The National Economy Council: The mismatch between theory, law, and history
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | por |
| Título da fonte: | Estudos Ibero-Americanos |
| Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/iberoamericana/article/view/42449 |
Resumo: | The Brazilian Constitution of 1937 is seen by historiography as the central moment of convergence in the materialization of the corporatist structure and authoritarian thinking in concrete political practices, thus establishing a link between intellectuals, the state structure, and political practice. From this way of reading, the objective of this article is to analyze the arguments that support the creation of the National Economy Council (CEN) as a central body within the corporate solution. The analysis focuses, on the formulations in the thought of Oliveira Viana, Azevedo Amaral and Francisco Campos, exponents of Brazilian authoritarian political thought, and on the Brazilian Constitution of 1937, in their articles that specifically analyze the CEN, confronting these sources with the historical background about this Council and the limits of the corporatist model. Therefore, as a method of analysis, a synthesis of this authors was carried out, considering the volume of their works. The focus is on the works that deal more directly with the problem of the organization of the Brazilian State, establishing an analysis of the content of these works and their analytical confrontation with the Brazilian Constitution of 1937, and the contrast with the historical analyzes on Brazilian corporatism. The choice to work with the thinking of Oliveira Viana, Azevedo Amaral and Francisco Campos is justified by the suggestion of the fruitful debate generated in the specialized literature on the history of authoritarian thinking, based on the analyzes of these authors, which raise analytical tensions that are still relevant and valid to think about the contemporary Brazilian case. |
| id |
PUC_RS-20_c620d598f95236d5e5392299eef66915 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/42449 |
| network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-20 |
| network_name_str |
Estudos Ibero-Americanos |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
The National Economy Council: The mismatch between theory, law, and historyEl Consejo Económico Nacional: El desajuste entre teoría, las leyes y la historiaO Conselho de Economia Nacional: O descompasso entre a teoria, a lei, e a históriaCorporatism1937 Brazilian ConstitutionOliveira VianaFrancisco CamposAzevedo AmaralCorporativismoConstitución Brasileña de 1937Oliveira VianaFrancisco CamposAzevedo AmaralCorporativismoConstituição de 1937Oliveira VianaFrancisco CamposAzevedo AmaralThe Brazilian Constitution of 1937 is seen by historiography as the central moment of convergence in the materialization of the corporatist structure and authoritarian thinking in concrete political practices, thus establishing a link between intellectuals, the state structure, and political practice. From this way of reading, the objective of this article is to analyze the arguments that support the creation of the National Economy Council (CEN) as a central body within the corporate solution. The analysis focuses, on the formulations in the thought of Oliveira Viana, Azevedo Amaral and Francisco Campos, exponents of Brazilian authoritarian political thought, and on the Brazilian Constitution of 1937, in their articles that specifically analyze the CEN, confronting these sources with the historical background about this Council and the limits of the corporatist model. Therefore, as a method of analysis, a synthesis of this authors was carried out, considering the volume of their works. The focus is on the works that deal more directly with the problem of the organization of the Brazilian State, establishing an analysis of the content of these works and their analytical confrontation with the Brazilian Constitution of 1937, and the contrast with the historical analyzes on Brazilian corporatism. The choice to work with the thinking of Oliveira Viana, Azevedo Amaral and Francisco Campos is justified by the suggestion of the fruitful debate generated in the specialized literature on the history of authoritarian thinking, based on the analyzes of these authors, which raise analytical tensions that are still relevant and valid to think about the contemporary Brazilian case.La Constitución Brasileña de 1937 es vista por la historiografía como el momento central de convergencia en la materialización de la estructura corporativista y el pensamiento autoritario en prácticas políticas concretas, estableciendo así un