Cultural paradiplomacy institutions and agenda: the case of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marié, Solène
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/28907
Resumo: This article aims to analise how the Brazilian State of Rio Grande do Sul (RS) projects its distinctive cultural identity internationally. It does so by identifying the cultural elements in the state’s paradiplomacy from 1987 to 2014 through a sequence analysis including two elements: RS’s paradiplomatic and cultural institutions; RS’s paradiplomatic agenda. Three phases are identified in terms of space given to culture in the paradiplomacy institutional framework: expansion (1987-1994); retraction (1995- 2010); expansion (2011-2014). The phases are slightly different in terms of agenda: will but lack of means (1987-1990); focus on other issues (1991-2010); construction of an incipient agenda (2011-2014). Also, the 2012 actions to structure cultural policy at federal and state level can be seen as a factor for the agenda expansion in the last phase. However, despite the discourse around the gaúcha identity being present within the state and country, the projection further afield remains weak. Generally, the multiple changes in institutional framework and agenda show that a long-term project has not been decided on. Thus, the resulting policies are highly dependent on each governor’s vision.
id PUC_RS-17_7c2dce66d5de306479787f4842adf3df
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/28907
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-17
network_name_str Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Cultural paradiplomacy institutions and agenda: the case of Rio Grande do Sul, BrazilInstituciones y agenda de paradiplomacia cultural: El caso de Rio Grande do Sul, BrasilCultural paradiplomacy institutions and agenda: The case of Rio Grande do Sul, BrazilParadiplomacy. Culture. Rio Grande do Sul.Paradiplomacia. Cultura. Rio Grande do Sul.Paradiplomacia. Cultura. Rio Grande do Sul.This article aims to analise how the Brazilian State of Rio Grande do Sul (RS) projects its distinctive cultural identity internationally. It does so by identifying the cultural elements in the state’s paradiplomacy from 1987 to 2014 through a sequence analysis including two elements: RS’s paradiplomatic and cultural institutions; RS’s paradiplomatic agenda. Three phases are identified in terms of space given to culture in the paradiplomacy institutional framework: expansion (1987-1994); retraction (1995- 2010); expansion (2011-2014). The phases are slightly different in terms of agenda: will but lack of means (1987-1990); focus on other issues (1991-2010); construction of an incipient agenda (2011-2014). Also, the 2012 actions to structure cultural policy at federal and state level can be seen as a factor for the agenda expansion in the last phase. However, despite the discourse around the gaúcha identity being present within the state and country, the projection further afield remains weak. Generally, the multiple changes in institutional framework and agenda show that a long-term project has not been decided on. Thus, the resulting policies are highly dependent on each governor’s vision.El propósito de este artículo es de analizar cómo el Estado de Rio Grande do Sul (RS), Brasil, proyecta internacionalmente su identidad cultural. Con este objetivo, se busca identificar los elementos culturales de la paradiplomacia del estado de 1987 a 2014 mediante un análisis de su trayectoria, y en concreto de dos elementos: las instituciones paradiplomáticas y culturales de RS y la agenda paradiplomática de RS. Se identifican tres fases en términos de espacio dado a la cultura en la estructura paradiplomática: expansión (1987-1994); reducción (1995-2010); expansión (2011- 2014). Las fases relativas a la agenda son un poco diferentes: ambición, pero falta de medios (1987-1990); enfoque en otros temas (1991-2010); construcción de una agenda incipiente (2011-2014). Además, las acciones llevadas a cabo a nivel federal y estatal para estructurar las políticas culturales pueden ser vistas como un factor de expansión de la agenda en la última fase. Sin embargo, pese a que el discurso sobre la identidad gaucha está presente dentro del estado y a nivel nacional, su proyección internacional es débil. De manera general, los múltiples cambios en la estructurainstitucional y en la agenda muestran que no se estableció un proyecto de largo plazo. Por lo tanto, las políticas resultantes son altamente dependientes de la visión de cada gobernador.This article aims to analise how the Brazilian State of Rio Grande do Sul (RS) projects its distinctive cultural identity internationally. It does so by identifying the cultural elements in the state’s paradiplomacy from 1987 to 2014 through a sequence analysis including two elements: RS’s paradiplomatic and cultural institutions; RS’s paradiplomatic agenda. Three phases are identified in terms of space given to culture in the paradiplomacy institutional framework: expansion (1987-1994); retraction (1995- 2010); expansion (2011-2014). The phases are slightly different in terms of agenda: will but lack of means (1987-1990); focus on other issues (1991-2010); construction of an incipient agenda (2011-2014). Also, the 2012 actions to structure cultural policy at federal and state level can be seen as a factor for the agenda expansion in the last phase. However, despite the discourse around the gaúcha identity being present within the state and country, the projection further afield remains weak. Generally, the multiple changes in institutional framework and agenda show that a long-term project has not been decided on. Thus, the resulting policies are highly dependent on each governor’s vision.