Are we capable of being conscious of the initial activity of consciousness? An analysis of transcendental deduction based on Kemp Smith

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Rômulo Martins
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/31238
Resumo: The present work will focus on the thesis of transcendental deduction (A) and will examine the question of the original synthetic activity of consciousness: are we capable of being conscious of this transcendental activity? To this end we shall set out the reason for privileging deduction A, on the basis of Kemp Smith’s interpretation; we shall investigate how the problem concerning the constitution of consciousness arises in Modernity; and, finally, we will analyze how this problem is specifically addressed in subjective deduction, relative to the central thesis established by Kant in deduction as a whole. It is in the subjective deduction that the question concerning the transcendental constitution of the unity of consciousness arises – a synthetic unity that is contained within the pure forms of sensibility and in the pure concepts of understanding. After all, can we describe the processes that constitute transcendental synthesis in the same way that we can describe empirical synthetic processes? Finally, we argue that, although this matter falls within the critical project as such, it cannot be analyzed with the theoretical elements that it comprises.
id PUC_SP-15_1f33ed0369def201225092bcffee642e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/31238
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-15
network_name_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Are we capable of being conscious of the initial activity of consciousness? An analysis of transcendental deduction based on Kemp SmithÉ possível estarmos conscientes da atividade originária da consciência? Uma análise da dedução transcendental a partir de Kemp SmithSíntese transcendentalDeduçãoKantConsciênciaTranscendental synthesisDeductionKantConsciousnessThe present work will focus on the thesis of transcendental deduction (A) and will examine the question of the original synthetic activity of consciousness: are we capable of being conscious of this transcendental activity? To this end we shall set out the reason for privileging deduction A, on the basis of Kemp Smith’s interpretation; we shall investigate how the problem concerning the constitution of consciousness arises in Modernity; and, finally, we will analyze how this problem is specifically addressed in subjective deduction, relative to the central thesis established by Kant in deduction as a whole. It is in the subjective deduction that the question concerning the transcendental constitution of the unity of consciousness arises – a synthetic unity that is contained within the pure forms of sensibility and in the pure concepts of understanding. After all, can we describe the processes that constitute transcendental synthesis in the same way that we can describe empirical synthetic processes? Finally, we argue that, although this matter falls within the critical project as such, it cannot be analyzed with the theoretical elements that it comprises.No presente trabalho, nos concentraremos na tese da dedução transcendental (A) e buscaremos analisar a questão acerca da atividade sintética originária da consciência: é possível estarmos conscientes dessa atividade transcendental? Para isso, exporemos o motivo de termos privilegiado a dedução (A), a partir da interpretação de Kemp Smith; investigaremos como surge, na modernidade, o problema acerca da constituição da consciência; e, por fim, analisaremos como esse problema é posto, especificamente, na dedução subjetiva, relativamente à tese principal estabelecida por Kant na dedução como um todo. É na dedução subjetiva que surge a questão acerca da constituição transcendental da unidade da consciência – unidade sintética essa que está contida nas formas puras da sensibilidade e nos conceitos puros do entendimento. Afinal, podemos descrever os processos que constituem a síntese transcendental do mesmo modo como podemos descrever os processos sintéticos empíricos? Por fim, argumentaremos que, embora essa questão se enquadre no projeto crítico enquanto tal, ela não pode ser analisada com os elementos teóricos que estão dispostos no mesmo.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2017-02-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/31238Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2016); 337-348Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 17 n. 2 (2016); 337-3482316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/31238/22064Copyright (c) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPereira, Rômulo Martins2017-02-04T19:39:25Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/31238Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2017-02-04T19:39:25Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Are we capable of being conscious of the initial activity of consciousness? An analysis of transcendental deduction based on Kemp Smith
É possível estarmos conscientes da atividade originária da consciência? Uma análise da dedução transcendental a partir de Kemp Smith
title Are we capable of being conscious of the initial activity of consciousness? An analysis of transcendental deduction based on Kemp Smith
spellingShingle Are we capable of being conscious of the initial activity of consciousness? An analysis of transcendental deduction based on Kemp Smith
Pereira, Rômulo Martins
Síntese transcendental
Dedução
Kant
Consciência
Transcendental synthesis
Deduction
Kant
Consciousness
title_short Are we capable of being conscious of the initial activity of consciousness? An analysis of transcendental deduction based on Kemp Smith
title_full Are we capable of being conscious of the initial activity of consciousness? An analysis of transcendental deduction based on Kemp Smith
title_fullStr Are we capable of being conscious of the initial activity of consciousness? An analysis of transcendental deduction based on Kemp Smith
title_full_unstemmed Are we capable of being conscious of the initial activity of consciousness? An analysis of transcendental deduction based on Kemp Smith
title_sort Are we capable of being conscious of the initial activity of consciousness? An analysis of transcendental deduction based on Kemp Smith
author Pereira, Rômulo Martins
author_facet Pereira, Rômulo Martins
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira, Rômulo Martins
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Síntese transcendental
Dedução
Kant
Consciência
Transcendental synthesis
Deduction
Kant
Consciousness
topic Síntese transcendental
Dedução
Kant
Consciência
Transcendental synthesis
Deduction
Kant
Consciousness
description The present work will focus on the thesis of transcendental deduction (A) and will examine the question of the original synthetic activity of consciousness: are we capable of being conscious of this transcendental activity? To this end we shall set out the reason for privileging deduction A, on the basis of Kemp Smith’s interpretation; we shall investigate how the problem concerning the constitution of consciousness arises in Modernity; and, finally, we will analyze how this problem is specifically addressed in subjective deduction, relative to the central thesis established by Kant in deduction as a whole. It is in the subjective deduction that the question concerning the transcendental constitution of the unity of consciousness arises – a synthetic unity that is contained within the pure forms of sensibility and in the pure concepts of understanding. After all, can we describe the processes that constitute transcendental synthesis in the same way that we can describe empirical synthetic processes? Finally, we argue that, although this matter falls within the critical project as such, it cannot be analyzed with the theoretical elements that it comprises.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-02-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/31238
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/31238
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/31238/22064
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2016); 337-348
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 17 n. 2 (2016); 337-348
2316-5278
1518-7187
reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
collection Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revcognitio@gmail.com
_version_ 1803387421758324736