Evaluation of medical professionals’ knowledge about Q fever

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rosa Meurer, Igor
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Silva, Marcio Roberto, Kleinsorge Roland, Ronald, do Amaral Corrêa, José Otávio, Soares Coimbra, Elaine
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/45474
Resumo: Aims: evaluate the medical professionals’ knowledge about Q fever, seeking integrative contributions to public health that may favor the formulation of policies and the development of strategies based on a One Health approach. Methods: this is a cross-sectional and quantitative study with data collection through a structured questionnaire applied face-to-face to physicians from various clinical specialties working at the three levels of health care in Brazil. The questionnaire consisted of 25 questions, seven of which were specific to assessing knowledge about Q fever. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess whether the variables medical specialty, level of health care in which they work, age range and gender were associated with a correct answer to at least one specific question about Q fever. Results: among the 254 physicians included, 236 (92.9%) were unaware of Q fever. Only three (16.6%) of the 18 who correctly answered at least one specific question about the disease had a score of more than 50%. The highest rates of correct answers for at least one question (p < 0.0001) occurred among the medical specialties most related to clinical signs and symptoms or the differential diagnosis of Q fever and among males. It is highlighted that 85.8% of physicians consider Q fever a neglected and underreported disease in Brazil. Additionally, all physicians responded that they were not aware of the One Health approach. Conclusions: the almost total lack of knowledge among medical professionals regarding Q fever reinforces the need for greater disclosure for this zoonosis with a One Health approach in Medical Schools, in Residency Programs and for physicians in general. In addition, the inclusion of Q fever in the national list of notifiable diseases becomes relevant, allowing a better understanding of its epidemiological situation in Brazil. Finally, effective public health actions must be carried out to avoid underdiagnosis and the development of severe cases of the disease. Methods: this is a cross-sectional and quantitative study with data collection through a structured questionnaire applied face-to-face to physicians from various clinical specialties working at the three levels of health care in Brazil. The questionnaire consisted of 25 questions, seven of which were specific to assessing knowledge about Q fever. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess whether the variables medical specialty, level of health care in which they work, age range and gender were associated with a correct answer to at least one specific question about Q fever. Results: among the 254 physicians included, 236 (92.9%) were unaware of Q fever. Only three (16.6%) of the 18 who correctly answered at least one specific question about the disease had a score of more than 50%. The highest rates of correct answers for at least one question (p < 0.0001) occurred among the medical specialties most related to clinical signs and symptoms or the differential diagnosis of Q fever and among males. It is highlighted that 85.8% of physicians consider Q fever a neglected and underreported disease in Brazil. Additionally, all physicians responded that they were not aware of the One Health approach. Conclusions: the almost total lack of knowledge among medical professionals regarding Q fever reinforces the need for greater disclosure for this zoonosis with a One Health approach in Medical Schools, in Residency Programs and for physicians in general. In addition, the inclusion of Q fever in the national list of notifiable diseases becomes relevant, allowing a better understanding of its epidemiological situation in Brazil. Finally, effective public health actions must be carried out to avoid underdiagnosis and the development of severe cases of the disease.
id PUC_RS-25_d6fa2de3df9c3e791b98a7b1edec6da6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/45474
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-25
network_name_str Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of medical professionals’ knowledge about Q feverAvaliação do conhecimento de profissionais médicos sobre a febre Qcoxiella burnetiimedical knowledgeneglected diseasesone healthQ fevercoxiella burnetiiconhecimento médicodoenças negligenciadassaúde únicafebre QAims: evaluate the medical professionals’ knowledge about Q fever, seeking integrative contributions to public health that may favor the formulation of policies and the development of strategies based on a One Health approach. Methods: this is a cross-sectional and quantitative study with data collection through a structured questionnaire applied face-to-face to physicians from various clinical specialties working at the three levels of health care in Brazil. The questionnaire consisted of 25 questions, seven of which were specific to assessing knowledge about Q fever. