Various modes of the foundation for Sociology: Weber, Parsons, and Schutz

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nasu, Hisashi
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/28064
Resumo: The foundation for Max Weber’s verstehende Soziologie provided by himself was sufficient for him to deal with his concrete sociological problems. It appeared, however, to be insufficient for Alfred Schutz as well as for Talcott Parsons, in spite of their appreciating Weber’s ideas of this sociology as such. Schutz criticized that Weber made little clarification of the fundamental layers of his primary concepts, whereas Parsons criticized Weber’s tendency “to obscure the role of the essentially nonfictional generalized system of theory.” What does this difference among them means? This essay tries to make an answer to this question through comparing Weber and Parsons, Weber and Schutz, and Schutz and Parsons by focusing mainly on the concepts of “Verstehen” (understanding), “action” and “subjective meaning.” Such a comparative investigation is expected to shed light on contributions of phenomenology to sociology.
id PUC_RS-17_596ca8c6f45f2d4718fc78517984387b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/28064
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-17
network_name_str Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Various modes of the foundation for Sociology: Weber, Parsons, and SchutzVarious modes of the foundation for Sociology: Weber, Parsons, and Schutz.Various modes of the foundation for Sociology: Weber, Parsons, and SchutzAction. Verstehen. Understanding. Subjective meaning. Project.Action. Verstehen. Understanding. Subjective meaning. Project.Ação. Verstehen. Compreensão. Significado subjetivo. Projeto.The foundation for Max Weber’s verstehende Soziologie provided by himself was sufficient for him to deal with his concrete sociological problems. It appeared, however, to be insufficient for Alfred Schutz as well as for Talcott Parsons, in spite of their appreciating Weber’s ideas of this sociology as such. Schutz criticized that Weber made little clarification of the fundamental layers of his primary concepts, whereas Parsons criticized Weber’s tendency “to obscure the role of the essentially nonfictional generalized system of theory.” What does this difference among them means? This essay tries to make an answer to this question through comparing Weber and Parsons, Weber and Schutz, and Schutz and Parsons by focusing mainly on the concepts of “Verstehen” (understanding), “action” and “subjective meaning.” Such a comparative investigation is expected to shed light on contributions of phenomenology to sociology.The foundation for Max Weber’s verstehende Soziologie provided by himself was sufficient for him to deal with his concrete sociological problems. It appeared, however, to be insufficient for Alfred Schutz as well as for Talcott Parsons, in spite of their appreciating Weber’s ideas of this sociology as such. Schutz criticized that Weber made little clarification of the fundamental layers of his primary concepts, whereas Parsons criticized Weber’s tendency “to obscure the role of the essentially nonfictional generalized system of theory.” What does this difference among them means? This essay tries to make an answer to this question through comparing Weber and Parsons, Weber and Schutz, and Schutz and Parsons by focusing mainly on the concepts of “Verstehen” (understanding), “action” and “subjective meaning.” Such a comparative investigation is expected to shed light on contributions of phenomenology to sociology.***Vários modos de fundamentação para a Sociologia: Weber, Parsons e Schutz***A fundamentação de verstehende Soziologie apresentada pelo próprio Max Weber foi suficiente para que ele pudesse lidar com seus problemas sociológicos concretos. Contudo, pareceu ser insuficiente para Alfred Schutz assim como para Talcott Parsons, a despeito do reconhecimento de ambos em relação às ideias de Weber sobre essa sociologia enquanto tal. Schutz criticou que Weber pouco esclareceu sobre os fundamentos de seus conceitos mais importantes, enquanto Parsons criticou a tendência de Weber “de obscurecer o papel essencialmente não-ficcional do sistema de teoria generalizado”. O que significa a diferença entre eles? Esse artigo tenta dar uma resposta a esta questão comparando Weber e Parsons, Weber e Schutz e Schutz e Parsons, concentrando-se sobretudo nos conceitos de “Verstehen” (compreensão), “ação” e “significado subjetivo”. Com essa análise comparativa espera-se jogar luzes sobre contribuições da fenomenologia para a sociologia.Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS2017-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/2806410.15448/1984-7289.2017.3.28064Civitas: journal of Social Sciences; Vol. 17 No. 3 (2017): Sociology and Phenomenology; 389-410Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 17 Núm. 3 (2017): Sociologia e Fenomenologia; 389-410Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 17 n. 3 (2017): Sociologia e Fenomenologia; 389-4101984-72891519-608910.15448/1984-7289.2017.3reponame:Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSenghttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/28064/16274Copyright (c) 2017 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociaishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNasu, Hisashi2019-02-28T15:06:06Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/28064Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/oaiPRIhttp://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/civitas/oaicivitas@pucrs.br1984-72891519-6089opendoar:2019-02-28T15:06:06Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Various modes of the foundation for Sociology: Weber, Parsons, and Schutz
Various modes of the foundation for Sociology: Weber, Parsons, and Schutz.
