Examining the relationship of C. S. Peirce’s semiotic and D. Winnicott’s transitional phenomena and playing

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Guimarães Filho, Paulo Duarte
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/33437
Resumo: First, it is considered how the possibilities of relationships between Peirce’s philosophy and psychoanalysis have been the subject of papers by philosophers and psychoanalysts. The conceptions of Donald Winnicott about transitional objects, transitional phenomena and playing are pointed out as of particular interest for the study of these relationships, due to their links with Peirce’s philosophy. Then, it is indicated how Winnicott refers to the relations of symbolization (not in Peircean terms) with the objects and transitional phenomena and how a “full understanding” of the processes of symbolization could contribute to the knowledge of those phenomena. We examine how Peirce’s semiotic has elements that help understanding what is called “symbolization” by Winnicott. In this way also allowing the discrimination of the semiotic aspects present in the transitional objects, transitional phenomena and playing; thus expanding on some dimensions of the meaning of Winnicott’s conceptions. These issues are further illustrated in the clinical cases of “Edmund” and “Diana”, related by Winnicott and in two other clinical situations presented by the author.
id PUC_SP-15_bffbac18489ddd0bc001ae9f5e2a90a2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33437
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-15
network_name_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Examining the relationship of C. S. Peirce’s semiotic and D. Winnicott’s transitional phenomena and playingAnalisando a relação entre a semiótica de C.S. Peirce e os fenômenos transicionais e o brincar de D. WinnicottPeirceSemióticaWinnicottObjetos transicionaisFenômenos transicionaisBrincarSimbolizaçãoPeirceSemioticWinnicottTransitional objectsTransitional phenomenaPlayingSymbolizationFirst, it is considered how the possibilities of relationships between Peirce’s philosophy and psychoanalysis have been the subject of papers by philosophers and psychoanalysts. The conceptions of Donald Winnicott about transitional objects, transitional phenomena and playing are pointed out as of particular interest for the study of these relationships, due to their links with Peirce’s philosophy. Then, it is indicated how Winnicott refers to the relations of symbolization (not in Peircean terms) with the objects and transitional phenomena and how a “full understanding” of the processes of symbolization could contribute to the knowledge of those phenomena. We examine how Peirce’s semiotic has elements that help understanding what is called “symbolization” by Winnicott. In this way also allowing the discrimination of the semiotic aspects present in the transitional objects, transitional phenomena and playing; thus expanding on some dimensions of the meaning of Winnicott’s conceptions. These issues are further illustrated in the clinical cases of “Edmund” and “Diana”, related by Winnicott and in two other clinical situations presented by the author.Inicialmente, considera-se como as possibilidades de relações entre a psicanálise e a filosofia de Peirce têm sido objeto de trabalhos de filósofos e psicanalistas. São destacadas as noções de Winnicott sobre os objetos e fenômenos transicionais e o brincar, como uma área de particular interesse para o estudo dessas relações, dadas suas ligações com a filosofia de Peirce. É, então, indicado como Winnicott faz referência às relações da simbolização (não em termos peircianos) com os objetos e fenômenos transicionais e indica como um “full understanding” dos processos de simbolização podem contribuir para o conhecimento desses fenômenos. Considerando essa manifestação de Winnicott, é examinado de que modo a semiótica de Peirce contém elementos que auxiliam o entendimento do que é chamado de “simbolização”, por Winnicott. Assim,, também permitindo a discriminação dos aspectos semióticos presentes nos objetos e fenômenos transicionais e no brincar, permitindo, assim, uma ampliação de algumas dimensões da significação das concepções de Winnicott. As questões referidas são examinadas amplamente nos casos clínicos de “Edmund” e “Diana”, citados por Winnicott e em outras duas situações clínicas apresentadas pelo autor.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2017-07-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/3343710.23925/2316-5278.2017v18i1p69-88Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 18 No. 1 (2017); 69-88Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 18 n. 1 (2017); 69-882316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/33437/23143Copyright (c) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGuimarães Filho, Paulo Duarte2017-08-17T16:50:34Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33437Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2017-08-17T16:50:34Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Examining the relationship of C. S. Peirce’s semiotic and D. Winnicott’s transitional phenomena and playing
Analisando a relação entre a semiótica de C.S. Peirce e os fenômenos transicionais e o brincar de D. Winnicott
title Examining the relationship of C. S. Peirce’s semiotic and D. Winnicott’s transitional phenomena and playing
spellingShingle Examining the relationship of C. S. Peirce’s semiotic and D. Winnicott’s transitional phenomena and playing
Guimarães Filho, Paulo Duarte
Peirce
Semiótica
Winnicott
Objetos transicionais
Fenômenos transicionais
Brincar
Simbolização
Peirce
Semiotic
Winnicott
Transitional objects
Transitional phenomena
Playing
Symbolization
title_short Examining the relationship of C. S. Peirce’s semiotic and D. Winnicott’s transitional phenomena and playing
title_full Examining the relationship of C. S. Peirce’s semiotic and D. Winnicott’s transitional phenomena and playing
title_fullStr Examining the relationship of C. S. Peirce’s semiotic and D. Winnicott’s transitional phenomena and playing
title_full_unstemmed Examining the relationship of C. S. Peirce’s semiotic and D. Winnicott’s transitional phenomena and playing
title_sort Examining the relationship of C. S. Peirce’s semiotic and D. Winnicott’s transitional phenomena and playing
author Guimarães Filho, Paulo Duarte
author_facet Guimarães Filho, Paulo Duarte
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Guimarães Filho, Paulo Duarte
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Peirce
Semiótica
Winnicott
Objetos transicionais
Fenômenos transicionais
Brincar
Simbolização
Peirce
Semiotic
Winnicott
Transitional objects
Transitional phenomena
Playing
Symbolization
topic Peirce
Semiótica
Winnicott
Objetos transicionais
Fenômenos transicionais
Brincar
Simbolização
Peirce
Semiotic
Winnicott
Transitional objects
Transitional phenomena
Playing
Symbolization
description First, it is considered how the possibilities of relationships between Peirce’s philosophy and psychoanalysis have been the subject of papers by philosophers and psychoanalysts. The conceptions of Donald Winnicott about transitional objects, transitional phenomena and playing are pointed out as of particular interest for the study of these relationships, due to their links with Peirce’s philosophy. Then, it is indicated how Winnicott refers to the relations of symbolization (not in Peircean terms) with the objects and transitional phenomena and how a “full understanding” of the processes of symbolization could contribute to the knowledge of those phenomena. We examine how Peirce’s semiotic has elements that help understanding what is called “symbolization” by Winnicott. In this way also allowing the discrimination of the semiotic aspects present in the transitional objects, transitional phenomena and playing; thus expanding on some dimensions of the meaning of Winnicott’s conceptions. These issues are further illustrated in the clinical cases of “Edmund” and “Diana”, related by Winnicott and in two other clinical situations presented by the author.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-07-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/33437
10.23925/2316-5278.2017v18i1p69-88
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/33437
identifier_str_mv 10.23925/2316-5278.2017v18i1p69-88
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/33437/23143
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 18 No. 1 (2017); 69-88
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 18 n. 1 (2017); 69-88
2316-5278
1518-7187
reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
collection Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revcognitio@gmail.com
_version_ 1803387421776150528