Pragmatic philosophizing: philosophizing for praxis or based on praxis?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Skarica, Mirko
Data de Publicação: 2013
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13212
Resumo: Often, contemporary philosophers such as Wittgenstein or Heidegger, are referred to as pragmatists, but there are also those who rebut such qualification, as Wittgenstein himself, for instance. To many, pragmatism consists in identifying the true with the useful, and it is in this sense that it is accepted or rejected. What should then be understood by pragmatic philosophy? This article proposes a distinction capable of delimiting the differences and problems that a pragmatist qualification may elicit. Basically, we suggest a distinction between the philosophizing for praxis and the philosophizing that has praxis, as such, as fundament of philosophical analysis, in the case of Heidegger, for instance, or some type of praxis, as linguistics, in the case of Wittgenstein.
id PUC_SP-15_ef4387ac6dd1ceab77a38a66abd8e44f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13212
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-15
network_name_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Pragmatic philosophizing: philosophizing for praxis or based on praxis?Filosofar Pragmático: ¿Filosofar para la Praxis o desde la Praxis?Contemporary philosophyPragmatismPraxisFilosofía contemporáneaPragmatismoPraxisOften, contemporary philosophers such as Wittgenstein or Heidegger, are referred to as pragmatists, but there are also those who rebut such qualification, as Wittgenstein himself, for instance. To many, pragmatism consists in identifying the true with the useful, and it is in this sense that it is accepted or rejected. What should then be understood by pragmatic philosophy? This article proposes a distinction capable of delimiting the differences and problems that a pragmatist qualification may elicit. Basically, we suggest a distinction between the philosophizing for praxis and the philosophizing that has praxis, as such, as fundament of philosophical analysis, in the case of Heidegger, for instance, or some type of praxis, as linguistics, in the case of Wittgenstein.Es frecuente calificar de pragmatistas a filósofos contemporáneos como Wittgenstein o Heidegger, pero también se puede leer el rechazo de tal calificación de parte de alguno de ellos, como en el caso del mismo Wittgenstein, por ejemplo. Para muchos el pragmatismo consiste en identificar lo verdadero con lo útil, y en tal sentido se suele aceptarlo o rechazarlo. ¿Qué se ha de entender por filosofar pragmático? El presente artículo propone una distinción que puede delimitar las diferencias y problemas que pueda suscitar la calificación de pragmatista. Básicamente se sugiere hacer la distinción entre el filosofar en orden a la praxis y filosofar poniendo como fundamento del análisis filosófico la praxis como tal, en el caso de Heidegger, por ejemplo, o algún tipo de praxis, como la lingüística, en el caso de Wittgenstein.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2013-01-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13212Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2004); 100-110Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 5 n. 1 (2004); 100-1102316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13212/9733Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSkarica, Mirko2024-07-01T13:09:31Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13212Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2024-07-01T13:09:31Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Pragmatic philosophizing: philosophizing for praxis or based on praxis?
Filosofar Pragmático: ¿Filosofar para la Praxis o desde la Praxis?
title Pragmatic philosophizing: philosophizing for praxis or based on praxis?
spellingShingle Pragmatic philosophizing: philosophizing for praxis or based on praxis?
Skarica, Mirko
Contemporary philosophy
Pragmatism
Praxis
Filosofía contemporánea
Pragmatismo
Praxis
title_short Pragmatic philosophizing: philosophizing for praxis or based on praxis?
title_full Pragmatic philosophizing: philosophizing for praxis or based on praxis?
title_fullStr Pragmatic philosophizing: philosophizing for praxis or based on praxis?
title_full_unstemmed Pragmatic philosophizing: philosophizing for praxis or based on praxis?
title_sort Pragmatic philosophizing: philosophizing for praxis or based on praxis?
author Skarica, Mirko
author_facet Skarica, Mirko
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Skarica, Mirko
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Contemporary philosophy
Pragmatism
Praxis
Filosofía contemporánea
Pragmatismo
Praxis
topic Contemporary philosophy
Pragmatism
Praxis
Filosofía contemporánea
Pragmatismo
Praxis
description Often, contemporary philosophers such as Wittgenstein or Heidegger, are referred to as pragmatists, but there are also those who rebut such qualification, as Wittgenstein himself, for instance. To many, pragmatism consists in identifying the true with the useful, and it is in this sense that it is accepted or rejected. What should then be understood by pragmatic philosophy? This article proposes a distinction capable of delimiting the differences and problems that a pragmatist qualification may elicit. Basically, we suggest a distinction between the philosophizing for praxis and the philosophizing that has praxis, as such, as fundament of philosophical analysis, in the case of Heidegger, for instance, or some type of praxis, as linguistics, in the case of Wittgenstein.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-01-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13212
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13212
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13212/9733
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2004); 100-110
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 5 n. 1 (2004); 100-110
2316-5278
1518-7187
reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
collection Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revcognitio@gmail.com
_version_ 1803387420471721984