Peirce’s Neglected Views on the Importance of the Individual for the Advancement of Civilization
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/18446 |
Resumo: | Peirce is well-known for his claim that man is a sign and, therefore, essentially general. He also taught that the individual person is of little account except as a member of a social group. Yet in Peirce’s metaphysics it is the individual that brings the general into existence just as in human affairs it is the sheriff who provides the dynamic power necessary for the rule of civic law. Not with standing his frequent admonition that individual glory must give way to communal achievement, throughout his life Peirce was fascinated with the phenomenon of individual greatness. Through his studies of great men he concluded that special individuals, with their unique capacities and powers, account for much that we count as human progress and that an exaggerated regard for morality is detrimental to scientific progress. The aim of this paper is to consider Peirce’s somewhat neglected views on the importance of individuals as distinct from whatever communities they may be a part of and to reflect on the implications for Peirce’s theory of personhood. |
id |
PUC_SP-15_a2fc669dad3289e1abf3de0a1deebc6c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18446 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-15 |
network_name_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Peirce’s Neglected Views on the Importance of the Individual for the Advancement of CivilizationAs Concepções Negligenciadas de Peirce Sobre a Importância do Indivíduo para o Progresso da CivilizaçãoPeirceIndivíduoPessoalidadeGênioGrandeza.PeirceIndividualPersonhoodGeniusGreatness.Peirce is well-known for his claim that man is a sign and, therefore, essentially general. He also taught that the individual person is of little account except as a member of a social group. Yet in Peirce’s metaphysics it is the individual that brings the general into existence just as in human affairs it is the sheriff who provides the dynamic power necessary for the rule of civic law. Not with standing his frequent admonition that individual glory must give way to communal achievement, throughout his life Peirce was fascinated with the phenomenon of individual greatness. Through his studies of great men he concluded that special individuals, with their unique capacities and powers, account for much that we count as human progress and that an exaggerated regard for morality is detrimental to scientific progress. The aim of this paper is to consider Peirce’s somewhat neglected views on the importance of individuals as distinct from whatever communities they may be a part of and to reflect on the implications for Peirce’s theory of personhood.Peirce é famoso por sua afirmação de que o homem é um signo e, portanto, essencialmente geral. Ele ainda nos ensinou que uma pessoa é de pouca importância exceto como membro de um grupo social. Contudo, na metafísica peirciana é o individuo que dá existência ao geral, da mesma forma que nos assuntos humanos é o delegado que fornece o poder dinâmico necessário para a regulação da lei civil. Não obstante sua frequente repreensão de que a glória individual deve dar caminho às conquistas comuns, Peirce foi por toda vida fascinado com o fenômeno da grandeza individual. Através de seus estudos sobre os grandes homens, ele concluiu que os indivíduos especiais, aqueles com capacidades e poderes únicos, são responsáveis por muito daquilo que nós contamos como progresso humano e que uma estima exagerada pela moralidade é prejudicial ao progresso científico. O objetivo deste texto é considerar a concepção peirciana, um tanto negligenciada, sobre a importância dos indivíduos como seres distintos de uma comunidade qualquer da qual eles façam parte. Algumas breves comparações serão feitas sobre a visão de Peirce em relação aos indivíduos e às visões mais conhecidas de Nietzsche e outros.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2014-03-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/18446Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 14 No. 2 (2013); 163-178Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 14 n. 2 (2013); 163-1782316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/18446/13679Copyright (c) 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHouser, Nathan2024-07-01T13:09:37Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18446Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2024-07-01T13:09:37Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Peirce’s Neglected Views on the Importance of the Individual for the Advancement of Civilization As Concepções Negligenciadas de Peirce Sobre a Importância do Indivíduo para o Progresso da Civilização |
title |
Peirce’s Neglected Views on the Importance of the Individual for the Advancement of Civilization |
spellingShingle |
Peirce’s Neglected Views on the Importance of the Individual for the Advancement of Civilization Houser, Nathan Peirce Indivíduo Pessoalidade Gênio Grandeza. Peirce Individual Personhood Genius Greatness. |
title_short |
Peirce’s Neglected Views on the Importance of the Individual for the Advancement of Civilization |
title_full |
Peirce’s Neglected Views on the Importance of the Individual for the Advancement of Civilization |
title_fullStr |
Peirce’s Neglected Views on the Importance of the Individual for the Advancement of Civilization |
title_full_unstemmed |
Peirce’s Neglected Views on the Importance of the Individual for the Advancement of Civilization |
title_sort |
Peirce’s Neglected Views on the Importance of the Individual for the Advancement of Civilization |
author |
Houser, Nathan |
author_facet |
Houser, Nathan |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Houser, Nathan |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Peirce Indivíduo Pessoalidade Gênio Grandeza. Peirce Individual Personhood Genius Greatness. |
topic |
Peirce Indivíduo Pessoalidade Gênio Grandeza. Peirce Individual Personhood Genius Greatness. |
description |
Peirce is well-known for his claim that man is a sign and, therefore, essentially general. He also taught that the individual person is of little account except as a member of a social group. Yet in Peirce’s metaphysics it is the individual that brings the general into existence just as in human affairs it is the sheriff who provides the dynamic power necessary for the rule of civic law. Not with standing his frequent admonition that individual glory must give way to communal achievement, throughout his life Peirce was fascinated with the phenomenon of individual greatness. Through his studies of great men he concluded that special individuals, with their unique capacities and powers, account for much that we count as human progress and that an exaggerated regard for morality is detrimental to scientific progress. The aim of this paper is to consider Peirce’s somewhat neglected views on the importance of individuals as distinct from whatever communities they may be a part of and to reflect on the implications for Peirce’s theory of personhood. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-03-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/18446 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/18446 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/18446/13679 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 14 No. 2 (2013); 163-178 Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 14 n. 2 (2013); 163-178 2316-5278 1518-7187 reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revcognitio@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803387421367205889 |