Evaluation of programs and public policies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fagundes, Helenara
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: de Moura, Alessandra Ballinhas
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Textos & contextos (Porto Alegre)
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fass/article/view/5676
Resumo: The human need to know is directly linked to a desire to understand, explain, judge and alter reality. Natural human curiosity steers thought to value judgments. It is true that any form of evaluation must involve a judgment, that is, in essence it involves attributing value, a measure of approval or disapproval of a public policy or program. The evaluative process should be an issue of constant study given the demand raised in reality, where public policies must respond to the needs of the population by implanting and implementing actions with quality. This article contextualizes the evolution of the process of evaluation and analyzes the methodological factors that should be used in public programs and policies, emphasizing the analytical models of effectiveness, efficacy and efficiency. Key words – Evaluation. Programs. Methodology. Results. Planning. Public policies. Impacts. Efficiency. Effectiveness. Efficacy.
id PUC_RS-13_efc9f0560d625016cf3cf6f7dba77e58
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/5676
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-13
network_name_str Textos & contextos (Porto Alegre)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of programs and public policiesAvaliação de programas e políticas públicasThe human need to know is directly linked to a desire to understand, explain, judge and alter reality. Natural human curiosity steers thought to value judgments. It is true that any form of evaluation must involve a judgment, that is, in essence it involves attributing value, a measure of approval or disapproval of a public policy or program. The evaluative process should be an issue of constant study given the demand raised in reality, where public policies must respond to the needs of the population by implanting and implementing actions with quality. This article contextualizes the evolution of the process of evaluation and analyzes the methodological factors that should be used in public programs and policies, emphasizing the analytical models of effectiveness, efficacy and efficiency. Key words – Evaluation. Programs. Methodology. Results. Planning. Public policies. Impacts. Efficiency. Effectiveness. Efficacy.A necessidade de conhecer do ser humano está diretamente vinculada ao seu desejo de compreender, explicar, julgar e alterar o real. A natural curiosidade humana direciona o pensamento a um julgamento de valor. É certo que qualquer forma de avaliação envolve necessariamente um julgamento, vale dizer, trata-se precipuamente de atribuir um valor, uma medida de aprovação ou desaprovação a uma política ou programa público. O processo avaliativo deve ser um tema de estudo constante frente à demanda colocada na realidade, onde as políticas públicas devem responder às necessidades da população, implantando e implementando ações com qualidade. O presente artigo pretende contextualizar a evolução do processo de avaliação e analisar os aspectos metodológicos que devem ser utilizados nos programas e políticas públicas, enfatizando os modelos analíticos de efetividade, eficácia e eficiência. Palavras-chave – Avaliação. Programas. Metodologia. Resultados. Planejamento. Políticas públicas. Impactos. Eficiência. Eficácia. Efetividade.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2009-08-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fass/article/view/5676Textos & Contextos (Porto Alegre); Vol. 8 No. 1 (2009); 89-103Textos & Contextos (Porto Alegre); v. 8 n. 1 (2009); 89-1031677-9509reponame:Textos & contextos (Porto Alegre)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUC RS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fass/article/view/5676/4129Fagundes, Helenarade Moura, Alessandra Ballinhasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-08-21T20:35:08Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/5676Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fassPUBhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fass/oaitextos@pucrs.br1677-95091677-9509opendoar:2017-08-21T20:35:08Textos & contextos (Porto Alegre) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUC RS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of programs and public policies
Avaliação de programas e políticas públicas
title Evaluation of programs and public policies
spellingShingle Evaluation of programs and public policies
Fagundes, Helenara
title_short Evaluation of programs and public policies
title_full Evaluation of programs and public policies
title_fullStr Evaluation of programs and public policies
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of programs and public policies
title_sort Evaluation of programs and public policies
author Fagundes, Helenara
author_facet Fagundes, Helenara
de Moura, Alessandra Ballinhas
author_role author
author2 de Moura, Alessandra Ballinhas
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fagundes, Helenara
de Moura, Alessandra Ballinhas
description The human need to know is directly linked to a desire to understand, explain, judge and alter reality. Natural human curiosity steers thought to value judgments. It is true that any form of evaluation must involve a judgment, that is, in essence it involves attributing value, a measure of approval or disapproval of a public policy or program. The evaluative process should be an issue of constant study given the demand raised in reality, where public policies must respond to the needs of the population by implanting and implementing actions with quality. This article contextualizes the evolution of the process of evaluation and analyzes the methodological factors that should be used in public programs and policies, emphasizing the analytical models of effectiveness, efficacy and efficiency. Key words – Evaluation. Programs. Methodology. Results. Planning. Public policies. Impacts. Efficiency. Effectiveness. Efficacy.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-08-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fass/article/view/5676
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fass/article/view/5676
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fass/article/view/5676/4129
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Textos & Contextos (Porto Alegre); Vol. 8 No. 1 (2009); 89-103
Textos & Contextos (Porto Alegre); v. 8 n. 1 (2009); 89-103
1677-9509
reponame:Textos & contextos (Porto Alegre)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUC RS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUC RS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Textos & contextos (Porto Alegre)
collection Textos & contextos (Porto Alegre)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Textos & contextos (Porto Alegre) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUC RS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv textos@pucrs.br
_version_ 1799128637284286464

Registros relacionados