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess whether the variables medical specialty, level of health care in which they work, age range and gender were associated with a correct answer to at least one specific question about Q fever. Results: among the 254 physicians included, 236 (92.9%) were unaware of Q fever. Only three (16.6%) of the 18 who correctly answered at least one specific question about the disease had a score of more than 50%. The highest rates of correct answers for at least one question (p < 0.0001) occurred among the medical specialties most related to clinical signs and symptoms or the differential diagnosis of Q fever and among males. It is highlighted that 85.8% of physicians consider Q fever a neglected and underreported disease in Brazil. Additionally, all physicians responded that they were not aware of the One Health approach. Conclusions: the almost total lack of knowledge among medical professionals regarding Q fever reinforces the need for greater disclosure for this zoonosis with a One Health approach in Medical Schools, in Residency Programs and for physicians in general. In addition, the inclusion of Q fever in the national list of notifiable diseases becomes relevant, allowing a better understanding of its epidemiological situation in Brazil. Finally, effective public health actions must be carried out to avoid underdiagnosis and the development of severe cases of the disease. Methods: this is a cross-sectional and quantitative study with data collection through a structured questionnaire applied face-to-face to physicians from various clinical specialties working at the three levels of health care in Brazil. The questionnaire consisted of 25 questions, seven of which were specific to assessing knowledge about Q fever. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess whether the variables medical specialty, level of health care in which they work, age range and gender were associated with a correct answer to at least one specific question about Q fever. Results: among the 254 physicians included, 236 (92.9%) were unaware of Q fever. Only three (16.6%) of the 18 who correctly answered at least one specific question about the disease had a score of more than 50%. The highest rates of correct answers for at least one question (p < 0.0001) occurred among the medical specialties most related to clinical signs and symptoms or the differential diagnosis of Q fever and among males. It is highlighted that 85.8% of physicians consider Q fever a neglected and underreported disease in Brazil. Additionally, all physicians responded that they were not aware of the One Health approach. Conclusions: the almost total lack of knowledge among medical professionals regarding Q fever reinforces the need for greater disclosure for this zoonosis with a One Health approach in Medical Schools, in Residency Programs and for physicians in general. In addition, the inclusion of Q fever in the national list of notifiable diseases becomes relevant, allowing a better understanding of its epidemiological situation in Brazil. Finally, effective public health actions must be carried out to avoid underdiagnosis and the development of severe cases of the disease.Objetivos: avaliar o conhecimento dos profissionais médicos sobre a febre Q, visando contribuições integrativas para saúde pública que possam favorecer a formulação de políticas e o desenvolvimento de estratégias baseadas na abordagem de Saúde Única. Métodos: trata-se de um estudo transversal e quantitativo com coleta de dados por meio de questionário estruturado aplicado presencialmente a médicos de diversas especialidades clínicas que atuam nos três níveis de atenção à saúde no Brasil. O questionário foi composto por 25 questões, sendo sete específicas de avaliação de conhecimento sobre a febre Q. Foram realizadas análises de regressão logística univariada e multivariada para avaliar se as variáveis especialidade médica, nível de assistência à saúde em que atua, faixa etária e sexo estavam associadas ao acerto de pelo menos uma questão específica sobre a febre Q. Resultados: dos 254 médicos incluídos, 236 (92,9%) desconheciam a febre Q. Apenas três (16,6%) dos 18 que acertaram pelo menos uma questão específica sobre a doença obtiveram um aproveitamento superior a 50%. As maiores taxas de acerto de pelo menos uma questão (p < 0,0001) ocorreram entre as especialidades médicas mais relacionadas aos sinais e sintomas clínicos ou ao diagnóstico diferencial da febre Q e entre os do sexo masculino. Destaca-se que 85,8% dos médicos consideram a febre Q uma doença negligenciada e subnotificada no Brasil. Além disso, todos os médicos responderam que não conheciam a abordagem de Saúde Única. Conclusões: o quase total desconhecimento dos profissionais médicos sobre a febre Q reforça a necessidade de maior divulgação desta zoonose com abordagem de Saúde Única nas Faculdades de Medicina, nos Programas de Residência e para os médicos em geral. Além disso, torna-se relevante a inclusão da febre Q na lista nacional de doenças de notificação compulsória, permitindo uma melhor compreensão da sua situação epidemiológica no Brasil. Por fim, devem ser realizadas ações eficazes de saúde pública para evitar o subdiagnóstico e o desenvolvimento de casos graves da doença.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2024-07-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/4547410.15448/1980-6108.2024.1.45474Scientia Medica; Vol. 34 No. 1 (2024): Single Volume - Continuous Flow ; e45474Scientia Medica; v. 34 n. 1 (2024): Volume Único - Fluxo Contínuo ; e454741980-61081806-556210.15448/1980-6108.2024.01.reponame:Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSenghttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/45474/28573Copyright (c) 2024 Scientia Medicahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRosa Meurer, IgorSilva, Marcio RobertoKleinsorge Roland, Ronalddo Amaral Corrêa, José OtávioSoares Coimbra, Elaine2024-07-23T16:37:03Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/45474Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/PUBhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/oaiscientiamedica@pucrs.br || editora.periodicos@pucrs.br1980-61081806-5562opendoar:2024-07-23T16:37:03Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of medical professionals’ knowledge about Q fever
Avaliação do conhecimento de profissionais médicos sobre a febre Q
title Evaluation of medical professionals’ knowledge about Q fever
spellingShingle Evaluation of medical professionals’ knowledge about Q fever
Rosa Meurer, Igor
coxiella burnetii
medical knowledge
neglected diseases
one health
Q fever
coxiella burnetii
