The effect of different solutions on bond strength of two root canal sealers
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/16349 |
Resumo: | Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different solutions on bond strength of two root canal sealers.Methods: Sixty bovine incisor roots were randomly divided into five groups: group 1, physiologic solution (control); group 2, 2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) followed by EDTA; group 3, CHX followed by EDTA and ethanol (EtOH); group 4, 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) followed by EDTA; and group 5, NaOCl followed by EDTA and EtOH. Each group was subdivided into two subgroups: AH Plus and MTA Fillapex sealers. Bond strength was measured by push-out test and were analyzed statistically by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s (a=0.05).Results: The different irrigating protocols did not influence the bond strength of either sealer (p>0.05). AH Plus sealer showed higher values of bond strength to root dentin than MTA Fillapex (p<0.05).Conclusion: The bond strength of AH Plus and MTA Fillapex were not influenced by different solutions. |
id |
PUC_RS-22_c1a11c1cdfb39081fdcf3ee134676f71 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/16349 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-22 |
network_name_str |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The effect of different solutions on bond strength of two root canal sealersEfeito de diferentes soluções na resistência de união de dois cimentos obturadores endodônticosBond strengthChlorhexidineEDTARoot canal sealerSodium hypochloriteobturationResistência de uniãoClorexidineEDTACimento obturador endodônticoHipoclorito de sódio Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different solutions on bond strength of two root canal sealers.Methods: Sixty bovine incisor roots were randomly divided into five groups: group 1, physiologic solution (control); group 2, 2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) followed by EDTA; group 3, CHX followed by EDTA and ethanol (EtOH); group 4, 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) followed by EDTA; and group 5, NaOCl followed by EDTA and EtOH. Each group was subdivided into two subgroups: AH Plus and MTA Fillapex sealers. Bond strength was measured by push-out test and were analyzed statistically by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s (a=0.05).Results: The different irrigating protocols did not influence the bond strength of either sealer (p>0.05). AH Plus sealer showed higher values of bond strength to root dentin than MTA Fillapex (p<0.05).Conclusion: The bond strength of AH Plus and MTA Fillapex were not influenced by different solutions.Objetivo: O objetivo do estudo foi avaliar o efeito de diferentes soluções na resistência de união de dois cimentos obturadores endodônticos.Métodos: Sessenta incisivos bovinos foram aleatoriamente divididos em cinco grupos: grupo 1, solução fisiológica (controle); grupo 2, digluconato de cloredidine 2% (CHX) seguido de EDTA 17%; grupo 3, CHX seguido de EDTA 17% e etanol (EtOH); grupo 4, hipoclorito de sódio 5,25% (NaOCl) seguido de EDTA 17%; grupo 5, NaOCl seguido de EDTA 17% e EtOH. Cada grupo foi subdividido em dois subgrupos: obturados com AH Plus e MTA Fillapex. A resistência de união foi mensurada pelo teste push-out e analizada estatisticamente por ANOVA com dois fatores de variação e Tukey’s (a=0,05).Resultados: Os diferentes protocolos de irrigação não influenciaram a resistência de união dos cimentos (p>0,05). AH Plus mostrou maiores valores de resistência de união à dentina do que MTA Fillapex (p<0,05).Conclusão: A resistência de união do AH Plus e MTA Fillapex não foi influenicado pelas diferentes soluções.EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS2016-03-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articlepush outapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/1634910.15448/1980-6523.2015.4.16349Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 30 No. 4 (2015); 161-166Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 30 n. 4 (2015); 161-1661980-65230102-946010.15448/1980-6523.2015.4reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSenghttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/16349/14450Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Odonto Ciênciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDalbem, FernandaCarli, Sabrina deFarina, Ana PaulaSouto Pantoja, Carlos Augusto de MoraesFerraz, Caio Cezar RandiCecchin, Doglas2016-06-16T13:45:47Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/16349Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/foPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/oai||odontociencia@pucrs.br1980-65230102-9460opendoar:2016-06-16T13:45:47Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The effect of different solutions on bond strength of two root canal sealers Efeito de diferentes soluções na resistência de união de dois cimentos obturadores endodônticos |
title |
The effect of different solutions on bond strength of two root canal sealers |
spellingShingle |
The effect of different solutions on bond strength of two root canal sealers Dalbem, Fernanda Bond strength Chlorhexidine EDTA Root canal sealer Sodium hypochlorite obturation Resistência de união Clorexidine EDTA Cimento obturador endodôntico Hipoclorito de sódio |
title_short |
The effect of different solutions on bond strength of two root canal sealers |
title_full |
The effect of different solutions on bond strength of two root canal sealers |
title_fullStr |
The effect of different solutions on bond strength of two root canal sealers |
title_full_unstemmed |
The effect of different solutions on bond strength of two root canal sealers |
title_sort |
The effect of different solutions on bond strength of two root canal sealers |
author |
Dalbem, Fernanda |
author_facet |
Dalbem, Fernanda Carli, Sabrina de Farina, Ana Paula Souto Pantoja, Carlos Augusto de Moraes Ferraz, Caio Cezar Randi Cecchin, Doglas |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Carli, Sabrina de Farina, Ana Paula Souto Pantoja, Carlos Augusto de Moraes Ferraz, Caio Cezar Randi Cecchin, Doglas |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dalbem, Fernanda Carli, Sabrina de Farina, Ana Paula Souto Pantoja, Carlos Augusto de Moraes Ferraz, Caio Cezar Randi Cecchin, Doglas |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bond strength Chlorhexidine EDTA Root canal sealer Sodium hypochlorite obturation Resistência de união Clorexidine EDTA Cimento obturador endodôntico Hipoclorito de sódio |
topic |
Bond strength Chlorhexidine EDTA Root canal sealer Sodium hypochlorite obturation Resistência de união Clorexidine EDTA Cimento obturador endodôntico Hipoclorito de sódio |
description |
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different solutions on bond strength of two root canal sealers.Methods: Sixty bovine incisor roots were randomly divided into five groups: group 1, physiologic solution (control); group 2, 2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) followed by EDTA; group 3, CHX followed by EDTA and ethanol (EtOH); group 4, 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) followed by EDTA; and group 5, NaOCl followed by EDTA and EtOH. Each group was subdivided into two subgroups: AH Plus and MTA Fillapex sealers. Bond strength was measured by push-out test and were analyzed statistically by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s (a=0.05).Results: The different irrigating protocols did not influence the bond strength of either sealer (p>0.05). AH Plus sealer showed higher values of bond strength to root dentin than MTA Fillapex (p<0.05).Conclusion: The bond strength of AH Plus and MTA Fillapex were not influenced by different solutions. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-03-03 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article push out |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/16349 10.15448/1980-6523.2015.4.16349 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/16349 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/1980-6523.2015.4.16349 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/16349/14450 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Odonto Ciência info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Odonto Ciência |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 30 No. 4 (2015); 161-166 Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 30 n. 4 (2015); 161-166 1980-6523 0102-9460 10.15448/1980-6523.2015.4 reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
collection |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||odontociencia@pucrs.br |
_version_ |
1754820876552896512 |