***Instituições e agenda de paradiplomacia cultural: O caso do Rio Grande do Sul***O objetivo deste artigo é de avaliar como o Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (RS), Brasil, projeta internacionalmente a sua identidade cultural singular. Para tanto, ele busca identificar os elementos culturais na paradiplomacia do estado de 1987 a 2014 com uma análise de trajetória composta de dois elementos: as instituições paradiplomáticas e culturais do RS; a agenda paradiplomática do RS. São identificadas três fases em termos de espaço dado à cultura na estrutura paradiplomática: expansão (1987-1994); redução (1995-2010); expansão (2011-2014). As fases relativas à agenda são um pouco diferentes: ambição, mas falta de meios (1987-1990); foco em outras temáticas (1991-2010); construção de uma agenda incipiente (2011-2014). Além disso, as ações conduzidas em 2012 para estruturar as políticas culturais em nível federal e estadual podem ser vistas como um fator da expansão da agenda na última fase.  Entretanto, apesar do discurso ao redor da identidade gaúcha ser presente dentro do estado e em nível nacional, a projeção internacional dele é fraca. De maneira geral, as múltiplas mudanças na estrutura institucional e na agenda mostram que um projeto de longo prazo não foi estabelecido. Portanto, as políticas resultantes são altamente dependentes da visão de cada governador.Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS2018-08-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/2890710.15448/1984-7289.2018.2.28907Civitas: journal of Social Sciences; Vol. 18 No. 2 (2018): Globalization, regionalization, and borders; 351-375Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 18 Núm. 2 (2018): Globalización, regionalización y fronteras; 351-375Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 18 n. 2 (2018): Mundialização, regionalização e fronteiras; 351-3751984-72891519-608910.15448/1984-7289.2018.2reponame:Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSenghttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/28907/17087Copyright (c) 2018 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociaishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarié, Solène2019-03-19T21:24:02Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/28907Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/oaiPRIhttp://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/civitas/oaicivitas@pucrs.br1984-72891519-6089opendoar:2019-03-19T21:24:02Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cultural paradiplomacy institutions and agenda: the case of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Instituciones y agenda de paradiplomacia cultural: El caso de Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil
Cultural paradiplomacy institutions and agenda: The case of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
title Cultural paradiplomacy institutions and agenda: the case of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
spellingShingle Cultural paradiplomacy institutions and agenda: the case of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Marié, Solène
Paradiplomacy. Culture. Rio Grande do Sul.
Paradiplomacia. Cultura. Rio Grande do Sul.
Paradiplomacia. Cultura. Rio Grande do Sul.
title_short Cultural paradiplomacy institutions and agenda: the case of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
title_full Cultural paradiplomacy institutions and agenda: the case of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
title_fullStr Cultural paradiplomacy institutions and agenda: the case of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Cultural paradiplomacy institutions and agenda: the case of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
title_sort Cultural paradiplomacy institutions and agenda: the case of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
author Marié, Solène
author_facet Marié, Solène
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marié, Solène
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Paradiplomacy. Culture. Rio Grande do Sul.
Paradiplomacia. Cultura. Rio Grande do Sul.
Paradiplomacia. Cultura. Rio Grande do Sul.
topic Paradiplomacy. Culture. Rio Grande do Sul.
Paradiplomacia. Cultura. Rio Grande do Sul.
Paradiplomacia. Cultura. Rio Grande do Sul.
description This article aims to analise how the Brazilian State of Rio Grande do Sul (RS) projects its distinctive cultural identity internationally. It does so by identifying the cultural elements in the state’s paradiplomacy from 1987 to 2014 through a sequence analysis including two elements: RS’s paradiplomatic and cultural institutions; RS’s paradiplomatic agenda. Three phases are identified in terms of space given to culture in the paradiplomacy institutional framework: expansion (1987-1994); retraction (1995- 2010); expansion (2011-2014). The phases are slightly different in terms of agenda: will but lack of means (1987-1990); focus on other issues (1991-2010); construction of an incipient agenda (2011-2014). Also, the 2012 actions to structure cultural policy at federal and state level can be seen as a factor for the agenda expansion in the last phase. However, despite the discourse around the gaúcha identity being present within the state and country, the projection further afield remains weak. Generally, the multiple changes in institutional framework and agenda show that a long-term project has not been decided on. Thus, the resulting policies are highly dependent on each governor’s vision.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-08-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/28907
10.15448/1984-7289.2018.2.28907
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/28907
identifier_str_mv 10.15448/1984-7289.2018.2.28907
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/28907/17087
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Civitas: journal of Social Sciences; Vol. 18 No. 2 (2018): Globalization, regionalization, and borders; 351-375
Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 18 Núm. 2 (2018): Globalización, regionalización y fronteras; 351-375
Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 18 n. 2 (2018): Mundialização, regionalização e fronteiras; 351-375
1984-7289
1519-6089
10.15448/1984-7289.2018.2
reponame:Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)
collection Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv civitas@pucrs.br
_version_ 1799128807048740864