Approaches to learning and academic performance in pharmacology among second-year undergraduate medical students

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kamath, Ashwin
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Rao, Rashmi, Shenoy, Preethi J., Ullal, Sheetal D.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/32395
Resumo: AIMS: To determine the learning approach of second-year undergraduate medical students and whether a surface or deep approach to learning had any correlation with the pharmacology sessional and university examination marks obtained.METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among second-year medical students in their fifth semester. To determine the students’ learning approach, whether superficial or deep, we used the Revised Two Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F), which contains 20 items in the form of a five-point Likert scale and is suitable for use in higher education settings. Cronbach’s alpha was calculated using the scores obtained from a sample of 20 students to determine the internal consistency. To determine the relationship between the learning approach and examination scores, the average of the individual sessional examination marks and the university examination scores obtained by the students were calculated.RESULTS: Of the 170 students who participated in the study, 87 (51.2%) were females. The Cronbach’s alpha value was considered acceptable for both surface and deep approach. While the academic performance was significantly better in females (U = 2571.5; p = 0.001), no difference was seen in the learning approach based on gender. Fifty (29.4%) students had a higher score for the surface approach. This group had lower examination scores compared with those with equal scores for surface and deep approach or higher scores for the deep approach. A weak negative correlation was seen between the examination marks and surface approach (τb = −0.167; p = 0.002). When analyzed based on gender, the correlation was statistically significant only in females (τb = −0.173; p = 0.02).CONCLUSIONS: A weak negative correlation was seen between the examination marks and surface approach to learning. Although statistically significant, the actual difference between the groups was of a small magnitude. Hence, whether promoting deep learning approach improves academic performance in terms of marks obtained in the examination needs to be confirmed by further studies.
id PUC_RS-25_a0b7ec04871fb47233f88fdecd4d3b48
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/32395
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-25
network_name_str Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Approaches to learning and academic performance in pharmacology among second-year undergraduate medical studentsApproaches to learning and academic performance in pharmacology among second-year undergraduate medical studentslearningpharmacologyacademic performancemalefemale.aprendizagemfarmacologiadesempenho acadêmicohomemmulher.AIMS: To determine the learning approach of second-year undergraduate medical students and whether a surface or deep approach to learning had any correlation with the pharmacology sessional and university examination marks obtained.METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among second-year medical students in their fifth semester. To determine the students’ learning approach, whether superficial or deep, we used the Revised Two Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F), which contains 20 items in the form of a five-point Likert scale and is suitable for use in higher education settings. Cronbach’s alpha was calculated using the scores obtained from a sample of 20 students to determine the internal consistency. To determine the relationship between the learning approach and examination scores, the average of the individual sessional examination marks and the university examination scores obtained by the students were calculated.RESULTS: Of the 170 students who participated in the study, 87 (51.2%) were females. The Cronbach’s alpha value was considered acceptable for both surface and deep approach. While the academic performance was significantly better in females (U = 2571.5; p = 0.001), no difference was seen in the learning approach based on gender. Fifty (29.4%) students had a higher score for the surface approach. This group had lower examination scores compared with those with equal scores for surface and deep approach or higher scores for the deep approach. A weak negative correlation was seen between the examination marks and surface approach (τb = −0.167; p = 0.002). When analyzed based on gender, the correlation was statistically significant only in females (τb = −0.173; p = 0.02).CONCLUSIONS: A weak negative correlation was seen between the examination marks and surface approach to learning. Although statistically significant, the actual difference between the groups was of a small magnitude. Hence, whether promoting deep learning approach improves academic performance in terms of marks obtained in the examination needs to be confirmed by further studies.***Abordagens de aprendizagem e desempenho acadêmico em farmacologia entre estudantes de medicina do segundo ano***OBJETIVOS: Investigar a abordagem de aprendizagem de estudantes de medicina do segundo ano de graduação e se uma abordagem superficial ou profunda teve alguma correlação com as notas obtidas na disciplina de farmacologia e nos exames universitários.MÉTODOS: Um estudo transversal foi conduzido entre estudantes do segundo ano de medicina em seu quinto semestre. Para determinar a abordagem de aprendizagem dos alunos, como superficial ou profunda, usamos o questionário Revised Two Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F), que contém 20 itens em forma de uma escala Likert de cinco pontos, sendo o seu uso adequado para ambientes de ensino superior. O alfa de Cronbach foi calculado usando as pontuações obtidas de uma amostra de 20 alunos para determinar a consistência interna. Para determinar a relação entre a abordagem de aprendizagem e as pontuações do exame, calculou-se a média das notas dos exames individuais e as pontuações dos exames universitários obtidas pelos alunos.RESULTADOS: Dos 170 alunos que participaram do estudo, 87 (51,2%) eram do gênero feminino. O alpha de Cronbach foi considerado bom tanto para a abordagem superficial quanto profunda. Enquanto o desempenho acadêmico foi significativamente melhor em mulheres (U = 2571,5; p = 0,001), nenhuma diferença baseada no gênero foi observada na abordagem de aprendizagem. Cinquenta (29,4%) estudantes tiveram uma pontuação mais alta para a abordagem superficial. Esse grupo teve escores de exame mais baixos em comparação com aqueles com escores iguais para abordagem superficial e profunda ou escores mais altos para a abordagem profunda. Uma fraca correlação negativa foi observada entre as notas do exame e a abordagem superficial (τb = −0,167; p = 0,002). Quando analisada com base no gênero, encontrou-se uma correlação de magnitude fraca e negativa apenas no gênero feminino (τb = −0,173; p = 0,02).CONCLUSÕES: Uma fraca correlação negativa foi observada entre as notas do exame e a abordagem superficial para a aprendizagem. Embora estatisticamente significativa, a diferença real entre os grupos foi de pequena magnitude. Portanto, se a promoção de uma abordagem de aprendizagem profunda melhora o desempenho acadêmico em termos de notas obtidas no exame, isso precisa ser confirmado por outros estudos.