Pragmatic philosophizing: philosophizing for praxis or based on praxis?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13212 |
Resumo: | Often, contemporary philosophers such as Wittgenstein or Heidegger, are referred to as pragmatists, but there are also those who rebut such qualification, as Wittgenstein himself, for instance. To many, pragmatism consists in identifying the true with the useful, and it is in this sense that it is accepted or rejected. What should then be understood by pragmatic philosophy? This article proposes a distinction capable of delimiting the differences and problems that a pragmatist qualification may elicit. Basically, we suggest a distinction between the philosophizing for praxis and the philosophizing that has praxis, as such, as fundament of philosophical analysis, in the case of Heidegger, for instance, or some type of praxis, as linguistics, in the case of Wittgenstein. |
id |
PUC_SP-15_ef4387ac6dd1ceab77a38a66abd8e44f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13212 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-15 |
network_name_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Pragmatic philosophizing: philosophizing for praxis or based on praxis?Filosofar Pragmático: ¿Filosofar para la Praxis o desde la Praxis?Contemporary philosophyPragmatismPraxisFilosofía contemporáneaPragmatismoPraxisOften, contemporary philosophers such as Wittgenstein or Heidegger, are referred to as pragmatists, but there are also those who rebut such qualification, as Wittgenstein himself, for instance. To many, pragmatism consists in identifying the true with the useful, and it is in this sense that it is accepted or rejected. What should then be understood by pragmatic philosophy? This article proposes a distinction capable of delimiting the differences and problems that a pragmatist qualification may elicit. Basically, we suggest a distinction between the philosophizing for praxis and the philosophizing that has praxis, as such, as fundament of philosophical analysis, in the case of Heidegger, for instance, or some type of praxis, as linguistics, in the case of Wittgenstein.Es frecuente calificar de pragmatistas a filósofos contemporáneos como Wittgenstein o Heidegger, pero también se puede leer el rechazo de tal calificación de parte de alguno de ellos, como en el caso del mismo Wittgenstein, por ejemplo. Para muchos el pragmatismo consiste en identificar lo verdadero con lo útil, y en tal sentido se suele aceptarlo o rechazarlo. ¿Qué se ha de entender por filosofar pragmático? El presente artículo propone una distinción que puede delimitar las diferencias y problemas que pueda suscitar la calificación de pragmatista. Básicamente se sugiere hacer la distinción entre el filosofar en orden a la praxis y filosofar poniendo como fundamento del análisis filosófico la praxis como tal, en el caso de Heidegger, por ejemplo, o algún tipo de praxis, como la lingüística, en el caso de Wittgenstein.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2013-01-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13212Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2004); 100-110Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 5 n. 1 (2004); 100-1102316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13212/9733Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSkarica, Mirko2024-07-01T13:09:31Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13212Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2024-07-01T13:09:31Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Pragmatic philosophizing: philosophizing for praxis or based on praxis? Filosofar Pragmático: ¿Filosofar para la Praxis o desde la Praxis? |
title |
Pragmatic philosophizing: philosophizing for praxis or based on praxis? |
spellingShingle |
Pragmatic philosophizing: philosophizing for praxis or based on praxis? Skarica, Mirko Contemporary philosophy Pragmatism Praxis Filosofía contemporánea Pragmatismo Praxis |
title_short |
Pragmatic philosophizing: philosophizing for praxis or based on praxis? |
title_full |
Pragmatic philosophizing: philosophizing for praxis or based on praxis? |
title_fullStr |
Pragmatic philosophizing: philosophizing for praxis or based on praxis? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pragmatic philosophizing: philosophizing for praxis or based on praxis? |
title_sort |
Pragmatic philosophizing: philosophizing for praxis or based on praxis? |
author |
Skarica, Mirko |
author_facet |
Skarica, Mirko |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Skarica, Mirko |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Contemporary philosophy Pragmatism Praxis Filosofía contemporánea Pragmatismo Praxis |
topic |
Contemporary philosophy Pragmatism Praxis Filosofía contemporánea Pragmatismo Praxis |
description |
Often, contemporary philosophers such as Wittgenstein or Heidegger, are referred to as pragmatists, but there are also those who rebut such qualification, as Wittgenstein himself, for instance. To many, pragmatism consists in identifying the true with the useful, and it is in this sense that it is accepted or rejected. What should then be understood by pragmatic philosophy? This article proposes a distinction capable of delimiting the differences and problems that a pragmatist qualification may elicit. Basically, we suggest a distinction between the philosophizing for praxis and the philosophizing that has praxis, as such, as fundament of philosophical analysis, in the case of Heidegger, for instance, or some type of praxis, as linguistics, in the case of Wittgenstein. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-01-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13212 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13212 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13212/9733 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2004); 100-110 Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 5 n. 1 (2004); 100-110 2316-5278 1518-7187 reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revcognitio@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803387420471721984 |