Comparative assessment of the flow rate of root canal sealers

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Faria-Júnior, Norberto Batista de
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Massi, Santiago, Croti, Hugo Ricardo, Gutierrez, José Carlos Rivas, Dametto, Fábio Roberto, Vaz, Luis Geraldo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista odonto ciência (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/5435
Resumo: Purpose: This study evaluated the flow rate of the Acroseal, AH Plus, Endomethasone N, Sealapex, and ActiV GP according to the standards of the ISO specification 6876/2001. Methods: A volume of 0.05 mL of the cement mixed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations was placed on a glass plate. At 180±5 s after the commencement of mixing, the second glass plate was placed on top of the sealer, followed by the weight of mass approximately 100 g to make a total mass on the plate of 120±2 g. Ten min after the start of mixing, the weight was removed and the value of the diameter of the compressed disc of sealer was measured. The mean of three such determinations for each sealer was taken as the flow of the material. The mean values were compared using ANOVA and Tukey’s tests. Results: The results obtained were: Acroseal 21.24 mm, AH Plus 22.72 mm, ActiV GP 24.90 mm, Endomethasone N 18.76 mm, and Sealapex 25.15 mm. Conclusion: Only the Endomethasone N did not conform to ISO Specification that requires that a sealer shall have a diameter of not less than 20 mm. The Sealapex achieved the greatest flow, but it did not differ from Activ GP and AH Plus (P>0.5).
id PUC_RS-22_a578f84596304283d4b09050559b828f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/5435
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-22
network_name_str Revista odonto ciência (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative assessment of the flow rate of root canal sealersEstudo comparativo do escoamento de cimentos obturadores endodônticosFlowdental materialsroot canal sealerscimentos obturadoresEscoamentomateriais dentárioscimentos obturadoresPurpose: This study evaluated the flow rate of the Acroseal, AH Plus, Endomethasone N, Sealapex, and ActiV GP according to the standards of the ISO specification 6876/2001. Methods: A volume of 0.05 mL of the cement mixed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations was placed on a glass plate. At 180±5 s after the commencement of mixing, the second glass plate was placed on top of the sealer, followed by the weight of mass approximately 100 g to make a total mass on the plate of 120±2 g. Ten min after the start of mixing, the weight was removed and the value of the diameter of the compressed disc of sealer was measured. The mean of three such determinations for each sealer was taken as the flow of the material. The mean values were compared using ANOVA and Tukey’s tests. Results: The results obtained were: Acroseal 21.24 mm, AH Plus 22.72 mm, ActiV GP 24.90 mm, Endomethasone N 18.76 mm, and Sealapex 25.15 mm. Conclusion: Only the Endomethasone N did not conform to ISO Specification that requires that a sealer shall have a diameter of not less than 20 mm. The Sealapex achieved the greatest flow, but it did not differ from Activ GP and AH Plus (P>0.5).Objetivo: Este estudo avaliou o escoamento do Acroseal, AH Plus, Endomethasone N, Sealapex e ActiV GP de acordo com a especificação ISO 6876/2001. Metodologia: Um volume de 0,05 mL do cimento manipulado de acordo com as recomendações do fabricante foi colocado numa placa de vidro. Aos 180±5 s após o início da espatulação, uma segunda placa de vidro foi colocada sobre o cimento, seguida por um peso de massa de 100 g para fazer um total de 120±2 g. Dez minutos após o começo da manipulação o peso foi removido e o valor do diâmetro do disco de cimento foi mensurado. A média de 3 mensurações para cada cimento foi tomada como o escoamento do material. Os dados foram comparados estatisticamente pelos testes ANOVA e Tukey. Resultados: Os escoamentos obtidos foram: Acroseal 21.,4 mm, AH Plus 22,72 mm, ActiV GP 24,90 mm, Endomethasone N 18,76 mm e Sealapex 25,15 mm. Conclusão: Apenas o Endomethasone N não se enquadrou na especificação ISO a qual requer que o cimento tenha um diâmetro não inferior a 20 mm. O Sealapex alcançou o melhor escoamento, mas não foi estatisticamente diferente do