Utopia and Dystopia: a tour of Huxley, Rorty and Scruton

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marques, Wilker
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/57171
Resumo: Utopias are born from the deep human desire for the world to be different, to be better. Dystopias, in turn, are born from the fear-recognition that this world could be worse. In any case, utopia and dystopia start from what we have, from the world as it is, from “things as they are”, towards a possibility. Literature and Philosophy – especially Political Philosophy – always walk together on the path that runs through utopias and dystopias, describing and redescribing the human condition, constructing and deconstructing the idea of man and the good life. Great names in the history of thought, from Plato to Thomas More, Campanella, Francis Bacon, Aldous Huxley and George Orwell dedicated themselves to the imaginative task of thinking about the world we have in the face of the one we could have – for better or worse. But would there still be room for utopias and dystopias in contemporary political thought? Does it still make sense to use such vocabularies in the context of political reflection? The American philosopher Richard Rorty (1931-2007) developed, in the 20th and early 21st centuries, a conception of social democratic and liberal cosmopolitan utopia. Recognized ethnocentric, Rorty envisioned the construction of a broad democratic society based on the reform of the institutions consolidated in real democratic societies, towards the objective of extinguishing the cruelty and humiliation of men by other men and the continuous replacement of force by dialogue. On the other hand, in defense of pessimism, and denouncing the dangers of false hope, the English philosopher and writer Roger Scruton (1944-2020) presents himself as a critical voice in the face of utopias, including what he calls “utopian fallacy” in his list of current sophisms in contemporary times that contribute to an inappropriate reading of our time. In this article, we present a tour of the feelings of utopia and dystopia, highlighting the fundamental writings of Huxley, Rorty and Scruton and drawing a parallel between their rhetoric, highlighting some controversies that can be seen between them.
id PUC_SP-15_2dbd1ea8e0a147f7f77b810c68ab1bed
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/57171
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-15
network_name_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Utopia and Dystopia: a tour of Huxley, Rorty and ScrutonUtopia e Distopia: um passeio por Huxley, Rorty e ScrutonDystopiaHuxleyRortyScrutonUtopiaDistopiaHuxleyRortyScrutonUtopia Utopias are born from the deep human desire for the world to be different, to be better. Dystopias, in turn, are born from the fear-recognition that this world could be worse. In any case, utopia and dystopia start from what we have, from the world as it is, from “things as they are”, towards a possibility. Literature and Philosophy – especially Political Philosophy – always walk together on the path that runs through utopias and dystopias, describing and redescribing the human condition, constructing and deconstructing the idea of man and the good life. Great names in the history of thought, from Plato to Thomas More, Campanella, Francis Bacon, Aldous Huxley and George Orwell dedicated themselves to the imaginative task of thinking about the world we have in the face of the one we could have – for better or worse. But would there still be room for utopias and dystopias in contemporary political thought? Does it still make sense to use such vocabularies in the context of political reflection? The American philosopher Richard Rorty (1931-2007) developed, in the 20th and early 21st centuries, a conception of social democratic and liberal cosmopolitan utopia. Recognized ethnocentric, Rorty envisioned the construction of a broad democratic society based on the reform of the institutions consolidated in real democratic societies, towards the objective of extinguishing the cruelty and humiliation of men by other men and the continuous replacement of force by dialogue. On the other hand, in defense of pessimism, and denouncing the dangers of false hope, the English philosopher and writer Roger Scruton (1944-2020) presents himself as a critical voice in the face of utopias, including what he calls “utopian fallacy” in his list of current sophisms in contemporary times that contribute to an inappropriate reading of our time. In this article, we present a tour of the feelings of utopia and dystopia, highlighting the fundamental writings of Huxley, Rorty and Scruton and drawing a parallel between their rhetoric, highlighting some controversies that can be seen between them. As utopias nascem do profundo desejo humano de que o mundo seja diferente, seja melhor. As distopias, por sua vez, nascem do reconhecimento-pavor de que esse mundo possa ser pior. De todo modo, utopia e distopia, partem do que se tem, do mundo como aí está, das “coisas como elas são”, em direção a uma possibilidade. A Literatura e a Filosofia – especialmente a Filosofia Política –, andam sempre juntas no caminho que perpassa as utopias e distopias, descrevendo e redescrevendo a condição humana, construindo e desconstruindo a ideia de homem e de boa vida. Grandes nomes da história do pensamento, desde Platão a Thomas Morus, Campanella, Francis Bacon, Aldous Huxley e George Orwell dedicaram-se à tarefa imaginativa de pensar o mundo que temos em face daquele que poderíamos ter – para o bem ou para o mal. Mas ainda haveria espaço para utopias e distopias no pensamento político contemporâneo? Ainda faz sentido autilização de tais vocabulários no âmbito da reflexão política? O