Three Kinds of Goodness
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13240 |
Resumo: | It is the task of the normative sciences to inquiry into the statute and nature of the ultimate ends of conduct. The possible end will be object of aesthetics; the actual end will be searched for in the domain of ethics, and the represented end will be object for logics. Had our reason a transcendental statute, and the ultimate grounding of conduct would lay in its origin. Were conduct reduced to what is merely empirical, being identified with behaviour, all motivation would be particular, and philosophy would not have any reason to exist. Refusing both alternatives, the kind of philosophy proposed by Charles Sanders Peirce shall face the question of the genuinely ultimate but irreducibly phenomenal groundings to understand the nature of reason in its evolving tension towards perfection. |
id |
PUC_SP-15_b417386578e06437fb0923c8cf89e6fa |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13240 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-15 |
network_name_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Three Kinds of GoodnessTrês Espécies de BemconductaestheticsethicslogicsgoodnessexpressivityveracitytruthcondutaestéticaéticalógicabemexpressividadeveracidadeverdadeIt is the task of the normative sciences to inquiry into the statute and nature of the ultimate ends of conduct. The possible end will be object of aesthetics; the actual end will be searched for in the domain of ethics, and the represented end will be object for logics. Had our reason a transcendental statute, and the ultimate grounding of conduct would lay in its origin. Were conduct reduced to what is merely empirical, being identified with behaviour, all motivation would be particular, and philosophy would not have any reason to exist. Refusing both alternatives, the kind of philosophy proposed by Charles Sanders Peirce shall face the question of the genuinely ultimate but irreducibly phenomenal groundings to understand the nature of reason in its evolving tension towards perfection.Cabe às ciências normativas investigar o estatuto e a natureza dos fins últimos da conduta. O fim possível será objeto da estética, o fim atual será procurado ao nível da ética e o fim a ser representado consistirá no objeto da lógica. Tivera a razão um estatuto transcendental, em sua própria origem estaria a fundamento último da conduta. Caso a conduta fosse reduzida simplesmente ao empírico, identificando-se com o comportamento, as motivações seriam todas particulares, e a filosofia sequer teria alguma razão de ser. Com a recusa a ambas as alternativas, a filosofia proposta por Charles Sanders Peirce deverá enfrentar a questão dos fundamentos genuinamente últimos mas irredutivelmente fenomênicos para compreender a natureza da razão em sua tensão evolutiva para a perfeição.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2013-01-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13240Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2003); 60-79Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 4 n. 1 (2003); 60-792316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13240/9754Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilveira, Lauro Frederico Barbosa da2024-07-01T13:09:31Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13240Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2024-07-01T13:09:31Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Three Kinds of Goodness Três Espécies de Bem |
title |
Three Kinds of Goodness |
spellingShingle |
Three Kinds of Goodness Silveira, Lauro Frederico Barbosa da conduct aesthetics ethics logics goodness expressivity veracity truth conduta estética ética lógica bem expressividade veracidade verdade |
title_short |
Three Kinds of Goodness |
title_full |
Three Kinds of Goodness |
title_fullStr |
Three Kinds of Goodness |
title_full_unstemmed |
Three Kinds of Goodness |
title_sort |
Three Kinds of Goodness |
author |
Silveira, Lauro Frederico Barbosa da |
author_facet |
Silveira, Lauro Frederico Barbosa da |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silveira, Lauro Frederico Barbosa da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
conduct aesthetics ethics logics goodness expressivity veracity truth conduta estética ética lógica bem expressividade veracidade verdade |
topic |
conduct aesthetics ethics logics goodness expressivity veracity truth conduta estética ética lógica bem expressividade veracidade verdade |
description |
It is the task of the normative sciences to inquiry into the statute and nature of the ultimate ends of conduct. The possible end will be object of aesthetics; the actual end will be searched for in the domain of ethics, and the represented end will be object for logics. Had our reason a transcendental statute, and the ultimate grounding of conduct would lay in its origin. Were conduct reduced to what is merely empirical, being identified with behaviour, all motivation would be particular, and philosophy would not have any reason to exist. Refusing both alternatives, the kind of philosophy proposed by Charles Sanders Peirce shall face the question of the genuinely ultimate but irreducibly phenomenal groundings to understand the nature of reason in its evolving tension towards perfection. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-01-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13240 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13240 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13240/9754 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2003); 60-79 Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 4 n. 1 (2003); 60-79 2316-5278 1518-7187 reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revcognitio@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803387420496887808 |