Gardner’s Method for Syllogistic

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sautter, Frank Thomas
Data de Publicação: 2014
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/18374
Resumo: Martin Gardner introduced, in the 1950s, a method by digraphs for classical proposition allogic. He proposed, as an open problem, the adaptation of the method for syllogistic. In this paper I answer in the affirmative to Gardner’s question. The resulting method reinforces theses presented in previous works, namely that the validity of syllogisms follows from applications of only two rules, and because it reveals a much smaller number of valid syllogistic forms than suggested by the division in figures and moods, this division is artificial. Furthermore, it highlights the very different nature of two types of components of syllogisms(propositions of existence and rules for passing from a proposition of existence to another), whose distinction has been spontaneously acknowledged in its use by philosophers and jurists. Finally, it demonstrates that BRAMANTIP, amood of the fourth figure should be considered a weakened valid syllogism.
id PUC_SP-15_eaf0ab929a4dd2b466f4b84de8206b89
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18374
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-15
network_name_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Gardner’s Method for SyllogisticMétodo de Gardner Para a SilogísticaKeywordsSyllogismRuleProposition of existenceDiagrammatic method.SilogismoRegraProposição de existênciaMétodo diagramático.Martin Gardner introduced, in the 1950s, a method by digraphs for classical proposition allogic. He proposed, as an open problem, the adaptation of the method for syllogistic. In this paper I answer in the affirmative to Gardner’s question. The resulting method reinforces theses presented in previous works, namely that the validity of syllogisms follows from applications of only two rules, and because it reveals a much smaller number of valid syllogistic forms than suggested by the division in figures and moods, this division is artificial. Furthermore, it highlights the very different nature of two types of components of syllogisms(propositions of existence and rules for passing from a proposition of existence to another), whose distinction has been spontaneously acknowledged in its use by philosophers and jurists. Finally, it demonstrates that BRAMANTIP, amood of the fourth figure should be considered a weakened valid syllogism.Martin Gardner apresentou, na década de 1950, um método por dígrafos para a lógica proposicional clássica. Ele propôs, como um problema em aberto, a adaptação do método para a silogística. Neste trabalho respondo afirmativamente à questão de Gardner. O método resultante reforça teses apresentadas em outros trabalhos, a saber, a validade dos silogismos se segue da aplicação de somente duas regras e porque ele revela a existência de uma quantidade muito menor de formas silogísticas válidas do que a sugerida pela divisão em figuras e modos, essa divisão é artificial. Além disso, ele destaca a natureza muito distinta de dois tipos de componentes dos silogismos, proposições de existência e regras para a passagem de uma proposição de existência a outra proposição de existência), cuja distinção está espontaneamente consagrada em sua utilização por filósofos e juristas. Finalmente, ele demonstra que BRAMANTIP, um modo da quarta figura, deve ser considerado um silogismo válido enfraquecido.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2014-03-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/18374Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 14 No. 2 (2013); 221-234Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 14 n. 2 (2013); 221-2342316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/18374/13728Copyright (c) 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSautter, Frank Thomas2024-07-01T13:09:37Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18374Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2024-07-01T13:09:37Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Gardner’s Method for Syllogistic
Método de Gardner Para a Silogística
title Gardner’s Method for Syllogistic
spellingShingle Gardner’s Method for Syllogistic
Sautter, Frank Thomas
Keywords
Syllogism
Rule
Proposition of existence
Diagrammatic method.
Silogismo
Regra
Proposição de existência
Método diagramático.
title_short Gardner’s Method for Syllogistic
title_full Gardner’s Method for Syllogistic
title_fullStr Gardner’s Method for Syllogistic
title_full_unstemmed Gardner’s Method for Syllogistic
title_sort Gardner’s Method for Syllogistic
author Sautter, Frank Thomas
author_facet Sautter, Frank Thomas
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sautter, Frank Thomas
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Keywords
Syllogism
Rule
Proposition of existence
Diagrammatic method.
Silogismo
Regra
Proposição de existência
Método diagramático.
topic Keywords
Syllogism
Rule
Proposition of existence
Diagrammatic method.
Silogismo
Regra
Proposição de existência
Método diagramático.
description Martin Gardner introduced, in the 1950s, a method by digraphs for classical proposition allogic. He proposed, as an open problem, the adaptation of the method for syllogistic. In this paper I answer in the affirmative to Gardner’s question. The resulting method reinforces theses presented in previous works, namely that the validity of syllogisms follows from applications of only two rules, and because it reveals a much smaller number of valid syllogistic forms than suggested by the division in figures and moods, this division is artificial. Furthermore, it highlights the very different nature of two types of components of syllogisms(propositions of existence and rules for passing from a proposition of existence to another), whose distinction has been spontaneously acknowledged in its use by philosophers and jurists. Finally, it demonstrates that BRAMANTIP, amood of the fourth figure should be considered a weakened valid syllogism.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-03-12
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/18374
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/18374
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/18374/13728
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 14 No. 2 (2013); 221-234
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 14 n. 2 (2013); 221-234
2316-5278
1518-7187
reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
collection Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revcognitio@gmail.com
_version_ 1803387421355671552