The enunciative arguments
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | letrônica |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/30475 |
Resumo: | It is on opposition to the notion of representation that the enunciation is usually defined. Our utterances would simultaneously represent the world and would communicate the speaker’s attitude to such representation: the latter could evaluate in terms of truth and falseness (Frege), declare it desirable, threatening (Bally), making use of it to demand, promise, presuppose (Austin) or even conceive it as the thought of other than you (Bally). Ducrot’s theory, as it is known, has opposed to this division and specifically to the hypothesis that it would be possible to isolate, within the meaning of an utterance, a representation of the world totally apart from the speaker's intuitions (Ducrot, 1993). The Theory of Argumentation within Language, followed by the Theory of Semantic Blocks (TSB) came up in order to appraise a positive meaning to Ducrot's refusal. Thus, as it is said by TSB, the contents of our utterances might be intertwines as argumentative threads. |
id |
PUC_RS-14_7f4e50938bd7b2ca3b139b42c406f4a4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/30475 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-14 |
network_name_str |
letrônica |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The enunciative argumentsLes argumentations énonciativesArgumentationEnunciationToneAttributionArgumentationÉnonciationTonAttribution.It is on opposition to the notion of representation that the enunciation is usually defined. Our utterances would simultaneously represent the world and would communicate the speaker’s attitude to such representation: the latter could evaluate in terms of truth and falseness (Frege), declare it desirable, threatening (Bally), making use of it to demand, promise, presuppose (Austin) or even conceive it as the thought of other than you (Bally). Ducrot’s theory, as it is known, has opposed to this division and specifically to the hypothesis that it would be possible to isolate, within the meaning of an utterance, a representation of the world totally apart from the speaker's intuitions (Ducrot, 1993). The Theory of Argumentation within Language, followed by the Theory of Semantic Blocks (TSB) came up in order to appraise a positive meaning to Ducrot's refusal. Thus, as it is said by TSB, the contents of our utterances might be intertwines as argumentative threads.C'est par opposition à la notion de représentation que l'on définit généralenent l'énonciation. Nos énoncés à la fois représenteraient le monde et communiqueraient l'attitude du locuteur vis-à-vis de cette représentation: ce dernier pourrait l'évaluer en termes de vrai et de faux (Frege), la déclarer désirable, menaçante (Bally) , l'utiliser pour ordonner, promettre, présupposer (Austin), ou encore la donner comme la pensée d'un autre (Bally), Ducrot, on le sait, s'est opposé à ce partage et, tout particulièrement, à l'hyppothèse que l'on pourrait isoler, à l'intérieur du sens d'un énoncé, une représentation du monde totalement débarrassée, nettoyée, des appréciations du locuteur (voir par exemple Ducrot (1993)). La Théorie de l'Argumentation dans la Langue puis la Théorie des Blocs Sémantiques (TBS) se sont construites pour donner un sens positif à ce rejet de Ducrot. Ainsi, selon la TBS, les contenus de nos énoncés sont assimilables à des enchaînements argumentatifs.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2018-07-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/3047510.15448/1984-4301.2018.2.30475Letrônica; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2018): Enunciation and Argumentation in Semantics; 125-143Letrônica; v. 11 n. 2 (2018): Enunciação e argumentação em semântica; 125-1431984-430110.15448/1984-4301.2018.2reponame:letrônicainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/30475/16991Copyright (c) 2018 Letrônicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarel, Marion2019-10-15T21:33:16Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/30475Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronicaPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/oailetronica@pucrs.br||ivanetemileski@gmail.com1984-43011984-4301opendoar:2019-10-15T21:33:16letrônica - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The enunciative arguments Les argumentations énonciatives |
title |
The enunciative arguments |
spellingShingle |
The enunciative arguments Carel, Marion Argumentation Enunciation Tone Attribution Argumentation Énonciation Ton Attribution. |
title_short |
The enunciative arguments |
title_full |
The enunciative arguments |
title_fullStr |
The enunciative arguments |
title_full_unstemmed |
The enunciative arguments |
title_sort |
The enunciative arguments |
author |
Carel, Marion |
author_facet |
Carel, Marion |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carel, Marion |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Argumentation Enunciation Tone Attribution Argumentation Énonciation Ton Attribution. |
topic |
Argumentation Enunciation Tone Attribution Argumentation Énonciation Ton Attribution. |
description |
It is on opposition to the notion of representation that the enunciation is usually defined. Our utterances would simultaneously represent the world and would communicate the speaker’s attitude to such representation: the latter could evaluate in terms of truth and falseness (Frege), declare it desirable, threatening (Bally), making use of it to demand, promise, presuppose (Austin) or even conceive it as the thought of other than you (Bally). Ducrot’s theory, as it is known, has opposed to this division and specifically to the hypothesis that it would be possible to isolate, within the meaning of an utterance, a representation of the world totally apart from the speaker's intuitions (Ducrot, 1993). The Theory of Argumentation within Language, followed by the Theory of Semantic Blocks (TSB) came up in order to appraise a positive meaning to Ducrot's refusal. Thus, as it is said by TSB, the contents of our utterances might be intertwines as argumentative threads. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-07-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/30475 10.15448/1984-4301.2018.2.30475 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/30475 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/1984-4301.2018.2.30475 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/30475/16991 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Letrônica info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Letrônica |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Letrônica; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2018): Enunciation and Argumentation in Semantics; 125-143 Letrônica; v. 11 n. 2 (2018): Enunciação e argumentação em semântica; 125-143 1984-4301 10.15448/1984-4301.2018.2 reponame:letrônica instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
letrônica |
collection |
letrônica |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
letrônica - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
letronica@pucrs.br||ivanetemileski@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799128598613852160 |