The legitimating fact in the transcendental deduction of the categories: on Dieter Henrich’s reading of Kant.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2007 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/11328/718 |
Resumo: | This article reconstructs the principal moments of Dieter Henrich’s work on Immanuel Kant’s theoretical philosophy. Henrich seeks to clarify and regain the fundaments of Kant’s theory of knowledge – from which his followers, according to him, have distanced themselves – based on the analysis of the “transcendental deduction of the categories”. Firstly, Henrich investigates the proof structure of deduction, comparing the first and the second edition of Critique of Pure Reason. Secondly, he investigates, in the Kantian argument, the relationship between the identity principle of self-consciousness and objectivity. Finally, extending the comparison to Critique of Practical Reason, Henrich elucidates the program and methodology in deduction, showing that the idea of a legitimating fact, borrowed from the juridical notion of a deduction, becomes the fundamental element. We analyse the problems raised by the conception of a philosophical argument based on fundamental “facts”. |
id |
RCAP_f95e48d516e331a5fb8d7aea4da60401 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.uportu.pt:11328/718 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The legitimating fact in the transcendental deduction of the categories: on Dieter Henrich’s reading of Kant.Immanuel KantDieter HenrichTranscendental deductionSelf- consciousnessObjectivityFactThis article reconstructs the principal moments of Dieter Henrich’s work on Immanuel Kant’s theoretical philosophy. Henrich seeks to clarify and regain the fundaments of Kant’s theory of knowledge – from which his followers, according to him, have distanced themselves – based on the analysis of the “transcendental deduction of the categories”. Firstly, Henrich investigates the proof structure of deduction, comparing the first and the second edition of Critique of Pure Reason. Secondly, he investigates, in the Kantian argument, the relationship between the identity principle of self-consciousness and objectivity. Finally, extending the comparison to Critique of Practical Reason, Henrich elucidates the program and methodology in deduction, showing that the idea of a legitimating fact, borrowed from the juridical notion of a deduction, becomes the fundamental element. We analyse the problems raised by the conception of a philosophical argument based on fundamental “facts”.2013-09-20T15:41:53Z2007-01-01T00:00:00Z2007info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11328/718engKlotz, ChristianSckell, Soraya Nourinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-06-15T02:08:58ZPortal AgregadorONG |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The legitimating fact in the transcendental deduction of the categories: on Dieter Henrich’s reading of Kant. |
title |
The legitimating fact in the transcendental deduction of the categories: on Dieter Henrich’s reading of Kant. |
spellingShingle |
The legitimating fact in the transcendental deduction of the categories: on Dieter Henrich’s reading of Kant. Klotz, Christian Immanuel Kant Dieter Henrich Transcendental deduction Self- consciousness Objectivity Fact |
title_short |
The legitimating fact in the transcendental deduction of the categories: on Dieter Henrich’s reading of Kant. |
title_full |
The legitimating fact in the transcendental deduction of the categories: on Dieter Henrich’s reading of Kant. |
title_fullStr |
The legitimating fact in the transcendental deduction of the categories: on Dieter Henrich’s reading of Kant. |
title_full_unstemmed |
The legitimating fact in the transcendental deduction of the categories: on Dieter Henrich’s reading of Kant. |
title_sort |
The legitimating fact in the transcendental deduction of the categories: on Dieter Henrich’s reading of Kant. |
author |
Klotz, Christian |
author_facet |
Klotz, Christian Sckell, Soraya Nour |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sckell, Soraya Nour |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Klotz, Christian Sckell, Soraya Nour |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Immanuel Kant Dieter Henrich Transcendental deduction Self- consciousness Objectivity Fact |
topic |
Immanuel Kant Dieter Henrich Transcendental deduction Self- consciousness Objectivity Fact |
description |
This article reconstructs the principal moments of Dieter Henrich’s work on Immanuel Kant’s theoretical philosophy. Henrich seeks to clarify and regain the fundaments of Kant’s theory of knowledge – from which his followers, according to him, have distanced themselves – based on the analysis of the “transcendental deduction of the categories”. Firstly, Henrich investigates the proof structure of deduction, comparing the first and the second edition of Critique of Pure Reason. Secondly, he investigates, in the Kantian argument, the relationship between the identity principle of self-consciousness and objectivity. Finally, extending the comparison to Critique of Practical Reason, Henrich elucidates the program and methodology in deduction, showing that the idea of a legitimating fact, borrowed from the juridical notion of a deduction, becomes the fundamental element. We analyse the problems raised by the conception of a philosophical argument based on fundamental “facts”. |
publishDate |
2007 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2007-01-01T00:00:00Z 2007 2013-09-20T15:41:53Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11328/718 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11328/718 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1777302547670761472 |