The self in Kierkegaard’s Sickness Unto Death: a Peircean and a Hegelian reading

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: McNabb, Darin
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/59912
Resumo: The first six paragraphs of Kierkegaard's The Sickness Unto Death are among the densest and most difficult passages to interpret in his entire oeuvre. There, he expounds the nature of the self in terms of relations, and many have interpreted it as an expression of Hegel's dialectic. In this essay, I read those paragraphs from Peirce's logic of relations and show that Peirce allows us to understand Kierkegaard much more clearly than Hegel. Moreover, despite all that Peirce and Hegel have in common, Peirce criticizes him severely with respect to the reality of Secondness. In analyzing this criticism and also what Peirce and Kierkegaard say about the importance of doubt vis-a-vis consciousness, I show that a Peircean reading of Kierkegaard is much more fruitful than the Hegelian framework that Kierkegaard knew. In the end, I reflect on the possibility of speaking of a semiotic Kierkegaard and an existentialist Peirce.
id PUC_SP-15_639497b98132e470c634d602da9175c8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/59912
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-15
network_name_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The self in Kierkegaard’s Sickness Unto Death: a Peircean and a Hegelian readingO Eu em O desespero humano de Kierkegaard: uma leitura Peirciana e HegelianaThe first six paragraphs of Kierkegaard's The Sickness Unto Death are among the densest and most difficult passages to interpret in his entire oeuvre. There, he expounds the nature of the self in terms of relations, and many have interpreted it as an expression of Hegel's dialectic. In this essay, I read those paragraphs from Peirce's logic of relations and show that Peirce allows us to understand Kierkegaard much more clearly than Hegel. Moreover, despite all that Peirce and Hegel have in common, Peirce criticizes him severely with respect to the reality of Secondness. In analyzing this criticism and also what Peirce and Kierkegaard say about the importance of doubt vis-a-vis consciousness, I show that a Peircean reading of Kierkegaard is much more fruitful than the Hegelian framework that Kierkegaard knew. In the end, I reflect on the possibility of speaking of a semiotic Kierkegaard and an existentialist Peirce. Os primeiros seis parágrafos de O Desespero humano, de Kierkegaard, estão entre as passagens mais densas e difíceis de interpretar em toda sua obra. Nelas, ele expõe a natureza do eu em termos de relações e muitos têm interpretado isso como uma expressão da dialética de Hegel. Nesse artigo, leio aqueles parágrafos da lógica das relações de Peirce e mostro que Peirce nos permite entender Kierkegaard muito mais claramente do que Hegel. Além disso, apesar de tudo que Peirce e Hegel têm em comum, Peirce o critica severamente com respeito à realidade da Segundidade. Analisando essa crítica e também o que Peirce e Kierkegaard dizem sobre a importância da dúvida vis-à-vis consciência, eu mostro que uma leitura Peirciana de Kierkegaard é bem mais frutífera do que a estruturaHegeliana que Kierkegaard conhecia. No final, eu reflito sobre a possibilidade de falar sobre um Kierkegaard semiótico e um Peirce existencialista. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2022-11-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/5991210.23925/2316-5278.2022v23i1:e59912Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 23 No. 1 (2022): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; e59912Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 23 n. 1 (2022): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; e599122316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/59912/40966Copyright (c) 2022 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMcNabb, Darin2023-01-23T11:50:17Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/59912Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2023-01-23T11:50:17Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The self in Kierkegaard’s Sickness Unto Death: a Peircean and a Hegelian reading
O Eu em O desespero humano de Kierkegaard: uma leitura Peirciana e Hegeliana
title The self in Kierkegaard’s Sickness Unto Death: a Peircean and a Hegelian reading
spellingShingle The self in Kierkegaard’s Sickness Unto Death: a Peircean and a Hegelian reading
McNabb, Darin
title_short The self in Kierkegaard’s Sickness Unto Death: a Peircean and a Hegelian reading
title_full The self in Kierkegaard’s Sickness Unto Death: a Peircean and a Hegelian reading
title_fullStr The self in Kierkegaard’s Sickness Unto Death: a Peircean and a Hegelian reading
title_full_unstemmed The self in Kierkegaard’s Sickness Unto Death: a Peircean and a Hegelian reading
title_sort The self in Kierkegaard’s Sickness Unto Death: a Peircean and a Hegelian reading
author McNabb, Darin
author_facet McNabb, Darin
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv McNabb, Darin
description The first six paragraphs of Kierkegaard's The Sickness Unto Death are among the densest and most difficult passages to interpret in his entire oeuvre. There, he expounds the nature of the self in terms of relations, and many have interpreted it as an expression of Hegel's dialectic. In this essay, I read those paragraphs from Peirce's logic of relations and show that Peirce allows us to understand Kierkegaard much more clearly than Hegel. Moreover, despite all that Peirce and Hegel have in common, Peirce criticizes him severely with respect to the reality of Secondness. In analyzing this criticism and also what Peirce and Kierkegaard say about the importance of doubt vis-a-vis consciousness, I show that a Peircean reading of Kierkegaard is much more fruitful than the Hegelian framework that Kierkegaard knew. In the end, I reflect on the possibility of speaking of a semiotic Kierkegaard and an existentialist Peirce.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-11-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/59912
10.23925/2316-5278.2022v23i1:e59912
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/59912
identifier_str_mv 10.23925/2316-5278.2022v23i1:e59912
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/59912/40966
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 23 No. 1 (2022): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; e59912
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 23 n. 1 (2022): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; e59912
2316-5278
1518-7187
reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
collection Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revcognitio@gmail.com
_version_ 1803387422578311168