Pragmatism and Realism: Semiotics as Language Transgression
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13550 |
Resumo: | Anyone who studies Peirce’s Phenomenology carefully will probably notice, in this first science of Philosophy, which deals solely with appearances and a taxonomy of experience – thus establishing the author’s categorial structure – a prediction of an ontology which has no theoretical space therein, but that will later come true in its own realm, that is, in Metaphysics. Within Phenomenology itself, the categories of experience will also index a symmetry between subject and object, suggesting, genetically, that the sphere of epistemology strongly interact with the ontology, imposing upon Semiotics a commitment of theoretical attunement with the realism of the continua adopted by Peirce. It is thus that the sphere of meaning or the universe of interpretants can neither be confined solely to language, nor be taken as a founding instance of the object when it wishes to stand for reality. Such theoretical boundary conditions will include Pragmatism as an essential doctrine that will enable an amplification of the concept of meaning, necessary to a harmonious relation between Semiotics and Peircean realism.The cognitive possibility of the sign will be provided by the actualization of its inner side as phenomenical exteriority, thus honoring the epistemological commitment provided by the rule of pragmatic meaning. It is in this line of theoretical development that we shall endeavor to highlight, in this short essay, that Semiotics is not simply a system of signs in which human languages and their respective logics are organized, organizing thus the contents of knowledge and meaning of its objects, but also, that it deals with a pragmatic science in its most wide-ranging aspect. In other words, it should enable not just a reading of the intersubjective communication phenomena, but equally, a realistic reading of the world in which natural signs interconnect transitively, that is, signify communicative and pragmatically. In this essay we intend to show, briefly, that Semiotics, when associated with a principle of meaning provided by the relation between sign and the action caused by it, i.e., to Pragmatism, acquires the true realistic reach required by Peirce’s philosophy. |
id |
PUC_SP-15_bf1601038cbebf5452ab22a3c4860699 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13550 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-15 |
network_name_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Pragmatism and Realism: Semiotics as Language TransgressionPragmatismo e Realismo: A Semiótica como Transgressão da LinguagemClassical PragmatismPhilosophical SemioticsOntologyPeircePragmatismo clássicoSemiótica filosóficaOntologiaPeirceAnyone who studies Peirce’s Phenomenology carefully will probably notice, in this first science of Philosophy, which deals solely with appearances and a taxonomy of experience – thus establishing the author’s categorial structure – a prediction of an ontology which has no theoretical space therein, but that will later come true in its own realm, that is, in Metaphysics. Within Phenomenology itself, the categories of experience will also index a symmetry between subject and object, suggesting, genetically, that the sphere of epistemology strongly interact with the ontology, imposing upon Semiotics a commitment of theoretical attunement with the realism of the continua adopted by Peirce. It is thus that the sphere of meaning or the universe of interpretants can neither be confined solely to language, nor be taken as a founding instance of the object when it wishes to stand for reality. Such theoretical boundary conditions will include Pragmatism as an essential doctrine that will enable an amplification of the concept of meaning, necessary to a harmonious relation between Semiotics and Peircean realism.The cognitive possibility of the sign will be provided by the actualization of its inner side as phenomenical exteriority, thus honoring the epistemological commitment provided by the rule of pragmatic meaning. It is in this line of theoretical development that we shall endeavor to highlight, in this short essay, that Semiotics is not simply a system of signs in which human languages and their respective logics are organized, organizing thus the contents of knowledge and meaning of its objects, but also, that it deals with a pragmatic science in its most wide-ranging aspect. In other words, it should enable not just a reading of the intersubjective communication phenomena, but equally, a realistic reading of the world in which natural signs interconnect transitively, that is, signify communicative and pragmatically. In this essay we intend to show, briefly, that Semiotics, when associated with a principle of meaning provided by the relation between sign and the action caused by it, i.e., to Pragmatism, acquires the true realistic reach required by Peirce’s philosophy.O estudioso atento da Fenomenologia de Peirce muito provavelmente perceberá, nesta primeira ciência da Filosofia que lida apenas com as aparências e com uma taxonomia da experiência fundadora da estrutura categorial do autor, um prenúncio de uma ontologia que lá não tem espaço teórico, mas que irá consumar-se, posteriormente, em seu âmbito próprio na Metafísica. No interior da Fenomenologia, também as categorias da experiência irão indicializar uma simetria entre sujeito e objeto, sugerindo, de gênese, que o plano da epistemologia interaja fortemente com a ontologia, impondo à Semiótica um compromisso de harmonia teórica com o realismo dos continua adotado por Peirce. É desse modo que o plano da significação ou o universo dos interpretantes não poderá ficar confinado à linguagem tão-somente, tampouco tomá-la como instância fundante do objeto à medida que este se colocar como realidade. Tais condições teóricas