Sorites Paradox: a semantic reflection about vagueness
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | letrônica |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/32479 |
Resumo: | We use vague words and expressions without perceiving or causing strangeness in our interlocutors in everyday language. They are vague predicates, in which the property of being vague may not be so explicit. These predicates are uncertain cases or cases with the semantic boundary make difficult to clarify the extension of the predicate itself. Vagueness is assessed in both logic and linguistics studies. In logic, this type of predicate enables the development of the so-called Sorites paradox, whose argument can be constructed by chaining the premises or by mathematical induction. We use in this paper a philosophical study of vagueness and Sorites paradox (PETRILLO, 2005) and also a linguistic study, in semantics based on truth conditions (CHIERCHIA; MCCONNELL-GINET, 1990), to reflect about the way vagueness is treated in language. |
id |
PUC_RS-14_9368f49dc6fcfedfdd56a85f008808a3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/32479 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-14 |
network_name_str |
letrônica |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Sorites Paradox: a semantic reflection about vaguenessParadoxo de Sorites: uma reflexão semântica sobre vaguezaSorites. Vagueness. Semantics.Sorites. Vagueza. Semântica.We use vague words and expressions without perceiving or causing strangeness in our interlocutors in everyday language. They are vague predicates, in which the property of being vague may not be so explicit. These predicates are uncertain cases or cases with the semantic boundary make difficult to clarify the extension of the predicate itself. Vagueness is assessed in both logic and linguistics studies. In logic, this type of predicate enables the development of the so-called Sorites paradox, whose argument can be constructed by chaining the premises or by mathematical induction. We use in this paper a philosophical study of vagueness and Sorites paradox (PETRILLO, 2005) and also a linguistic study, in semantics based on truth conditions (CHIERCHIA; MCCONNELL-GINET, 1990), to reflect about the way vagueness is treated in language.No cotidiano, usamos palavras e expressões vagas sem muitas vezes pensarmos sobre isso ou causarmos estranheza em nossos interlocutores. São predicados de vagueza, nos quais a propriedade de ser vago pode não ser tão explícita. Esses predicados são casos incertos ou com a fronteira semântica limítrofe, o que dificulta a clareza da extensão do predicado em si. O objetivo principal deste trabalho, é avaliar os encadeamentos soríticos em uma interface entre a linguística e a lógica. Visto que a vagueza é observada nessas duas áreas do conhecimento. Na lógica, esse tipo de predicado possibilita o desenvolvimento do chamado paradoxo de Sorites, cujo argumento pode ser construído por encadeamento das premissas ou por indução matemática. Usamos, nesse trabalho, o estudo filosófico da vagueza e do paradoxo (PETRILLO, 2005) e, também, o estudo linguístico, em uma semântica de condições de verdade (CHIERCHIA; MCCONNELL-GINET, 1990), para refletirmos sobre como a vagueza é tratada na linguagem.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2019-10-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/3247910.15448/1984-4301.2019.2.32479Letrônica; Vol. 12 No. 2 (2019): Semantics: Interfaces and Developments in Applied Research; e32479Letrônica; v. 12 n. 2 (2019): Semânticas: interfaces e desdobramentos em pesquisa aplicada; e324791984-430110.15448/1984-4301.2019.2reponame:letrônicainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/32479/18697Copyright (c) 2019 Letrônicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBehle, Nanashara Fagundes2019-10-18T01:22:22Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/32479Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronicaPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/oailetronica@pucrs.br||ivanetemileski@gmail.com1984-43011984-4301opendoar:2019-10-18T01:22:22letrônica - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sorites Paradox: a semantic reflection about vagueness Paradoxo de Sorites: uma reflexão semântica sobre vagueza |
title |
Sorites Paradox: a semantic reflection about vagueness |
spellingShingle |
Sorites Paradox: a semantic reflection about vagueness Behle, Nanashara Fagundes Sorites. Vagueness. Semantics. Sorites. Vagueza. Semântica. |
title_short |
Sorites Paradox: a semantic reflection about vagueness |
title_full |
Sorites Paradox: a semantic reflection about vagueness |
title_fullStr |
Sorites Paradox: a semantic reflection about vagueness |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sorites Paradox: a semantic reflection about vagueness |
title_sort |
Sorites Paradox: a semantic reflection about vagueness |
author |
Behle, Nanashara Fagundes |
author_facet |
Behle, Nanashara Fagundes |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Behle, Nanashara Fagundes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sorites. Vagueness. Semantics. Sorites. Vagueza. Semântica. |
topic |
Sorites. Vagueness. Semantics. Sorites. Vagueza. Semântica. |
description |
We use vague words and expressions without perceiving or causing strangeness in our interlocutors in everyday language. They are vague predicates, in which the property of being vague may not be so explicit. These predicates are uncertain cases or cases with the semantic boundary make difficult to clarify the extension of the predicate itself. Vagueness is assessed in both logic and linguistics studies. In logic, this type of predicate enables the development of the so-called Sorites paradox, whose argument can be constructed by chaining the premises or by mathematical induction. We use in this paper a philosophical study of vagueness and Sorites paradox (PETRILLO, 2005) and also a linguistic study, in semantics based on truth conditions (CHIERCHIA; MCCONNELL-GINET, 1990), to reflect about the way vagueness is treated in language. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/32479 10.15448/1984-4301.2019.2.32479 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/32479 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/1984-4301.2019.2.32479 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/32479/18697 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Letrônica info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Letrônica |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Letrônica; Vol. 12 No. 2 (2019): Semantics: Interfaces and Developments in Applied Research; e32479 Letrônica; v. 12 n. 2 (2019): Semânticas: interfaces e desdobramentos em pesquisa aplicada; e32479 1984-4301 10.15448/1984-4301.2019.2 reponame:letrônica instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
letrônica |
collection |
letrônica |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
letrônica - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
letronica@pucrs.br||ivanetemileski@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799128598735486976 |