New information paths: Mediation and visibility on the Brazilian 2013 protests
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/40365 |
Resumo: | The Brazilian protests of 2013 were not only a landmark in the country’s political life, but also outlined an important shift in the production, dissemination, and consumption of political information. What we propose in this text is to approach these changes in two senses: to understand the role of the new mediation processes and to discuss who is really gaining visibility in this new communication environment. We understand that, if on the one hand social media open space for the emergence of new information mediators, on the other hand there is an extremely strong visibility inequality among them. What interests us is to understand what are the differences a) in the mediation process and b) in the visibility dynamics in this new media environment in relation to the broadcast model. Our analysis is based on a corpus of 97,000 tweets collected around one of the main hashtags used during the protests. Our results point to a more complex but less visible mediation process. In terms of visibility dynamics, the patterns we found in the conversation about the 2013 protests show that the broadcast model is not reproduced, but the size of the audience continues to influence access to the visibility arena. In both cases, the main difference is related to the role that sociability plays in determining the paths through which information may or may not pass. |
id |
PUC_RS-12_e99c89ab78f5f47a4f6adbf42c4e17de |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/40365 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-12 |
network_name_str |
Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
New information paths: Mediation and visibility on the Brazilian 2013 protestsNuevas vías de información: Mediación y visibilidad sobre las protestas brasileñas de 2013Novos caminhos da informação: Mediação e visibilidade nos protestos brasileiros de 2013Social mediaProtestVisibilityMediationDemocracyMedios socialesProtestaVisibilidadMediaciónDemocraciaMídias sociaisProtestoVisibilidadeMediaçãoDemocraciaThe Brazilian protests of 2013 were not only a landmark in the country’s political life, but also outlined an important shift in the production, dissemination, and consumption of political information. What we propose in this text is to approach these changes in two senses: to understand the role of the new mediation processes and to discuss who is really gaining visibility in this new communication environment. We understand that, if on the one hand social media open space for the emergence of new information mediators, on the other hand there is an extremely strong visibility inequality among them. What interests us is to understand what are the differences a) in the mediation process and b) in the visibility dynamics in this new media environment in relation to the broadcast model. Our analysis is based on a corpus of 97,000 tweets collected around one of the main hashtags used during the protests. Our results point to a more complex but less visible mediation process. In terms of visibility dynamics, the patterns we found in the conversation about the 2013 protests show that the broadcast model is not reproduced, but the size of the audience continues to influence access to the visibility arena. In both cases, the main difference is related to the role that sociability plays in determining the paths through which information may or may not pass.Las protestas brasileñas de 2013 marcaron no solo un momento sorprendente de la vida política del país, sino también un cambio importante en la producción, difusión y consumo de información política. Lo que proponemos es acceder a estos cambios en dos sentidos: entendiendo el papel de los nuevos procesos de mediación y discutiendo quién está ganando visibilidad en este nuevo entorno comunicativo. Entendemos que si por un lado las redes sociales abren el espacio para que surjan nuevos mediadores de información, por el otro hay una desigualdad de visibilidad extremadamente fuerte entre ellos. Lo que nos interesa es entender cuáles son las diferencias a) en el proceso de mediación y b) en la dinámica de visibilidad en este nuevo entorno mediático. Basamos nuestro análisis en un corpus de 97 mil tweets recopilados alrededor de uno de los principales hashtags utilizados durante las demostraciones. Nuestros resultados apuntan a un proceso de mediación más complejo pero menos visible. En cuanto a la dinámica de visibilidad, los padrones que encontramos en la conversación sobre las protestas de 2013 muestran que el modelo de broadcast no se reproduce, pero el tamaño de la audiencia sigue influyendo en el acceso a la visibilidad. En ambos casos, la mayor diferencia está relacionada con el papel que juega la sociabilidad en la determinación de los caminos por los que puede o no pasar una información.Os protestos brasileiros de 2013 foram não apenas um momento marcante da vida política do país, mas também delinearam uma mudança importante na produção, difusão e consumo de informações políticas. O que propomos neste texto é abordar essas mudanças em dois sentidos: compreender o papel dos novos processos de mediação e discutir quem está realmente ganhando visibilidade nesse novo ambiente de comunicação. Entendemos que, se por um lado as mídias sociais abrem espaço para o surgimento de novos mediadores de informação, no outro há uma desigualdade de visibilidade extremamente forte entre eles. O que nos interessa é entender quais são as diferenças a) no processo de mediação e b) na dinâmica de visibilidade neste novo ambiente midiático em relação ao modelo de broadcast. Baseamos nossa análise em um corpus de 97 mil tweets coletados em torno de uma das principais hashtags usadas durante as manifestações. Nossos resultados apontam para um processo de mediação mais complexo, porém menos visível. Em termos de dinâmica de visibilidade, os padrões que encontramos na conversa sobre os protestos de 2013 mostram que o modelo de broadcast não é reproduzido, mas o tamanho do público continua influenciando no acesso à arena da visibilidade. Em ambos os casos, a principal diferença está relacionada ao papel que a sociabilidade desempenha na determinação dos caminhos pelos quais uma informação pode ou não passar.