Religion and psychological sciences: critical considerations
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Rever (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/rever/article/view/10488 |
Resumo: | The article discusses critically the relations between Religion and the Psychological Sciences. After presenting his own concepts about each one of them, the author greets the increasing number of publications in the field of Religion and Spirituality, especially in the United States, but makes also some critical remarks. After making a distinction among scientifically based books and other of the so called Help yourself tendency, he discusses two different theoretical and practical approaches today present in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy: the neurobiological and the more phenomenologically oriented view. He defends that we should make a distinction between them but recognizing also their distinct roles and competencies. After these preliminary considerations, Belzen enumerates six epistemological theses for the clinical praxis of psychiatrists and psychotherapists who work in modern health care hospitals and institutions. For him those guide lines or principles may help the psychoscientists to understand and distinguish in their daily praxis what is religious and spiritual counseling from what is psychological and medical care. |
id |
PUC_SP-13_73bd99d20701db0b3cf5ff9ebac80d49 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10488 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-13 |
network_name_str |
Rever (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Religion and psychological sciences: critical considerationsReligião e Ciências Psicológicas:considerações críticasPsychology of Religion and PsychiatryGuide Lines for praxisnormal versus anormal in Psychotherapy and Religion.Relações Psicologia e Religiãocritérios epistemológicos e metodológicosnormal versus anormal na Psicoterapia e na ReligiãoThe article discusses critically the relations between Religion and the Psychological Sciences. After presenting his own concepts about each one of them, the author greets the increasing number of publications in the field of Religion and Spirituality, especially in the United States, but makes also some critical remarks. After making a distinction among scientifically based books and other of the so called Help yourself tendency, he discusses two different theoretical and practical approaches today present in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy: the neurobiological and the more phenomenologically oriented view. He defends that we should make a distinction between them but recognizing also their distinct roles and competencies. After these preliminary considerations, Belzen enumerates six epistemological theses for the clinical praxis of psychiatrists and psychotherapists who work in modern health care hospitals and institutions. For him those guide lines or principles may help the psychoscientists to understand and distinguish in their daily praxis what is religious and spiritual counseling from what is psychological and medical care.O artigo traz uma discussão crítica a respeito das relações entre Religião e Ciências Psicológicas. Adotando um sentido científico para a definição de uma e outra, Belzen saúda o crescimento em todo o mundo do interesse pelos estudos da religião e da espiritualidade, mas adverte para a necessidade de se distinguir rigorosamente o que é mera divulgação do que segue os padrões da boa metodologia de pesquisa. Faz também uma distinção entre duas concepções hoje presentes no atendimento médico-psicológico: de um lado, a tendência psiquiátrica e biomédica e, do outro, a que se orienta para aspectos de tipo fenomenológico atenta (também!) à questão da espiritualidade e da busca de sentido do paciente, julgada importante para o atendimento e cura integral do mesmo. Na atribuição do que cabe ao psiquiatra médico e ao que é atribuição do profissional que cuida da estabilidade e saúde espiritual, há alguns princípios a serem observados. Belzen enumera seis deles, apresentando-os e comentando-os a modo de teses práticas para o discernimento e o trabalho conjunto adequado entre o médico e o psicólogo chamado a intervir no atendimento.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2012-08-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/rever/article/view/10488REVER: Journal for the Study of Religion; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2012): História da Religião - Perspectivas Culturalistas; 197-218REVER: Revista de Estudos da Religião; v. 12 n. 1 (2012): História da Religião - Perspectivas Culturalistas; 197-2181677-1222reponame:Rever (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/rever/article/view/10488/7805Belzen, Jacob A.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-07-12T12:18:54Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10488Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/rever/PRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/rever/oairever@pucsp.br1677-12221677-1222opendoar:2023-07-12T12:18:54Rever (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Religion and psychological sciences: critical considerations Religião e Ciências Psicológicas:considerações críticas |
title |
Religion and psychological sciences: critical considerations |
spellingShingle |
Religion and psychological sciences: critical considerations Belzen, Jacob A. Psychology of Religion and Psychiatry Guide Lines for praxis normal versus anormal in Psychotherapy and Religion. Relações Psicologia e Religião critérios epistemológicos e metodológicos normal versus anormal na Psicoterapia e na Religião |
title_short |
Religion and psychological sciences: critical considerations |
title_full |
Religion and psychological sciences: critical considerations |
title_fullStr |
Religion and psychological sciences: critical considerations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Religion and psychological sciences: critical considerations |
title_sort |
Religion and psychological sciences: critical considerations |
author |
Belzen, Jacob A. |
author_facet |
Belzen, Jacob A. |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Belzen, Jacob A. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Psychology of Religion and Psychiatry Guide Lines for praxis normal versus anormal in Psychotherapy and Religion. Relações Psicologia e Religião critérios epistemológicos e metodológicos normal versus anormal na Psicoterapia e na Religião |
topic |
Psychology of Religion and Psychiatry Guide Lines for praxis normal versus anormal in Psychotherapy and Religion. Relações Psicologia e Religião critérios epistemológicos e metodológicos normal versus anormal na Psicoterapia e na Religião |
description |
The article discusses critically the relations between Religion and the Psychological Sciences. After presenting his own concepts about each one of them, the author greets the increasing number of publications in the field of Religion and Spirituality, especially in the United States, but makes also some critical remarks. After making a distinction among scientifically based books and other of the so called Help yourself tendency, he discusses two different theoretical and practical approaches today present in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy: the neurobiological and the more phenomenologically oriented view. He defends that we should make a distinction between them but recognizing also their distinct roles and competencies. After these preliminary considerations, Belzen enumerates six epistemological theses for the clinical praxis of psychiatrists and psychotherapists who work in modern health care hospitals and institutions. For him those guide lines or principles may help the psychoscientists to understand and distinguish in their daily praxis what is religious and spiritual counseling from what is psychological and medical care. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-08-02 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/rever/article/view/10488 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/rever/article/view/10488 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/rever/article/view/10488/7805 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REVER: Journal for the Study of Religion; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2012): História da Religião - Perspectivas Culturalistas; 197-218 REVER: Revista de Estudos da Religião; v. 12 n. 1 (2012): História da Religião - Perspectivas Culturalistas; 197-218 1677-1222 reponame:Rever (São Paulo. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Rever (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Rever (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Rever (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rever@pucsp.br |
_version_ |
1796798386006917120 |