Various modes of the foundation for Sociology: Weber, Parsons, and Schutz
title Various modes of the foundation for Sociology: Weber, Parsons, and Schutz
spellingShingle Various modes of the foundation for Sociology: Weber, Parsons, and Schutz
Nasu, Hisashi
Action. Verstehen. Understanding. Subjective meaning. Project.
Action. Verstehen. Understanding. Subjective meaning. Project.
Ação. Verstehen. Compreensão. Significado subjetivo. Projeto.
title_short Various modes of the foundation for Sociology: Weber, Parsons, and Schutz
title_full Various modes of the foundation for Sociology: Weber, Parsons, and Schutz
title_fullStr Various modes of the foundation for Sociology: Weber, Parsons, and Schutz
title_full_unstemmed Various modes of the foundation for Sociology: Weber, Parsons, and Schutz
title_sort Various modes of the foundation for Sociology: Weber, Parsons, and Schutz
author Nasu, Hisashi
author_facet Nasu, Hisashi
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nasu, Hisashi
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Action. Verstehen. Understanding. Subjective meaning. Project.
Action. Verstehen. Understanding. Subjective meaning. Project.
Ação. Verstehen. Compreensão. Significado subjetivo. Projeto.
topic Action. Verstehen. Understanding. Subjective meaning. Project.
Action. Verstehen. Understanding. Subjective meaning. Project.
Ação. Verstehen. Compreensão. Significado subjetivo. Projeto.
description The foundation for Max Weber’s verstehende Soziologie provided by himself was sufficient for him to deal with his concrete sociological problems. It appeared, however, to be insufficient for Alfred Schutz as well as for Talcott Parsons, in spite of their appreciating Weber’s ideas of this sociology as such. Schutz criticized that Weber made little clarification of the fundamental layers of his primary concepts, whereas Parsons criticized Weber’s tendency “to obscure the role of the essentially nonfictional generalized system of theory.” What does this difference among them means? This essay tries to make an answer to this question through comparing Weber and Parsons, Weber and Schutz, and Schutz and Parsons by focusing mainly on the concepts of “Verstehen” (understanding), “action” and “subjective meaning.” Such a comparative investigation is expected to shed light on contributions of phenomenology to sociology.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/28064
10.15448/1984-7289.2017.3.28064
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/28064
identifier_str_mv 10.15448/1984-7289.2017.3.28064
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/28064/16274
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Civitas: journal of Social Sciences; Vol. 17 No. 3 (2017): Sociology and Phenomenology; 389-410
Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 17 Núm. 3 (2017): Sociologia e Fenomenologia; 389-410
Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 17 n. 3 (2017): Sociologia e Fenomenologia; 389-410
1984-7289
1519-6089
10.15448/1984-7289.2017.3
reponame:Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)
collection Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv civitas@pucrs.br
_version_ 1799128807018332160

Registros relacionados