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2018-12-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/3239510.15448/1980-6108.2018.4.32395Scientia Medica; Vol. 28 No. 4 (2018); ID32395Scientia Medica; v. 28 n. 4 (2018); ID323951980-61081806-556210.15448/1980-6108.2018.4reponame:Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSenghttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/32395/17580Copyright (c) 2018 Scientia Medicahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKamath, AshwinRao, RashmiShenoy, Preethi J.Ullal, Sheetal D.2019-02-12T22:14:03Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/32395Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/PUBhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/oaiscientiamedica@pucrs.br || editora.periodicos@pucrs.br1980-61081806-5562opendoar:2019-02-12T22:14:03Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Approaches to learning and academic performance in pharmacology among second-year undergraduate medical students
Approaches to learning and academic performance in pharmacology among second-year undergraduate medical students
title Approaches to learning and academic performance in pharmacology among second-year undergraduate medical students
spellingShingle Approaches to learning and academic performance in pharmacology among second-year undergraduate medical students
Kamath, Ashwin
learning
pharmacology
academic performance
male
female.
aprendizagem
farmacologia
desempenho acadêmico
homem
mulher.
title_short Approaches to learning and academic performance in pharmacology among second-year undergraduate medical students
title_full Approaches to learning and academic performance in pharmacology among second-year undergraduate medical students
title_fullStr Approaches to learning and academic performance in pharmacology among second-year undergraduate medical students
title_full_unstemmed Approaches to learning and academic performance in pharmacology among second-year undergraduate medical students
title_sort Approaches to learning and academic performance in pharmacology among second-year undergraduate medical students
author Kamath, Ashwin
author_facet Kamath, Ashwin
Rao, Rashmi
Shenoy, Preethi J.
Ullal, Sheetal D.
author_role author
author2 Rao, Rashmi
Shenoy, Preethi J.
Ullal, Sheetal D.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kamath, Ashwin
Rao, Rashmi
Shenoy, Preethi J.
Ullal, Sheetal D.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv learning
pharmacology
academic performance
male
female.
aprendizagem
farmacologia
desempenho acadêmico
homem
mulher.
topic learning
pharmacology
academic performance
male
female.
aprendizagem
farmacologia
desempenho acadêmico
homem
mulher.
description AIMS: To determine the learning approach of second-year undergraduate medical students and whether a surface or deep approach to learning had any correlation with the pharmacology sessional and university examination marks obtained.METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among second-year medical students in their fifth semester. To determine the students’ learning approach, whether superficial or deep, we used the Revised Two Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F), which contains 20 items in the form of a five-point Likert scale and is suitable for use in higher education settings. Cronbach’s alpha was calculated using the scores obtained from a sample of 20 students to determine the internal consistency. To determine the relationship between the learning approach and examination scores, the average of the individual sessional examination marks and the university examination scores obtained by the students were calculated.RESULTS: Of the 170 students who participated in the study, 87 (51.2%) were females. The Cronbach’s alpha value was considered acceptable for both surface and deep approach. While the academic performance was significantly better in females (U = 2571.5; p = 0.001), no difference was seen in the learning approach based on gender. Fifty (29.4%) students had a higher score for the surface approach. This group had lower examination scores compared with those with equal scores for surface and deep approach or higher scores for the deep approach. A weak negative correlation was seen between the examination marks and surface approach (τb = −0.167; p = 0.002). When analyzed based on gender, the correlation was statistically significant only in females (τb = −0.173; p = 0.02).CONCLUSIONS: A weak negative correlation was seen between the examination marks and surface approach to learning. Although statistically significant, the actual difference between the groups was of a small magnitude. Hence, whether promoting deep learning approach improves academic performance in terms of marks obtained in the examination needs to be confirmed by further studies.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/32395
10.15448/1980-6108.2018.4.32395
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/32395
identifier_str_mv 10.15448/1980-6108.2018.4.32395
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/32395/17580
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Scientia Medica
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Scientia Medica
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Medica; Vol. 28 No. 4 (2018); ID32395
Scientia Medica; v. 28 n. 4 (2018); ID32395
1980-6108
1806-5562
10.15448/1980-6108.2018.4
reponame:Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
collection Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scientiamedica@pucrs.br || editora.periodicos@pucrs.br
_version_ 1809101751935041536