Evaluation of medical professionals’ knowledge about Q fever
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/45474 |
Resumo: | Aims: evaluate the medical professionals’ knowledge about Q fever, seeking integrative contributions to public health that may favor the formulation of policies and the development of strategies based on a One Health approach. Methods: this is a cross-sectional and quantitative study with data collection through a structured questionnaire applied face-to-face to physicians from various clinical specialties working at the three levels of health care in Brazil. The questionnaire consisted of 25 questions, seven of which were specific to assessing knowledge about Q fever. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess whether the variables medical specialty, level of health care in which they work, age range and gender were associated with a correct answer to at least one specific question about Q fever. Results: among the 254 physicians included, 236 (92.9%) were unaware of Q fever. Only three (16.6%) of the 18 who correctly answered at least one specific question about the disease had a score of more than 50%. The highest rates of correct answers for at least one question (p < 0.0001) occurred among the medical specialties most related to clinical signs and symptoms or the differential diagnosis of Q fever and among males. It is highlighted that 85.8% of physicians consider Q fever a neglected and underreported disease in Brazil. Additionally, all physicians responded that they were not aware of the One Health approach. Conclusions: the almost total lack of knowledge among medical professionals regarding Q fever reinforces the need for greater disclosure for this zoonosis with a One Health approach in Medical Schools, in Residency Programs and for physicians in general. In addition, the inclusion of Q fever in the national list of notifiable diseases becomes relevant, allowing a better understanding of its epidemiological situation in Brazil. Finally, effective public health actions must be carried out to avoid underdiagnosis and the development of severe cases of the disease. Methods: this is a cross-sectional and quantitative study with data collection through a structured questionnaire applied face-to-face to physicians from various clinical specialties working at the three levels of health care in Brazil. The questionnaire consisted of 25 questions, seven of which were specific to assessing knowledge about Q fever. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess whether the variables medical specialty, level of health care in which they work, age range and gender were associated with a correct answer to at least one specific question about Q fever. Results: among the 254 physicians included, 236 (92.9%) were unaware of Q fever. Only three (16.6%) of the 18 who correctly answered at least one specific question about the disease had a score of more than 50%. The highest rates of correct answers for at least one question (p < 0.0001) occurred among the medical specialties most related to clinical signs and symptoms or the differential diagnosis of Q fever and among males. It is highlighted that 85.8% of physicians consider Q fever a neglected and underreported disease in Brazil. Additionally, all physicians responded that they were not aware of the One Health approach. Conclusions: the almost total lack of knowledge among medical professionals regarding Q fever reinforces the need for greater disclosure for this zoonosis with a One Health approach in Medical Schools, in Residency Programs and for physicians in general. In addition, the inclusion of Q fever in the national list of notifiable diseases becomes relevant, allowing a better understanding of its epidemiological situation in Brazil. Finally, effective public health actions must be carried out to avoid underdiagnosis and the development of severe cases of the disease. |
id |
PUC_RS-25_d6fa2de3df9c3e791b98a7b1edec6da6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/45474 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-25 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of medical professionals’ knowledge about Q feverAvaliação do conhecimento de profissionais médicos sobre a febre Qcoxiella burnetiimedical knowledgeneglected diseasesone healthQ fevercoxiella burnetiiconhecimento médicodoenças negligenciadassaúde únicafebre QAims: evaluate the medical professionals’ knowledge about Q fever, seeking integrative contributions to public health that may favor the formulation of policies and the development of strategies based on a One Health approach. Methods: this is a cross-sectional and quantitative study with data collection through a structured questionnaire applied face-to-face to physicians from various clinical specialties working at the three levels of health care in Brazil. The questionnaire consisted of 25 questions, seven of which were specific to assessing knowledge about Q fever. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess whether the variables medical specialty, level of health care in which they work, age range and gender were associated with a correct answer to at least one specific question about Q fever. Results: among the 254 physicians included, 236 (92.9%) were unaware of Q fever. Only three (16.6%) of the 18 who correctly answered at least one specific question about the disease had a score of more than 50%. The highest rates of correct answers for at least one question (p < 0.0001) occurred among the medical specialties most related to clinical signs and symptoms or the differential diagnosis of Q fever and among males. It is highlighted that 85.8% of physicians consider Q fever a neglected and underreported disease in Brazil. Additionally, all physicians responded that they were not aware of the One Health approach. Conclusions: the almost total lack of knowledge among medical professionals regarding Q fever reinforces the need for greater disclosure for this zoonosis with a One Health approach in Medical Schools, in Residency Programs and for physicians in general. In addition, the inclusion of Q fever in the national list of notifiable diseases becomes relevant, allowing a better understanding of its epidemiological situation in Brazil. Finally, effective public health actions must be carried out to avoid underdiagnosis and the development of severe cases of the disease. Methods: this is a cross-sectional and quantitative study with data collection through a structured questionnaire applied face-to-face to physicians from various clinical specialties working at the three levels of health care in Brazil. The questionnaire consisted of 25 questions, seven of which were specific to assessing knowledge about Q fever. