Post-colonial studies: Deconstructing Eurocentric genealogies
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/16185 |
Resumo: | The expression post-colonial, current in the 70’s of the last century, was only recognized in the Anglo-Saxon world as a substantial concept during the 80’s. This dates from the publication of the book, The empire writes back: theory and practice in post-colonial literatures (Ashcroft, 1989). Although this was one of the first books in this area of study (however, a seminal work which, we could say, gave rise to the opening of a field of research which is being retraced today), and although there can’t be said to be one post-colonial theory, what seems to approximate the various perceptions of this field of studies is the construction of epistemologies that point to other methodological paradigms for cultural analysis. The most important change to point out in the field of cultural (and literary) is the analysis of power relations in the different areas of social activity, differentiated by such things as ethnicity, race, class, gender and sexual orientation. Despite this, many researchers, particularly from the former empires, merge in their considerations of recent cultural studies, notably in the area of post-colonial criticism, reorganized on other foundations, different from the traditional, from linear and dualistic antagonisms which attempt to perpetuate the supremacy of an ideological and historical space-time structure. The object of the present study is to endeavour to unveil these hegemonic meanderings of post-colonial studies. |
id |
PUC_RS-17_9456c9dee2dd8d9c3df678b26d736f71 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/16185 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-17 |
network_name_str |
Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Post-colonial studies: Deconstructing Eurocentric genealogiesEstudos pós-coloniais: desconstruindo genealogias eurocêntricasPost-colonial. Epistemological construction. Ideology. Hegemony.Pós-colonial. Construção epistemológica. Ideologia. Eurocentrismo. Hegemonia.The expression post-colonial, current in the 70’s of the last century, was only recognized in the Anglo-Saxon world as a substantial concept during the 80’s. This dates from the publication of the book, The empire writes back: theory and practice in post-colonial literatures (Ashcroft, 1989). Although this was one of the first books in this area of study (however, a seminal work which, we could say, gave rise to the opening of a field of research which is being retraced today), and although there can’t be said to be one post-colonial theory, what seems to approximate the various perceptions of this field of studies is the construction of epistemologies that point to other methodological paradigms for cultural analysis. The most important change to point out in the field of cultural (and literary) is the analysis of power relations in the different areas of social activity, differentiated by such things as ethnicity, race, class, gender and sexual orientation. Despite this, many researchers, particularly from the former empires, merge in their considerations of recent cultural studies, notably in the area of post-colonial criticism, reorganized on other foundations, different from the traditional, from linear and dualistic antagonisms which attempt to perpetuate the supremacy of an ideological and historical space-time structure. The object of the present study is to endeavour to unveil these hegemonic meanderings of post-colonial studies.O pós-colonial, termo que remonta aos anos 1970 do século passado, só adquire, enquanto noção, substância conceptual a partir dos anos 1980, no mundo anglo-saxônico, particularmente com o hoje datado livro The Empires Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literatures (1989). O pós-colonial, termo que remonta aos anos 1970, só adquire, enquanto noção, substância conceptual a partir dos anos 1980, no mundo anglo-saxônico, particularmente com o hoje datado livro The empires writes back: theory and practice in post-colonial literatures (Ashcroft, 1989). Embora este seja um dos primeiros livros desta área de estudos (aliás, livro seminal que, pode dizer-se, está na origem da abertura a um campo de investigação, em retração hoje), e apesar de não existir uma teoria pós-colonial, o que parece aproximar as várias percepções deste campo de estudos é a construção de epistemologias que apontam para outros paradigmas metodológicos na análise cultural, sendo porventura a mais importante mudança a assinalar no campo dos estudos culturais (e literários) a análise das relações de poder, nas diversas áreas da atividade social caracterizada pela diferença: étnica, de raça, de classe, de gênero, de orientação sexual… Apesar disso, muitos estudiosos, particularmente de ex-impérios, convergem para a consideração de que os atuais estudos culturais, nomeadamente no âmbito da crítica pós-colonial, se reorganizam em outros alicerces, diferentes dos tradicionais, de antagonismos lineares e duais, que intentam perpetuar a supremacia de uma estrutura ideológica e histórica espácio-temporal. O objetivo deste ensaio é intentar o desvelamento dos meandros hegemônicos dos estudos pós-coloniais.Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS2014-04-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/1618510.15448/1984-7289.2014.1.16185Civitas: journal of Social Sciences; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2014): Dialogues of the South; 27-42Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (2014): Diálogos do Sul; 27-42Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 14 n. 1 (2014): Diálogos do Sul; 27-421984-72891519-608910.15448/1984-7289.2014.1reponame:Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/16185/10957Copyright (c) 2016 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociaishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMatta, Inocência2016-08-29T20:19:48Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/16185Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/oaiPRIhttp://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/civitas/oaicivitas@pucrs.br1984-72891519-6089opendoar:2016-08-29T20:19:48Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Post-colonial studies: Deconstructing Eurocentric genealogies Estudos pós-coloniais: desconstruindo genealogias eurocêntricas |
title |
Post-colonial studies: Deconstructing Eurocentric genealogies |
spellingShingle |
Post-colonial studies: Deconstructing Eurocentric genealogies Matta, Inocência Post-colonial. Epistemological construction. Ideology. Hegemony. Pós-colonial. Construção epistemológica. Ideologia. Eurocentrismo. Hegemonia. |
title_short |
Post-colonial studies: Deconstructing Eurocentric genealogies |
title_full |
Post-colonial studies: Deconstructing Eurocentric genealogies |
title_fullStr |
Post-colonial studies: Deconstructing Eurocentric genealogies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Post-colonial studies: Deconstructing Eurocentric genealogies |
title_sort |
Post-colonial studies: Deconstructing Eurocentric genealogies |
author |
Matta, Inocência |
author_facet |
Matta, Inocência |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Matta, Inocência |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Post-colonial. Epistemological construction. Ideology. Hegemony. Pós-colonial. Construção epistemológica. Ideologia. Eurocentrismo. Hegemonia. |
topic |
Post-colonial. Epistemological construction. Ideology. Hegemony. Pós-colonial. Construção epistemológica. Ideologia. Eurocentrismo. Hegemonia. |
description |
The expression post-colonial, current in the 70’s of the last century, was only recognized in the Anglo-Saxon world as a substantial concept during the 80’s. This dates from the publication of the book, The empire writes back: theory and practice in post-colonial literatures (Ashcroft, 1989). Although this was one of the first books in this area of study (however, a seminal work which, we could say, gave rise to the opening of a field of research which is being retraced today), and although there can’t be said to be one post-colonial theory, what seems to approximate the various perceptions of this field of studies is the construction of epistemologies that point to other methodological paradigms for cultural analysis. The most important change to point out in the field of cultural (and literary) is the analysis of power relations in the different areas of social activity, differentiated by such things as ethnicity, race, class, gender and sexual orientation. Despite this, many researchers, particularly from the former empires, merge in their considerations of recent cultural studies, notably in the area of post-colonial criticism, reorganized on other foundations, different from the traditional, from linear and dualistic antagonisms which attempt to perpetuate the supremacy of an ideological and historical space-time structure. The object of the present study is to endeavour to unveil these hegemonic meanderings of post-colonial studies. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-04-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/16185 10.15448/1984-7289.2014.1.16185 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/16185 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/1984-7289.2014.1.16185 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/16185/10957 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Civitas: journal of Social Sciences; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2014): Dialogues of the South; 27-42 Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (2014): Diálogos do Sul; 27-42 Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 14 n. 1 (2014): Diálogos do Sul; 27-42 1984-7289 1519-6089 10.15448/1984-7289.2014.1 reponame:Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) |
collection |
Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
civitas@pucrs.br |
_version_ |
1799128806050496512 |