Are we capable of being conscious of the initial activity of consciousness? An analysis of transcendental deduction based on Kemp Smith
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/31238 |
Resumo: | The present work will focus on the thesis of transcendental deduction (A) and will examine the question of the original synthetic activity of consciousness: are we capable of being conscious of this transcendental activity? To this end we shall set out the reason for privileging deduction A, on the basis of Kemp Smith’s interpretation; we shall investigate how the problem concerning the constitution of consciousness arises in Modernity; and, finally, we will analyze how this problem is specifically addressed in subjective deduction, relative to the central thesis established by Kant in deduction as a whole. It is in the subjective deduction that the question concerning the transcendental constitution of the unity of consciousness arises – a synthetic unity that is contained within the pure forms of sensibility and in the pure concepts of understanding. After all, can we describe the processes that constitute transcendental synthesis in the same way that we can describe empirical synthetic processes? Finally, we argue that, although this matter falls within the critical project as such, it cannot be analyzed with the theoretical elements that it comprises. |
id |
PUC_SP-15_1f33ed0369def201225092bcffee642e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/31238 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-15 |
network_name_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Are we capable of being conscious of the initial activity of consciousness? An analysis of transcendental deduction based on Kemp SmithÉ possível estarmos conscientes da atividade originária da consciência? Uma análise da dedução transcendental a partir de Kemp SmithSíntese transcendentalDeduçãoKantConsciênciaTranscendental synthesisDeductionKantConsciousnessThe present work will focus on the thesis of transcendental deduction (A) and will examine the question of the original synthetic activity of consciousness: are we capable of being conscious of this transcendental activity? To this end we shall set out the reason for privileging deduction A, on the basis of Kemp Smith’s interpretation; we shall investigate how the problem concerning the constitution of consciousness arises in Modernity; and, finally, we will analyze how this problem is specifically addressed in subjective deduction, relative to the central thesis established by Kant in deduction as a whole. It is in the subjective deduction that the question concerning the transcendental constitution of the unity of consciousness arises – a synthetic unity that is contained within the pure forms of sensibility and in the pure concepts of understanding. After all, can we describe the processes that constitute transcendental synthesis in the same way that we can describe empirical synthetic processes? Finally, we argue that, although this matter falls within the critical project as such, it cannot be analyzed with the theoretical elements that it comprises.No presente trabalho, nos concentraremos na tese da dedução transcendental (A) e buscaremos analisar a questão acerca da atividade sintética originária da consciência: é possível estarmos conscientes dessa atividade transcendental? Para isso, exporemos o motivo de termos privilegiado a dedução (A), a partir da interpretação de Kemp Smith; investigaremos como surge, na modernidade, o problema acerca da constituição da consciência; e, por fim, analisaremos como esse problema é posto, especificamente, na dedução subjetiva, relativamente à tese principal estabelecida por Kant na dedução como um todo. É na dedução subjetiva que surge a questão acerca da constituição transcendental da unidade da consciência – unidade sintética essa que está contida nas formas puras da sensibilidade e nos conceitos puros do entendimento. Afinal, podemos descrever os processos que constituem a síntese transcendental do mesmo modo como podemos descrever os processos sintéticos empíricos? Por fim, argumentaremos que, embora essa questão se enquadre no projeto crítico enquanto tal, ela não pode ser analisada com os elementos teóricos que estão dispostos no mesmo.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2017-02-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/31238Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2016); 337-348Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 17 n. 2 (2016); 337-3482316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/31238/22064Copyright (c) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPereira, Rômulo Martins2017-02-04T19:39:25Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/31238Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2017-02-04T19:39:25Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Are we capable of being conscious of the initial activity of consciousness? An analysis of transcendental deduction based on Kemp Smith É possível estarmos conscientes da atividade originária da consciência? Uma análise da dedução transcendental a partir de Kemp Smith |
title |
Are we capable of being conscious of the initial activity of consciousness? An analysis of transcendental deduction based on Kemp Smith |
spellingShingle |
Are we capable of being conscious of the initial activity of consciousness? An analysis of transcendental deduction based on Kemp Smith Pereira, Rômulo Martins Síntese transcendental Dedução Kant Consciência Transcendental synthesis Deduction Kant Consciousness |
title_short |
Are we capable of being conscious of the initial activity of consciousness? An analysis of transcendental deduction based on Kemp Smith |
title_full |
Are we capable of being conscious of the initial activity of consciousness? An analysis of transcendental deduction based on Kemp Smith |
title_fullStr |
Are we capable of being conscious of the initial activity of consciousness? An analysis of transcendental deduction based on Kemp Smith |
title_full_unstemmed |
Are we capable of being conscious of the initial activity of consciousness? An analysis of transcendental deduction based on Kemp Smith |
title_sort |
Are we capable of being conscious of the initial activity of consciousness? An analysis of transcendental deduction based on Kemp Smith |
author |
Pereira, Rômulo Martins |
author_facet |
Pereira, Rômulo Martins |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pereira, Rômulo Martins |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Síntese transcendental Dedução Kant Consciência Transcendental synthesis Deduction Kant Consciousness |
topic |
Síntese transcendental Dedução Kant Consciência Transcendental synthesis Deduction Kant Consciousness |
description |
The present work will focus on the thesis of transcendental deduction (A) and will examine the question of the original synthetic activity of consciousness: are we capable of being conscious of this transcendental activity? To this end we shall set out the reason for privileging deduction A, on the basis of Kemp Smith’s interpretation; we shall investigate how the problem concerning the constitution of consciousness arises in Modernity; and, finally, we will analyze how this problem is specifically addressed in subjective deduction, relative to the central thesis established by Kant in deduction as a whole. It is in the subjective deduction that the question concerning the transcendental constitution of the unity of consciousness arises – a synthetic unity that is contained within the pure forms of sensibility and in the pure concepts of understanding. After all, can we describe the processes that constitute transcendental synthesis in the same way that we can describe empirical synthetic processes? Finally, we argue that, although this matter falls within the critical project as such, it cannot be analyzed with the theoretical elements that it comprises. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-02-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/31238 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/31238 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/31238/22064 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2016); 337-348 Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 17 n. 2 (2016); 337-348 2316-5278 1518-7187 reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revcognitio@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803387421758324736 |