vínculo entre los intelectuales, la estructura estatal y la práctica política. Desde esta forma de lectura, el objetivo de este artículo es analizar los argumentos que sustentan la creación del Consejo Nacional de Economía (CEN) como órgano central dentro de la solución corporativista. El análisis se centra, en las formulaciones en el pensamiento de Oliveira Viana, Azevedo Amaral y Francisco Campos, exponentes del pensamiento político autoritario brasileño, y en la Constitución Brasileña de 1937, en sus artículos que analizan específicamente la CEN, confrontando estas fuentes con los antecedentes históricos sobre este Consejo y los límites del modelo corporativista. Por lo tanto, como método de análisis, se realizó una síntesis de estos autores, considerando el volumen de sus obras. El foco está en las obras que tratan más directamente el problema de la organización del Estado brasileño, estableciendo un análisis del contenido de esas obras y su confrontación analítica con la Constitución Brasileña de 1937, y el contraste con los análisis históricos sobre el corporativismo brasileño. La elección de trabajar con el pensamiento de Oliveira Viana, Azevedo Amaral y Francisco Campos se justifica por la sugerencia del fructífero debate generado en la literatura especializada sobre la historia del pensamiento autoritario, a partir de los análisis de estos autores, que suscita tensiones analíticas que siguen siendo relevantes y válidos para pensar el caso brasileño contemporáneo.A Constituição de 1937 é vista pela historiografia como o momento central de convergência na materialização da estrutura corporativista e do pensamento autoritário em práticas políticas concretas, estabelecendo, assim, um elo entre os intelectuais, a estrutura estatal, e a prática política. A partir dessa chave de leitura, o objetivo deste texto é analisar os argumentos que dão suporte à criação do Conselho de Economia Nacional (CEN) como órgão central dentro da solução corporativa. A análise se detém, sobretudo, nas formulações no pensamento de Oliveira Viana, Azevedo Amaral e Francisco Campos, expoentes do pensamento político autoritário brasileiro, e na própria Constituição de 1937, em seus artigos que tratam especificamente do CEN, confrontando essas fontes com a análise histórica sobre o órgão e os limites do modelo corporativista. Para tanto, como método de análise, realizou-se um esforço de síntese que priorizou algumas passagens dos referidos autores levando em consideração o caráter díspar e o volume das obras. O enfoque recai sobre as obras que tratam mais diretamente do problema da organização do Estado brasileiro, estabelecendo uma análise do conteúdo dessas obras e seu confronto analítico com a letra da lei da Constituição de 1937, e o contraste com as análises históricas sobre o corporativismo brasileiro. A escolha de trabalhar com o pensamento de Oliveira Viana, Azevedo Amaral e de Francisco Campos, justifica-se pela sugestão do profícuo debate gerado na literatura especializada sobre a história do pensamento autoritário, a partir das análises desses autores, e que suscitam tensões analíticas ainda relevantes e válidas para se pensar o caso brasileiro contemporâneo. Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2022-08-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/iberoamericana/article/view/4244910.15448/1980-864X.2022.1.42449Estudos Ibero-Americanos; Vol. 48 No. 1 (2022): Single Volume; e42449Estudos Ibero-Americanos; Vol. 48 Núm. 1 (2022): Volumen Único; e42449Estudos Ibero-Americanos; v. 48 n. 1 (2022): Volume Único; e424491980-864X0101-406410.15448/1980-864X.2022.1reponame:Estudos Ibero-Americanosinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/iberoamericana/article/view/42449/27615Copyright (c) 2022 Cássio A. A. Albernazhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlbernaz, Cássio A. A.2022-12-05T11:18:13Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/42449Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/iberoamericanaPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/iberoamericana/oaieditora.periodicos@pucrs.br||eia@pucrs.br1980-864X0101-4064opendoar:2022-12-05T11:18:13Estudos Ibero-Americanos - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The National Economy Council: The mismatch between theory, law, and history El Consejo Económico Nacional: El desajuste entre teoría, las leyes y la historia O Conselho de Economia Nacional: O descompasso entre a teoria, a lei, e a história |
| title |
The National Economy Council: The mismatch between theory, law, and history |
| spellingShingle |
