Antibacterial action of red and green propolis extract in infected root canal
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/28930 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the antibacterial action of 30% red propolis, 40% green propolis and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite with irrigation protocols in infected root canals.METHODS: During 60 days, twenty-four root canals were inoculated with E. faecalis. In all experimental groups were performed root canal preparation and two irrigation protocols - passive ultrasonic irrigation and conventional irrigation. In the groups 1, 3, 5 and 7 it were made root canal preparation associated to conventional irrigation with 30% propolis, 40% propolis, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and distilled water, respectively. In groups 2, 4, 6 and 8 it was made root canal preparation associated with passive ultrasonic irrigation with the solutions described above. The groups 9 and 10 were the controls (negative and positive). Samples of the root canals were collected and immersed in 7 mL of BHI, for 48 hours, at 37ºC. Bacterial growth was analyzed by turbidity of the culture medium.RESULTS: Antibacterial action was observed of 30% red propolis and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite when used passive ultrasonic irrigation and conventional irrigation after 20 minutes, but in 72 hours it was not effective.CONCLUSION: The irrigating agents and protocols were not effective to eliminate the microorganisms of the infected root canals. Clinical Significance: Propolis presents potential for clinical application due to its antimicrobial, anti inflammatory, antioxidant and low toxicity properties. |
id |
PUC_RS-22_a73bbb560b413a5b5b47b4ccbf90b857 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/28930 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-22 |
network_name_str |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Antibacterial action of red and green propolis extract in infected root canalAção antimicrobiana do extrato de própolis vermelho e verde em canais radiculares infectadosEndodonticPropolisSodium hypochloriteEndodontiaPrópolisHipoclorito de sódioOBJECTIVE: This study investigated the antibacterial action of 30% red propolis, 40% green propolis and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite with irrigation protocols in infected root canals.METHODS: During 60 days, twenty-four root canals were inoculated with E. faecalis. In all experimental groups were performed root canal preparation and two irrigation protocols - passive ultrasonic irrigation and conventional irrigation. In the groups 1, 3, 5 and 7 it were made root canal preparation associated to conventional irrigation with 30% propolis, 40% propolis, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and distilled water, respectively. In groups 2, 4, 6 and 8 it was made root canal preparation associated with passive ultrasonic irrigation with the solutions described above. The groups 9 and 10 were the controls (negative and positive). Samples of the root canals were collected and immersed in 7 mL of BHI, for 48 hours, at 37ºC. Bacterial growth was analyzed by turbidity of the culture medium.RESULTS: Antibacterial action was observed of 30% red propolis and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite when used passive ultrasonic irrigation and conventional irrigation after 20 minutes, but in 72 hours it was not effective.CONCLUSION: The irrigating agents and protocols were not effective to eliminate the microorganisms of the infected root canals. Clinical Significance: Propolis presents potential for clinical application due to its antimicrobial, anti inflammatory, antioxidant and low toxicity properties.OBJETIVO: Investigar a ação antibacteriana do própolis vermelhos 30%, do própolis verde 40% e do hipoclorito de sódio 2,5% com protocolos de irrigação em canais radiculares infectados.MÉTODOS: Durante 60 dias, vinte e quatro canais radiculares foram inoculados com E. faecalis. Em todos os grupos experimentais foi realizado o preparo do canal radicular e dois protocolos de irrigação – irrigação ultra-sônica passiva e irrigação convencional. Nos grupos 1, 3, 5 e 7 foi feito o preparo do canal radicular associado à irrigação convencional com própolis 30%, própolis 40%, hipoclorito de sódio 2,5% e água destilada, respectivamente. Nos grupos 2, 4, 6 e 8 foi feito o preparo do canal radicular associado à irrigação ultra-sônica passiva com as soluções descritas acima. Os grupos 9 e 10 foram os controles (negativos e positivos). Amostras dos canais radiculares foram coletadas e imersas em 7 mL de BHI, durante 48 horas, a 37ºC. O crescimento bacteriano foi analisado por turvação do meio de cultura.RESULTADOS: Ação antibacteriana foi observada com própolis vermelho 30% e hipoclorito de sódio 2,5% quando utilizado irrigação ultra-sônica passiva e irrigação convencional após 20 minutos, porém, após 72 horas as substâncias não foram efetivas.CONCLUSÃO: Os agentes de irrigação e os protocolos não foram efetivos para eliminar os microorganismos dos canais radiculares infectados.EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS2017-11-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articlemicrobiology methodsapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/2893010.15448/1980-6523.2017.2.28930Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 32 No. 2 (2017); 99-103Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 32 n. 2 (2017); 99-1031980-65230102-946010.15448/1980-6523.2017.2reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSenghttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/28930/16178Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Odonto Ciênciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEndo, Mônica MisaéEstrela, Cyntia R. A.Alencar, Ana Helena G.Silva, Júlio AlmeidaDecurcio, Daniel AlmeidaEstrela, Carlos2018-04-04T16:33:37Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/28930Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/foPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/oai||odontociencia@pucrs.br1980-65230102-9460opendoar:2018-04-04T16:33:37Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Antibacterial action of red and green propolis extract in infected root canal Ação antimicrobiana do extrato de própolis vermelho e verde em canais radiculares infectados |
title |
Antibacterial action of red and green propolis extract in infected root canal |
spellingShingle |
Antibacterial action of red and green propolis extract in infected root canal Endo, Mônica Misaé Endodontic Propolis Sodium hypochlorite Endodontia Própolis Hipoclorito de sódio |
title_short |
Antibacterial action of red and green propolis extract in infected root canal |
title_full |
Antibacterial action of red and green propolis extract in infected root canal |
title_fullStr |
Antibacterial action of red and green propolis extract in infected root canal |
title_full_unstemmed |
Antibacterial action of red and green propolis extract in infected root canal |
title_sort |
Antibacterial action of red and green propolis extract in infected root canal |
author |
Endo, Mônica Misaé |
author_facet |
Endo, Mônica Misaé Estrela, Cyntia R. A. Alencar, Ana Helena G. Silva, Júlio Almeida Decurcio, Daniel Almeida Estrela, Carlos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Estrela, Cyntia R. A. Alencar, Ana Helena G. Silva, Júlio Almeida Decurcio, Daniel Almeida Estrela, Carlos |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Endo, Mônica Misaé Estrela, Cyntia R. A. Alencar, Ana Helena G. Silva, Júlio Almeida Decurcio, Daniel Almeida Estrela, Carlos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Endodontic Propolis Sodium hypochlorite Endodontia Própolis Hipoclorito de sódio |
topic |
Endodontic Propolis Sodium hypochlorite Endodontia Própolis Hipoclorito de sódio |
description |
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the antibacterial action of 30% red propolis, 40% green propolis and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite with irrigation protocols in infected root canals.METHODS: During 60 days, twenty-four root canals were inoculated with E. faecalis. In all experimental groups were performed root canal preparation and two irrigation protocols - passive ultrasonic irrigation and conventional irrigation. In the groups 1, 3, 5 and 7 it were made root canal preparation associated to conventional irrigation with 30% propolis, 40% propolis, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and distilled water, respectively. In groups 2, 4, 6 and 8 it was made root canal preparation associated with passive ultrasonic irrigation with the solutions described above. The groups 9 and 10 were the controls (negative and positive). Samples of the root canals were collected and immersed in 7 mL of BHI, for 48 hours, at 37ºC. Bacterial growth was analyzed by turbidity of the culture medium.RESULTS: Antibacterial action was observed of 30% red propolis and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite when used passive ultrasonic irrigation and conventional irrigation after 20 minutes, but in 72 hours it was not effective.CONCLUSION: The irrigating agents and protocols were not effective to eliminate the microorganisms of the infected root canals. Clinical Significance: Propolis presents potential for clinical application due to its antimicrobial, anti inflammatory, antioxidant and low toxicity properties. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-11-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article microbiology methods |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/28930 10.15448/1980-6523.2017.2.28930 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/28930 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/1980-6523.2017.2.28930 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/28930/16178 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Odonto Ciência info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Odonto Ciência |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 32 No. 2 (2017); 99-103 Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 32 n. 2 (2017); 99-103 1980-6523 0102-9460 10.15448/1980-6523.2017.2 reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
collection |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||odontociencia@pucrs.br |
_version_ |
1754820877099204608 |