de contorno irão inserir o Pragmatismo como doutrina essencial que possibilitará uma amplificação do conceito de significado, necessário a uma harmonia entre a Semiótica e o realismo peirceano. A possibilidade cognitiva do signo será dada pela objetivação de seu lado interior na forma de exterioridade fenomênica, mantendo, assim, o compromisso epistemológico fornecido pela regra de significação pragmática. É nessa linha de desenvolvimento teórico que se buscará evidenciar, neste pequeno ensaio, que a Semiótica não é apenas um sistema de signos no qual se organizam as linguagens humanas e suas respectivas lógicas, organizando os conteúdos de conhecimento e a significação de seus objetos, mas, também, uma ciência pragmática em seu mais abrangente sentido. Em outras palavras, ela deve permitir não tão-somente uma leitura dos fenômenos da comunicação intersubjetiva, mas, igualmente, uma leitura realista de mundo na qual os signos naturais se interconectam transitivamente, isto é, significam comunicativa e pragmaticamente. Pretende-se neste trabalho, em resumo, mostrar que a Semiótica, quando associada a um princípio de significação dado pela relação entre signo e ação por ele provocada, ou seja, ao Pragmatismo, adquire o verdadeiro alcance realista requerido pela filosofia de Peirce.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2013-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13550Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2006); 247-259Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 7 n. 2 (2006); 247-2592316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13550/10065Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessIbri, Ivo Assad2024-07-01T13:09:36Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13550Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2024-07-01T13:09:36Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Pragmatism and Realism: Semiotics as Language Transgression Pragmatismo e Realismo: A Semiótica como Transgressão da Linguagem |
title |
Pragmatism and Realism: Semiotics as Language Transgression |
spellingShingle |
Pragmatism and Realism: Semiotics as Language Transgression Ibri, Ivo Assad Classical Pragmatism Philosophical Semiotics Ontology Peirce Pragmatismo clássico Semiótica filosófica Ontologia Peirce |
title_short |
Pragmatism and Realism: Semiotics as Language Transgression |
title_full |
Pragmatism and Realism: Semiotics as Language Transgression |
title_fullStr |
Pragmatism and Realism: Semiotics as Language Transgression |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pragmatism and Realism: Semiotics as Language Transgression |
title_sort |
Pragmatism and Realism: Semiotics as Language Transgression |
author |
Ibri, Ivo Assad |
author_facet |
Ibri, Ivo Assad |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ibri, Ivo Assad |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Classical Pragmatism Philosophical Semiotics Ontology Peirce Pragmatismo clássico Semiótica filosófica Ontologia Peirce |
topic |
Classical Pragmatism Philosophical Semiotics Ontology Peirce Pragmatismo clássico Semiótica filosófica Ontologia Peirce |
description |
Anyone who studies Peirce’s Phenomenology carefully will probably notice, in this first science of Philosophy, which deals solely with appearances and a taxonomy of experience – thus establishing the author’s categorial structure – a prediction of an ontology which has no theoretical space therein, but that will later come true in its own realm, that is, in Metaphysics. Within Phenomenology itself, the categories of experience will also index a symmetry between subject and object, suggesting, genetically, that the sphere of epistemology strongly interact with the ontology, imposing upon Semiotics a commitment of theoretical attunement with the realism of the continua adopted by Peirce. It is thus that the sphere of meaning or the universe of interpretants can neither be confined solely to language, nor be taken as a founding instance of the object when it wishes to stand for reality. Such theoretical boundary conditions will include Pragmatism as an essential doctrine that will enable an amplification of the concept of meaning, necessary to a harmonious relation between Semiotics and Peircean realism.The cognitive possibility of the sign will be provided by the actualization of its inner side as phenomenical exteriority, thus honoring the epistemological commitment provided by the rule of pragmatic meaning. It is in this line of theoretical development that we shall endeavor to highlight, in this short essay, that Semiotics is not simply a system of signs in which human languages and their respective logics are organized, organizing thus the contents of knowledge and meaning of its objects, but also, that it deals with a pragmatic science in its most wide-ranging aspect. In other words, it should enable not just a reading of the intersubjective communication phenomena, but equally, a realistic reading of the world in which natural signs interconnect transitively, that is, signify communicative and pragmatically. In this essay we intend to show, briefly, that Semiotics, when associated with a principle of meaning provided by the relation between sign and the action caused by it, i.e., to Pragmatism, acquires the true realistic reach required by Peirce’s philosophy. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-02-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13550 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13550 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13550/10065 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2006); 247-259 Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 7 n. 2 (2006); 247-259 2316-5278 1518-7187 reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revcognitio@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803387421238231040 |