The Increasing Attractiveness of Classical Pragmatism

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Houser, Nathan
Data de Publicação: 2013
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12119
Resumo: In 1951, Max H. Fisch put forward the idea that there is a distinct American philosophy that could be considered classical and he outlined the characteristic themes and proponents of “classical American philosophy.” In this paper it is argued that the themes Fisch listed characterize a broad pragmatic ethos and can be used to help clarify what should count as classical pragmatism. This is the pragmatism that is increasingly attractive to philosophers today rather than the narrow technical pragmatism of Charles Peirce. It is further argued that, contrary to many accounts, Peirce regarded his narrower doctrine, which he called pragmaticism, as a technical variant of the more general pragmatism and that Peirce was a classical pragmatist along with James, Dewey, and the others.
id PUC_SP-15_df18ff98ce043976979ed5882d7517c7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12119
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-15
network_name_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The Increasing Attractiveness of Classical PragmatismA Crescente Atratividade do Pragmatismo ClássicoClassical American philosophyClassical pragmatismPragmaticismMax H. FischCharles S. Peirce.Filosofia americana clássicaPragmatismo clássicoPragmaticismoMax H. FischCharles S. Peirce.In 1951, Max H. Fisch put forward the idea that there is a distinct American philosophy that could be considered classical and he outlined the characteristic themes and proponents of “classical American philosophy.” In this paper it is argued that the themes Fisch listed characterize a broad pragmatic ethos and can be used to help clarify what should count as classical pragmatism. This is the pragmatism that is increasingly attractive to philosophers today rather than the narrow technical pragmatism of Charles Peirce. It is further argued that, contrary to many accounts, Peirce regarded his narrower doctrine, which he called pragmaticism, as a technical variant of the more general pragmatism and that Peirce was a classical pragmatist along with James, Dewey, and the others.Em 1951, Max H, Fisch apresentou a ideia de que há uma Filosofia Americana distinta que poderia ser considerada clássica e delineou os temas característicos e os proponentes da “Filosofia Americana clássica”. Neste artigo, argumenta-se que os temas listados por Fisch caracterizam um amplo ethos pragmático e pode ser usado para ajudar a esclarecer o que pode ser considerado como pragmatismo clássico. Este é o pragmatismo que é cada vez mais atraente para os filósofos de hoje, ao invés do pragmatismo estreito e técnico de Charles Peirce. Além disso argumenta-se que, ao contrário do que muitos dizem, Peirce considerava sua doutrina estreita, que ele chamou pragmaticismo, como uma variante técnica de um pragmatismo mais geral e que Peirce foi um pragmatista clássico, junto com James, Dewey e outros.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2013-01-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12119Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2010); 224-240Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 11 n. 2 (2010); 224-2402316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12119/9473Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHouser, Nathan2024-07-01T13:09:30Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12119Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2024-07-01T13:09:30Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Increasing Attractiveness of Classical Pragmatism
A Crescente Atratividade do Pragmatismo Clássico
title The Increasing Attractiveness of Classical Pragmatism
spellingShingle The Increasing Attractiveness of Classical Pragmatism
Houser, Nathan
Classical American philosophy
Classical pragmatism
Pragmaticism
Max H. Fisch
Charles S. Peirce.
Filosofia americana clássica
Pragmatismo clássico
Pragmaticismo
Max H. Fisch
Charles S. Peirce.
title_short The Increasing Attractiveness of Classical Pragmatism
title_full The Increasing Attractiveness of Classical Pragmatism
title_fullStr The Increasing Attractiveness of Classical Pragmatism
title_full_unstemmed The Increasing Attractiveness of Classical Pragmatism
title_sort The Increasing Attractiveness of Classical Pragmatism
author Houser, Nathan
author_facet Houser, Nathan
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Houser, Nathan
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Classical American philosophy
Classical pragmatism
Pragmaticism
Max H. Fisch
Charles S. Peirce.
Filosofia americana clássica
Pragmatismo clássico
Pragmaticismo
Max H. Fisch
Charles S. Peirce.
topic Classical American philosophy
Classical pragmatism
Pragmaticism
Max H. Fisch
Charles S. Peirce.
Filosofia americana clássica
Pragmatismo clássico
Pragmaticismo
Max H. Fisch
Charles S. Peirce.
description In 1951, Max H. Fisch put forward the idea that there is a distinct American philosophy that could be considered classical and he outlined the characteristic themes and proponents of “classical American philosophy.” In this paper it is argued that the themes Fisch listed characterize a broad pragmatic ethos and can be used to help clarify what should count as classical pragmatism. This is the pragmatism that is increasingly attractive to philosophers today rather than the narrow technical pragmatism of Charles Peirce. It is further argued that, contrary to many accounts, Peirce regarded his narrower doctrine, which he called pragmaticism, as a technical variant of the more general pragmatism and that Peirce was a classical pragmatist along with James, Dewey, and the others.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-01-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12119
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12119
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12119/9473
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2010); 224-240
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 11 n. 2 (2010); 224-240
2316-5278
1518-7187
reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
collection Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revcognitio@gmail.com
_version_ 1803387420390981632