filósofo estadunidense Richard Rorty (1931-2007) desenvolveu, no século XX e início do XXI, uma concepção de utopia cosmopolita social democrática e liberal. Reconhecidamente etnocêntrico, Rorty vislumbrava a construção de uma ampla sociedade democrática a partir da reforma das instituições consolidadas nas sociedades democráticas reais, rumo ao objetivo da extinção da crueldade e da humilhação dos homens por outros homens e da contínua substituição da força pelo diálogo. Por outro lado, em defesa do pessimismo, e denunciando os perigos da falsa esperança, o filósofo e literato inglês Roger Scruton (1944-2020) apresenta-se como uma voz crítica face às utopias, incluindo aquilo que denomina “falácia utópica” em seu rol de sofismas correntes na contemporaneidade que contribuem para uma leitura inapropriada do nosso tempo. Apresentamos neste artigo um passeio pelos sentimentos de utopia e distopia, assinalando os escritos fundamentais de Huxley, Rorty e Scruton e traçando um paralelo entre suas retóricas, destacando algumas controvérsias que entre elas se pode verificar. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2023-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/5717110.23925/2316-5278.2023v24i1:e57171Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 24 No. 1 (2023): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia ; e57171Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 24 n. 1 (2023): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia ; e571712316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/57171/43460Copyright (c) 2022 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarques, Wilker2023-01-26T13:20:10Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/57171Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2023-01-26T13:20:10Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Utopia and Dystopia: a tour of Huxley, Rorty and Scruton
Utopia e Distopia: um passeio por Huxley, Rorty e Scruton
title Utopia and Dystopia: a tour of Huxley, Rorty and Scruton
spellingShingle Utopia and Dystopia: a tour of Huxley, Rorty and Scruton
Marques, Wilker
Dystopia
Huxley
Rorty
Scruton
Utopia
Distopia
Huxley
Rorty
Scruton
Utopia
title_short Utopia and Dystopia: a tour of Huxley, Rorty and Scruton
title_full Utopia and Dystopia: a tour of Huxley, Rorty and Scruton
title_fullStr Utopia and Dystopia: a tour of Huxley, Rorty and Scruton
title_full_unstemmed Utopia and Dystopia: a tour of Huxley, Rorty and Scruton
title_sort Utopia and Dystopia: a tour of Huxley, Rorty and Scruton
author Marques, Wilker
author_facet Marques, Wilker
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marques, Wilker
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dystopia
Huxley
Rorty
Scruton
Utopia
Distopia
Huxley
Rorty
Scruton
Utopia
topic Dystopia
Huxley
Rorty
Scruton
Utopia
Distopia
Huxley
Rorty
Scruton
Utopia
description Utopias are born from the deep human desire for the world to be different, to be better. Dystopias, in turn, are born from the fear-recognition that this world could be worse. In any case, utopia and dystopia start from what we have, from the world as it is, from “things as they are”, towards a possibility. Literature and Philosophy – especially Political Philosophy – always walk together on the path that runs through utopias and dystopias, describing and redescribing the human condition, constructing and deconstructing the idea of man and the good life. Great names in the history of thought, from Plato to Thomas More, Campanella, Francis Bacon, Aldous Huxley and George Orwell dedicated themselves to the imaginative task of thinking about the world we have in the face of the one we could have – for better or worse. But would there still be room for utopias and dystopias in contemporary political thought? Does it still make sense to use such vocabularies in the context of political reflection? The American philosopher Richard Rorty (1931-2007) developed, in the 20th and early 21st centuries, a conception of social democratic and liberal cosmopolitan utopia. Recognized ethnocentric, Rorty envisioned the construction of a broad democratic society based on the reform of the institutions consolidated in real democratic societies, towards the objective of extinguishing the cruelty and humiliation of men by other men and the continuous replacement of force by dialogue. On the other hand, in defense of pessimism, and denouncing the dangers of false hope, the English philosopher and writer Roger Scruton (1944-2020) presents himself as a critical voice in the face of utopias, including what he calls “utopian fallacy” in his list of current sophisms in contemporary times that contribute to an inappropriate reading of our time. In this article, we present a tour of the feelings of utopia and dystopia, highlighting the fundamental writings of Huxley, Rorty and Scruton and drawing a parallel between their rhetoric, highlighting some controversies that can be seen between them.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-11-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/57171
10.23925/2316-5278.2023v24i1:e57171
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/57171
identifier_str_mv 10.23925/2316-5278.2023v24i1:e57171
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/57171/43460
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 24 No. 1 (2023): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia ; e57171
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 24 n. 1 (2023): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia ; e57171
2316-5278
1518-7187
reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
collection Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revcognitio@gmail.com
_version_ 1803387422368595968