The role of aesthetic play of musement in Charles S. Peirce’s “Neglected Argument for the Reality of God”
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/35743 |
Resumo: | This paper intends to briefly reflect on an important and heuristic subject in the architectonic philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce, to wit, the role of the concept of aesthetic play of musement in the advent and establishment of a pragmatic belief in the hypothesis of the reality of God. Within the available space constraints, after exposing the stages of the neglected argument for the reality of God, developed by Peirce in a homonymous text, we shall show how the concept of aesthetic play of musement is deeply grounded on the author’s realist ontology and how this concept, though it may appear, specifically, as the first stage of a thought process on notable elements of the real universe, a free and purposeless mental state, that does not intend to mediate anything, such as self-controlled thought would do, but that can, however, result in the feeling of being before some of the wonders of the three universes of experience, ultimately becomes a process of pondering with an instinctive appeal towards one’s conduct in life, with that being exactly its profound and notable pragmatic meaning. |
id |
PUC_SP-15_64b5f0f32b203e9ebb5d93bcc31a1423 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35743 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-15 |
network_name_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The role of aesthetic play of musement in Charles S. Peirce’s “Neglected Argument for the Reality of God”O papel do jogo estético do devaneio no “Argumento negligenciado para a realidade de Deus” de Charles S. PeirceCharles PeirceJogo Estético do DevaneioArgumento NegligenciadoDeusRealismo.Charles PeirceMusementNeglected ArgumentGodRealismThis paper intends to briefly reflect on an important and heuristic subject in the architectonic philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce, to wit, the role of the concept of aesthetic play of musement in the advent and establishment of a pragmatic belief in the hypothesis of the reality of God. Within the available space constraints, after exposing the stages of the neglected argument for the reality of God, developed by Peirce in a homonymous text, we shall show how the concept of aesthetic play of musement is deeply grounded on the author’s realist ontology and how this concept, though it may appear, specifically, as the first stage of a thought process on notable elements of the real universe, a free and purposeless mental state, that does not intend to mediate anything, such as self-controlled thought would do, but that can, however, result in the feeling of being before some of the wonders of the three universes of experience, ultimately becomes a process of pondering with an instinctive appeal towards one’s conduct in life, with that being exactly its profound and notable pragmatic meaning.O presente artigo pretende tecer algumas breves considerações acerca de um importante e heurístico tema da filosofia arquitetônica de Charles Sanders Peirce, a saber, o papel exercido pelo conceito de jogo estético do devaneio (musement) no surgimento e estabelecimento de uma crença pragmática na hipótese da realidade de Deus. Seguindo, dentro do limite de espaço disponível, a exposição das etapas do chamado argumento negligenciado para a realidade de Deus, desenvolvido por Peirce em texto homônimo, mostrar-se-á como o conceito de jogo estético do devaneio encontra-se profundamente alicerçado na ontologia realística do autor e como esse conceito, embora apareça, propriamente falando, como a primeira etapa de um processo de pensamento sobre traços notáveis do universo real, um estado mental livre e despropositado, que não se propõe a mediar algo, tal como o pensamento autocontrolado o faz, mas que pode, no entanto, resultar no sentimento de estar diante de alguma maravilha em um dos três universos da experiência, acaba por converter-se, em última instância, em um processo de ponderação com força de apelo instintivo para a conduta da vida, sendo essa, justamente, a sua marcante e contundente significação pragmática.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2018-02-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/3574310.23925/2316-5278.2017v18i2p173-186Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 18 No. 2 (2017); 173-186Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 18 n. 2 (2017); 173-1862316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/35743/24812Copyright (c) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlmeida, Rodrigo Vieira de2018-06-30T21:06:04Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35743Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2018-06-30T21:06:04Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The role of aesthetic play of musement in Charles S. Peirce’s “Neglected Argument for the Reality of God” O papel do jogo estético do devaneio no “Argumento negligenciado para a realidade de Deus” de Charles S. Peirce |
title |
The role of aesthetic play of musement in Charles S. Peirce’s “Neglected Argument for the Reality of God” |
spellingShingle |
The role of aesthetic play of musement in Charles S. Peirce’s “Neglected Argument for the Reality of God” Almeida, Rodrigo Vieira de Charles Peirce Jogo Estético do Devaneio Argumento Negligenciado Deus Realismo. Charles Peirce Musement Neglected Argument God Realism |
title_short |
The role of aesthetic play of musement in Charles S. Peirce’s “Neglected Argument for the Reality of God” |
title_full |
The role of aesthetic play of musement in Charles S. Peirce’s “Neglected Argument for the Reality of God” |
title_fullStr |
The role of aesthetic play of musement in Charles S. Peirce’s “Neglected Argument for the Reality of God” |
title_full_unstemmed |
The role of aesthetic play of musement in Charles S. Peirce’s “Neglected Argument for the Reality of God” |
title_sort |
The role of aesthetic play of musement in Charles S. Peirce’s “Neglected Argument for the Reality of God” |
author |
Almeida, Rodrigo Vieira de |
author_facet |
Almeida, Rodrigo Vieira de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Almeida, Rodrigo Vieira de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Charles Peirce Jogo Estético do Devaneio Argumento Negligenciado Deus Realismo. Charles Peirce Musement Neglected Argument God Realism |
topic |
Charles Peirce Jogo Estético do Devaneio Argumento Negligenciado Deus Realismo. Charles Peirce Musement Neglected Argument God Realism |
description |
This paper intends to briefly reflect on an important and heuristic subject in the architectonic philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce, to wit, the role of the concept of aesthetic play of musement in the advent and establishment of a pragmatic belief in the hypothesis of the reality of God. Within the available space constraints, after exposing the stages of the neglected argument for the reality of God, developed by Peirce in a homonymous text, we shall show how the concept of aesthetic play of musement is deeply grounded on the author’s realist ontology and how this concept, though it may appear, specifically, as the first stage of a thought process on notable elements of the real universe, a free and purposeless mental state, that does not intend to mediate anything, such as self-controlled thought would do, but that can, however, result in the feeling of being before some of the wonders of the three universes of experience, ultimately becomes a process of pondering with an instinctive appeal towards one’s conduct in life, with that being exactly its profound and notable pragmatic meaning. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-02-03 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/35743 10.23925/2316-5278.2017v18i2p173-186 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/35743 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.23925/2316-5278.2017v18i2p173-186 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/35743/24812 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 18 No. 2 (2017); 173-186 Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 18 n. 2 (2017); 173-186 2316-5278 1518-7187 reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revcognitio@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803387421787684864 |