conhecimento médico
doenças negligenciadas
saúde única
febre Q
title_short Evaluation of medical professionals’ knowledge about Q fever
title_full Evaluation of medical professionals’ knowledge about Q fever
title_fullStr Evaluation of medical professionals’ knowledge about Q fever
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of medical professionals’ knowledge about Q fever
title_sort Evaluation of medical professionals’ knowledge about Q fever
author Rosa Meurer, Igor
author_facet Rosa Meurer, Igor
Silva, Marcio Roberto
Kleinsorge Roland, Ronald
do Amaral Corrêa, José Otávio
Soares Coimbra, Elaine
author_role author
author2 Silva, Marcio Roberto
Kleinsorge Roland, Ronald
do Amaral Corrêa, José Otávio
Soares Coimbra, Elaine
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rosa Meurer, Igor
Silva, Marcio Roberto
Kleinsorge Roland, Ronald
do Amaral Corrêa, José Otávio
Soares Coimbra, Elaine
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv coxiella burnetii
medical knowledge
neglected diseases
one health
Q fever
coxiella burnetii
conhecimento médico
doenças negligenciadas
saúde única
febre Q
topic coxiella burnetii
medical knowledge
neglected diseases
one health
Q fever
coxiella burnetii
conhecimento médico
doenças negligenciadas
saúde única
febre Q
description Aims: evaluate the medical professionals’ knowledge about Q fever, seeking integrative contributions to public health that may favor the formulation of policies and the development of strategies based on a One Health approach. Methods: this is a cross-sectional and quantitative study with data collection through a structured questionnaire applied face-to-face to physicians from various clinical specialties working at the three levels of health care in Brazil. The questionnaire consisted of 25 questions, seven of which were specific to assessing knowledge about Q fever. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess whether the variables medical specialty, level of health care in which they work, age range and gender were associated with a correct answer to at least one specific question about Q fever. Results: among the 254 physicians included, 236 (92.9%) were unaware of Q fever. Only three (16.6%) of the 18 who correctly answered at least one specific question about the disease had a score of more than 50%. The highest rates of correct answers for at least one question (p < 0.0001) occurred among the medical specialties most related to clinical signs and symptoms or the differential diagnosis of Q fever and among males. It is highlighted that 85.8% of physicians consider Q fever a neglected and underreported disease in Brazil. Additionally, all physicians responded that they were not aware of the One Health approach. Conclusions: the almost total lack of knowledge among medical professionals regarding Q fever reinforces the need for greater disclosure for this zoonosis with a One Health approach in Medical Schools, in Residency Programs and for physicians in general. In addition, the inclusion of Q fever in the national list of notifiable diseases becomes relevant, allowing a better understanding of its epidemiological situation in Brazil. Finally, effective public health actions must be carried out to avoid underdiagnosis and the development of severe cases of the disease. Methods: this is a cross-sectional and quantitative study with data collection through a structured questionnaire applied face-to-face to physicians from various clinical specialties working at the three levels of health care in Brazil. The questionnaire consisted of 25 questions, seven of which were specific to assessing knowledge about Q fever. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess whether the variables medical specialty, level of health care in which they work, age range and gender were associated with a correct answer to at least one specific question about Q fever. Results: among the 254 physicians included, 236 (92.9%) were unaware of Q fever. Only three (16.6%) of the 18 who correctly answered at least one specific question about the disease had a score of more than 50%. The highest rates of correct answers for at least one question (p < 0.0001) occurred among the medical specialties most related to clinical signs and symptoms or the differential diagnosis of Q fever and among males. It is highlighted that 85.8% of physicians consider Q fever a neglected and underreported disease in Brazil. Additionally, all physicians responded that they were not aware of the One Health approach. Conclusions: the almost total lack of knowledge among medical professionals regarding Q fever reinforces the need for greater disclosure for this zoonosis with a One Health approach in Medical Schools, in Residency Programs and for physicians in general. In addition, the inclusion of Q fever in the national list of notifiable diseases becomes relevant, allowing a better understanding of its epidemiological situation in Brazil. Finally, effective public health actions must be carried out to avoid underdiagnosis and the development of severe cases of the disease.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/45474
10.15448/1980-6108.2024.1.45474
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/45474
identifier_str_mv 10.15448/1980-6108.2024.1.45474
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/45474/28573
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Scientia Medica
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Scientia Medica
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Medica; Vol. 34 No. 1 (2024): Single Volume - Continuous Flow ; e45474
Scientia Medica; v. 34 n. 1 (2024): Volume Único - Fluxo Contínuo ; e45474
1980-6108
1806-5562
10.15448/1980-6108.2024.01.
reponame:Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
collection Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scientiamedica@pucrs.br || editora.periodicos@pucrs.br
_version_ 1809101752637587456