The removal of dilma rousseff: affections and discourses in the political contention
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/31913 |
Resumo: | In this paper we inquire what are the meanings produced by two players(Frente Brasil Popular and Vem pra Rua) at Facebook. They are among the various political movements pro and against the removal of President Dilma Roussef, in April 2016. The analysis is based on Laclau’s discursive theory and Zilberbeg and Fontanille’s tensive semiotics. The research questions are: which are the communication contracts and themes constructed by this two enunciators, from opposite sides of the political spectrum? Which are the fundamental semantic oppositions? Which political discourses transverse this convocations? Which are the nodal points of those discourses? How do they construct, in each case, the image of ‘the people’? What affections do one and another political movements put on scene? What are the positions of these enunciators, through the semiotics of the event therms? Through the tensive semiotics approach, how to understand this political movements with the mechanisms of triage and mixture? Finally, how can we think the construction of democracy from this polarization? |
id |
PUC_RS-12_9d303ad5746d60c0fddf676403bb5ead |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/31913 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-12 |
network_name_str |
Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The removal of dilma rousseff: affections and discourses in the political contentionEl impedimento de dilma roussef: afectos y discursos en disputa en la políticaO afastamento de dilma roussef: afetos e discursos em disputa na políticaFacebook. Communication and politics. Discourse.Facebook. Comunicación y política. Discurso.Facebook. Comunicação e política. Discurso.discurso e políticaIn this paper we inquire what are the meanings produced by two players(Frente Brasil Popular and Vem pra Rua) at Facebook. They are among the various political movements pro and against the removal of President Dilma Roussef, in April 2016. The analysis is based on Laclau’s discursive theory and Zilberbeg and Fontanille’s tensive semiotics. The research questions are: which are the communication contracts and themes constructed by this two enunciators, from opposite sides of the political spectrum? Which are the fundamental semantic oppositions? Which political discourses transverse this convocations? Which are the nodal points of those discourses? How do they construct, in each case, the image of ‘the people’? What affections do one and another political movements put on scene? What are the positions of these enunciators, through the semiotics of the event therms? Through the tensive semiotics approach, how to understand this political movements with the mechanisms of triage and mixture? Finally, how can we think the construction of democracy from this polarization?Este texto examina los sentidos producidos en Facebook por dos articuladores (Frente Brasil Popular y Vem pra Rua – Ven a la Calle) entre los varios movimientos a favor y contra el impedimento de la presidente Dilma Roussef, en abril de 2016. El análisis se basa en la teoría del discurso de Laclau y en la semiótica tensiva de Zilberberg y Fontanille. Las cuestiones investigadas son: ¿Cuáles fueron los contratos de comunicación y los temas construidos por los enunciadores situados en lados opuestos del espectro político? ¿Cuáles son las oposiciones semánticas fundamentales? ¿Qué discursos políticos atraviesan estas convocaciones? ¿Cuáles fueron los puntos nodales de estos discursos? ¿Cómo se construye en cada caso la figura del “pueblo”? ¿Qué afectos ponen en escena cada uno de estos dos movimientos opuestos? ¿En términos de una teoría del acontecimiento cómo se posicionan los dos enunciadores enfrentados? En términos tensivos, ¿cómo entender estos movimientos a partir de una semiótica de la selección y de la mezcla? Finalmente, ¿cómo pensar la construcción de la democracia a partir de esta polarización?Este texto examina os sentidos produzidos no Facebook por dois articuladores(Frente Brasil Popular e Vem pra Rua) entre os vários movimentos a favor ou contra o afastamento da presidente Dilma Roussef, em abril de 2016. A análise é feita a partir da teoria do discurso de Laclau e da semiótica tensiva de Zilberberg e Fontanille. As questões de pesquisa são: quais foram os contratos de comunicação e os temas construídos pelos enunciadores situados em lados opostos do espectro político? Quais são as oposições semânticas fundamentais? Que discursos políticos atravessam essas convocações? Quais foram os pontos nodais desses discursos? Como se constrói em cada caso a figura do “povo”? Que afetos um e outro movimento põe em cena? Em termos de uma teoria do acontecimento como se posicionam um e outro enunciador? Em termos tensivos, como entender esses movimentos a partir de uma semiótica da triagem e da mistura? Finalmente, como pensar a construção da democracia a partir dessa polarização?Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2019-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/3191310.15448/1980-3729.2019.2.31913Revista FAMECOS; Vol. 26 No. 2 (2019); e31913Revista FAMECOS; Vol. 26 Núm. 2 (2019); e31913Revista FAMECOS; v. 26 n. 2 (2019); e319131980-37291415-054910.15448/1980-3729.2019.2reponame:Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologiainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/31913/19314Copyright (c) 2019 Revista FAMECOShttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPrado, José Luiz AidarBueno, Vinicius Prates da Fonseca2020-01-08T18:09:35Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/31913Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecosPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/oai||revistafamecos@gmail.com1980-37291980-3729opendoar:2020-01-08T18:09:35Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The removal of dilma rousseff: affections and discourses in the political contention El impedimento de dilma roussef: afectos y discursos en disputa en la política O afastamento de dilma roussef: afetos e discursos em disputa na política |
title |
The removal of dilma rousseff: affections and discourses in the political contention |
spellingShingle |
The removal of dilma rousseff: affections and discourses in the political contention Prado, José Luiz Aidar Facebook. Communication and politics. Discourse. Facebook. Comunicación y política. Discurso. Facebook. Comunicação e política. Discurso. discurso e política |
title_short |
The removal of dilma rousseff: affections and discourses in the political contention |
title_full |
The removal of dilma rousseff: affections and discourses in the political contention |
title_fullStr |
The removal of dilma rousseff: affections and discourses in the political contention |
title_full_unstemmed |
The removal of dilma rousseff: affections and discourses in the political contention |
title_sort |
The removal of dilma rousseff: affections and discourses in the political contention |
author |
Prado, José Luiz Aidar |
author_facet |
Prado, José Luiz Aidar Bueno, Vinicius Prates da Fonseca |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bueno, Vinicius Prates da Fonseca |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Prado, José Luiz Aidar Bueno, Vinicius Prates da Fonseca |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Facebook. Communication and politics. Discourse. Facebook. Comunicación y política. Discurso. Facebook. Comunicação e política. Discurso. discurso e política |
topic |
Facebook. Communication and politics. Discourse. Facebook. Comunicación y política. Discurso. Facebook. Comunicação e política. Discurso. discurso e política |
description |
In this paper we inquire what are the meanings produced by two players(Frente Brasil Popular and Vem pra Rua) at Facebook. They are among the various political movements pro and against the removal of President Dilma Roussef, in April 2016. The analysis is based on Laclau’s discursive theory and Zilberbeg and Fontanille’s tensive semiotics. The research questions are: which are the communication contracts and themes constructed by this two enunciators, from opposite sides of the political spectrum? Which are the fundamental semantic oppositions? Which political discourses transverse this convocations? Which are the nodal points of those discourses? How do they construct, in each case, the image of ‘the people’? What affections do one and another political movements put on scene? What are the positions of these enunciators, through the semiotics of the event therms? Through the tensive semiotics approach, how to understand this political movements with the mechanisms of triage and mixture? Finally, how can we think the construction of democracy from this polarization? |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/31913 10.15448/1980-3729.2019.2.31913 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/31913 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/1980-3729.2019.2.31913 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/31913/19314 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista FAMECOS https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista FAMECOS https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista FAMECOS; Vol. 26 No. 2 (2019); e31913 Revista FAMECOS; Vol. 26 Núm. 2 (2019); e31913 Revista FAMECOS; v. 26 n. 2 (2019); e31913 1980-3729 1415-0549 10.15448/1980-3729.2019.2 reponame:Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia |
collection |
Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistafamecos@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799128663789142016 |