On the limits of philosophy and the possibilities of sociology in Pierre Bourdieu

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sandoval Aragón, Sergio Lorenzo
Data de Publicação: 2024
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/43073
Resumo: Since the origins of the social sciences during the European eighteenth century, philosophy has maintained a problematic relationship with them, particularly with sociology. Despite the historical process of progressive structuring and differentiation of the social sciences from philosophy, the discussion is by no means definitively settled, at least from the point of view of philosophy. This article reviews the position of the sociologist Pierre Bourdieu in this regard. Against the idea according to which, for Bourdieu, both philosophy and the social sciences are capable of elaborating problems and concepts, differing only by their methods and maintaining a fruitful theoretical exchange with each other, a processual reading of his work, supported by recent historiographical studies, reveal a more radical position according to which the social sciences have developed the autonomous capacity to elaborate authentic scientific knowledge. Thus, Bourdieu's alleged ambiguity in relation to philosophy would be nothing more than the superficial appearance of a permanent rupture process, which the development of his sociology required.
id PUC_RS-17_91dad8cf3f45e4681794b47ebfe3874c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/43073
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-17
network_name_str Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling On the limits of philosophy and the possibilities of sociology in Pierre BourdieuDe los límites de la filosofía y las posibilidades de la sociología en Pierre BourdieuSobre os limites da filosofia e as possibilidades da sociologia em Pierre BourdieuFilosofíaAutonomíaCiencias socialesSociohistoriaReflexividadFilosofíaAutonomíaCiências SociaisSocio-históriaReflexividadePhilosophyAutonomySocial SciencesSocial historyReflexivitySince the origins of the social sciences during the European eighteenth century, philosophy has maintained a problematic relationship with them, particularly with sociology. Despite the historical process of progressive structuring and differentiation of the social sciences from philosophy, the discussion is by no means definitively settled, at least from the point of view of philosophy. This article reviews the position of the sociologist Pierre Bourdieu in this regard. Against the idea according to which, for Bourdieu, both philosophy and the social sciences are capable of elaborating problems and concepts, differing only by their methods and maintaining a fruitful theoretical exchange with each other, a processual reading of his work, supported by recent historiographical studies, reveal a more radical position according to which the social sciences have developed the autonomous capacity to elaborate authentic scientific knowledge. Thus, Bourdieu's alleged ambiguity in relation to philosophy would be nothing more than the superficial appearance of a permanent rupture process, which the development of his sociology required.Desde los orígenes de las ciencias sociales durante el siglo 18 europeo, la filosofía ha mantenido con ellas una relación problemática, particularmente con la sociología. No obstante el proceso histórico de estructuración y diferenciación progresiva de las ciencias sociales respecto de la filosofía, la discusión no está para nada definitivamente zanjada, al menos desde el punto de vista de la filosofía. En este artículo se revisa la posición del sociólogo Pierre Bourdieu al respecto. En contra de la idea según la cual, para Bourdieu, tanto la filosofía como las ciencias sociales son capaces de elaborar problemas y conceptos, diferenciándose solamente por sus métodos y manteniendo entre sí un fecundo intercambio teórico, una lectura procesual de su obra, apoyada en estudios historiográficos recientes, revelan una postura más radical según la cual las ciencias sociales han desarrollado la capacidad autónoma de elaborar un auténtico conocimiento científico. Así, la ambigüedad de Bourdieu en relación con la filosofía, no sería más que la apariencia superficial de un proceso de ruptura permamente, que el desarrollo de su sociología requirió.Desde os primórdios das ciências sociais durante o século 18 europeu, a filosofia manteve uma relação problemática com elas, particularmente com a sociologia. Apesar do processo histórico de progressiva estruturação e diferenciação das ciências sociais da filosofia, a discussão não está de modo algum definitivamente resolvida, pelo menos do ponto de vista da filosofia. Este artigo revisa a posição do sociólogo Pierre Bourdieu a esse respeito. Contra a ideia segundo a qual, para Bourdieu, tanto a filosofia quanto as ciências sociais são capazes de elaborar problemas e conceitos, diferenciando-se apenas por seus métodos e mantendo um frutífero intercâmbio teórico entre si, uma leitura processual de sua obra, apoiada em estudos historiográficos recentes, revelam uma posição mais radical segundo a qual as ciências sociais desenvolveram a capacidade autônoma de elaborar o conhecimento científico autêntico. Assim, a ambiguidade de Bourdieu em relação à filosofia nada mais seria do que a aparência superficial de um processo de ruptura permanente, que o desenvolvimento de sua sociologia exigia.Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS2024-01-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/4307310.15448/1984-7289.2024.1.43073Civitas: journal of Social Sciences; Vol. 24 No. 1 (2024): Single Volume - Continuous flow; e43073Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 24 Núm. 1 (2024): Volumen Único - Flujo continuo; e43073Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 24 n. 1 (2024): Volume único - Fluxo contínuo; e430731984-72891519-608910.15448/1984-7289.2024.1.reponame:Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSspahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/43073/28435Copyright (c) 2024 Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociaishttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSandoval Aragón, Sergio Lorenzo2024-04-02T19:06:00Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/43073Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/oaiPRIhttp://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/civitas/oaicivitas@pucrs.br1984-72891519-6089opendoar:2024-04-02T19:06Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv On the limits of philosophy and the possibilities of sociology in Pierre Bourdieu
De los límites de la filosofía y las posibilidades de la sociología en Pierre Bourdieu
Sobre os limites da filosofia e as possibilidades da sociologia em Pierre Bourdieu
title On the limits of philosophy and the possibilities of sociology in Pierre Bourdieu
spellingShingle On the limits of philosophy and the possibilities of sociology in Pierre Bourdieu
Sandoval Aragón, Sergio Lorenzo
Filosofía
Autonomía
Ciencias sociales
Sociohistoria
Reflexividad
Filosofía
Autonomía
Ciências Sociais
Socio-história
Reflexividade
Philosophy
Autonomy
Social Sciences
Social history
Reflexivity
title_short On the limits of philosophy and the possibilities of sociology in Pierre Bourdieu
title_full On the limits of philosophy and the possibilities of sociology in Pierre Bourdieu
title_fullStr On the limits of philosophy and the possibilities of sociology in Pierre Bourdieu
title_full_unstemmed On the limits of philosophy and the possibilities of sociology in Pierre Bourdieu
title_sort On the limits of philosophy and the possibilities of sociology in Pierre Bourdieu
author Sandoval Aragón, Sergio Lorenzo
author_facet Sandoval Aragón, Sergio Lorenzo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sandoval Aragón, Sergio Lorenzo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Filosofía
Autonomía
Ciencias sociales
Sociohistoria
Reflexividad
Filosofía
Autonomía
Ciências Sociais
Socio-história
Reflexividade
Philosophy
Autonomy
Social Sciences
Social history
Reflexivity
topic Filosofía
Autonomía
Ciencias sociales
Sociohistoria
Reflexividad
Filosofía
Autonomía
Ciências Sociais
Socio-história
Reflexividade
Philosophy
Autonomy
Social Sciences
Social history
Reflexivity
description Since the origins of the social sciences during the European eighteenth century, philosophy has maintained a problematic relationship with them, particularly with sociology. Despite the historical process of progressive structuring and differentiation of the social sciences from philosophy, the discussion is by no means definitively settled, at least from the point of view of philosophy. This article reviews the position of the sociologist Pierre Bourdieu in this regard. Against the idea according to which, for Bourdieu, both philosophy and the social sciences are capable of elaborating problems and concepts, differing only by their methods and maintaining a fruitful theoretical exchange with each other, a processual reading of his work, supported by recent historiographical studies, reveal a more radical position according to which the social sciences have developed the autonomous capacity to elaborate authentic scientific knowledge. Thus, Bourdieu's alleged ambiguity in relation to philosophy would be nothing more than the superficial appearance of a permanent rupture process, which the development of his sociology required.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-01-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/43073
10.15448/1984-7289.2024.1.43073
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/43073
identifier_str_mv 10.15448/1984-7289.2024.1.43073
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/43073/28435
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Civitas: journal of Social Sciences; Vol. 24 No. 1 (2024): Single Volume - Continuous flow; e43073
Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 24 Núm. 1 (2024): Volumen Único - Flujo continuo; e43073
Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 24 n. 1 (2024): Volume único - Fluxo contínuo; e43073
1984-7289
1519-6089
10.15448/1984-7289.2024.1.
reponame:Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)
collection Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv civitas@pucrs.br
_version_ 1799128804071833600

Registros relacionados