The Affective Toxicology of Social Media

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Palazuelos, Felix Rebolledo
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/42648
Resumo: The toxicity ascribed to social media indicates deeper systemic problems than those usually designated as its toxic ills. Although the widespread afflictions resulting from social media consumption constitute grave social problems in their own right, they allude to a dysfunctionality that precedes and transcends the individual troubles. The ill effects not only predicate toxicity, they indicate social media as both causal factor and self-perpetuating outcome by creating the conditions of reciprocal obligation and the dependency on the “Like!” which together function as the engine behind the compulsion to repeat. Platforms seek to maximize their users’ screen-time because all screen-time is unpaid productive net-work that contributes to the platform’s capital and to its bottom line. We examine the dynamics of social media toxicity as an affective affliction using Marcel Mauss’s ideas of reciprocal obligation from The Gift (1925) and Spinoza’s Ethics (1677) as a practical philosophy that sheds light on the underlying machinism of digital social platforms and the creation of value as the space-time of social networks by way of cultivating narcissism. It does not purport to be the “be-all, end-all” explanation of the phenomenon, but seeks to produce an alternative, supplemental — albeit incomplete — image of social media use.
id PUC_RS-12_e26b786d4364b737ba204bbd6654aef0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/42648
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-12
network_name_str Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia
repository_id_str
spelling The Affective Toxicology of Social MediaLa toxicología afectiva de las redes socialesA Toxicologia Afetiva das Mídias SociaistoxicitynetworkaffecttoxicidadredafectotoxicidaderedeafetoThe toxicity ascribed to social media indicates deeper systemic problems than those usually designated as its toxic ills. Although the widespread afflictions resulting from social media consumption constitute grave social problems in their own right, they allude to a dysfunctionality that precedes and transcends the individual troubles. The ill effects not only predicate toxicity, they indicate social media as both causal factor and self-perpetuating outcome by creating the conditions of reciprocal obligation and the dependency on the “Like!” which together function as the engine behind the compulsion to repeat. Platforms seek to maximize their users’ screen-time because all screen-time is unpaid productive net-work that contributes to the platform’s capital and to its bottom line. We examine the dynamics of social media toxicity as an affective affliction using Marcel Mauss’s ideas of reciprocal obligation from The Gift (1925) and Spinoza’s Ethics (1677) as a practical philosophy that sheds light on the underlying machinism of digital social platforms and the creation of value as the space-time of social networks by way of cultivating narcissism. It does not purport to be the “be-all, end-all” explanation of the phenomenon, but seeks to produce an alternative, supplemental — albeit incomplete — image of social media use.La toxicidad atribuida a las redes sociales indica problemas sistémicos más profundos que los que generalmente se designan como sus males tóxicos. Aunque las aflicciones resultantes del consumo de redes sociales constituyen serios problemas sociales por derecho propio, aluden a una disfuncionalidad que los antecede y los trasciende. Esos efectos nocivos apuntan simultáneamente a las redes sociales como factores causales y resultados que se autoperpetúan, creando las condiciones de obligación recíproca y de dependencia del “¡Like!”, que funcionan juntos como el motor que impulsa la compulsión a repetir. Se busca maximizar el tiempo de pantalla de los usuarios porque es trabajo productivo no remunerado que contribuye al capital de la plataforma y a sus ganancias. Examinamos la dinámica de la toxicidad como una aflicción afectiva utilizando el concepto de afecto en la Ética (1677) de Spinoza y las ideas de Marcel Mauss sobre la obligación recíproca del Ensayo sobre el don (1925) como una filosofía práctica que arroja luz sobre el maquinismo subyacente y la creación de valor en terminos del espacio-tiempo de las redes sociales a través del cultivo del narcisismo. No pretendemos dar una explicación total del fenómeno, sino que buscamos producir una imagen alternativa, complementaria, aunque incompleta.A toxicidade atribuída às mídias sociais indica problemas sistêmicos mais profundos do que aqueles geralmente designados como seus males tóxicos. Embora as aflições resultantes do consumo das mídias sociais constituam graves problemas sociais por si só, elas aludem a uma disfuncionalidade que precede e transcende os problemas individuais. Os efeitos nocivos indicam simultaneamente as mídias sociais como fatores causais e resultados