The taboo of childbirth: Dilemmas and interdictions of a field under construction
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/17928 |
Resumo: | This paper focuses on the receptivity of researches about childbirth within the Social Sciences. On one hand, we have acknowledged an increasing consolidation of this investigation field, from social demands that were raised due to the actual obstetric scenario in Brazil, in which different discourses are articulated, ranging from public policies to social movements. On the other hand, there is a recurrent delegitimization not only of researches and their addressed issues but also of researchers and their motivations. Therefore, due to the above consideration, and based on situations that were experienced by the authors in the academic and/or feminist context, we present a critical perspective of some recurrent comments that we have identified with the hegemonic discourse, which poses no critics about the Brazilian obstetric reality. As for instance, we also analyse episiotomy as an emblematic intervention that illustrates how the knowledge about woman’s body was shaped and controlled by prejudice and power. |
id |
PUC_RS-17_175f843adc4e039e441b4a4c53909f97 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/17928 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-17 |
network_name_str |
Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The taboo of childbirth: Dilemmas and interdictions of a field under constructionO tabu do parto: Dilemas e interdições de um campo ainda em construçãoChildbirth. Social research. Feminism. Neutrality.Parto. Pesquisa Social. Feminismo. Neutralidade.This paper focuses on the receptivity of researches about childbirth within the Social Sciences. On one hand, we have acknowledged an increasing consolidation of this investigation field, from social demands that were raised due to the actual obstetric scenario in Brazil, in which different discourses are articulated, ranging from public policies to social movements. On the other hand, there is a recurrent delegitimization not only of researches and their addressed issues but also of researchers and their motivations. Therefore, due to the above consideration, and based on situations that were experienced by the authors in the academic and/or feminist context, we present a critical perspective of some recurrent comments that we have identified with the hegemonic discourse, which poses no critics about the Brazilian obstetric reality. As for instance, we also analyse episiotomy as an emblematic intervention that illustrates how the knowledge about woman’s body was shaped and controlled by prejudice and power.O artigo se debruça sobre a receptividade das pesquisas sobre parto e nascimento no âmbito das Ciências Sociais. Se, por um lado, percebe-se a paulatina consolidação de um campo de pesquisa, a partir de demandas sociais que emergiram em face do atual cenário obstétrico brasileiro, no qual diferentes discursos são articulados entre políticas públicas e movimentos sociais; por outro, há uma recorrente deslegitimização tanto das pesquisas e problemáticas trabalhadas quanto das pesquisadoras e suas motivações. Dito isto, e a partir de experiências vivenciadas pelas autoras no contexto acadêmico e/ou feminista, apresentamos uma reflexão crítica sobre alguns comentários ouvidos nesses ambientes, identificando-os com o discurso hegemônico que não problematiza o cenário obstétrico. Para ilustrar, optamos por analisar a episiotomia como intervenção emblemática na assistência ao parto no Brasil, que condensa expressões dos saberes e poderes formulados e reproduzidos sobre o corpo da mulher.Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS2015-09-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/1792810.15448/1984-7289.2015.2.17928Civitas: journal of Social Sciences; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2015): Childbirths, maternities and body policies; 272-293Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 15 Núm. 2 (2015): Partos, maternidades e políticas do corpo; 272-293Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 15 n. 2 (2015): Partos, maternidades e políticas do corpo; 272-2931984-72891519-608910.15448/1984-7289.2015.2reponame:Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/17928/13393Copyright (c) 2016 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociaishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMuller, ElaineRodrigues, LaísPimentel, Camila2016-11-03T22:22:55Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/17928Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/oaiPRIhttp://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/civitas/oaicivitas@pucrs.br1984-72891519-6089opendoar:2016-11-03T22:22:55Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The taboo of childbirth: Dilemmas and interdictions of a field under construction O tabu do parto: Dilemas e interdições de um campo ainda em construção |
title |
The taboo of childbirth: Dilemmas and interdictions of a field under construction |
spellingShingle |
The taboo of childbirth: Dilemmas and interdictions of a field under construction Muller, Elaine Childbirth. Social research. Feminism. Neutrality. Parto. Pesquisa Social. Feminismo. Neutralidade. |
title_short |
The taboo of childbirth: Dilemmas and interdictions of a field under construction |
title_full |
The taboo of childbirth: Dilemmas and interdictions of a field under construction |
title_fullStr |
The taboo of childbirth: Dilemmas and interdictions of a field under construction |
title_full_unstemmed |
The taboo of childbirth: Dilemmas and interdictions of a field under construction |
title_sort |
The taboo of childbirth: Dilemmas and interdictions of a field under construction |
author |
Muller, Elaine |
author_facet |
Muller, Elaine Rodrigues, Laís Pimentel, Camila |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rodrigues, Laís Pimentel, Camila |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Muller, Elaine Rodrigues, Laís Pimentel, Camila |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Childbirth. Social research. Feminism. Neutrality. Parto. Pesquisa Social. Feminismo. Neutralidade. |
topic |
Childbirth. Social research. Feminism. Neutrality. Parto. Pesquisa Social. Feminismo. Neutralidade. |
description |
This paper focuses on the receptivity of researches about childbirth within the Social Sciences. On one hand, we have acknowledged an increasing consolidation of this investigation field, from social demands that were raised due to the actual obstetric scenario in Brazil, in which different discourses are articulated, ranging from public policies to social movements. On the other hand, there is a recurrent delegitimization not only of researches and their addressed issues but also of researchers and their motivations. Therefore, due to the above consideration, and based on situations that were experienced by the authors in the academic and/or feminist context, we present a critical perspective of some recurrent comments that we have identified with the hegemonic discourse, which poses no critics about the Brazilian obstetric reality. As for instance, we also analyse episiotomy as an emblematic intervention that illustrates how the knowledge about woman’s body was shaped and controlled by prejudice and power. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-09-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/17928 10.15448/1984-7289.2015.2.17928 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/17928 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/1984-7289.2015.2.17928 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/17928/13393 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Civitas: journal of Social Sciences; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2015): Childbirths, maternities and body policies; 272-293 Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 15 Núm. 2 (2015): Partos, maternidades e políticas do corpo; 272-293 Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 15 n. 2 (2015): Partos, maternidades e políticas do corpo; 272-293 1984-7289 1519-6089 10.15448/1984-7289.2015.2 reponame:Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) |
collection |
Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
civitas@pucrs.br |
_version_ |
1799128806159548416 |