Fact, value, meaning, pragmatism
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/60854 |
Resumo: | considering the debate in the modern and contemporary contexts of philosophy, I explore the pragmatic response to fact-value dualism. In this sense, considering that pragmatism regards mind and world as parts of an experiential continuum and humans as social beings, I draw attention to the “requiredness” of meaning and value in practices of living. Tracing a parallel between William James and Wolfgang Köhler regarding the notion of “interest”, as a form of requiredness, the central idea that I work out in this paper is that “interest” makes difference in some contexts of experience and then it leaves space for meaning and value in multiple levels of life. In terms of James’s pragmatism, as an alternative to the traditional dualities (fact-value, theory-practice, knowledge-reality, and so on), this pluralistic view supposes that each form of interest stands for condition and genesis of meaning and value in human practices. |
id |
PUC_SP-15_b382b69c204c402112b7a18b5d4e2a36 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/60854 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-15 |
network_name_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Fact, value, meaning, pragmatismFato, valor, significação, pragmatismo considering the debate in the modern and contemporary contexts of philosophy, I explore the pragmatic response to fact-value dualism. In this sense, considering that pragmatism regards mind and world as parts of an experiential continuum and humans as social beings, I draw attention to the “requiredness” of meaning and value in practices of living. Tracing a parallel between William James and Wolfgang Köhler regarding the notion of “interest”, as a form of requiredness, the central idea that I work out in this paper is that “interest” makes difference in some contexts of experience and then it leaves space for meaning and value in multiple levels of life. In terms of James’s pragmatism, as an alternative to the traditional dualities (fact-value, theory-practice, knowledge-reality, and so on), this pluralistic view supposes that each form of interest stands for condition and genesis of meaning and value in human practices. considerando o debate nos contextos moderno e contemporâneo da filosofia, exploro a resposta pragmática ao dualismo fato-valor. Nesse sentido, levando em conta que o pragmatismo considera mente e mundo como partes de um continuum experiencial e os humanos como seres sociais, chamo a atenção para a “exigência” de significação e valor nas práticas de vida. Traçando um paralelo entre William James e Wolfgang Köhler relação à noção de “interesse”, como forma de exigência, a ideia central que desenvolvo neste artigo é que “interesse” faz diferença em alguns contextos de experiência e então abre espaço para significação e valor em múltiplos níveis da vida. Em termos do pragmatismo de James, como alternativa aos dualismos tradicionais (fato-valor, teoria- prática, conhecimento-realidade etc.), essa visão pluralista supõe que cada forma de interesse representa condição e gênese de sentido e valor nas práticas humanas. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2023-05-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/6085410.23925/2316-5278.2023v24i1:e60854Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 24 No. 1 (2023): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia ; e60854Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 24 n. 1 (2023): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia ; e608542316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/60854/42193Copyright (c) 2023 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAraújo, Arthur 2023-02-12T13:48:31Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/60854Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2023-02-12T13:48:31Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Fact, value, meaning, pragmatism Fato, valor, significação, pragmatismo |
title |
Fact, value, meaning, pragmatism |
spellingShingle |
Fact, value, meaning, pragmatism Araújo, Arthur |
title_short |
Fact, value, meaning, pragmatism |
title_full |
Fact, value, meaning, pragmatism |
title_fullStr |
Fact, value, meaning, pragmatism |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fact, value, meaning, pragmatism |
title_sort |
Fact, value, meaning, pragmatism |
author |
Araújo, Arthur |
author_facet |
Araújo, Arthur |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Araújo, Arthur |
description |
considering the debate in the modern and contemporary contexts of philosophy, I explore the pragmatic response to fact-value dualism. In this sense, considering that pragmatism regards mind and world as parts of an experiential continuum and humans as social beings, I draw attention to the “requiredness” of meaning and value in practices of living. Tracing a parallel between William James and Wolfgang Köhler regarding the notion of “interest”, as a form of requiredness, the central idea that I work out in this paper is that “interest” makes difference in some contexts of experience and then it leaves space for meaning and value in multiple levels of life. In terms of James’s pragmatism, as an alternative to the traditional dualities (fact-value, theory-practice, knowledge-reality, and so on), this pluralistic view supposes that each form of interest stands for condition and genesis of meaning and value in human practices. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-05-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/60854 10.23925/2316-5278.2023v24i1:e60854 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/60854 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.23925/2316-5278.2023v24i1:e60854 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/60854/42193 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 24 No. 1 (2023): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia ; e60854 Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 24 n. 1 (2023): Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia ; e60854 2316-5278 1518-7187 reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revcognitio@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803387422595088384 |