Mathematical Individuality in Charles Sanders Peirce

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marietti, Susanna
Data de Publicação: 2013
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13605
Resumo: Peirce regards mathematics as an informative science capable of really increasing our knowledge. This means that mathematics is not limited to conceptual analysis but possesses a real object of investigation. The core of Peirce’s view of mathematics is that mathematical reasoning is not developed through general concepts alone but deals with an unavoidable element of individuality. The conclusion of a deductive inference can contain information that is not at all present in its premises and can only come into being through concrete work on the part of the mathematician. Peirce describes this work as observation and experimentation on individual diagrams. While the idea of an individual element in mathematics is already present in Kant (and can also be traced back to Aristotle), the different location Peirce assigns it attests to a marked difference in their conceptions, the basis of which lies in the difference between Kant and Peirce in categorial analysis. Peirce’s semiotic approach to mathematics involves a shift from the plane of the object denoted to that of the sign itself. This holds true for geometric as well as algebraic inferences, which Peirce can equate in this respect. In both cases, the individual element of mathematics is thus to be found within the diagram itself with no reference to the object denoted. While the diagram is in any case a token, this cannot explain its essential individuality, to which end the indexical juxtaposition of its parts should be examined.
id PUC_SP-15_81facce095e96760af288c60ef8e0daf
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13605
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-15
network_name_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Mathematical Individuality in Charles Sanders PeirceIndividualidade Matemática em Charles Sanders PeirceMatemáticaRaciocínio matemáticoIndividualidadeDiagramaÍndiceMathematicsMathematical reasoningIndividualityDiagramIndexPeirce regards mathematics as an informative science capable of really increasing our knowledge. This means that mathematics is not limited to conceptual analysis but possesses a real object of investigation. The core of Peirce’s view of mathematics is that mathematical reasoning is not developed through general concepts alone but deals with an unavoidable element of individuality. The conclusion of a deductive inference can contain information that is not at all present in its premises and can only come into being through concrete work on the part of the mathematician. Peirce describes this work as observation and experimentation on individual diagrams. While the idea of an individual element in mathematics is already present in Kant (and can also be traced back to Aristotle), the different location Peirce assigns it attests to a marked difference in their conceptions, the basis of which lies in the difference between Kant and Peirce in categorial analysis. Peirce’s semiotic approach to mathematics involves a shift from the plane of the object denoted to that of the sign itself. This holds true for geometric as well as algebraic inferences, which Peirce can equate in this respect. In both cases, the individual element of mathematics is thus to be found within the diagram itself with no reference to the object denoted. While the diagram is in any case a token, this cannot explain its essential individuality, to which end the indexical juxtaposition of its parts should be examined.Peirce considera a matemática uma ciência informativa realmente capaz de aumentar nosso conhecimento. Isso significa que a matemática não é limitada à análise conceitual, mas possui um objeto real de investigação. O coração da visão peirciana da matemática é que o raciocínio matemático não é desenvolvido somente por meio de conceitos gerais, mas lida com um inevitável elemento de individualidade. A conclusão de uma inferência indutiva pode conter informação que não está absolutamente presente nas suas premissas, podendo vir a ser somente por meio de trabalho concreto por parte do matemático. Peirce descreve esse trabalho como observação e experimentação sobre diagramas individuais. Enquanto a idéia de um elemento individual na matemática já está presente em Kant (e pode também ser traçada até Aristóteles), a sua base está na diferença entre Kant e Peirce acerca da análise categorial. A abordagem semiótica peirciana da matemática implica uma mudança, do plano do objeto denotado para o do próprio signo. Isso vale tanto para as inferências geométricas como para as inferências algébricas, que Peirce pode igualar nesse aspecto. Em ambos os casos, o elemento individual da matemática deve ser encontrado dentro do próprio diagrama, sem referência ao objeto denotado. Enquanto o diagrama é em todo caso um token, isso não pode explicar sua individualidade essencial, para cujo fim a justaposição indicial de suas partes deve ser examinada.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2013-02-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13605Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2005); 201-207Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 6 n. 2 (2005); 201-2072316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13605/10114Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarietti, Susanna2024-07-01T13:09:36Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13605Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2024-07-01T13:09:36Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mathematical Individuality in Charles Sanders Peirce
Individualidade Matemática em Charles Sanders Peirce
title Mathematical Individuality in Charles Sanders Peirce
spellingShingle Mathematical Individuality in Charles Sanders Peirce
Marietti, Susanna
Matemática
Raciocínio matemático
Individualidade
Diagrama
Índice
Mathematics
Mathematical reasoning
Individuality
Diagram
Index
title_short Mathematical Individuality in Charles Sanders Peirce
title_full Mathematical Individuality in Charles Sanders Peirce
title_fullStr Mathematical Individuality in Charles Sanders Peirce
title_full_unstemmed Mathematical Individuality in Charles Sanders Peirce
title_sort Mathematical Individuality in Charles Sanders Peirce
author Marietti, Susanna
author_facet Marietti, Susanna
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marietti, Susanna
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Matemática
Raciocínio matemático
Individualidade
Diagrama
Índice
Mathematics
Mathematical reasoning
Individuality
Diagram
Index
topic Matemática
Raciocínio matemático
Individualidade
Diagrama
Índice
Mathematics
Mathematical reasoning
Individuality
Diagram
Index
description Peirce regards mathematics as an informative science capable of really increasing our knowledge. This means that mathematics is not limited to conceptual analysis but possesses a real object of investigation. The core of Peirce’s view of mathematics is that mathematical reasoning is not developed through general concepts alone but deals with an unavoidable element of individuality. The conclusion of a deductive inference can contain information that is not at all present in its premises and can only come into being through concrete work on the part of the mathematician. Peirce describes this work as observation and experimentation on individual diagrams. While the idea of an individual element in mathematics is already present in Kant (and can also be traced back to Aristotle), the different location Peirce assigns it attests to a marked difference in their conceptions, the basis of which lies in the difference between Kant and Peirce in categorial analysis. Peirce’s semiotic approach to mathematics involves a shift from the plane of the object denoted to that of the sign itself. This holds true for geometric as well as algebraic inferences, which Peirce can equate in this respect. In both cases, the individual element of mathematics is thus to be found within the diagram itself with no reference to the object denoted. While the diagram is in any case a token, this cannot explain its essential individuality, to which end the indexical juxtaposition of its parts should be examined.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-02-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13605
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13605
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13605/10114
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2005); 201-207
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 6 n. 2 (2005); 201-207
2316-5278
1518-7187
reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
collection Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revcognitio@gmail.com
_version_ 1803387421281222656