Activ GP e AH Plus (P>0,05).EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS2010-02-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/5435Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 25 No. 2 (2010); 170 - 173Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 25 n. 2 (2010); 170 - 1731980-65230102-9460reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSenghttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/5435/5338Faria-Júnior, Norberto Batista deMassi, SantiagoCroti, Hugo RicardoGutierrez, José Carlos RivasDametto, Fábio RobertoVaz, Luis Geraldoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2013-11-11T12:39:32Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/5435Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/foPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/oai||odontociencia@pucrs.br1980-65230102-9460opendoar:2013-11-11T12:39:32Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative assessment of the flow rate of root canal sealers
Estudo comparativo do escoamento de cimentos obturadores endodônticos
title Comparative assessment of the flow rate of root canal sealers
spellingShingle Comparative assessment of the flow rate of root canal sealers
Faria-Júnior, Norberto Batista de
Flow
dental materials
root canal sealers
cimentos obturadores
Escoamento
materiais dentários
cimentos obturadores
title_short Comparative assessment of the flow rate of root canal sealers
title_full Comparative assessment of the flow rate of root canal sealers
title_fullStr Comparative assessment of the flow rate of root canal sealers
title_full_unstemmed Comparative assessment of the flow rate of root canal sealers
title_sort Comparative assessment of the flow rate of root canal sealers
author Faria-Júnior, Norberto Batista de
author_facet Faria-Júnior, Norberto Batista de
Massi, Santiago
Croti, Hugo Ricardo
Gutierrez, José Carlos Rivas
Dametto, Fábio Roberto
Vaz, Luis Geraldo
author_role author
author2 Massi, Santiago
Croti, Hugo Ricardo
Gutierrez, José Carlos Rivas
Dametto, Fábio Roberto
Vaz, Luis Geraldo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Faria-Júnior, Norberto Batista de
Massi, Santiago
Croti, Hugo Ricardo
Gutierrez, José Carlos Rivas
Dametto, Fábio Roberto
Vaz, Luis Geraldo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Flow
dental materials
root canal sealers
cimentos obturadores
Escoamento
materiais dentários
cimentos obturadores
topic Flow
dental materials
root canal sealers
cimentos obturadores
Escoamento
materiais dentários
cimentos obturadores
description Purpose: This study evaluated the flow rate of the Acroseal, AH Plus, Endomethasone N, Sealapex, and ActiV GP according to the standards of the ISO specification 6876/2001. Methods: A volume of 0.05 mL of the cement mixed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations was placed on a glass plate. At 180±5 s after the commencement of mixing, the second glass plate was placed on top of the sealer, followed by the weight of mass approximately 100 g to make a total mass on the plate of 120±2 g. Ten min after the start of mixing, the weight was removed and the value of the diameter of the compressed disc of sealer was measured. The mean of three such determinations for each sealer was taken as the flow of the material. The mean values were compared using ANOVA and Tukey’s tests. Results: The results obtained were: Acroseal 21.24 mm, AH Plus 22.72 mm, ActiV GP 24.90 mm, Endomethasone N 18.76 mm, and Sealapex 25.15 mm. Conclusion: Only the Endomethasone N did not conform to ISO Specification that requires that a sealer shall have a diameter of not less than 20 mm. The Sealapex achieved the greatest flow, but it did not differ from Activ GP and AH Plus (P>0.5).
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-02-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/5435
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/5435
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/5435/5338
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 25 No. 2 (2010); 170 - 173
Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 25 n. 2 (2010); 170 - 173
1980-6523
0102-9460
reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Revista odonto ciência (Online)
collection Revista odonto ciência (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||odontociencia@pucrs.br
_version_ 1754820874930749440