autoperpetuantes, criando as condições de obrigação recíproca e a dependência do “Curtir!” que juntos funcionam como o motor por trás da compulsão de repetir. As plataformas buscam maximizar o tempo de tela é trabalho produtivo não remunerado que contribui para o capital da plataforma e para seus lucros. Examinamos a dinâmica da toxicidade das mídias sociais como uma aflição afetiva usando o conceito de afeto do Spinoza na Ética (1677) e as ideias de obrigação recíproca de Marcel Mauss no Ensaio sobre a dádiva (1925) como uma filosofia prática que lança luz sobre o maquinismo subjacente das plataformas sociais digitais e a criação de valor como espaço-tempo das redes sociais por meio do cultivo do narcisismo. Não pretende ser a explicação “final” do fenômeno, mas busca produzir uma imagem alternativa, suplementar — embora incompleta — do uso das mídias sociais.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2023-01-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/4264810.15448/1980-3729.2023.1.42648Revista FAMECOS; Vol. 30 No. 1 (2023): Single Volume ; e42648Revista FAMECOS; Vol. 30 Núm. 1 (2023): Volumen único ; e42648Revista FAMECOS; v. 30 n. 1 (2023): Volume Único ; e426481980-37291415-054910.15448/1980-3729.2023.1reponame:Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologiainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSenghttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/42648/27906Copyright (c) 2023 Revista FAMECOShttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPalazuelos, Felix Rebolledo2024-04-05T12:55:07Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/42648Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecosPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/oai||revistafamecos@gmail.com1980-37291980-3729opendoar:2024-04-05T12:55:07Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Affective Toxicology of Social Media
La toxicología afectiva de las redes sociales
A Toxicologia Afetiva das Mídias Sociais
title The Affective Toxicology of Social Media
spellingShingle The Affective Toxicology of Social Media
Palazuelos, Felix Rebolledo
toxicity
network
affect
toxicidad
red
afecto
toxicidade
rede
afeto
title_short The Affective Toxicology of Social Media
title_full The Affective Toxicology of Social Media
title_fullStr The Affective Toxicology of Social Media
title_full_unstemmed The Affective Toxicology of Social Media
title_sort The Affective Toxicology of Social Media
author Palazuelos, Felix Rebolledo
author_facet Palazuelos, Felix Rebolledo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Palazuelos, Felix Rebolledo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv toxicity
network
affect
toxicidad
red
afecto
toxicidade
rede
afeto
topic toxicity
network
affect
toxicidad
red
afecto
toxicidade
rede
afeto
description The toxicity ascribed to social media indicates deeper systemic problems than those usually designated as its toxic ills. Although the widespread afflictions resulting from social media consumption constitute grave social problems in their own right, they allude to a dysfunctionality that precedes and transcends the individual troubles. The ill effects not only predicate toxicity, they indicate social media as both causal factor and self-perpetuating outcome by creating the conditions of reciprocal obligation and the dependency on the “Like!” which together function as the engine behind the compulsion to repeat. Platforms seek to maximize their users’ screen-time because all screen-time is unpaid productive net-work that contributes to the platform’s capital and to its bottom line. We examine the dynamics of social media toxicity as an affective affliction using Marcel Mauss’s ideas of reciprocal obligation from The Gift (1925) and Spinoza’s Ethics (1677) as a practical philosophy that sheds light on the underlying machinism of digital social platforms and the creation of value as the space-time of social networks by way of cultivating narcissism. It does not purport to be the “be-all, end-all” explanation of the phenomenon, but seeks to produce an alternative, supplemental — albeit incomplete — image of social media use.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-01-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/42648
10.15448/1980-3729.2023.1.42648
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/42648
identifier_str_mv 10.15448/1980-3729.2023.1.42648
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/42648/27906
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista FAMECOS
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista FAMECOS
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista FAMECOS; Vol. 30 No. 1 (2023): Single Volume ; e42648
Revista FAMECOS; Vol. 30 Núm. 1 (2023): Volumen único ; e42648
Revista FAMECOS; v. 30 n. 1 (2023): Volume Único ; e42648
1980-3729
1415-0549
10.15448/1980-3729.2023.1
reponame:Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia
collection Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistafamecos@gmail.com
_version_ 1799128657231347712