Equality in paradox: an enunciative approach

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dias, Luiz Francisco
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Souza, Thalita Nogueira de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: letrônica
DOI: 10.15448/1984-4301.2018.2.28707
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/28707
Resumo: This study does a semantic analysis of the term equality. It was based on the French enunciation theory developed in Brazil by Guimarães (1995; 2002). The object of the analysis was the legal texts produced by the ministers of the Supreme Court, in which uses of the word equality appear. The results of the analysis show that the meaning of this word is not based on the relationship "A is equal to B". This new meaning is based on the relationship "A should be equal to B". Thus, the ministers justify the decision to adopt racial quotas, in the selection processes for universities, in order to transform this new concept into reality.
id PUC_RS-14_a859531587d5224deea04f4736d9377d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/28707
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-14
network_name_str letrônica
spelling Equality in paradox: an enunciative approachA igualdade em paradoxo: uma abordagem enunciativaEnunciationEqualityNominal training.EnunciaçãoIgualdadeFormação nominal.This study does a semantic analysis of the term equality. It was based on the French enunciation theory developed in Brazil by Guimarães (1995; 2002). The object of the analysis was the legal texts produced by the ministers of the Supreme Court, in which uses of the word equality appear. The results of the analysis show that the meaning of this word is not based on the relationship "A is equal to B". This new meaning is based on the relationship "A should be equal to B". Thus, the ministers justify the decision to adopt racial quotas, in the selection processes for universities, in order to transform this new concept into reality.Este estudo realiza uma análise semântica do termo igualdade. Utilizou-se como fundamento a teoria da enunciação de linha francesa, desenvolvida no Brasil por Guimarães (1995; 2002). A análise tomou como objeto textos jurídicos produzidos por ministros do Supremo Tribunal Federal, nos quais aparecem os usos da palavra igualdade. Os resultados da análise indicam que a significação dessa palavra não está fundamentada na relação “A igual a B”. Esse novo sentido está fundamentado na relação “A deve ser igual a B”. Assim, os ministros justificam a decisão de adotar cotas raciais nos processos de seleção para as universidades, no intuito de transformar em realidade esse novo conceito.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2018-07-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/2870710.15448/1984-4301.2018.2.28707Letrônica; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2018): Enunciation and Argumentation in Semantics; 181-191Letrônica; v. 11 n. 2 (2018): Enunciação e argumentação em semântica; 181-1911984-430110.15448/1984-4301.2018.2reponame:letrônicainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/28707/16995Copyright (c) 2018 Letrônicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDias, Luiz FranciscoSouza, Thalita Nogueira de2019-10-15T21:33:16Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/28707Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronicaPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/oailetronica@pucrs.br||ivanetemileski@gmail.com1984-43011984-4301opendoar:2019-10-15T21:33:16letrônica - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Equality in paradox: an enunciative approach
A igualdade em paradoxo: uma abordagem enunciativa
title Equality in paradox: an enunciative approach
spellingShingle Equality in paradox: an enunciative approach
Equality in paradox: an enunciative approach
Dias, Luiz Francisco
Enunciation
Equality
Nominal training.
Enunciação
Igualdade
Formação nominal.
Dias, Luiz Francisco
Enunciation
Equality
Nominal training.
Enunciação
Igualdade
Formação nominal.
title_short Equality in paradox: an enunciative approach
title_full Equality in paradox: an enunciative approach
title_fullStr Equality in paradox: an enunciative approach
Equality in paradox: an enunciative approach
title_full_unstemmed Equality in paradox: an enunciative approach
Equality in paradox: an enunciative approach
title_sort Equality in paradox: an enunciative approach
author Dias, Luiz Francisco
author_facet Dias, Luiz Francisco
Dias, Luiz Francisco
Souza, Thalita Nogueira de
Souza, Thalita Nogueira de
author_role author
author2 Souza, Thalita Nogueira de
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dias, Luiz Francisco
Souza, Thalita Nogueira de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Enunciation
Equality
Nominal training.
Enunciação
Igualdade
Formação nominal.
topic Enunciation
Equality
Nominal training.
Enunciação
Igualdade
Formação nominal.
description This study does a semantic analysis of the term equality. It was based on the French enunciation theory developed in Brazil by Guimarães (1995; 2002). The object of the analysis was the legal texts produced by the ministers of the Supreme Court, in which uses of the word equality appear. The results of the analysis show that the meaning of this word is not based on the relationship "A is equal to B". This new meaning is based on the relationship "A should be equal to B". Thus, the ministers justify the decision to adopt racial quotas, in the selection processes for universities, in order to transform this new concept into reality.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-07-19
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/28707
10.15448/1984-4301.2018.2.28707
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/28707
identifier_str_mv 10.15448/1984-4301.2018.2.28707
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/28707/16995
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Letrônica
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Letrônica
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Letrônica; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2018): Enunciation and Argumentation in Semantics; 181-191
Letrônica; v. 11 n. 2 (2018): Enunciação e argumentação em semântica; 181-191
1984-4301
10.15448/1984-4301.2018.2
reponame:letrônica
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str letrônica
collection letrônica
repository.name.fl_str_mv letrônica - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv letronica@pucrs.br||ivanetemileski@gmail.com
_version_ 1822181297806639104
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.15448/1984-4301.2018.2.28707

Registros relacionados