The Increasing Attractiveness of Classical Pragmatism
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12119 |
Resumo: | In 1951, Max H. Fisch put forward the idea that there is a distinct American philosophy that could be considered classical and he outlined the characteristic themes and proponents of “classical American philosophy.” In this paper it is argued that the themes Fisch listed characterize a broad pragmatic ethos and can be used to help clarify what should count as classical pragmatism. This is the pragmatism that is increasingly attractive to philosophers today rather than the narrow technical pragmatism of Charles Peirce. It is further argued that, contrary to many accounts, Peirce regarded his narrower doctrine, which he called pragmaticism, as a technical variant of the more general pragmatism and that Peirce was a classical pragmatist along with James, Dewey, and the others. |
id |
PUC_SP-15_df18ff98ce043976979ed5882d7517c7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12119 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-15 |
network_name_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Increasing Attractiveness of Classical PragmatismA Crescente Atratividade do Pragmatismo ClássicoClassical American philosophyClassical pragmatismPragmaticismMax H. FischCharles S. Peirce.Filosofia americana clássicaPragmatismo clássicoPragmaticismoMax H. FischCharles S. Peirce.In 1951, Max H. Fisch put forward the idea that there is a distinct American philosophy that could be considered classical and he outlined the characteristic themes and proponents of “classical American philosophy.” In this paper it is argued that the themes Fisch listed characterize a broad pragmatic ethos and can be used to help clarify what should count as classical pragmatism. This is the pragmatism that is increasingly attractive to philosophers today rather than the narrow technical pragmatism of Charles Peirce. It is further argued that, contrary to many accounts, Peirce regarded his narrower doctrine, which he called pragmaticism, as a technical variant of the more general pragmatism and that Peirce was a classical pragmatist along with James, Dewey, and the others.Em 1951, Max H, Fisch apresentou a ideia de que há uma Filosofia Americana distinta que poderia ser considerada clássica e delineou os temas característicos e os proponentes da “Filosofia Americana clássica”. Neste artigo, argumenta-se que os temas listados por Fisch caracterizam um amplo ethos pragmático e pode ser usado para ajudar a esclarecer o que pode ser considerado como pragmatismo clássico. Este é o pragmatismo que é cada vez mais atraente para os filósofos de hoje, ao invés do pragmatismo estreito e técnico de Charles Peirce. Além disso argumenta-se que, ao contrário do que muitos dizem, Peirce considerava sua doutrina estreita, que ele chamou pragmaticismo, como uma variante técnica de um pragmatismo mais geral e que Peirce foi um pragmatista clássico, junto com James, Dewey e outros.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2013-01-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12119Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2010); 224-240Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 11 n. 2 (2010); 224-2402316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12119/9473Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHouser, Nathan2024-07-01T13:09:30Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12119Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2024-07-01T13:09:30Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Increasing Attractiveness of Classical Pragmatism A Crescente Atratividade do Pragmatismo Clássico |
title |
The Increasing Attractiveness of Classical Pragmatism |
spellingShingle |
The Increasing Attractiveness of Classical Pragmatism Houser, Nathan Classical American philosophy Classical pragmatism Pragmaticism Max H. Fisch Charles S. Peirce. Filosofia americana clássica Pragmatismo clássico Pragmaticismo Max H. Fisch Charles S. Peirce. |
title_short |
The Increasing Attractiveness of Classical Pragmatism |
title_full |
The Increasing Attractiveness of Classical Pragmatism |
title_fullStr |
The Increasing Attractiveness of Classical Pragmatism |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Increasing Attractiveness of Classical Pragmatism |
title_sort |
The Increasing Attractiveness of Classical Pragmatism |
author |
Houser, Nathan |
author_facet |
Houser, Nathan |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Houser, Nathan |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Classical American philosophy Classical pragmatism Pragmaticism Max H. Fisch Charles S. Peirce. Filosofia americana clássica Pragmatismo clássico Pragmaticismo Max H. Fisch Charles S. Peirce. |
topic |
Classical American philosophy Classical pragmatism Pragmaticism Max H. Fisch Charles S. Peirce. Filosofia americana clássica Pragmatismo clássico Pragmaticismo Max H. Fisch Charles S. Peirce. |
description |
In 1951, Max H. Fisch put forward the idea that there is a distinct American philosophy that could be considered classical and he outlined the characteristic themes and proponents of “classical American philosophy.” In this paper it is argued that the themes Fisch listed characterize a broad pragmatic ethos and can be used to help clarify what should count as classical pragmatism. This is the pragmatism that is increasingly attractive to philosophers today rather than the narrow technical pragmatism of Charles Peirce. It is further argued that, contrary to many accounts, Peirce regarded his narrower doctrine, which he called pragmaticism, as a technical variant of the more general pragmatism and that Peirce was a classical pragmatist along with James, Dewey, and the others. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-01-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12119 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12119 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/12119/9473 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2010); 224-240 Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 11 n. 2 (2010); 224-240 2316-5278 1518-7187 reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revcognitio@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803387420390981632 |