Thinking and Acting: Tne Logial Background of Peirce's Pragmatism

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pape, Helmut
Data de Publicação: 2013
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13460
Resumo: What is the logical background of pragmatism? The answer I want to suggest in this paper is that pragmatism is supported by some mathematical and logical ideas that provide a logical background for it. That is to say, they may be used to back up pragmatism's claim to give us a viable account of thought and knowledge acquisition that describes some of the crucial relations by which knowledge acquisition and action are guided. I will start by giving a shot account of why some mathematical and logical ideas coming from the logic of relations, order theory in particular, might be helpful for pragmatism's view of knowledge and praxis. That is, I claim that they support, clarify and strengthen some of the claims made by the pragmatic maxim. In a second step I describe why these logical concepts and rules of reasoing acquire a normative meaning when they become part of pragmatism's semiotic, methodology and epistemology. In particular, the normative role of a semiotic concept ot the identity of an object of different beliefs is discussed. In a concluding step some of the consequences of all of this for the pragmatistic account of thought for the theory of interpretations is developed.
id PUC_SP-15_1376ae337b6dc608a85152f78363e3ab
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13460
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-15
network_name_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Thinking and Acting: Tne Logial Background of Peirce's PragmatismPensando e agindo: O Arcabouço Lógico do Pragmatismo de PeircePragmatismLogicSemioticObjects of thought.PragmatismoLógicaSemióticaObjetos do pensamentoWhat is the logical background of pragmatism? The answer I want to suggest in this paper is that pragmatism is supported by some mathematical and logical ideas that provide a logical background for it. That is to say, they may be used to back up pragmatism's claim to give us a viable account of thought and knowledge acquisition that describes some of the crucial relations by which knowledge acquisition and action are guided. I will start by giving a shot account of why some mathematical and logical ideas coming from the logic of relations, order theory in particular, might be helpful for pragmatism's view of knowledge and praxis. That is, I claim that they support, clarify and strengthen some of the claims made by the pragmatic maxim. In a second step I describe why these logical concepts and rules of reasoing acquire a normative meaning when they become part of pragmatism's semiotic, methodology and epistemology. In particular, the normative role of a semiotic concept ot the identity of an object of different beliefs is discussed. In a concluding step some of the consequences of all of this for the pragmatistic account of thought for the theory of interpretations is developed.Qual é o arcabouço lógico do pragmatismo? A resposta que desejo sugerir neste trabalho é que o pragmatismo lógico é sustentado por algumas ideias matemáticas e lógicas que fornecem um arcabouço para ele. Em outras palavras, elas podem ser utilizadas para apoiar a asserção do pragmatismo de nos fornecer uma explicação víável do pensamento e aquisição do conhecimento, que descreva algumas das relações cruciais pelas quais a aquisição do conhecimento e a ação são orientadas. Iniciarei dando uma breve explicação porque algumas das ideias matematicas e lógicas oriundas da lógica das relações - da teoria da ordem em particular - podem ser úteis para a visão do conhecimento e práxis do pragmatismo. Ou seja, afirmo que elas sustentam, esclarecem e fortalecem algumas das asserções da máxima pragmática. Em um segundo estágio, descrevo porque esses conceitos lógicos e regras de raciocínio adquirem um significado normativo quando se tornam parte da metodologia e epistemologia semiótica do pragmatismo. Em particular, discute-se o papel normativo de um conceito semiótico da identidade de um objeto de diferentes crenças. Em um estágio conclusivo, desenvolvem-se algumas das consequências de tudo isto para a explanação pragmatística do pensamento para a teoria das interpretações.  Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2013-01-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13460Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2009); 91-104Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 10 n. 1 (2009); 91-1042316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13460/9976Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPape, Helmut2024-07-01T13:09:33Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13460Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2024-07-01T13:09:33Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Thinking and Acting: Tne Logial Background of Peirce's Pragmatism
Pensando e agindo: O Arcabouço Lógico do Pragmatismo de Peirce
title Thinking and Acting: Tne Logial Background of Peirce's Pragmatism
spellingShingle Thinking and Acting: Tne Logial Background of Peirce's Pragmatism
Pape, Helmut
Pragmatism
Logic
Semiotic
Objects of thought.
Pragmatismo
Lógica
Semiótica
Objetos do pensamento
title_short Thinking and Acting: Tne Logial Background of Peirce's Pragmatism
title_full Thinking and Acting: Tne Logial Background of Peirce's Pragmatism
title_fullStr Thinking and Acting: Tne Logial Background of Peirce's Pragmatism
title_full_unstemmed Thinking and Acting: Tne Logial Background of Peirce's Pragmatism
title_sort Thinking and Acting: Tne Logial Background of Peirce's Pragmatism
author Pape, Helmut
author_facet Pape, Helmut
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pape, Helmut
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pragmatism
Logic
Semiotic
Objects of thought.
Pragmatismo
Lógica
Semiótica
Objetos do pensamento
topic Pragmatism
Logic
Semiotic
Objects of thought.
Pragmatismo
Lógica
Semiótica
Objetos do pensamento
description What is the logical background of pragmatism? The answer I want to suggest in this paper is that pragmatism is supported by some mathematical and logical ideas that provide a logical background for it. That is to say, they may be used to back up pragmatism's claim to give us a viable account of thought and knowledge acquisition that describes some of the crucial relations by which knowledge acquisition and action are guided. I will start by giving a shot account of why some mathematical and logical ideas coming from the logic of relations, order theory in particular, might be helpful for pragmatism's view of knowledge and praxis. That is, I claim that they support, clarify and strengthen some of the claims made by the pragmatic maxim. In a second step I describe why these logical concepts and rules of reasoing acquire a normative meaning when they become part of pragmatism's semiotic, methodology and epistemology. In particular, the normative role of a semiotic concept ot the identity of an object of different beliefs is discussed. In a concluding step some of the consequences of all of this for the pragmatistic account of thought for the theory of interpretations is developed.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-01-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13460
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13460
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13460/9976
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2009); 91-104
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 10 n. 1 (2009); 91-104
2316-5278
1518-7187
reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
collection Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revcognitio@gmail.com
_version_ 1803387420888006656