Utopia and Dystopia: a tour of Huxley, Rorty and Scruton
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
DOI: | 10.23925/2316-5278.2023v24i1:e57171 |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/57171 |
Resumo: | Utopias are born from the deep human desire for the world to be different, to be better. Dystopias, in turn, are born from the fear-recognition that this world could be worse. In any case, utopia and dystopia start from what we have, from the world as it is, from “things as they are”, towards a possibility. Literature and Philosophy – especially Political Philosophy – always walk together on the path that runs through utopias and dystopias, describing and redescribing the human condition, constructing and deconstructing the idea of man and the good life. Great names in the history of thought, from Plato to Thomas More, Campanella, Francis Bacon, Aldous Huxley and George Orwell dedicated themselves to the imaginative task of thinking about the world we have in the face of the one we could have – for better or worse. But would there still be room for utopias and dystopias in contemporary political thought? Does it still make sense to use such vocabularies in the context of political reflection? The American philosopher Richard Rorty (1931-2007) developed, in the 20th and early 21st centuries, a conception of social democratic and liberal cosmopolitan utopia. Recognized ethnocentric, Rorty envisioned the construction of a broad democratic society based on the reform of the institutions consolidated in real democratic societies, towards the objective of extinguishing the cruelty and humiliation of men by other men and the continuous replacement of force by dialogue. On the other hand, in defense of pessimism, and denouncing the dangers of false hope, the English philosopher and writer Roger Scruton (1944-2020) presents himself as a critical voice in the face of utopias, including what he calls “utopian fallacy” in his list of current sophisms in contemporary times that contribute to an inappropriate reading of our time. In this article, we present a tour of the feelings of utopia and dystopia, highlighting the fundamental writings of Huxley, Rorty and Scruton and drawing a parallel between their rhetoric, highlighting some controversies that can be seen between them. |
id |
PUC_SP-15_2dbd1ea8e0a147f7f77b810c68ab1bed |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/57171 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-15 |
network_name_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
spelling |
Utopia and Dystopia: a tour of Huxley, Rorty and ScrutonUtopia e Distopia: um passeio por Huxley, Rorty e ScrutonDystopiaHuxleyRortyScrutonUtopiaDistopiaHuxleyRortyScrutonUtopia Utopias are born from the deep human desire for the world to be different, to be better. Dystopias, in turn, are born from the fear-recognition that this world could be worse. In any case, utopia and dystopia start from what we have, from the world as it is, from “things as they are”, towards a possibility. Literature and Philosophy – especially Political Philosophy – always walk together on the path that runs through utopias and dystopias, describing and redescribing the human condition, constructing and deconstructing the idea of man and the good life. Great names in the history of thought, from Plato to Thomas More, Campanella, Francis Bacon, Aldous Huxley and George Orwell dedicated themselves to the imaginative task of thinking about the world we have in the face of the one we could have – for better or worse. But would there still be room for utopias and dystopias in contemporary political thought? Does it still make sense to use such vocabularies in the context of political reflection? The American philosopher Richard Rorty (1931-2007) developed, in the 20th and early 21st centuries, a conception of social democratic and liberal cosmopolitan utopia. Recognized ethnocentric, Rorty envisioned the construction of a broad democratic society based on the reform of the institutions consolidated in real democratic societies, towards the objective of extinguishing the cruelty and humiliation of men by other men and the continuous replacement of force by dialogue. On the other hand, in defense of pessimism, and denouncing the dangers of false hope, the English philosopher and writer Roger Scruton (1944-2020) presents himself as a critical voice in the face of utopias, including what he calls “utopian fallacy” in his list of current sophisms in contemporary times that contribute to an inappropriate reading of our time. In this article, we present a tour of the feelings of utopia and dystopia, highlighting the fundamental writings of Huxley, Rorty and Scruton and drawing a parallel between their rhetoric, highlighting some controversies that can be seen between them. As utopias nascem do profundo desejo humano de que o mundo seja diferente, seja melhor. As distopias, por sua vez, nascem do reconhecimento-pavor de que esse mundo possa ser pior. De todo modo, utopia e distopia, partem do que se tem, do mundo como aí está, das “coisas como elas são”, em direção a uma possibilidade. A Literatura e a Filosofia – especialmente a Filosofia Política –, andam sempre juntas no caminho que perpassa as utopias e distopias, descrevendo e redescrevendo a condição humana, construindo e desconstruindo a ideia de homem e de boa vida. Grandes nomes da história do pensamento, desde Platão a Thomas Morus, Campanella, Francis Bacon, Aldous Huxley e George Orwell dedicaram-se à tarefa imaginativa de pensar o mundo que temos em face daquele que poderíamos ter – para o bem ou para o mal. Mas ainda haveria espaço para utopias e distopias no pensamento político contemporâneo? Ainda faz sentido autilização de tais vocabulários no âmbito da reflexão política? O filósofo estadunidense Richard Rorty (1931-2007) desenvolveu, no século XX e início do XXI, uma concepção de utopia cosmopolita social democrática e liberal. Reconhecidamente etnocêntrico, Rorty vislumbrava a construção de uma ampla sociedade democrática a partir da reforma das instituições consolidadas nas sociedades democráticas reais, rumo ao objetivo da extinção da crueldade e da humilhação dos homens por outros homens e da contínua substituição da força pelo diálogo. Por outro lado, em defesa do pessimismo, e denunciando os perigos da falsa esperança, o filósofo e literato inglês Roger Scruton (1944-2020) apresenta-se como uma voz crítica face às utopias, incluindo aquilo que denomina “falácia utópica” em seu rol de sofismas correntes na contemporaneidade que contribuem para uma leitura inapropriada do nosso tempo. Apresentamos neste artigo um passeio pelos sentimentos de utopia e distopia, assinalando os escritos fundamentais de Huxley, Rorty e Scruton e traçando um paralelo entre suas retóricas, destacando algumas controvérsias que entre elas se pode verificar. