The self in Kierkegaard’s Sickness Unto Death: a Peircean and a Hegelian reading
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/59912 |
Resumo: | The first six paragraphs of Kierkegaard's The Sickness Unto Death are among the densest and most difficult passages to interpret in his entire oeuvre. There, he expounds the nature of the self in terms of relations, and many have interpreted it as an expression of Hegel's dialectic. In this essay, I read those paragraphs from Peirce's logic of relations and show that Peirce allows us to understand Kierkegaard much more clearly than Hegel. Moreover, despite all that Peirce and Hegel have in common, Peirce criticizes him severely with respect to the reality of Secondness. In analyzing this criticism and also what Peirce and Kierkegaard say about the importance of doubt vis-a-vis consciousness, I show that a Peircean reading of Kierkegaard is much more fruitful than the Hegelian framework that Kierkegaard knew. In the end, I reflect on the possibility of speaking of a semiotic Kierkegaard and an existentialist Peirce. |
id |
PUC_SP-15_639497b98132e470c634d602da9175c8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/59912 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-15 |
network_name_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The self in Kierkegaard’s Sickness Unto Death: a Peircean and a Hegelian readingO Eu em O desespero humano de Kierkegaard: uma leitura Peirciana e HegelianaThe first six paragraphs of Kierkegaard's The Sickness Unto Death are among the densest and most difficult passages to interpret in his entire oeuvre. There, he expounds the nature of the self in terms of relations, and many have interpreted it as an expression of Hegel's dialectic. In this essay, I read those paragraphs from Peirce's logic of relations and show that Peirce allows us to understand Kierkegaard much more clearly than Hegel. Moreover, despite all that Peirce and Hegel have in common, Peirce criticizes him severely with respect to the reality of Secondness. In analyzing this criticism and also what Peirce and Kierkegaard say about the importance of doubt vis-a-vis consciousness, I show that a Peircean reading of Kierkegaard is much more fruitful than the Hegelian framework that Kierkegaard knew. In the end, I reflect on the possibility of speaking of a semiotic Kierkegaard and an existentialist Peirce. Os primeiros seis parágrafos de O Desespero humano, de Kierkegaard, estão entre as passagens mais densas e difíceis de interpretar em toda sua obra. Nelas, ele expõe a natureza do eu em termos de relações e muitos têm interpretado isso como uma expressão da dialética de Hegel. Nesse artigo, leio aqueles parágrafos da lógica das relações de Peirce e mostro que Peirce nos permite entender Kierkegaard muito mais claramente do que Hegel. Além disso, apesar de tudo que Peirce e Hegel têm em comum, Peirce o critica severamente com respeito à realidade da Segundidade. Analisando essa crítica e também o que Peirce e Kierkegaard dizem sobre a importância da dúvida vis-à-vis consciência, eu mostro que uma leitura Peirciana de Kierkegaard é bem mais frutífera do que a estruturaHegeliana que Kierkegaard conhecia. No final, eu reflito sobre a possibilidade de falar sobre um Kierkegaard semiótico e um Peirce existencialista. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2022-11-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/5991210.23925/2316-5278.2022v23i1:e59912Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 23 No. 1 (2022): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; e59912Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 23 n. 1 (2022): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; e599122316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/59912/40966Copyright (c) 2022 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMcNabb, Darin2023-01-23T11:50:17Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/59912Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2023-01-23T11:50:17Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The self in Kierkegaard’s Sickness Unto Death: a Peircean and a Hegelian reading O Eu em O desespero humano de Kierkegaard: uma leitura Peirciana e Hegeliana |
title |
The self in Kierkegaard’s Sickness Unto Death: a Peircean and a Hegelian reading |
spellingShingle |
The self in Kierkegaard’s Sickness Unto Death: a Peircean and a Hegelian reading McNabb, Darin |
title_short |
The self in Kierkegaard’s Sickness Unto Death: a Peircean and a Hegelian reading |
title_full |
The self in Kierkegaard’s Sickness Unto Death: a Peircean and a Hegelian reading |
title_fullStr |
The self in Kierkegaard’s Sickness Unto Death: a Peircean and a Hegelian reading |
title_full_unstemmed |
The self in Kierkegaard’s Sickness Unto Death: a Peircean and a Hegelian reading |
title_sort |
The self in Kierkegaard’s Sickness Unto Death: a Peircean and a Hegelian reading |
author |
McNabb, Darin |
author_facet |
McNabb, Darin |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
McNabb, Darin |
description |
The first six paragraphs of Kierkegaard's The Sickness Unto Death are among the densest and most difficult passages to interpret in his entire oeuvre. There, he expounds the nature of the self in terms of relations, and many have interpreted it as an expression of Hegel's dialectic. In this essay, I read those paragraphs from Peirce's logic of relations and show that Peirce allows us to understand Kierkegaard much more clearly than Hegel. Moreover, despite all that Peirce and Hegel have in common, Peirce criticizes him severely with respect to the reality of Secondness. In analyzing this criticism and also what Peirce and Kierkegaard say about the importance of doubt vis-a-vis consciousness, I show that a Peircean reading of Kierkegaard is much more fruitful than the Hegelian framework that Kierkegaard knew. In the end, I reflect on the possibility of speaking of a semiotic Kierkegaard and an existentialist Peirce. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-11-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/59912 10.23925/2316-5278.2022v23i1:e59912 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/59912 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.23925/2316-5278.2022v23i1:e59912 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/59912/40966 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 23 No. 1 (2022): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; e59912 Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 23 n. 1 (2022): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; e59912 2316-5278 1518-7187 reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revcognitio@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803387422578311168 |