Examining the relationship of C. S. Peirce’s semiotic and D. Winnicott’s transitional phenomena and playing
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/33437 |
Resumo: | First, it is considered how the possibilities of relationships between Peirce’s philosophy and psychoanalysis have been the subject of papers by philosophers and psychoanalysts. The conceptions of Donald Winnicott about transitional objects, transitional phenomena and playing are pointed out as of particular interest for the study of these relationships, due to their links with Peirce’s philosophy. Then, it is indicated how Winnicott refers to the relations of symbolization (not in Peircean terms) with the objects and transitional phenomena and how a “full understanding” of the processes of symbolization could contribute to the knowledge of those phenomena. We examine how Peirce’s semiotic has elements that help understanding what is called “symbolization” by Winnicott. In this way also allowing the discrimination of the semiotic aspects present in the transitional objects, transitional phenomena and playing; thus expanding on some dimensions of the meaning of Winnicott’s conceptions. These issues are further illustrated in the clinical cases of “Edmund” and “Diana”, related by Winnicott and in two other clinical situations presented by the author. |
id |
PUC_SP-15_bffbac18489ddd0bc001ae9f5e2a90a2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33437 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-15 |
network_name_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Examining the relationship of C. S. Peirce’s semiotic and D. Winnicott’s transitional phenomena and playingAnalisando a relação entre a semiótica de C.S. Peirce e os fenômenos transicionais e o brincar de D. WinnicottPeirceSemióticaWinnicottObjetos transicionaisFenômenos transicionaisBrincarSimbolizaçãoPeirceSemioticWinnicottTransitional objectsTransitional phenomenaPlayingSymbolizationFirst, it is considered how the possibilities of relationships between Peirce’s philosophy and psychoanalysis have been the subject of papers by philosophers and psychoanalysts. The conceptions of Donald Winnicott about transitional objects, transitional phenomena and playing are pointed out as of particular interest for the study of these relationships, due to their links with Peirce’s philosophy. Then, it is indicated how Winnicott refers to the relations of symbolization (not in Peircean terms) with the objects and transitional phenomena and how a “full understanding” of the processes of symbolization could contribute to the knowledge of those phenomena. We examine how Peirce’s semiotic has elements that help understanding what is called “symbolization” by Winnicott. In this way also allowing the discrimination of the semiotic aspects present in the transitional objects, transitional phenomena and playing; thus expanding on some dimensions of the meaning of Winnicott’s conceptions. These issues are further illustrated in the clinical cases of “Edmund” and “Diana”, related by Winnicott and in two other clinical situations presented by the author.Inicialmente, considera-se como as possibilidades de relações entre a psicanálise e a filosofia de Peirce têm sido objeto de trabalhos de filósofos e psicanalistas. São destacadas as noções de Winnicott sobre os objetos e fenômenos transicionais e o brincar, como uma área de particular interesse para o estudo dessas relações, dadas suas ligações com a filosofia de Peirce. É, então, indicado como Winnicott faz referência às relações da simbolização (não em termos peircianos) com os objetos e fenômenos transicionais e indica como um “full understanding” dos processos de simbolização podem contribuir para o conhecimento desses fenômenos. Considerando essa manifestação de Winnicott, é examinado de que modo a semiótica de Peirce contém elementos que auxiliam o entendimento do que é chamado de “simbolização”, por Winnicott. Assim,, também permitindo a discriminação dos aspectos semióticos presentes nos objetos e fenômenos transicionais e no brincar, permitindo, assim, uma ampliação de algumas dimensões da significação das concepções de Winnicott. As questões referidas são examinadas amplamente nos casos clínicos de “Edmund” e “Diana”, citados por Winnicott e em outras duas situações clínicas apresentadas pelo autor.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2017-07-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/3343710.23925/2316-5278.2017v18i1p69-88Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 18 No. 1 (2017); 69-88Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 18 n. 1 (2017); 69-882316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/33437/23143Copyright (c) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGuimarães Filho, Paulo Duarte2017-08-17T16:50:34Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33437Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2017-08-17T16:50:34Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Examining the relationship of C. S. Peirce’s semiotic and D. Winnicott’s transitional phenomena and playing Analisando a relação entre a semiótica de C.S. Peirce e os fenômenos transicionais e o brincar de D. Winnicott |
title |
Examining the relationship of C. S. Peirce’s semiotic and D. Winnicott’s transitional phenomena and playing |
spellingShingle |
Examining the relationship of C. S. Peirce’s semiotic and D. Winnicott’s transitional phenomena and playing Guimarães Filho, Paulo Duarte Peirce Semiótica Winnicott Objetos transicionais Fenômenos transicionais Brincar Simbolização Peirce Semiotic Winnicott Transitional objects Transitional phenomena Playing Symbolization |
title_short |
Examining the relationship of C. S. Peirce’s semiotic and D. Winnicott’s transitional phenomena and playing |
title_full |
Examining the relationship of C. S. Peirce’s semiotic and D. Winnicott’s transitional phenomena and playing |
title_fullStr |
Examining the relationship of C. S. Peirce’s semiotic and D. Winnicott’s transitional phenomena and playing |
title_full_unstemmed |
Examining the relationship of C. S. Peirce’s semiotic and D. Winnicott’s transitional phenomena and playing |
title_sort |
Examining the relationship of C. S. Peirce’s semiotic and D. Winnicott’s transitional phenomena and playing |
author |
Guimarães Filho, Paulo Duarte |
author_facet |
Guimarães Filho, Paulo Duarte |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Guimarães Filho, Paulo Duarte |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Peirce Semiótica Winnicott Objetos transicionais Fenômenos transicionais Brincar Simbolização Peirce Semiotic Winnicott Transitional objects Transitional phenomena Playing Symbolization |
topic |
Peirce Semiótica Winnicott Objetos transicionais Fenômenos transicionais Brincar Simbolização Peirce Semiotic Winnicott Transitional objects Transitional phenomena Playing Symbolization |
description |
First, it is considered how the possibilities of relationships between Peirce’s philosophy and psychoanalysis have been the subject of papers by philosophers and psychoanalysts. The conceptions of Donald Winnicott about transitional objects, transitional phenomena and playing are pointed out as of particular interest for the study of these relationships, due to their links with Peirce’s philosophy. Then, it is indicated how Winnicott refers to the relations of symbolization (not in Peircean terms) with the objects and transitional phenomena and how a “full understanding” of the processes of symbolization could contribute to the knowledge of those phenomena. We examine how Peirce’s semiotic has elements that help understanding what is called “symbolization” by Winnicott. In this way also allowing the discrimination of the semiotic aspects present in the transitional objects, transitional phenomena and playing; thus expanding on some dimensions of the meaning of Winnicott’s conceptions. These issues are further illustrated in the clinical cases of “Edmund” and “Diana”, related by Winnicott and in two other clinical situations presented by the author. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-07-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/33437 10.23925/2316-5278.2017v18i1p69-88 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/33437 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.23925/2316-5278.2017v18i1p69-88 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/33437/23143 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 18 No. 1 (2017); 69-88 Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 18 n. 1 (2017); 69-88 2316-5278 1518-7187 reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revcognitio@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803387421776150528 |