Questions to Naturologists by the Study of Religion
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Rever (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/rever/article/view/35668 |
Resumo: | This article presents questions to naturologists based on researches that have been carried out by scholars of religions since 2011. Due to tensions among naturologists, such questions are usually not discussed through the official channels of naturology. The tensions can be explained by the three main causes related to the believer-related factor according to Pye’s theory: (1) exposure of structures not apparent to the adepts, such as the naturology’s religious interface; (2) comparison with different traditions, such as the intense and still current relationship between naturology and New Age, denied by a considerable part of its interlocutors; and (3) questions regarding certain discourses propagated by its leadership. |
id |
PUC_SP-13_24b21c6f149ea7e6d4fa5adfb1d5f8e0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35668 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-13 |
network_name_str |
Rever (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Questions to Naturologists by the Study of ReligionQuestões postas aos Naturólogos pela Ciência da ReligiãoNaturologiaciência da religiãofator de tensão com os fieisNaturologystudy of religiontension with believer factorThis article presents questions to naturologists based on researches that have been carried out by scholars of religions since 2011. Due to tensions among naturologists, such questions are usually not discussed through the official channels of naturology. The tensions can be explained by the three main causes related to the believer-related factor according to Pye’s theory: (1) exposure of structures not apparent to the adepts, such as the naturology’s religious interface; (2) comparison with different traditions, such as the intense and still current relationship between naturology and New Age, denied by a considerable part of its interlocutors; and (3) questions regarding certain discourses propagated by its leadership.Esse trabalho apresenta questões à naturologia, baseadas em pesquisas que foram efetuadas na ciência da religião desde 2011. Usualmente tais questões não são discutidas pelas vias oficiais da naturologia, por causa da tensão que ocasionam entre os naturólogos. Tais tensões podem ser explicadas pelos três principais motivos de tensão relacionada aos fieis segundo a teoria de Pye: (1) exposição de estruturas não aparentes aos adeptos, como a interface religiosa da naturologia; (2) comparação com outras tradições, como a intensa e ainda atual relação entre naturologia e Nova Era, negada por parte considerável de seus interlocutores; e (3) questionamentos sobre determinados discursos propagados por suas lideranças.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2017-12-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/rever/article/view/3566810.23925/1677-1222.2017vol17i3a10REVER: Journal for the Study of Religion; Vol. 17 No. 3 (2017): (In)tolerância – reflexões teóricas e concretizações históricas; 167-179REVER: Revista de Estudos da Religião; v. 17 n. 3 (2017): (In)tolerância – reflexões teóricas e concretizações históricas; 167-1791677-1222reponame:Rever (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/rever/article/view/35668/24469Copyright (c) 2017 REVER - Revista de Estudos da Religiãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessStern, Fábio L.Leite, Ana Luisa Prosperi2017-12-27T19:03:33Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35668Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/rever/PRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/rever/oairever@pucsp.br1677-12221677-1222opendoar:2017-12-27T19:03:33Rever (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Questions to Naturologists by the Study of Religion Questões postas aos Naturólogos pela Ciência da Religião |
title |
Questions to Naturologists by the Study of Religion |
spellingShingle |
Questions to Naturologists by the Study of Religion Stern, Fábio L. Naturologia ciência da religião fator de tensão com os fieis Naturology study of religion tension with believer factor |
title_short |
Questions to Naturologists by the Study of Religion |
title_full |
Questions to Naturologists by the Study of Religion |
title_fullStr |
Questions to Naturologists by the Study of Religion |
title_full_unstemmed |
Questions to Naturologists by the Study of Religion |
title_sort |
Questions to Naturologists by the Study of Religion |
author |
Stern, Fábio L. |
author_facet |
Stern, Fábio L. Leite, Ana Luisa Prosperi |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Leite, Ana Luisa Prosperi |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Stern, Fábio L. Leite, Ana Luisa Prosperi |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Naturologia ciência da religião fator de tensão com os fieis Naturology study of religion tension with believer factor |
topic |
Naturologia ciência da religião fator de tensão com os fieis Naturology study of religion tension with believer factor |
description |
This article presents questions to naturologists based on researches that have been carried out by scholars of religions since 2011. Due to tensions among naturologists, such questions are usually not discussed through the official channels of naturology. The tensions can be explained by the three main causes related to the believer-related factor according to Pye’s theory: (1) exposure of structures not apparent to the adepts, such as the naturology’s religious interface; (2) comparison with different traditions, such as the intense and still current relationship between naturology and New Age, denied by a considerable part of its interlocutors; and (3) questions regarding certain discourses propagated by its leadership. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/rever/article/view/35668 10.23925/1677-1222.2017vol17i3a10 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/rever/article/view/35668 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.23925/1677-1222.2017vol17i3a10 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/rever/article/view/35668/24469 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 REVER - Revista de Estudos da Religião info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 REVER - Revista de Estudos da Religião |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REVER: Journal for the Study of Religion; Vol. 17 No. 3 (2017): (In)tolerância – reflexões teóricas e concretizações históricas; 167-179 REVER: Revista de Estudos da Religião; v. 17 n. 3 (2017): (In)tolerância – reflexões teóricas e concretizações históricas; 167-179 1677-1222 reponame:Rever (São Paulo. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Rever (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Rever (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Rever (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rever@pucsp.br |
_version_ |
1796798387139379200 |