 pandemic has transformed the public debate on vaccination on social media. In the current configuration of the "Risk Society" (Beck, 1992), risk management becomes a central component of everyday life, influencing how the public accesses and interacts with health-related information in media spaces. Given this scenario, we aim to verify whether the advance of coronavirus vaccination coverage and the positive results obtained in confronting the pandemic throughout the second year of the crisis have been reflected in the nature of information circulating about vaccines. Against this background, our goal was to identify changes and continuities of the contents that guide this debate in the Brazilian context. To this end, we analyzed the 100 links with the most engagement during the second year of the pandemic (2021), comparing them quantitatively with the first year (2020) and with the period preceding the health crisis (2018-2019). Our methodology is inspired by Content Analysis and structured from five categories: engagement, theme, accuracy, positioning, and risk calculation. Among the main results achieved, we observed in the corpus a reduction of disinformation content, possibly associated with the fact that, in the face of the effectiveness of immunizers, vaccines have ceased to be a priority theme in the disputes of meaning present in the public debate. Moreover, we identified a sharp drop in the total engagement on the subject in 2021.
id PUC_RS-12_5c6930bb57bd10bd1a3cb22206e85f14
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/44004
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-12
network_name_str Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia
spelling Risk perception and social media engagement: The public debate on vaccination during the second year of the Covid-19 pandemicPercepción de riesgo y participación activa en las redes sociales: El debate publico sobre la vacunación durante el segundo año de la pandemia de Covid-19Percepção de risco e engajamento nas redes sociais: O debate público sobre vacinação durante o segundo ano da pandemia de Covid-19Social MediaEngagementRisk PerceptionCovid-19VaccineRedes SocialesParticipación ActivaPercepción del RiesgoCovid-19VacunaRedes SociaisEngajamentoPercepção de RiscoCovid-19Vacina: In this article, we start from the hypothesis that the COVID-19 pandemic has transformed the public debate on vaccination on social media. In the current configuration of the "Risk Society" (Beck, 1992), risk management becomes a central component of everyday life, influencing how the public accesses and interacts with health-related information in media spaces. Given this scenario, we aim to verify whether the advance of coronavirus vaccination coverage and the positive results obtained in confronting the pandemic throughout the second year of the crisis have been reflected in the nature of information circulating about vaccines. Against this background, our goal was to identify changes and continuities of the contents that guide this debate in the Brazilian context. To this end, we analyzed the 100 links with the most engagement during the second year of the pandemic (2021), comparing them quantitatively with the first year (2020) and with the period preceding the health crisis (2018-2019). Our methodology is inspired by Content Analysis and structured from five categories: engagement, theme, accuracy, positioning, and risk calculation. Among the main results achieved, we observed in the corpus a reduction of disinformation content, possibly associated with the fact that, in the face of the effectiveness of immunizers, vaccines have ceased to be a priority theme in the disputes of meaning present in the public debate. Moreover, we identified a sharp drop in the total engagement on the subject in 2021.En este artículo, partimos de la hipótesis de que la pandemia de COVID-19 ha transformado el debate público sobre la vacunación en las redes sociales. En la configuración actual de la "Sociedad del Riesgo" (BeckK, 1992), la gestión de riesgos se convierte en un componente central de la vida cotidiana, influyendo en cómo el público accede e interactúa con información relacionada con la salud en los espacios mediáticos. Ante este escenario, buscamos verificar si el avance en la cobertura de vacunación contra el coronavirus y los resultados positivos obtenidos en el enfrentamiento a la pandemia a lo largo del segundo año de la crisis influyen en la naturaleza de la información que circula sobre las vacunas. En este contexto, nuestro objetivo fue identificar cambios y continuidades de los contenidos que orientan el debate en el escenario brasileño. Para ello, analizamos los 100 enlaces con más participación activa durante el segundo año de la pandemia (2021), comparándolos cuantitativamente con el primer año (2020) y con el periodo anterior a la crisis sanitaria (2018-2019). Nuestra metodología está inspirada en el análisis de contenido y estructurada a partir de cinco categorías: participación activa, tema, precisión, posicionamiento y cálculo de riesgo. Entre los principales resultados alcanzados, observamos en el corpus una reducción del contenido de desinformación, posiblemente asociado al hecho de que, frente a la efectividad de los inmunizadores, las vacunas han dejado de ser un tema prioritario en las disputas de sentido presentes en el debate publico. Además, identificamos una marcada reducción en la participación activa total sobre el tema en 2021.Neste artigo, partimos da hipótese de que a pandemia da COVID-19 tem transformado o debate público sobre a vacinação nas mídias sociais. Na atual configuração da “Sociedade de Risco” (Beck, 1992), a gestão dos riscos se torna um componente central da vida cotidiana, influenciando os modos como o público acessa e interage com informações relacionadas à saúde em espaços midiáticos. Diante desse cenário, buscamos verificar se o avanço da cobertura vacinal contra o coronavírus e os resultados positivos obtidos no enfrentamento da pandemia ao longo do segundo ano da crise refletiram na natureza das informações circulantes sobre vacinas. Sob esse pano de fundo, nosso objetivo foi identificar mudanças e continuidades dos conteúdos que pautam esse debate no contexto brasileiro. Com este fim, analisamos os 100 links com mais engajamento durante o segundo ano da pandemia (2021), comparando-os quantitativamente com o primeiro ano (2020) e com o período que antecedeu a crise sanitária (2018-2019). Nossa metodologia é inspirada na Análise de Conteúdo e estruturada a partir de cinco categorias: engajamento, tema, acurácia, posicionamento e cálculo de risco. Dentre os principais resultados alcançados, observamos no corpus uma redução de conteúdos desinformativos, que pode estar diretamente ligada ao fato de que, diante da eficácia dos imunizantes, as vacinas terem deixado de ser tema prioritário nas disputas de sentido presentes no debate público. Além disso, identificamos uma queda acentuada no engajamento total acerca do assunto em 2021.