The effect of different solutions on bond strength of two root canal sealers

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dalbem, Fernanda
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Carli, Sabrina de, Farina, Ana Paula, Souto Pantoja, Carlos Augusto de Moraes, Ferraz, Caio Cezar Randi, Cecchin, Doglas
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista odonto ciência (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/16349
Resumo: Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different solutions on bond strength of two root canal sealers.Methods: Sixty bovine incisor roots were randomly divided into five groups: group 1, physiologic solution (control); group 2, 2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) followed by EDTA; group 3, CHX followed by EDTA and ethanol (EtOH); group 4, 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) followed by EDTA; and group 5, NaOCl followed by EDTA and EtOH. Each group was subdivided into two subgroups: AH Plus and MTA Fillapex sealers. Bond strength was measured by push-out test and were analyzed statistically by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s (a=0.05).Results: The different irrigating protocols did not influence the bond strength of either sealer (p>0.05). AH Plus sealer showed higher values of bond strength to root dentin than MTA Fillapex (p<0.05).Conclusion: The bond strength of AH Plus and MTA Fillapex were not influenced by different solutions.
id PUC_RS-22_c1a11c1cdfb39081fdcf3ee134676f71
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/16349
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-22
network_name_str Revista odonto ciência (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The effect of different solutions on bond strength of two root canal sealersEfeito de diferentes soluções na resistência de união de dois cimentos obturadores endodônticosBond strengthChlorhexidineEDTARoot canal sealerSodium hypochloriteobturationResistência de uniãoClorexidineEDTACimento obturador endodônticoHipoclorito de sódio Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different solutions on bond strength of two root canal sealers.Methods: Sixty bovine incisor roots were randomly divided into five groups: group 1, physiologic solution (control); group 2, 2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) followed by EDTA; group 3, CHX followed by EDTA and ethanol (EtOH); group 4, 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) followed by EDTA; and group 5, NaOCl followed by EDTA and EtOH. Each group was subdivided into two subgroups: AH Plus and MTA Fillapex sealers. Bond strength was measured by push-out test and were analyzed statistically by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s (a=0.05).Results: The different irrigating protocols did not influence the bond strength of either sealer (p>0.05). AH Plus sealer showed higher values of bond strength to root dentin than MTA Fillapex (p<0.05).Conclusion: The bond strength of AH Plus and MTA Fillapex were not influenced by different solutions.Objetivo: O objetivo do estudo foi avaliar o efeito de diferentes soluções na resistência de união de dois cimentos obturadores endodônticos.Métodos: Sessenta incisivos bovinos foram aleatoriamente divididos em cinco grupos: grupo 1, solução fisiológica (controle); grupo 2, digluconato de cloredidine 2% (CHX) seguido de EDTA 17%; grupo 3, CHX seguido de EDTA 17% e etanol (EtOH); grupo 4, hipoclorito de sódio 5,25% (NaOCl) seguido de EDTA 17%; grupo 5, NaOCl seguido de EDTA 17% e EtOH. Cada grupo foi subdividido em dois subgrupos: obturados com AH Plus e MTA Fillapex. A resistência de união foi mensurada pelo teste push-out e analizada estatisticamente por ANOVA com dois fatores de variação e Tukey’s (a=0,05).Resultados: Os diferentes protocolos de irrigação não influenciaram a resistência de união dos cimentos (p>0,05). AH Plus mostrou maiores valores de resistência de união à dentina do que MTA Fillapex (p<0,05).Conclusão: A resistência de união do AH Plus e MTA Fillapex não foi influenicado pelas diferentes soluções.EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS2016-03-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articlepush outapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/1634910.15448/1980-6523.2015.4.16349Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 30 No. 4 (2015); 161-166Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 30 n. 4 (2015); 161-1661980-65230102-946010.15448/1980-6523.2015.4reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSenghttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/16349/14450Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Odonto Ciênciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDalbem, FernandaCarli, Sabrina deFarina, Ana PaulaSouto Pantoja, Carlos Augusto de MoraesFerraz, Caio Cezar RandiCecchin, Doglas2016-06-16T13:45:47Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/16349Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/foPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/oai||odontociencia@pucrs.br1980-65230102-9460opendoar:2016-06-16T13:45:47Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The effect of different solutions on bond strength of two root canal sealers
Efeito de diferentes soluções na resistência de união de dois cimentos obturadores endodônticos
title The effect of different solutions on bond strength of two root canal sealers
spellingShingle The effect of different solutions on bond strength of two root canal sealers
Dalbem, Fernanda
Bond strength
Chlorhexidine
EDTA
Root canal sealer
Sodium hypochlorite
obturation
Resistência de união
Clorexidine
EDTA
Cimento obturador endodôntico
Hipoclorito de sódio
title_short The effect of different solutions on bond strength of two root canal sealers
title_full The effect of different solutions on bond strength of two root canal sealers
title_fullStr The effect of different solutions on bond strength of two root canal sealers
title_full_unstemmed The effect of different solutions on bond strength of two root canal sealers
title_sort The effect of different solutions on bond strength of two root canal sealers
author Dalbem, Fernanda
author_facet Dalbem, Fernanda
Carli, Sabrina de
Farina, Ana Paula
Souto Pantoja, Carlos Augusto de Moraes
Ferraz, Caio Cezar Randi
Cecchin, Doglas
author_role author
author2 Carli, Sabrina de
Farina, Ana Paula
Souto Pantoja, Carlos Augusto de Moraes
Ferraz, Caio Cezar Randi
Cecchin, Doglas
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dalbem, Fernanda
Carli, Sabrina de
Farina, Ana Paula
Souto Pantoja, Carlos Augusto de Moraes
Ferraz, Caio Cezar Randi
Cecchin, Doglas
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bond strength
Chlorhexidine
EDTA
Root canal sealer
Sodium hypochlorite
obturation
Resistência de união
Clorexidine
EDTA
Cimento obturador endodôntico
Hipoclorito de sódio
topic Bond strength
Chlorhexidine
EDTA
Root canal sealer
Sodium hypochlorite
obturation
Resistência de união
Clorexidine
EDTA
Cimento obturador endodôntico
Hipoclorito de sódio
description Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different solutions on bond strength of two root canal sealers.Methods: Sixty bovine incisor roots were randomly divided into five groups: group 1, physiologic solution (control); group 2, 2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) followed by EDTA; group 3, CHX followed by EDTA and ethanol (EtOH); group 4, 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) followed by EDTA; and group 5, NaOCl followed by EDTA and EtOH. Each group was subdivided into two subgroups: AH Plus and MTA Fillapex sealers. Bond strength was measured by push-out test and were analyzed statistically by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s (a=0.05).Results: The different irrigating protocols did not influence the bond strength of either sealer (p>0.05). AH Plus sealer showed higher values of bond strength to root dentin than MTA Fillapex (p<0.05).Conclusion: The bond strength of AH Plus and MTA Fillapex were not influenced by different solutions.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-03-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
push out
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/16349
10.15448/1980-6523.2015.4.16349
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/16349
identifier_str_mv 10.15448/1980-6523.2015.4.16349
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/16349/14450
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Odonto Ciência
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Odonto Ciência
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 30 No. 4 (2015); 161-166
Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 30 n. 4 (2015); 161-166
1980-6523
0102-9460
10.15448/1980-6523.2015.4
reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Revista odonto ciência (Online)
collection Revista odonto ciência (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||odontociencia@pucrs.br
_version_ 1754820876552896512

Registros relacionados