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2021-11-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/4036510.15448/1980-3729.2021.1.40365Revista FAMECOS; Vol. 28 No. 1 (2021): Single Volume; e40365Revista FAMECOS; Vol. 28 Núm. 1 (2021): Número Único; e40365Revista FAMECOS; v. 28 n. 1 (2021): Número Único; e403651980-37291415-054910.15448/1980-3729.2021.1reponame:Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologiainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/40365/27169Copyright (c) 2021 Revista FAMECOShttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Nina2022-02-04T19:02:42Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/40365Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecosPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/oai||revistafamecos@gmail.com1980-37291980-3729opendoar:2022-02-04T19:02:42Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
New information paths: Mediation and visibility on the Brazilian 2013 protests Nuevas vías de información: Mediación y visibilidad sobre las protestas brasileñas de 2013 Novos caminhos da informação: Mediação e visibilidade nos protestos brasileiros de 2013 |
title |
New information paths: Mediation and visibility on the Brazilian 2013 protests |
spellingShingle |
New information paths: Mediation and visibility on the Brazilian 2013 protests Santos, Nina Social media Protest Visibility Mediation Democracy Medios sociales Protesta Visibilidad Mediación Democracia Mídias sociais Protesto Visibilidade Mediação Democracia |
title_short |
New information paths: Mediation and visibility on the Brazilian 2013 protests |
title_full |
New information paths: Mediation and visibility on the Brazilian 2013 protests |
title_fullStr |
New information paths: Mediation and visibility on the Brazilian 2013 protests |
title_full_unstemmed |
New information paths: Mediation and visibility on the Brazilian 2013 protests |
title_sort |
New information paths: Mediation and visibility on the Brazilian 2013 protests |
author |
Santos, Nina |
author_facet |
Santos, Nina |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Nina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Social media Protest Visibility Mediation Democracy Medios sociales Protesta Visibilidad Mediación Democracia Mídias sociais Protesto Visibilidade Mediação Democracia |
topic |
Social media Protest Visibility Mediation Democracy Medios sociales Protesta Visibilidad Mediación Democracia Mídias sociais Protesto Visibilidade Mediação Democracia |
description |
The Brazilian protests of 2013 were not only a landmark in the country’s political life, but also outlined an important shift in the production, dissemination, and consumption of political information. What we propose in this text is to approach these changes in two senses: to understand the role of the new mediation processes and to discuss who is really gaining visibility in this new communication environment. We understand that, if on the one hand social media open space for the emergence of new information mediators, on the other hand there is an extremely strong visibility inequality among them. What interests us is to understand what are the differences a) in the mediation process and b) in the visibility dynamics in this new media environment in relation to the broadcast model. Our analysis is based on a corpus of 97,000 tweets collected around one of the main hashtags used during the protests. Our results point to a more complex but less visible mediation process. In terms of visibility dynamics, the patterns we found in the conversation about the 2013 protests show that the broadcast model is not reproduced, but the size of the audience continues to influence access to the visibility arena. In both cases, the main difference is related to the role that sociability plays in determining the paths through which information may or may not pass. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-11-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/40365 10.15448/1980-3729.2021.1.40365 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/40365 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/1980-3729.2021.1.40365 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistafamecos/article/view/40365/27169 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista FAMECOS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista FAMECOS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista FAMECOS; Vol. 28 No. 1 (2021): Single Volume; e40365 Revista FAMECOS; Vol. 28 Núm. 1 (2021): Número Único; e40365 Revista FAMECOS; v. 28 n. 1 (2021): Número Único; e40365 1980-3729 1415-0549 10.15448/1980-3729.2021.1 reponame:Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia |
collection |
Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistafamecos@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799128664330207232 |