Semiotic paradoxes of the absolute

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nöth, Winfried
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/30220
Resumo: The paper gives a survey of major concepts of the absolute in the history of Western philosophy, postulates that discourse about the notion of the absolute involves a fundamental aporetic paradox, and distinguishes five specific paradoxes of the absolute. First, the paradox of the inconceivability of the absolute (as an object of knowledge), second, the paradox of the defined absolute, third, the performative paradox of the indefinability of the absolute, fourth, the structuralist paradox of the concept of the absolute, and fifth, the paradox of the absolute from the perspective of Charles S. Peirce’s pragmaticist semiotics.
id PUC_SP-15_526dd96573193acd5c42526004b05bc6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30220
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-15
network_name_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Semiotic paradoxes of the absoluteParadoxos semióticos do absolutoAbsoluteParadoxAporiaCharles S. PeirceLeibnizSpinozaHegelSchopenhauer.AbsolutoParadoxoAporiaCharles S. PeirceLeibnizEspinosaHegelSchopenhauer.The paper gives a survey of major concepts of the absolute in the history of Western philosophy, postulates that discourse about the notion of the absolute involves a fundamental aporetic paradox, and distinguishes five specific paradoxes of the absolute. First, the paradox of the inconceivability of the absolute (as an object of knowledge), second, the paradox of the defined absolute, third, the performative paradox of the indefinability of the absolute, fourth, the structuralist paradox of the concept of the absolute, and fifth, the paradox of the absolute from the perspective of Charles S. Peirce’s pragmaticist semiotics.O trabalho apresenta um panorama das concepções principais do absoluto na história da filosofia ocidental, postula que qualquer discurso sobre do absoluto implica em um paradoxo aporético fundamental e apresenta cinco paradoxos específicos do absoluto. Primeiro, o paradoxo da inconcebilidade do absoluto, segundo, o paradoxo do absoluto definido, terceiro, o paradoxo performativo da indefinibilidade do paradoxo, quarto, o paradoxo do ponto estruturalista do conceito do absoluto e quinto, o paradoxo do absoluto do ponto de vista da semiótica pragmaticista de Charles S. Peirce.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2016-12-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/30220Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2016); 83-96Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 17 n. 1 (2016); 83-962316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/30220/21692Copyright (c) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNöth, Winfried2017-02-04T19:25:58Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30220Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2017-02-04T19:25:58Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Semiotic paradoxes of the absolute
Paradoxos semióticos do absoluto
title Semiotic paradoxes of the absolute
spellingShingle Semiotic paradoxes of the absolute
Nöth, Winfried
Absolute
Paradox
Aporia
Charles S. Peirce
Leibniz
Spinoza
Hegel
Schopenhauer.
Absoluto
Paradoxo
Aporia
Charles S. Peirce
Leibniz
Espinosa
Hegel
Schopenhauer.
title_short Semiotic paradoxes of the absolute
title_full Semiotic paradoxes of the absolute
title_fullStr Semiotic paradoxes of the absolute
title_full_unstemmed Semiotic paradoxes of the absolute
title_sort Semiotic paradoxes of the absolute
author Nöth, Winfried
author_facet Nöth, Winfried
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nöth, Winfried
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Absolute
Paradox
Aporia
Charles S. Peirce
Leibniz
Spinoza
Hegel
Schopenhauer.
Absoluto
Paradoxo
Aporia
Charles S. Peirce
Leibniz
Espinosa
Hegel
Schopenhauer.
topic Absolute
Paradox
Aporia
Charles S. Peirce
Leibniz
Spinoza
Hegel
Schopenhauer.
Absoluto
Paradoxo
Aporia
Charles S. Peirce
Leibniz
Espinosa
Hegel
Schopenhauer.
description The paper gives a survey of major concepts of the absolute in the history of Western philosophy, postulates that discourse about the notion of the absolute involves a fundamental aporetic paradox, and distinguishes five specific paradoxes of the absolute. First, the paradox of the inconceivability of the absolute (as an object of knowledge), second, the paradox of the defined absolute, third, the performative paradox of the indefinability of the absolute, fourth, the structuralist paradox of the concept of the absolute, and fifth, the paradox of the absolute from the perspective of Charles S. Peirce’s pragmaticist semiotics.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/30220
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/30220
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/30220/21692
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2016); 83-96
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 17 n. 1 (2016); 83-96
2316-5278
1518-7187
reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
collection Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revcognitio@gmail.com
_version_ 1803387421728964608