Gardner-Peirce Method for Syllogistic

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sautter, Frank Thomas
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/36778
Resumo: The Gardner Method – a digraph method for Syllogistic – implements the conception of categorical propositions as expressions of subordination and non-subordination between pairs of concepts; in it, the representation of the universal propositions is more complex than the representation of the particular ones. In this work, I will develop an implementation of Syllogistic in which categorical propositions are expressions of instantiation and of non-instantiation of pairs of concepts. I will adapt the Beta System of Peirce’s Existential Graphs to the Gardner Method. This adaptation has the merit of equating the complexity of the representation of categorical propositions, but it introduces other drawbacks.
id PUC_SP-15_1473f7a30497e66732a6c9bfd349325e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/36778
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-15
network_name_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Gardner-Peirce Method for SyllogisticMétodo de Gardner-Peirce para a SilogísticaDiagrammatic methodExistential graphInstantiationSubordinationGrafo ExistencialInstanciaçãoMétodo DiagramáticoSubordinaçãoThe Gardner Method – a digraph method for Syllogistic – implements the conception of categorical propositions as expressions of subordination and non-subordination between pairs of concepts; in it, the representation of the universal propositions is more complex than the representation of the particular ones. In this work, I will develop an implementation of Syllogistic in which categorical propositions are expressions of instantiation and of non-instantiation of pairs of concepts. I will adapt the Beta System of Peirce’s Existential Graphs to the Gardner Method. This adaptation has the merit of equating the complexity of the representation of categorical propositions, but it introduces other drawbacks.O Método de Gardner – um método por dígrafos para a Silogística – implementa a concepção de proposições categóricas como expressões de subordinação e de não-subordinação entre pares de conceitos; nele, a representação das proposições universais é mais complexa do que a representação das proposições particulares. Neste trabalho desenvolverei uma implementação da Silogística na qual as proposições categóricas são expressões de instanciação e de não-instanciação de pares de conceitos. Adaptarei o Sistema Beta dos Grafos Existenciais de Peirce ao Método de Gardner. Essa adaptação tem o mérito de igualar a complexidade da representação das proposições categóricas, mas introduz outros inconvenientes.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2019-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/3677810.23925/2316-5278.2018v19i2p296-308Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 19 No. 2 (2018); 296-308Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 19 n. 2 (2018); 296-3082316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/36778/27843Copyright (c) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSautter, Frank Thomas2019-02-01T16:39:18Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/36778Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2019-02-01T16:39:18Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Gardner-Peirce Method for Syllogistic
Método de Gardner-Peirce para a Silogística
title Gardner-Peirce Method for Syllogistic
spellingShingle Gardner-Peirce Method for Syllogistic
Sautter, Frank Thomas
Diagrammatic method
Existential graph
Instantiation
Subordination
Grafo Existencial
Instanciação
Método Diagramático
Subordinação
title_short Gardner-Peirce Method for Syllogistic
title_full Gardner-Peirce Method for Syllogistic
title_fullStr Gardner-Peirce Method for Syllogistic
title_full_unstemmed Gardner-Peirce Method for Syllogistic
title_sort Gardner-Peirce Method for Syllogistic
author Sautter, Frank Thomas
author_facet Sautter, Frank Thomas
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sautter, Frank Thomas
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Diagrammatic method
Existential graph
Instantiation
Subordination
Grafo Existencial
Instanciação
Método Diagramático
Subordinação
topic Diagrammatic method
Existential graph
Instantiation
Subordination
Grafo Existencial
Instanciação
Método Diagramático
Subordinação
description The Gardner Method – a digraph method for Syllogistic – implements the conception of categorical propositions as expressions of subordination and non-subordination between pairs of concepts; in it, the representation of the universal propositions is more complex than the representation of the particular ones. In this work, I will develop an implementation of Syllogistic in which categorical propositions are expressions of instantiation and of non-instantiation of pairs of concepts. I will adapt the Beta System of Peirce’s Existential Graphs to the Gardner Method. This adaptation has the merit of equating the complexity of the representation of categorical propositions, but it introduces other drawbacks.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/36778
10.23925/2316-5278.2018v19i2p296-308
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/36778
identifier_str_mv 10.23925/2316-5278.2018v19i2p296-308
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/36778/27843
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 19 No. 2 (2018); 296-308
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 19 n. 2 (2018); 296-308
2316-5278
1518-7187
reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
collection Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revcognitio@gmail.com
_version_ 1803387421811802112

Registros relacionados