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2024-01-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/4400410.15448/1980-3729.2024.1.44004Revista FAMECOS; Vol. 31 No. 1 (2024): Single Volume - Continuous flow; e44004Revista FAMECOS; Vol. 31 Núm. 1 (2024): Volumen Único - Flujo continuo; e44004Revista FAMECOS; v. 31 n. 1 (2024): Volume único - Fluxo contínuo; e440041980-37291415-0549reponame:Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologiainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/44004/28446Copyright (c) 2024 Revista FAMECOShttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMassarani, LuisaWaltz, IgorMedeiros, Amanda2024-04-09T14:35:35Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/44004Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecosPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/oai||revistafamecos@gmail.com1980-37291980-3729opendoar:2024-04-09T14:35:35Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Risk perception and social media engagement: The public debate on vaccination during the second year of the Covid-19 pandemic
Percepción de riesgo y participación activa en las redes sociales: El debate publico sobre la vacunación durante el segundo año de la pandemia de Covid-19
Percepção de risco e engajamento nas redes sociais: O debate público sobre vacinação durante o segundo ano da pandemia de Covid-19
title Risk perception and social media engagement: The public debate on vaccination during the second year of the Covid-19 pandemic
spellingShingle Risk perception and social media engagement: The public debate on vaccination during the second year of the Covid-19 pandemic
Risk perception and social media engagement: The public debate on vaccination during the second year of the Covid-19 pandemic
Massarani, Luisa
Social Media
Engagement
Risk Perception
Covid-19
Vaccine
Redes Sociales
Participación Activa
Percepción del Riesgo
Covid-19
Vacuna
Redes Sociais
Engajamento
Percepção de Risco
Covid-19
Vacina
Massarani, Luisa
Social Media
Engagement
Risk Perception
Covid-19
Vaccine
Redes Sociales
Participación Activa
Percepción del Riesgo
Covid-19
Vacuna
Redes Sociais
Engajamento
Percepção de Risco
Covid-19
Vacina
title_short Risk perception and social media engagement: The public debate on vaccination during the second year of the Covid-19 pandemic
title_full Risk perception and social media engagement: The public debate on vaccination during the second year of the Covid-19 pandemic
title_fullStr Risk perception and social media engagement: The public debate on vaccination during the second year of the Covid-19 pandemic
Risk perception and social media engagement: The public debate on vaccination during the second year of the Covid-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Risk perception and social media engagement: The public debate on vaccination during the second year of the Covid-19 pandemic
Risk perception and social media engagement: The public debate on vaccination during the second year of the Covid-19 pandemic
title_sort Risk perception and social media engagement: The public debate on vaccination during the second year of the Covid-19 pandemic
author Massarani, Luisa
author_facet Massarani, Luisa
Massarani, Luisa
Waltz, Igor
Medeiros, Amanda
Waltz, Igor
Medeiros, Amanda
author_role author
author2 Waltz, Igor
Medeiros, Amanda
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Massarani, Luisa
Waltz, Igor
Medeiros, Amanda
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Social Media
Engagement
Risk Perception
Covid-19
Vaccine
Redes Sociales
Participación Activa
Percepción del Riesgo
Covid-19
Vacuna
Redes Sociais
Engajamento
Percepção de Risco
Covid-19
Vacina
topic Social Media
Engagement
Risk Perception
Covid-19
Vaccine
Redes Sociales
Participación Activa
Percepción del Riesgo
Covid-19
Vacuna
Redes Sociais
Engajamento
Percepção de Risco
Covid-19
Vacina
description : In this article, we start from the hypothesis that the COVID-19 pandemic has transformed the public debate on vaccination on social media. In the current configuration of the "Risk Society" (Beck, 1992), risk management becomes a central component of everyday life, influencing how the public accesses and interacts with health-related information in media spaces. Given this scenario, we aim to verify whether the advance of coronavirus vaccination coverage and the positive results obtained in confronting the pandemic throughout the second year of the crisis have been reflected in the nature of information circulating about vaccines. Against this background, our goal was to identify changes and continuities of the contents that guide this debate in the Brazilian context. To this end, we analyzed the 100 links with the most engagement during the second year of the pandemic (2021), comparing them quantitatively with the first year (2020) and with the period preceding the health crisis (2018-2019). Our methodology is inspired by Content Analysis and structured from five categories: engagement, theme, accuracy, positioning, and risk calculation. Among the main results achieved, we observed in the corpus a reduction of disinformation content, possibly associated with the fact that, in the face of the effectiveness of immunizers, vaccines have ceased to be a priority theme in the disputes of meaning present in the public debate. Moreover, we identified a sharp drop in the total engagement on the subject in 2021.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-01-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/44004
10.15448/1980-3729.2024.1.44004
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/44004
identifier_str_mv 10.15448/1980-3729.2024.1.44004
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/44004/28446
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Revista FAMECOS
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Revista FAMECOS
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista FAMECOS; Vol. 31 No. 1 (2024): Single Volume - Continuous flow; e44004
Revista FAMECOS; Vol. 31 Núm. 1 (2024): Volumen Único - Flujo continuo; e44004
Revista FAMECOS; v. 31 n. 1 (2024): Volume único - Fluxo contínuo; e44004
1980-3729
1415-0549
reponame:Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia
collection Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistafamecos@gmail.com
_version_ 1822181321277964288
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.15448/1980-3729.2024.1.44004