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess whether the variables medical specialty, level of health care in which they work, age range and gender were associated with a correct answer to at least one specific question about Q fever. Results: among the 254 physicians included, 236 (92.9%) were unaware of Q fever. Only three (16.6%) of the 18 who correctly answered at least one specific question about the disease had a score of more than 50%. The highest rates of correct answers for at least one question (p < 0.0001) occurred among the medical specialties most related to clinical signs and symptoms or the differential diagnosis of Q fever and among males. It is highlighted that 85.8% of physicians consider Q fever a neglected and underreported disease in Brazil. Additionally, all physicians responded that they were not aware of the One Health approach. Conclusions: the almost total lack of knowledge among medical professionals regarding Q fever reinforces the need for greater disclosure for this zoonosis with a One Health approach in Medical Schools, in Residency Programs and for physicians in general. In addition, the inclusion of Q fever in the national list of notifiable diseases becomes relevant, allowing a better understanding of its epidemiological situation in Brazil. Finally, effective public health actions must be carried out to avoid underdiagnosis and the development of severe cases of the disease.Objetivos: avaliar o conhecimento dos profissionais médicos sobre a febre Q, visando contribuições integrativas para saúde pública que possam favorecer a formulação de políticas e o desenvolvimento de estratégias baseadas na abordagem de Saúde Única. Métodos: trata-se de um estudo transversal e quantitativo com coleta de dados por meio de questionário estruturado aplicado presencialmente a médicos de diversas especialidades clínicas que atuam nos três níveis de atenção à saúde no Brasil. O questionário foi composto por 25 questões, sendo sete específicas de avaliação de conhecimento sobre a febre Q. Foram realizadas análises de regressão logística univariada e multivariada para avaliar se as variáveis especialidade médica, nível de assistência à saúde em que atua, faixa etária e sexo estavam associadas ao acerto de pelo menos uma questão específica sobre a febre Q. Resultados: dos 254 médicos incluídos, 236 (92,9%) desconheciam a febre Q. Apenas três (16,6%) dos 18 que acertaram pelo menos uma questão específica sobre a doença obtiveram um aproveitamento superior a 50%. As maiores taxas de acerto de pelo menos uma questão (p < 0,0001) ocorreram entre as especialidades médicas mais relacionadas aos sinais e sintomas clínicos ou ao diagnóstico diferencial da febre Q e entre os do sexo masculino. Destaca-se que 85,8% dos médicos consideram a febre Q uma doença negligenciada e subnotificada no Brasil. Além disso, todos os médicos responderam que não conheciam a abordagem de Saúde Única. Conclusões: o quase total desconhecimento dos profissionais médicos sobre a febre Q reforça a necessidade de maior divulgação desta zoonose com abordagem de Saúde Única nas Faculdades de Medicina, nos Programas de Residência e para os médicos em geral. Além disso, torna-se relevante a inclusão da febre Q na lista nacional de doenças de notificação compulsória, permitindo uma melhor compreensão da sua situação epidemiológica no Brasil. Por fim, devem ser realizadas ações eficazes de saúde pública para evitar o subdiagnóstico e o desenvolvimento de casos graves da doença.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2024-07-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/4547410.15448/1980-6108.2024.1.45474Scientia Medica; Vol. 34 No. 1 (2024): Single Volume - Continuous Flow ; e45474Scientia Medica; v. 34 n. 1 (2024): Volume Único - Fluxo Contínuo ; e454741980-61081806-556210.15448/1980-6108.2024.01.reponame:Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSenghttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/45474/28573Copyright (c) 2024 Scientia Medicahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRosa Meurer, IgorSilva, Marcio RobertoKleinsorge Roland, Ronalddo Amaral Corrêa, José OtávioSoares Coimbra, Elaine2024-07-23T16:37:03Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/45474Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/PUBhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/oaiscientiamedica@pucrs.br || editora.periodicos@pucrs.br1980-61081806-5562opendoar:2024-07-23T16:37:03Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of medical professionals’ knowledge about Q fever Avaliação do conhecimento de profissionais médicos sobre a febre Q |
title |
Evaluation of medical professionals’ knowledge about Q fever |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of medical professionals’ knowledge about Q fever Rosa Meurer, Igor coxiella burnetii medical knowledge neglected diseases one health Q fever coxiella burnetii conhecimento médico doenças negligenciadas saúde única febre Q |
title_short |
Evaluation of medical professionals’ knowledge about Q fever |
title_full |
