The role of aesthetic play of musement in Charles S. Peirce’s “Neglected Argument for the Reality of God”

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Almeida, Rodrigo Vieira de
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/35743
Resumo: This paper intends to briefly reflect on an important and heuristic subject in the architectonic philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce, to wit, the role of the concept of aesthetic play of musement in the advent and establishment of a pragmatic belief in the hypothesis of the reality of God. Within the available space constraints, after exposing the stages of the neglected argument for the reality of God, developed by Peirce in a homonymous text, we shall show how the concept of aesthetic play of musement is deeply grounded on the author’s realist ontology and how this concept, though it may appear, specifically, as the first stage of a thought process on notable elements of the real universe, a free and purposeless mental state, that does not intend to mediate anything, such as self-controlled thought would do, but that can, however, result in the feeling of being before some of the wonders of the three universes of experience, ultimately becomes a process of pondering with an instinctive appeal towards one’s conduct in life, with that being exactly its profound and notable pragmatic meaning.
id PUC_SP-15_64b5f0f32b203e9ebb5d93bcc31a1423
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35743
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-15
network_name_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The role of aesthetic play of musement in Charles S. Peirce’s “Neglected Argument for the Reality of God”O papel do jogo estético do devaneio no “Argumento negligenciado para a realidade de Deus” de Charles S. PeirceCharles PeirceJogo Estético do DevaneioArgumento NegligenciadoDeusRealismo.Charles PeirceMusementNeglected ArgumentGodRealismThis paper intends to briefly reflect on an important and heuristic subject in the architectonic philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce, to wit, the role of the concept of aesthetic play of musement in the advent and establishment of a pragmatic belief in the hypothesis of the reality of God. Within the available space constraints, after exposing the stages of the neglected argument for the reality of God, developed by Peirce in a homonymous text, we shall show how the concept of aesthetic play of musement is deeply grounded on the author’s realist ontology and how this concept, though it may appear, specifically, as the first stage of a thought process on notable elements of the real universe, a free and purposeless mental state, that does not intend to mediate anything, such as self-controlled thought would do, but that can, however, result in the feeling of being before some of the wonders of the three universes of experience, ultimately becomes a process of pondering with an instinctive appeal towards one’s conduct in life, with that being exactly its profound and notable pragmatic meaning.O presente artigo pretende tecer algumas breves considerações acerca de um importante e heurístico tema da filosofia arquitetônica de Charles Sanders Peirce, a saber, o papel exercido pelo conceito de jogo estético do devaneio (musement) no surgimento e estabelecimento de uma crença pragmática na hipótese da realidade de Deus. Seguindo, dentro do limite de espaço disponível, a exposição das etapas do chamado argumento negligenciado para a realidade de Deus, desenvolvido por Peirce em texto homônimo, mostrar-se-á como o conceito de jogo estético do devaneio encontra-se profundamente alicerçado na ontologia realística do autor e como esse conceito, embora apareça, propriamente falando, como a primeira etapa de um processo de pensamento sobre traços notáveis do universo real, um estado mental livre e despropositado, que não se propõe a mediar algo, tal como o pensamento autocontrolado o faz, mas que pode, no entanto, resultar no sentimento de estar diante de alguma maravilha em um dos três universos da experiência, acaba por converter-se, em última instância, em um processo de ponderação com força de apelo instintivo para a conduta da vida, sendo essa, justamente, a sua marcante e contundente significação pragmática.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2018-02-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/3574310.23925/2316-5278.2017v18i2p173-186Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 18 No. 2 (2017); 173-186Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 18 n. 2 (2017); 173-1862316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/35743/24812Copyright (c) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlmeida, Rodrigo Vieira de2018-06-30T21:06:04Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35743Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2018-06-30T21:06:04Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The role of aesthetic play of musement in Charles S. Peirce’s “Neglected Argument for the Reality of God”
O papel do jogo estético do devaneio no “Argumento negligenciado para a realidade de Deus” de Charles S. Peirce
title The role of aesthetic play of musement in Charles S. Peirce’s “Neglected Argument for the Reality of God”
spellingShingle The role of aesthetic play of musement in Charles S. Peirce’s “Neglected Argument for the Reality of God”
Almeida, Rodrigo Vieira de
Charles Peirce
Jogo Estético do Devaneio
Argumento Negligenciado
Deus
Realismo.
Charles Peirce
Musement
Neglected Argument
God
Realism
title_short The role of aesthetic play of musement in Charles S. Peirce’s “Neglected Argument for the Reality of God”
title_full The role of aesthetic play of musement in Charles S. Peirce’s “Neglected Argument for the Reality of God”
title_fullStr The role of aesthetic play of musement in Charles S. Peirce’s “Neglected Argument for the Reality of God”
title_full_unstemmed The role of aesthetic play of musement in Charles S. Peirce’s “Neglected Argument for the Reality of God”
title_sort The role of aesthetic play of musement in Charles S. Peirce’s “Neglected Argument for the Reality of God”
author Almeida, Rodrigo Vieira de
author_facet Almeida, Rodrigo Vieira de
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Almeida, Rodrigo Vieira de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Charles Peirce
Jogo Estético do Devaneio
Argumento Negligenciado
Deus
Realismo.
Charles Peirce
Musement
Neglected Argument
God
Realism
topic Charles Peirce
Jogo Estético do Devaneio
Argumento Negligenciado
Deus
Realismo.
Charles Peirce
Musement
Neglected Argument
God
Realism
description This paper intends to briefly reflect on an important and heuristic subject in the architectonic philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce, to wit, the role of the concept of aesthetic play of musement in the advent and establishment of a pragmatic belief in the hypothesis of the reality of God. Within the available space constraints, after exposing the stages of the neglected argument for the reality of God, developed by Peirce in a homonymous text, we shall show how the concept of aesthetic play of musement is deeply grounded on the author’s realist ontology and how this concept, though it may appear, specifically, as the first stage of a thought process on notable elements of the real universe, a free and purposeless mental state, that does not intend to mediate anything, such as self-controlled thought would do, but that can, however, result in the feeling of being before some of the wonders of the three universes of experience, ultimately becomes a process of pondering with an instinctive appeal towards one’s conduct in life, with that being exactly its profound and notable pragmatic meaning.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-02-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/35743
10.23925/2316-5278.2017v18i2p173-186
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/35743
identifier_str_mv 10.23925/2316-5278.2017v18i2p173-186
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/35743/24812
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 18 No. 2 (2017); 173-186
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 18 n. 2 (2017); 173-186
2316-5278
1518-7187
reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
collection Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revcognitio@gmail.com
_version_ 1803387421787684864