The National Economy Council: The mismatch between theory, law, and history Albernaz, Cássio A. A. Corporatism 1937 Brazilian Constitution Oliveira Viana Francisco Campos Azevedo Amaral Corporativismo Constitución Brasileña de 1937 Oliveira Viana Francisco Campos Azevedo Amaral Corporativismo Constituição de 1937 Oliveira Viana Francisco Campos Azevedo Amaral |
| title_short |
The National Economy Council: The mismatch between theory, law, and history |
| title_full |
The National Economy Council: The mismatch between theory, law, and history |
| title_fullStr |
The National Economy Council: The mismatch between theory, law, and history |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The National Economy Council: The mismatch between theory, law, and history |
| title_sort |
The National Economy Council: The mismatch between theory, law, and history |
| author |
Albernaz, Cássio A. A. |
| author_facet |
Albernaz, Cássio A. A. |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Albernaz, Cássio A. A. |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Corporatism 1937 Brazilian Constitution Oliveira Viana Francisco Campos Azevedo Amaral Corporativismo Constitución Brasileña de 1937 Oliveira Viana Francisco Campos Azevedo Amaral Corporativismo Constituição de 1937 Oliveira Viana Francisco Campos Azevedo Amaral |
| topic |
Corporatism 1937 Brazilian Constitution Oliveira Viana Francisco Campos Azevedo Amaral Corporativismo Constitución Brasileña de 1937 Oliveira Viana Francisco Campos Azevedo Amaral Corporativismo Constituição de 1937 Oliveira Viana Francisco Campos Azevedo Amaral |
| description |
The Brazilian Constitution of 1937 is seen by historiography as the central moment of convergence in the materialization of the corporatist structure and authoritarian thinking in concrete political practices, thus establishing a link between intellectuals, the state structure, and political practice. From this way of reading, the objective of this article is to analyze the arguments that support the creation of the National Economy Council (CEN) as a central body within the corporate solution. The analysis focuses, on the formulations in the thought of Oliveira Viana, Azevedo Amaral and Francisco Campos, exponents of Brazilian authoritarian political thought, and on the Brazilian Constitution of 1937, in their articles that specifically analyze the CEN, confronting these sources with the historical background about this Council and the limits of the corporatist model. Therefore, as a method of analysis, a synthesis of this authors was carried out, considering the volume of their works. The focus is on the works that deal more directly with the problem of the organization of the Brazilian State, establishing an analysis of the content of these works and their analytical confrontation with the Brazilian Constitution of 1937, and the contrast with the historical analyzes on Brazilian corporatism. The choice to work with the thinking of Oliveira Viana, Azevedo Amaral and Francisco Campos is justified by the suggestion of the fruitful debate generated in the specialized literature on the history of authoritarian thinking, based on the analyzes of these authors, which raise analytical tensions that are still relevant and valid to think about the contemporary Brazilian case. |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-25 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/iberoamericana/article/view/42449 10.15448/1980-864X.2022.1.42449 |
| url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/iberoamericana/article/view/42449 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/1980-864X.2022.1.42449 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/iberoamericana/article/view/42449/27615 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Cássio A. A. Albernaz http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Cássio A. A. Albernaz http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Estudos Ibero-Americanos; Vol. 48 No. 1 (2022): Single Volume; e42449 Estudos Ibero-Americanos; Vol. 48 Núm. 1 (2022): Volumen Único; e42449 Estudos Ibero-Americanos; v. 48 n. 1 (2022): Volume Único; e42449 1980-864X 0101-4064 10.15448/1980-864X.2022.1 reponame:Estudos Ibero-Americanos instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
| instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
| instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
| institution |
PUC_RS |
| reponame_str |
Estudos Ibero-Americanos |
| collection |
Estudos Ibero-Americanos |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Estudos Ibero-Americanos - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
editora.periodicos@pucrs.br||eia@pucrs.br |
| _version_ |
1799128862469128192 |