The polysemic condition of judicial cognition
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/52137 |
Resumo: | The ‘rite of office’ to be applied by the judges has effective properties for the prevention of solutions unrelated to the reality of the cases presented in court, removing any imaginative spills to which we are all subject. Add to this that the virtue of temperance is vertiginously neglected and without it Justice will never be realized. These alerts point to the care that must be taken during the analysis of the cases, banning the strands of alienated meanings that corrupt the interpretant’s conviction. The idea of the polysemic condition refers to the loss of the sign’s strength, which leads to the opening up of disparate meanings based on factors particular [to individual] repertoires, which may be at odds with the concrete fact. The semiotic basis bequeathed by Peirce and Fichte’s legacy for Law, treated according to the respective system of his idealism, will assist in the investigation of a cohesive context for this study. Thus, it is essential to understand that interpretations, when they occur with polysemic echoes in relation to the objects of legal proceedings, represent a deteriorating mistake in the judicial exercise, which must be avoided. |
id |
PUC_SP-15_45bd25e3cc8486fb1db33139648aae32 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/52137 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-15 |
network_name_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The polysemic condition of judicial cognitionA condição polissêmica da cognição judicialFichteFilosofia do DireitoPeircePolissemiaRealeRito de ofícioSemióticaSubjetivismoFichtePeircePhilosophy of LawPolysemyRealeRite of officeSemioticSubjectivismThe ‘rite of office’ to be applied by the judges has effective properties for the prevention of solutions unrelated to the reality of the cases presented in court, removing any imaginative spills to which we are all subject. Add to this that the virtue of temperance is vertiginously neglected and without it Justice will never be realized. These alerts point to the care that must be taken during the analysis of the cases, banning the strands of alienated meanings that corrupt the interpretant’s conviction. The idea of the polysemic condition refers to the loss of the sign’s strength, which leads to the opening up of disparate meanings based on factors particular [to individual] repertoires, which may be at odds with the concrete fact. The semiotic basis bequeathed by Peirce and Fichte’s legacy for Law, treated according to the respective system of his idealism, will assist in the investigation of a cohesive context for this study. Thus, it is essential to understand that interpretations, when they occur with polysemic echoes in relation to the objects of legal proceedings, represent a deteriorating mistake in the judicial exercise, which must be avoided.O ‘rito de ofício’ a ser aplicado pelos julgadores possui propriedades eficazes para prevenir soluções alheias à realidade dos casos apresentados nos tribunais, afastando eventuais derrames imaginativos aos quais todos estamos sujeitos. Some-se a isso que a virtude da temperança é vertiginosamente deixada de lado e sem ela a Justiça não se realizará jamais. Estes alertas apontam para o cuidado que se deve ter durante a análise dos casos, banindo as vertentes de significações alienadas que corrompem a convicção do interpretante. A ideia da condição polissêmica remete à perda do espeque do signo, o que provoca a abertura de acepções díspares e fundamentadas em fatores repertoriais particulares, e que pode destoar do fato concreto. A base semiótica legada por Peirce e a herança de Fichte para o Direito, abordada segundo o respectivo sistema de seu idealismo, auxiliarão na investigação de um contexto coeso para este estudo. Assim, imprescindível a compreensão de que as interpretações, quando ocorrem com os ecos polissêmicos em relação aos objetos de processos judiciais, representam um equívoco deteriorante no exercício judicativo, o que se deve evitar.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2021-01-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/5213710.23925/2316-5278.2020v21i2p260-272Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2020): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; 260-272Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 21 n. 2 (2020): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; 260-2722316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/52137/34462Copyright (c) 2021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessD’Oliveira, Júlio César2021-09-25T08:58:51Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/52137Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2021-09-25T08:58:51Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The polysemic condition of judicial cognition A condição polissêmica da cognição judicial |
title |
The polysemic condition of judicial cognition |
spellingShingle |
The polysemic condition of judicial cognition D’Oliveira, Júlio César Fichte Filosofia do Direito Peirce Polissemia Reale Rito de ofício Semiótica Subjetivismo Fichte Peirce Philosophy of Law Polysemy Reale Rite of office Semiotic Subjectivism |
title_short |
The polysemic condition of judicial cognition |
title_full |
The polysemic condition of judicial cognition |
title_fullStr |
The polysemic condition of judicial cognition |
title_full_unstemmed |
The polysemic condition of judicial cognition |
title_sort |
The polysemic condition of judicial cognition |
author |
D’Oliveira, Júlio César |
author_facet |
D’Oliveira, Júlio César |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
D’Oliveira, Júlio César |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Fichte Filosofia do Direito Peirce Polissemia Reale Rito de ofício Semiótica Subjetivismo Fichte Peirce Philosophy of Law Polysemy Reale Rite of office Semiotic Subjectivism |
topic |
Fichte Filosofia do Direito Peirce Polissemia Reale Rito de ofício Semiótica Subjetivismo Fichte Peirce Philosophy of Law Polysemy Reale Rite of office Semiotic Subjectivism |
description |
The ‘rite of office’ to be applied by the judges has effective properties for the prevention of solutions unrelated to the reality of the cases presented in court, removing any imaginative spills to which we are all subject. Add to this that the virtue of temperance is vertiginously neglected and without it Justice will never be realized. These alerts point to the care that must be taken during the analysis of the cases, banning the strands of alienated meanings that corrupt the interpretant’s conviction. The idea of the polysemic condition refers to the loss of the sign’s strength, which leads to the opening up of disparate meanings based on factors particular [to individual] repertoires, which may be at odds with the concrete fact. The semiotic basis bequeathed by Peirce and Fichte’s legacy for Law, treated according to the respective system of his idealism, will assist in the investigation of a cohesive context for this study. Thus, it is essential to understand that interpretations, when they occur with polysemic echoes in relation to the objects of legal proceedings, represent a deteriorating mistake in the judicial exercise, which must be avoided. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/52137 10.23925/2316-5278.2020v21i2p260-272 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/52137 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.23925/2316-5278.2020v21i2p260-272 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/52137/34462 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2020): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; 260-272 Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 21 n. 2 (2020): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; 260-272 2316-5278 1518-7187 reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revcognitio@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803387422322458624 |