Evaluation of medical professionals’ knowledge about Q fever |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of medical professionals’ knowledge about Q fever |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of medical professionals’ knowledge about Q fever |
title_sort |
Evaluation of medical professionals’ knowledge about Q fever |
author |
Rosa Meurer, Igor |
author_facet |
Rosa Meurer, Igor Silva, Marcio Roberto Kleinsorge Roland, Ronald do Amaral Corrêa, José Otávio Soares Coimbra, Elaine |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Marcio Roberto Kleinsorge Roland, Ronald do Amaral Corrêa, José Otávio Soares Coimbra, Elaine |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rosa Meurer, Igor Silva, Marcio Roberto Kleinsorge Roland, Ronald do Amaral Corrêa, José Otávio Soares Coimbra, Elaine |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
coxiella burnetii medical knowledge neglected diseases one health Q fever coxiella burnetii conhecimento médico doenças negligenciadas saúde única febre Q |
topic |
coxiella burnetii medical knowledge neglected diseases one health Q fever coxiella burnetii conhecimento médico doenças negligenciadas saúde única febre Q |
description |
Aims: evaluate the medical professionals’ knowledge about Q fever, seeking integrative contributions to public health that may favor the formulation of policies and the development of strategies based on a One Health approach. Methods: this is a cross-sectional and quantitative study with data collection through a structured questionnaire applied face-to-face to physicians from various clinical specialties working at the three levels of health care in Brazil. The questionnaire consisted of 25 questions, seven of which were specific to assessing knowledge about Q fever. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess whether the variables medical specialty, level of health care in which they work, age range and gender were associated with a correct answer to at least one specific question about Q fever. Results: among the 254 physicians included, 236 (92.9%) were unaware of Q fever. Only three (16.6%) of the 18 who correctly answered at least one specific question about the disease had a score of more than 50%. The highest rates of correct answers for at least one question (p < 0.0001) occurred among the medical specialties most related to clinical signs and symptoms or the differential diagnosis of Q fever and among males. It is highlighted that 85.8% of physicians consider Q fever a neglected and underreported disease in Brazil. Additionally, all physicians responded that they were not aware of the One Health approach. Conclusions: the almost total lack of knowledge among medical professionals regarding Q fever reinforces the need for greater disclosure for this zoonosis with a One Health approach in Medical Schools, in Residency Programs and for physicians in general. In addition, the inclusion of Q fever in the national list of notifiable diseases becomes relevant, allowing a better understanding of its epidemiological situation in Brazil. Finally, effective public health actions must be carried out to avoid underdiagnosis and the development of severe cases of the disease. Methods: this is a cross-sectional and quantitative study with data collection through a structured questionnaire applied face-to-face to physicians from various clinical specialties working at the three levels of health care in Brazil. The questionnaire consisted of 25 questions, seven of which were specific to assessing knowledge about Q fever. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess whether the variables medical specialty, level of health care in which they work, age range and gender were associated with a correct answer to at least one specific question about Q fever. Results: among the 254 physicians included, 236 (92.9%) were unaware of Q fever. Only three (16.6%) of the 18 who correctly answered at least one specific question about the disease had a score of more than 50%. The highest rates of correct answers for at least one question (p < 0.0001) occurred among the medical specialties most related to clinical signs and symptoms or the differential diagnosis of Q fever and among males. It is highlighted that 85.8% of physicians consider Q fever a neglected and underreported disease in Brazil. Additionally, all physicians responded that they were not aware of the One Health approach. Conclusions: the almost total lack of knowledge among medical professionals regarding Q fever reinforces the need for greater disclosure for this zoonosis with a One Health approach in Medical Schools, in Residency Programs and for physicians in general. In addition, the inclusion of Q fever in the national list of notifiable diseases becomes relevant, allowing a better understanding of its epidemiological situation in Brazil. Finally, effective public health actions must be carried out to avoid underdiagnosis and the development of severe cases of the disease. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-07-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/45474 10.15448/1980-6108.2024.1.45474 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/45474 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/1980-6108.2024.1.45474 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/45474/28573 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Scientia Medica http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Scientia Medica http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Medica; Vol. 34 No. 1 (2024): Single Volume - Continuous Flow ; e45474 Scientia Medica; v. 34 n. 1 (2024): Volume Único - Fluxo Contínuo ; e45474 1980-6108 1806-5562 10.15448/1980-6108.2024.01. reponame:Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) |
collection |
Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
scientiamedica@pucrs.br || editora.periodicos@pucrs.br |
_version_ |
1809101752637587456 |