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2023-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/5717110.23925/2316-5278.2023v24i1:e57171Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 24 No. 1 (2023): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia ; e57171Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 24 n. 1 (2023): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia ; e571712316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/57171/43460Copyright (c) 2022 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarques, Wilker2023-01-26T13:20:10Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/57171Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2023-01-26T13:20:10Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Utopia and Dystopia: a tour of Huxley, Rorty and Scruton Utopia e Distopia: um passeio por Huxley, Rorty e Scruton |
title |
Utopia and Dystopia: a tour of Huxley, Rorty and Scruton |
spellingShingle |
Utopia and Dystopia: a tour of Huxley, Rorty and Scruton Utopia and Dystopia: a tour of Huxley, Rorty and Scruton Marques, Wilker Dystopia Huxley Rorty Scruton Utopia Distopia Huxley Rorty Scruton Utopia Marques, Wilker Dystopia Huxley Rorty Scruton Utopia Distopia Huxley Rorty Scruton Utopia |
title_short |
Utopia and Dystopia: a tour of Huxley, Rorty and Scruton |
title_full |
Utopia and Dystopia: a tour of Huxley, Rorty and Scruton |
title_fullStr |
Utopia and Dystopia: a tour of Huxley, Rorty and Scruton Utopia and Dystopia: a tour of Huxley, Rorty and Scruton |
title_full_unstemmed |
Utopia and Dystopia: a tour of Huxley, Rorty and Scruton Utopia and Dystopia: a tour of Huxley, Rorty and Scruton |
title_sort |
Utopia and Dystopia: a tour of Huxley, Rorty and Scruton |
author |
Marques, Wilker |
author_facet |
Marques, Wilker Marques, Wilker |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Marques, Wilker |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dystopia Huxley Rorty Scruton Utopia Distopia Huxley Rorty Scruton Utopia |
topic |
Dystopia Huxley Rorty Scruton Utopia Distopia Huxley Rorty Scruton Utopia |
description |
Utopias are born from the deep human desire for the world to be different, to be better. Dystopias, in turn, are born from the fear-recognition that this world could be worse. In any case, utopia and dystopia start from what we have, from the world as it is, from “things as they are”, towards a possibility. Literature and Philosophy – especially Political Philosophy – always walk together on the path that runs through utopias and dystopias, describing and redescribing the human condition, constructing and deconstructing the idea of man and the good life. Great names in the history of thought, from Plato to Thomas More, Campanella, Francis Bacon, Aldous Huxley and George Orwell dedicated themselves to the imaginative task of thinking about the world we have in the face of the one we could have – for better or worse. But would there still be room for utopias and dystopias in contemporary political thought? Does it still make sense to use such vocabularies in the context of political reflection? The American philosopher Richard Rorty (1931-2007) developed, in the 20th and early 21st centuries, a conception of social democratic and liberal cosmopolitan utopia. Recognized ethnocentric, Rorty envisioned the construction of a broad democratic society based on the reform of the institutions consolidated in real democratic societies, towards the objective of extinguishing the cruelty and humiliation of men by other men and the continuous replacement of force by dialogue. On the other hand, in defense of pessimism, and denouncing the dangers of false hope, the English philosopher and writer Roger Scruton (1944-2020) presents himself as a critical voice in the face of utopias, including what he calls “utopian fallacy” in his list of current sophisms in contemporary times that contribute to an inappropriate reading of our time. In this article, we present a tour of the feelings of utopia and dystopia, highlighting the fundamental writings of Huxley, Rorty and Scruton and drawing a parallel between their rhetoric, highlighting some controversies that can be seen between them. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-11-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/57171 10.23925/2316-5278.2023v24i1:e57171 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/57171 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.23925/2316-5278.2023v24i1:e57171 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/57171/43460 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 24 No. 1 (2023): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia ; e57171 Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 24 n. 1 (2023): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia ; e57171 2316-5278 1518-7187 reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revcognitio@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1822219015759593472 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.23925/2316-5278.2023v24i1:e57171 |