Thinking and Acting: Tne Logial Background of Peirce's Pragmatism
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13460 |
Resumo: | What is the logical background of pragmatism? The answer I want to suggest in this paper is that pragmatism is supported by some mathematical and logical ideas that provide a logical background for it. That is to say, they may be used to back up pragmatism's claim to give us a viable account of thought and knowledge acquisition that describes some of the crucial relations by which knowledge acquisition and action are guided. I will start by giving a shot account of why some mathematical and logical ideas coming from the logic of relations, order theory in particular, might be helpful for pragmatism's view of knowledge and praxis. That is, I claim that they support, clarify and strengthen some of the claims made by the pragmatic maxim. In a second step I describe why these logical concepts and rules of reasoing acquire a normative meaning when they become part of pragmatism's semiotic, methodology and epistemology. In particular, the normative role of a semiotic concept ot the identity of an object of different beliefs is discussed. In a concluding step some of the consequences of all of this for the pragmatistic account of thought for the theory of interpretations is developed. |
id |
PUC_SP-15_1376ae337b6dc608a85152f78363e3ab |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13460 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-15 |
network_name_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Thinking and Acting: Tne Logial Background of Peirce's PragmatismPensando e agindo: O Arcabouço Lógico do Pragmatismo de PeircePragmatismLogicSemioticObjects of thought.PragmatismoLógicaSemióticaObjetos do pensamentoWhat is the logical background of pragmatism? The answer I want to suggest in this paper is that pragmatism is supported by some mathematical and logical ideas that provide a logical background for it. That is to say, they may be used to back up pragmatism's claim to give us a viable account of thought and knowledge acquisition that describes some of the crucial relations by which knowledge acquisition and action are guided. I will start by giving a shot account of why some mathematical and logical ideas coming from the logic of relations, order theory in particular, might be helpful for pragmatism's view of knowledge and praxis. That is, I claim that they support, clarify and strengthen some of the claims made by the pragmatic maxim. In a second step I describe why these logical concepts and rules of reasoing acquire a normative meaning when they become part of pragmatism's semiotic, methodology and epistemology. In particular, the normative role of a semiotic concept ot the identity of an object of different beliefs is discussed. In a concluding step some of the consequences of all of this for the pragmatistic account of thought for the theory of interpretations is developed.Qual é o arcabouço lógico do pragmatismo? A resposta que desejo sugerir neste trabalho é que o pragmatismo lógico é sustentado por algumas ideias matemáticas e lógicas que fornecem um arcabouço para ele. Em outras palavras, elas podem ser utilizadas para apoiar a asserção do pragmatismo de nos fornecer uma explicação víável do pensamento e aquisição do conhecimento, que descreva algumas das relações cruciais pelas quais a aquisição do conhecimento e a ação são orientadas. Iniciarei dando uma breve explicação porque algumas das ideias matematicas e lógicas oriundas da lógica das relações - da teoria da ordem em particular - podem ser úteis para a visão do conhecimento e práxis do pragmatismo. Ou seja, afirmo que elas sustentam, esclarecem e fortalecem algumas das asserções da máxima pragmática. Em um segundo estágio, descrevo porque esses conceitos lógicos e regras de raciocínio adquirem um significado normativo quando se tornam parte da metodologia e epistemologia semiótica do pragmatismo. Em particular, discute-se o papel normativo de um conceito semiótico da identidade de um objeto de diferentes crenças. Em um estágio conclusivo, desenvolvem-se algumas das consequências de tudo isto para a explanação pragmatística do pensamento para a teoria das interpretações. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2013-01-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13460Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2009); 91-104Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 10 n. 1 (2009); 91-1042316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13460/9976Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPape, Helmut2024-07-01T13:09:33Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13460Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2024-07-01T13:09:33Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Thinking and Acting: Tne Logial Background of Peirce's Pragmatism Pensando e agindo: O Arcabouço Lógico do Pragmatismo de Peirce |
title |
Thinking and Acting: Tne Logial Background of Peirce's Pragmatism |
spellingShingle |
Thinking and Acting: Tne Logial Background of Peirce's Pragmatism Pape, Helmut Pragmatism Logic Semiotic Objects of thought. Pragmatismo Lógica Semiótica Objetos do pensamento |
title_short |
Thinking and Acting: Tne Logial Background of Peirce's Pragmatism |
title_full |
Thinking and Acting: Tne Logial Background of Peirce's Pragmatism |
title_fullStr |
Thinking and Acting: Tne Logial Background of Peirce's Pragmatism |
title_full_unstemmed |
Thinking and Acting: Tne Logial Background of Peirce's Pragmatism |
title_sort |
Thinking and Acting: Tne Logial Background of Peirce's Pragmatism |
author |
Pape, Helmut |
author_facet |
Pape, Helmut |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pape, Helmut |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Pragmatism Logic Semiotic Objects of thought. Pragmatismo Lógica Semiótica Objetos do pensamento |
topic |
Pragmatism Logic Semiotic Objects of thought. Pragmatismo Lógica Semiótica Objetos do pensamento |
description |
What is the logical background of pragmatism? The answer I want to suggest in this paper is that pragmatism is supported by some mathematical and logical ideas that provide a logical background for it. That is to say, they may be used to back up pragmatism's claim to give us a viable account of thought and knowledge acquisition that describes some of the crucial relations by which knowledge acquisition and action are guided. I will start by giving a shot account of why some mathematical and logical ideas coming from the logic of relations, order theory in particular, might be helpful for pragmatism's view of knowledge and praxis. That is, I claim that they support, clarify and strengthen some of the claims made by the pragmatic maxim. In a second step I describe why these logical concepts and rules of reasoing acquire a normative meaning when they become part of pragmatism's semiotic, methodology and epistemology. In particular, the normative role of a semiotic concept ot the identity of an object of different beliefs is discussed. In a concluding step some of the consequences of all of this for the pragmatistic account of thought for the theory of interpretations is developed. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-01-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13460 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13460 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13460/9976 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2009); 91-104 Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 10 n. 1 (2009); 91-104 2316-5278 1518-7187 reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revcognitio@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803387420888006656 |